This study explored self-reported substance use and factors associated with use among adolescents with and without cancer.
Methods:
Adolescents (aged 13–19) receiving cancer treatment at a Mid-Atlantic children's hospital (n=103) and healthy peers (n=98) answered questions about substance use (drinking or drug use in past 4 months) and psychosocial variables. Parents completed demographic and family functioning questionnaires.
Results:
Healthy adolescents reported more substance use (n=17) than adolescents with cancer (n=8). Associates of substance use in adolescents with cancer included more avoidant and substance use-related coping, less positive affect, worse parent-reported family functioning, and less nausea.
Conclusion:
Substance use and its health implications in adolescent oncology need enhanced awareness, intervention and prevention efforts, and further research.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
MorganS, DaviesS, PalmerSet al.Sex, drugs, and rock ’n’ roll: caring for adolescents and young adults with cancer. J Clin Oncol., 2010; 28,32:4825–30.
2.
JohnstonL, O'MalleyPM, BachmanJGet al.Monitoring the future national results on adolescent drug use: overview of key findings, 2011. Ann Arbor, Michigan: Institute for Social Research, The University of Michigan, 2012.
3.
KloskyJL, TycVL, Garces-WebbDMet al.Emerging issues in smoking among adolescent and adult cancer survivors: a comprehensive review. Cancer, 2007; 110,11:2408–19.
4.
PalmerS, ThomasD. A practice framework for working with 15–25 year-old cancer patients treated within the adult health sector. Melbourne, Australia: OnTrac@PeterMac Adolescent and Young Adult Cancer Service, 2008.
5.
CarpentierMY, MullinsLL, ElkinTDet al.Prevalence of multiple health-related behaviors in adolescents with cancer. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol., 2008; 30,12:902–7.
6.
CarpentierMY, MullinsLL, ElkinTDet al.Predictors of health-harming and health-protective behaviors in adolescents with cancer. Pediatr Blood Cancer, 2008; 51,4:525–30.
7.
TycVL, LensingS, KloskyJet al.A comparison of tobacco-related risk factors between adolescents with and without cancer. J Pediatr Psychol., 2005; 30,4:359–70.
8.
KloskyJL, HowellCR, LiZet al.Risky health behavior among adolescents in the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study Cohort. J Pediatr Psychol., 2012; 37,6:634–46.
9.
HollenPJ, HobbieW, DonnangeloSFet al.Substance use risk behaviors and decision-making skills among cancer-surviving adolescents. J Pediatr Oncol Nurs., 2007; 24,5:264–73.
10.
BauldC, ToumbourouJW, AndersonVet al.Health-risk behaviours among adolescent survivors of childhood cancer. Pediatr Blood Cancer, 2005; 45,5:706–15.
11.
CoxCL, McLaughlinRA, SteenBDet al.Predicting and modifying substance use in childhood cancer survivors: application of a conceptual model. Oncol Nurs Forum., 2007; 33,1:51–60.
12.
KahalleyLS, RobinsonLA, TycVLet al.Risk factors for smoking among adolescent survivors of childhood cancer: a report from the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study. Pediatr Blood Cancer, 2012; 58,3:428–34.
13.
BiernackiP, WaldorfD. Snowball sampling: problems and techniques of chain referral sampling. Socio Meth Res., 1981; 10,2:141–63.
14.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. The 2009 HHS poverty guidelines. Federal Register, 2009; 74,14:4199–201.
15.
WerbaB, HobbieW, KazakAet al.Classifying the intensity of pediatric cancer treatment protocols: the intensity of treatment rating scale 2.0 (ITR-2)Pediatr Blood Cancer, 2007; 48,7:673–77.
16.
KazakAE, StuberML, BarakatLPet al.Predicting posttraumatic stress symptoms in mothers and fathers of survivors of childhood cancers. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry., 1998; 37,8:823–31.
17.
CompasBE, DavisGE, ForsytheCJet al.Assessment of major and daily stressful events during adolescence: the Adolescent Perceived Events Scale. J Consult Clin Psychol., 1987; 55,4:534–41.
18.
CarverCS. You want to measure coping but your protocol's too long: consider the Brief COPE. Int J Behav Med., 1997; 4,1:92–100.
19.
HaskingP, LyversM, CarlopioC. The relationship between coping strategies, alcohol expectancies, drinking motives, and drinking behavior. Addict Behav., 2011; 36,5:479–87.
20.
VarniJW, SeidM, RodeCA. The PedsQL: measurement model for the pediatric quality of life inventory. Med Care., 1999; 37,2:126–39.
21.
WatsonD, ClarkLA, TellegenA. Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: the PANAS scales. J Pers Soc Psychol., 1988; 54,6:1063–70.
22.
EpsteinNB, BaldwinL, BishopDS. The McMaster Family Assessment Device. J Marital Fam Ther., 1983; 9,2:171–80.
23.
AllenJP, ChangoJ, SzewdoDet al.Predictors of susceptibility to peer influence regarding substance use in adolescence. Child Dev., 2012; 83,1:337–50.
24.
WillsTA, ShiffmanS. Coping and substance use: a conceptual framework. Coping and substance use. ShiffmanS, WillsTA. Orlando, FL: Academic Press Inc., 1985; 3–24.
