The financial burden resulting from cancers on families is higher when it arises in young people compared with older adults. Previous research has provided insight into the financial toxicities associated with childhood cancer, but less is known about the efficacy of financial aid systems in reducing the financial burden on families. We conducted a scoping review to identify the determinants of success and failure of financial aid.
Methods:
Five databases were searched for articles published between January 1, 2000 and December 1, 2022. Dual processes were used to screen and select studies. Through thematic content analysis, we identified barriers and enablers of financial aid, categorised by country income level.
Results:
From 17 articles, which were evenly split between high-income countries and upper middle- to low-income countries, four major themes emerged: (1) accessibility of support, (2) delivery of support, (3) administration, and (4) psychosocial factors. Within these themes, the enablers identified were (1) support navigators, (2) establishing a direct contact between donors and beneficiaries, (3) implementation of digital solutions to improve outreach, and (4) using cultural and community values to encourage donor engagement.
Conclusions:
This scoping review identified the determinants of success and failure of financial aid in supporting families in the context of childhood, adolescent, and young adult (CAYA) cancers. By understanding the barriers and enablers identified in this review, organizations could develop pragmatic evidence-based care models and policies to ensure access to assistance is equitable and appropriate for families experiencing CAYA cancers.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
GibbinsJ, SteinhardtK, BeinartH. A systematic review of qualitative studies exploring the experience of parents whose child is diagnosed and treated for cancer. J Pediatr Oncol Nurs, 2012; 29(5):253–271; doi: 10.1177/1043454212452791
2.
ZafarSY, McNeilRB, ThomasCM, et al.Population-based assessment of cancer survivors' financial burden and quality of life: A prospective cohort study. J Oncol Pract, 2015; 11(2):145–150; doi: 10.1200/JOP.2014.001542
3.
DusetzinaSB, WinnAN, AbelGA, et al.Cost sharing and adherence to tyrosine kinase inhibitors for patients with chronic myeloid leukemia. J Clin Oncol, 2014; 32(4):306–311; doi: 10.1200/JCO.2013.52.9123
4.
KaisaengN, HarpeSE, CarrollNV. Out-of-pocket costs and oral cancer medication discontinuation in the elderly. J Manag Care Spec Pharm, 2014; 20(7):669–675; doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2014.20.7.669
5.
ZafarSY, PeppercornJM, SchragD, et al.The financial toxicity of cancer treatment: A pilot study assessing out-of-pocket expenses and the insured cancer patient's experience. Oncologist, 2013; 18(4):381–390; doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2012-0279
6.
TsimicalisA, StevensB, UngarWJ, et al.The cost of childhood cancer from the family's perspective: A critical review. Pediatr Blood Cancer, 2011; 56(5):707–717; doi: 10.1002/pbc.22685
7.
IragorriN, de OliveiraC, FitzgeraldN, et al.The out-of-pocket cost burden of cancer care—A systematic literature review. Curr Oncol, 2021; 28(2):1216–1248; doi: 10.3390/curroncol28020117
8.
SyseA, LarsenIK, TretliS. Does cancer in a child affect parents' employment and earnings? A population-based study. Cancer Epidemiol, 2011; 35(3):298–305; doi: 10.1016/j.canep.2010.08.002
9.
OkadaH, MaruM, MaedaR, et al.Impact of childhood cancer on maternal employment in Japan. Cancer Nurs, 2015; 38(1):23–30; doi: 10.1097/ncc.0000000000000123
10.
NorbergAL, MontgomerySM, BottaiM, et al.Short-term and long-term effects of childhood cancer on income from employment and employment status: A national cohort study in Sweden. Cancer, 2017; 123(7):1238–1248; doi: 10.1002/cncr.30436
11.
ÖhmanM, WoodfordJ, von EssenL. Socioeconomic consequences of parenting a child with cancer for fathers and mothers in Sweden: A population-based difference-in-difference study. Int J Cancer, 2021; 148(10):2535–2541; doi: 10.1002/ijc.33444
12.
HiyoshiA, MontgomeryS, BottaiM, et al.Trajectories of income and social benefits for mothers and fathers of children with cancer: A national cohort study in Sweden. Cancer, 2018; 124(7):1492–1500; doi: 10.1002/cncr.31123
13.
RoserK, ErdmannF, MichelG, et al.The impact of childhood cancer on parents' socio-economic situation—A systematic review. Psychooncology, 2019; 28(6):1207–1226; doi: 10.1002/pon.5088
14.
PlessisJ, StonesD, MeiringM. Family experiences of oncological palliative and supportive care in children: Can we do better?. Int J Palliat Nurs, 2019; 25(9):421–430; doi: 10.12968/ijpn.2019.25.9.421
15.
DusselV, BonaK, HeathJA, et al.Unmeasured costs of a child's death: Perceived financial burden, work disruptions, and economic coping strategies used by American and Australian families who lost children to cancer. J Clin Oncol, 2011; 29(8):1007; doi: 10.1200%2FJCO.2009.27.8960
16.
BilodeauM, MaC, Al-SayeghH, et al.Household material hardship in families of children post-chemotherapy. Pediatr Blood Cancer, 2018; 65(1):e26743; doi: 10.1002/pbc.26743
17.
PaiAL, GreenleyRN, LewandowskiA, et al.A meta-analytic review of the influence of pediatric cancer on parent and family functioning. J Fam Psychol, 2007; 21(3):407; doi: 10.1037/0893-3200.21.3.407
18.
von EssenL, EnskärK, SkolinI. Important aspects of care and assistance for parents of children, 0–18years of age, on or off treatment for cancer. Parent and nurse perceptions. Eur J Oncol Nurs, 2001; 5(4):254–264; doi: 10.1054/ejon.2001.0151
19.
WakefieldC, McLooneJ, ButowP, et al.Support after the completion of cancer treatment: Perspectives of Australian adolescents and their families. Eur J Cancer Care, 2013; 22(4):530–539; doi: 10.1111/ecc.12059
20.
PetriwskyjA, FranzJ, AdkinsB. Parents, services and system: An exploration of power dynamics in future planning among parent carers for people with disability. Disabil Soc, 2016; 31(8):1081–1097; doi: 10.1080/09687599.2016.1234367
21.
DeaneK.National People with Disabilities and Carer Council. National People with Disabilities and Carer Council, Department of Families, Housing, Community Services and Indigenous Affairs: Canberra; 2009.
22.
SpallP, McDonaldC, ZetlinD. Fixing the system? The experience of service users of the quasi-market in disability services in Australia. Health Soc Care Community, 2005; 13(1):56–63; doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2524.2005.00529.x
23.
GordonLG, MerolliniKM, LoweA, et al.A systematic review of financial toxicity among cancer survivors: We can't pay the co-pay. Patient, 2017; 10(3):295–309; doi: 10.1007/s40271-016-0204-x
24.
LongoCJ, FitchMI, BanfieldL, et al.Financial toxicity associated with a cancer diagnosis in publicly funded healthcare countries: A systematic review. Support Care Cancer, 2020; 28:4645–4665; doi: 10.1007/s00520-020-05620-9
25.
BobyJM, RajappaS, MathewA. Financial toxicity in cancer care in India: A systematic review. Lancet Oncol, 2021; 22(12):e541–e549; doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(21)00468-X
26.
MoffattS, NobleE, WhiteM. Addressing the financial consequences of cancer: Qualitative evaluation of a welfare rights advice service. PLoS One, 2012; 7(8):e42979; doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0042979
27.
TriccoAC, LillieE, ZarinW, et al.PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and explanation. Ann Intern Med, 2018; 169(7):467–473; doi: 10.7326/M18-0850
28.
HupeM. EndNote X9. J Electron Resour Med Lib, 2019; 16(3–4):117–119; doi: 10.1080/15424065.2019.1691963
29.
OuzzaniM, HammadyH, FedorowiczZ, et al.Rayyan—A web and mobile app for systematic reviews. Syst Rev, 2016; 5:1–10; doi: 10.1186/s13643-016-0384-4
30.
DanielG, WakefieldCE, RyanB, et al.Accommodation in pediatric oncology: Parental experiences, preferences and unmet needs. Rural Remote Health, 2013; 13(2):1–9.
31.
SutherlandG, ChowA, ChowT, et al.A review of Leila Rose Foundation support for families affected by rare childhood cancer in Australia over the past decade. Cancer Rep, 2022; 5(6):e1381; doi: 10.1002/cnr2.1381
32.
McNeilRJ, McCarthyM, DuntD, et al.Financial challenges of cancer for adolescents and young adults and their parent caregivers. Social Work Res, 2019; 43(1):17–30; doi: 10.1093/swr/svy027
33.
PannierST, WarnerEL, FowlerB, et al.Age-specific patient navigation preferences among adolescents and young adults with cancer. J Cancer Educ, 2019; 34:242–251; doi: 10.1007/s13187-017-1294-4
34.
RagavanMV, MoraRV, WinderK, et al.Impact of a comprehensive financial resource on financial toxicity in a national, multiethnic sample of adult, adolescent/young adult, and pediatric patients with cancer. JCO Oncol Pract, 2023; 19(2):e286–e297; doi: 10.1200/op.22.00350
35.
LarsenHB, HeilmannC, JohansenC, et al.Socially disadvantaged parents of children treated with allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT): Report from a supportive intervention study, Denmark. Eur J Oncol Nurs, 2013; 17(3):302–310; doi: 10.1016/j.ejon.2012.08.003
36.
NgKH, OwR. Meeting healthcare costs: The case of childhood cancer in Singapore. Int J Social Welfare, 2005; 14(1):33–43; doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2397.2005.00337.x
37.
JatiaS, PrasadM, ParadkarA, et al.Holistic support coupled with prospective tracking reduces abandonment in childhood cancers: A report from India. Pediatr Blood Cancer, 2019; 66(6):e27716; doi: 10.1002/pbc.27716
38.
AgarwalaS, BhatnagarV, MitraD. Generating finances for the chemotherapy of children with cancer. Natl Med J India, 2000; 13(2):94–95.
39.
MostertS, SitaresmiMN, GundyCM, et al.Does aid reach the poor? Experiences of a childhood leukaemia outreach-programme. Eur J Cancer, 2009; 45(3):414–419; doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2008.09.018
40.
WangJ, HowellD, ShenN, et al.mHealth supportive care intervention for parents of children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia: Quasi-experimental pre-and postdesign study. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth, 2018; 6(11):e9981; doi: 10.2196/mhealth.9981
41.
RossellN, SalaverriaC, HernandezA, et al.Community resources support adherence to treatment for childhood cancer in El Salvador. J Psychosoc Oncol, 2018; 36(3):319–332; doi: 10.1080/07347332.2018.1427174
42.
ZuletaV, BerlinerJ, RossellN, et al.Securing continuation of treatment for children with cancer in times of social unrest and pandemic. Cancer Rep, 2022; 5(6):e1430; doi: 10.1002/cnr2.1430
43.
AhmedAM, A-RahmanNHA. Hawadith street initiative: A unique Sudanese childhood charity experience. Sudan J Paediatr, 2015; 15(2):9–15.
44.
PaulC, BoyesA, HallA, et al.The impact of cancer diagnosis and treatment on employment, income, treatment decisions and financial assistance and their relationship to socioeconomic and disease factors. Support Care Cancer, 2016; 24(11):4739–4746; doi: 10.1007/s00520-016-3323-y
45.
FitchMI, SharpL, HanlyP, et al.Experiencing financial toxicity associated with cancer in publicly funded healthcare systems: A systematic review of qualitative studies. J Cancer Surviv, 2022; 16(2):314–328; doi: 10.1007/s11764-021-01025-7
46.
MoffattS, NobleE, ExleyC. “Done more for me in a fortnight than anybody done in all me life.” How welfare rights advice can help people with cancer. BMC Health Serv Res, 2010; 10:259; doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-10-259
47.
HegneyD, Pearce SRO, GERS-CLARKC, et al.Close, but still too far. The experience of Australian people with cancer commuting from a regional to a capital city for radiotherapy treatment. Eur J Cancer Care, 2005; 14(1):75–82; doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2354.2005.00525.x
48.
ShahidS, FinnL, BessarabD, et al.‘Nowhere to room… nobody told them’: Logistical and cultural impediments to aboriginal peoples' participation in cancer treatment. Aust Health Rev, 2011; 35(2):235–241; doi: 10.1071/AH09835
49.
ByrneJ, CampbellH, GilchristM, et al.Barriers to care for breast cancer: A qualitative study in Ireland. Eur J Cancer Care, 2018; 27(5):e12876; doi: 10.1111/ecc.12876
50.
Ó CéilleachairA, CostelloL, FinnC, et al.Inter-relationships between the economic and emotional consequences of colorectal cancer for patients and their families: A qualitative study. BMC Gastroenterol, 2012; 12:62; doi: 10.1186/1471-230X-12-62
51.
TimmonsA, Gooberman-HillR, SharpL. The multidimensional nature of the financial and economic burden of a cancer diagnosis on patients and their families: Qualitative findings from a country with a mixed public–private healthcare system. Support Care Cancer, 2013; 21(1):107–117; doi: 10.1007/s00520-012-1498-4
52.
LongoCJ, FitchM, GrignonM, et al.Understanding the full breadth of cancer-related patient costs in Ontario: A qualitative exploration. Support Care Cancer, 2016; 24:4541–4548; doi: 10.1007/s00520-016-3293-0
53.
AmirZ, WilsonK, HenningsJ, et al.The meaning of cancer: Implications for family finances and consequent impact on lifestyle, activities, roles and relationships. Psychooncology, 2012; 21(11):1167–1174; doi: 10.1002/pon.2021
54.
TimmonsA, Gooberman-HillR, SharpL. “It's at a time in your life when you are most vulnerable”: A qualitative exploration of the financial impact of a cancer diagnosis and implications for financial protection in health. PLoS One, 2013; 8(11):e77549; doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0077549
55.
Gage-BouchardEA, LaValleyS, MollicaM, et al.Cancer communication on social media: Examining how cancer caregivers use Facebook for cancer-related communication. Cancer Nurs, 2017; 40(4):332–338; doi: 10.1097/ncc.0000000000000418
56.
LindsayB, GitelmanB. Communication technology and social media: Opportunities and implications for healthcare systems. Online J Issues Nurs, 2012; 17(3):3; doi: 10.3912/OJIN.Vol17No03Man03
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
