Improvements in cancer outcomes for adolescents and young adults with cancer lag behind those of other age groups, and few psychosocial interventions have been developed specifically for this population. This study sought to explore both adolescent cancer patients' interest in engaging in a participatory study and their perceived coping needs.
Methods:
Applying a grounded theory and participatory action approach, cancer patients aged 13–19 years who were at least 3 months post-diagnosis at a tertiary pediatric oncology service were invited for group discussions and activities involving a t-shirt design and blog. Inductive coding and thematic analysis were applied to session transcripts.
Results:
Four themes were elicited regarding coping with cancer as an adolescent: adjustments related to physical and social participation, social perceptions, physical effects, and health-related communication needs. Peer-to-peer messages aligned with shared coping strategies, particularly featuring elements of humor and resilience while connecting to culture and redefining one's individual and group identity.
Conclusion:
Participatory methods can be effective in eliciting perceptions and needs in adolescents with cancer, and warrant further attention in research efforts to define and assess interventions and patient-reported outcomes for adolescents with chronic disease.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
ZebrackB, BleyerA, AlbrittonKet al.Assessing the health care needs of adolescent and young adult cancer patients and survivors. Cancer, 2006; 107,12:2915–23.
2.
BleyerA, O'LearyM, BarrR, RiesLAG. Cancer epidemiology in older adolescents and young adults 15 to 29 years of age, including SEER incidence and survival: 1975–2000 (NIH Publication No. 06-5767)Bethesda, MD: National Cancer Institute, 2006.
3.
EvanEE, ZeltzerLK. Psychosocial dimensions of cancer in adolescents and young adults. Cancer, 2006; 107,7 Suppl:1663–71.
4.
AlbrittonK, BleyerWA. The management of cancer in the older adolescent. Eur J Cancer, 2003; 39,18:2584–99.
5.
KondrynHJ, EdmondsonCL, HillJ, EdenTO. Treatment non-adherence in teenage and young adult patients with cancer. Lancet Oncol., 2011; 12,1:100–8.
6.
MorganS, DaviesS, PalmerS, PlasterM. Sex, drugs, and rock ’n’ roll: caring for adolescents and young adults with cancer. J Clin Oncol., 2010; 28,32:4825–30.
7.
ZebrackBJ. Psychological, social, and behavioral issues for young adults with cancer. Cancer, 2011; 117,10 Suppl:2289–94.
8.
D'AgostinoNM, PenneyA, ZebrackB. Providing developmentally appropriate psychosocial care to adolescent and young adult cancer survivors. Cancer, 2011; 117,10 Suppl:2329–34.
9.
ZebrackB, Mathews-BradshawB, SiegelS. Quality cancer care for adolescents and young adults: a position statement. J Clin Oncol., 2010; 28,32:4862–7.
10.
PiniS, Hugh-JonesS, GardnerPH. What effect does a cancer diagnosis have on the educational engagement and school life of teenagers? A systematic review. Psychooncology, 2012; 21,7:685–94.
11.
SeitzDC, BesierT, GoldbeckL. Psychosocial interventions for adolescent cancer patients: a systematic review of the literature. Psychooncology, 2009; 18,7:683–90.
12.
ZebrackB, HamiltonR, SmithAW. Psychosocial outcomes and service use among young adults with cancer. Semin Oncol., 2009; 36,5:468–77.
13.
DysonGJ, ThompsonK, PalmerSet al.The relationship between unmet needs and distress amongst young people with cancer. Support Care Cancer, 2012; 20,1:75–85.
14.
PalmerS, MitchellA, ThompsonK, SextonM. Unmet needs among adolescent cancer patients: a pilot study. Palliat Support Care, 2007; 5,2:127–34.
15.
ZebrackBJ, MillsJ, WeitzmanTS. Health and supportive care needs of young adult cancer patients and survivors. J Cancer Surviv., 2007; 1,2:137–45.
16.
MacdonaldJA, GagnonAJ, MitchellCet al.Include them and they will tell you: learnings from a participatory process with youth. Qual Health Res., 2011; 21,8:1127–35.
17.
KemmisS, McTaggartR. Participatory action research. DenzinNK, LincolnYS. The SAGE handbook of qualitative research, 3rd. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2005; 559–68.
18.
WrightMT, RocheB, von UngerHet al.A call for an international collaboration on participatory research for health. Health Promot Int., 2010; 25,1:115–22.
19.
HubbardG, KiddL, DonaghyEet al.A review of literature about involving people affected by cancer in research, policy and planning and practice. Patient Educ Couns., 2007; 65,1:21–33.
20.
WrightD, CornerJ, HopkinsonJ, FosterC. Listening to the views of people affected by cancer about cancer research: an example of participatory research in setting the cancer research agenda. Health Expect., 2006; 9,1:3–12.
21.
GibsonF, AldissS, HorstmanMet al.Children and young people's experiences of cancer care: a qualitative research study using participatory methods. Int J Nurs Stud., 2010; 47,11:1397–407.
22.
UlinPR, RobinsonB, TolleyB. Qualitative methods in public health: a field guide for applied research. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 2005; 54–6.
23.
BarreraM, Damore-PetingolaS, FlemingC, MayerJ. Support and intervention groups for adolescents with cancer in two Ontario communities. Cancer, 2006; 107,7 Suppl:1680–5.
24.
StevensB, KaganS, YamadaJet al.Adventure therapy for adolescents with cancer. Pediatr Blood Cancer, 2004; 43,3:278–84.
25.
CassanoJ, NagelK, O'MaraL. Talking with others who “just know”: perceptions of adolescents with cancer who participate in a teen group. J Pediatr Oncol Nurs., 2008; 25,4:193–9.
26.
BirksM, ChapmanY, FrancisK. Memoing in qualitative research: probing data and processes. J Res Nurs., 2008; 13:68–75.
PopeC, ZieblandS, MaysN. Qualitative research in health care. Analysing qualitative data. BMJ, 2000; 320,7227:114–6.
29.
PopeC, ZieblandS, MayN. Analysing qualitative data. PopeC, MaysN. Qualitative research in health care, 3rd. Oxford: Blackwell, 2006; 63–81.
30.
ReevesS, KuperA, HodgesBD. Qualitative research methodologies: ethnography. BMJ, 2008; 337:a1020.
31.
ChirewaB. Development of a practical toolkit using participatory action research to address health inequalities through NGOs in the UK: challenges and lessons learned. Perspect Public Health, 2012; 132,5:228–34.
32.
TovarA, VikreEK, GuteDMet al.Development of the Live Well curriculum for recent immigrants: a community-based participatory approach. Prog Community Health Partnersh., 2012; 6,2:195–204.
33.
FitzgeraldE, Bunde-BirousteA, WebsterE. Through the eyes of children: engaging primary school-aged children in creating supportive school environments for physical activity and nutrition. Health Promot J Austr., 2009; 20,2:127–32.
34.
AbbotJM, PolicastroP, BruhnCet al.Development and evaluation of a university campus-based food safety media campaign for young adults. J Food Prot., 2012; 75,6:1117–24.
35.
TreadgoldCL, KuperbergA. Been there, done that, wrote the blog: the choices and challenges of supporting adolescents and young adults with cancer. J Clin Oncol., 2010; 28,32:4842–9.
36.
LoveB, CrookB, ThompsonCMet al.Exploring psychosocial support online: a content analysis of messages in an adolescent and young adult cancer community. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw., 2012; 15,10:555–9.
37.
TatesK, ZwaanswijkM, OttenRet al.Online focus groups as a tool to collect data in hard-to-include populations: examples from paediatric oncology. BMC Med Res Methodol., 2009; 9:15.
38.
Sansom-DalyUM, WakefieldCE, BryantRAet al.Online group-based cognitive-behavioural therapy for adolescents and young adults after cancer treatment: A multicenter randomized controlled trial of Recapture Life-AYA. BMC Cancer, 2012; 12,1:339.
