Adolescent and Young Adult Oncology Progress Review Group. Closing the gap: Research and care implications for adolescents and young adults with cancer. 2006.
2.
YouL, LvZ, LiC, et al.Worldwide cancer statistics of adolescents and young adults in 2019: A systematic analysis of the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. ESMO Open, 2021; 6(5):100255; doi: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2021.100255
3.
TonorezosES, OeffingerKC. Research challenges in adolescent and young adult cancer survivor research. Cancer, 2011; 117(SUPPL. 10):2295–2300; doi: 10.1002/cncr.26058
4.
WuMJ, ZhaoK, Fils-AimeF. Response rates of online surveys in published research: A meta-analysis. Computers in Human Behavior Reports, 2022; 7(May):100206; doi: 10.1016/j.chbr.2022.100206
5.
DaikelerJ, BosnjakM, ManfredaKL. Web versus other survey modes: An updated and extended meta-analysis comparing response rates. J Surv Stat Methodol, 2020; 8(3):513–539; doi: 10.1093/jssam/smz008
6.
HokkeS, HackworthNJ, QuinN, et al.Ethical issues in using the internet to engage participants in family and child research: A scoping review. PLoS One, 2018; 13(9):e0204572–30; doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0204572
7.
HarlanLC, LynchCF, KeeganTHM, et al.AYA HOPE Study Collaborative Group. Recruitment and follow-up of adolescent and young adult cancer survivors: The AYA HOPE study. J Cancer Surviv, 2011; 5(3):305–314; doi: 10.1007/s11764-011-0173-y
8.
RichterD, CleverK, Mehnert-TheuerkaufA, et al.Fear of recurrence in young adult cancer patients—A network analysis. Cancers (Basel), 2022; 14(9):1–12; doi: 10.3390/cancers14092092
9.
World Medical Association. WMA declaration of Helsinki - Ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. 2022.
10.
BechmannA, ZimmerM, et al.Internet research: Ethical guidelines 3.0 association of internet researchers. 2020.
11.
FaccaD, SmithMJ, ShelleyJ, et al.Exploring the ethical issues in research using digital data collection strategies with minors: A scoping review. PLoS One, 2020; 15(8):e0237875–17; doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0237875
12.
British Psychological Society. Ethics Guidelines for Internet-Mediated Research. British Psychological Society: Leicester; 2021.
13.
MackenzieE, BergerN, HolmesK, et al.Online educational research with middle adolescent populations: Ethical considerations and recommendations. Res Ethics, 2021; 17(2):217–227; doi: 10.1177/1747016120963160
14.
Diário da República. Lei n.o, 2019; 58/(2019).
15.
Associación Española de Pediatria. Consentimiento informado en niños y jóvenes. 2019.
16.
NHS. Children and young people: Consent to treatment. 2022.
17.
HarrisJ, PorcellatoL. Opt-out parental consent in online surveys: Ethical considerations. J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics, 2018; 13(3):223–229; doi: 10.1177/1556264618766953
18.
KotilainenS. Methods in Practice: Studying Children and Youth Online. 1st ed. (KotilainenS. ed). Leibniz-Institut für Medienforschung | Hans-Bredow-Institut (HBI): Hamburg; 2022.
19.
SmithDMY, LipsonSM, WangSB, et al.Online methods in adolescent self-injury research: Challenges and recommendations. J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol, 2022; 51(2):143–154; doi: 10.1080/15374416.2021.1875325
20.
Department of Health and Human Services. US Code of Federal Regulations, 45 CFR 46. 1983.
21.
OlssonM, SteineckG, EnskarK, et al.Adolescent and young adult cancer survivors’ perceptions of participating in a survey—Ethical and methodological considerations. Eur J Oncol Nurs, 2019; 39:55–61; doi: 10.1016/j.ejon.2019.02.001
22.
TaylorRM, WhelanJS, GibsonF, et al.Core Consumer Group (CCG) and National Cancer Research Institute Teenage and Young Adult Clinical Studies Group (NCRI TYA CSG). Involving young people in BRIGHTLIGHT from study inception to secondary data analysis: Insights from 10 years of user involvement. Res Involv Engagem, 2018; 4(1):50–14; doi: 10.1186/s40900-018-0135-x
