Strong mineral acids such as sulfuric acid are still mainly used to break down carbohydrates in processes that prepare plant-based waste for further use. However, researchers are increasingly studying the use of organic acids as alternatives. This study aimed to obtain organic compounds by fermenting a hemicellulosic extract rich in simple sugars from the organic acid pretreatment of brewer’ spent grain. Hydrolysis tests using 4.5% oxalic acid for 24 minutes at 125.6°C dissolved over 99% of the hemicellulose, producing 14.9 g/L of xylose and 4.9 g/L of glucose. The production of inhibitory compounds was relatively low (0.05 g/L and 0.12 g/L of 5-hydroxymethylfurfural and furfural, respectively), which is beneficial for the yeast’s performance during the next step. The extract was then fermented by three strains of Saccharomyces cerevisiae: one industrial strain (PE-2) and two genetically modified strains (MP-P5 and JDY-01). Despite the hydrolysate containing around 45 g/L of oxalic acid, which significantly inhibited yeast activity in producing ethanol, for example, the three strains still produced several important volatile organic compounds, including 2-phenylethanol, known for its antimicrobial properties, and 4-hydroxy-2-methylacetophenone, a phenolic compound with antioxidant and antiseptic properties.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
EvaristoRBW, CostaAA, NascimentoPGBD, et al.Biorefinery development based on brewers’ Spent Grain (BSG) Conversion: A forecasting technology study in the Brazilian scenario. Biomass, 2023; 3(3):217–237; doi: 10.3390/BIOMASS3030013
2.
MujtabaM, Fernandes FracetoL, FazeliM, et al.Lignocellulosic biomass from agricultural waste to the circular economy: A review with focus on biofuels, biocomposites and bioplastics. J Clean Prod, 2023; 402:136815; doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.136815
3.
DavisonBH, ParksJ, DavisMF, et al.Plant cell walls: Basics of structure, chemistry, accessibility and the influence on conversion. Aqueous Pretreat Plant Biomass Biol Chem Convers to Fuels Chem, 2013; 23–38; doi: 10.1002/9780470975831.CH3[Database]
4.
PasangulapatiV, RamachandriyaKD, KumarA, et al.Effects of cellulose, hemicellulose and lignin on thermochemical conversion characteristics of the selected biomass. Bioresour Technol, 2012; 114:663–669; doi: 10.1016/J.BIORTECH.2012.03.036
5.
VelvizhiG, JacquelinePJ, ShettiNP, et al.Emerging trends and advances in valorization of lignocellulosic biomass to biofuels. J Environ Manage, 2023; 345:118527; doi: 10.1016/J.JENVMAN.2023.118527
6.
Zeko-PivačA, TišmaM, Žnidaršič-PlazlP, et al.The potential of brewer’s spent grain in the circular bioeconomy: State of the art and future perspectives. Front Bioeng Biotechnol, 2022; 10:870744; doi: 10.3389/FBIOE.2022.870744
7.
MitriS, SalamehSJ, KhelfaA, et al.Valorization of Brewers’ spent grains: Pretreatments and fermentation, a review. Ferment, 2022; 8(2):50; doi: 10.3390/FERMENTATION8020050
8.
MussattoSI, RobertoIC. Acid hydrolysis and fermentation of brewer’s spent grain to produce xylitol. J Sci Food Agric, 2005; 85(14):2453–2460; doi: 10.1002/JSFA.2276
9.
MussattoSI. Brewer’s spent grain: A valuable feedstock for industrial applications. J Sci Food Agric, 2014; 94(7):1264–1275; doi: 10.1002/JSFA.6486
10.
SganzerlaWG, AmpeseLC, MussattoSI, et al.A bibliometric analysis on potential uses of brewer’s spent grains in a biorefinery for the circular economy transition of the beer industry. Biofuels Bioprod Bioref, 2021; 15(6):1965–1988; doi: 10.1002/BBB.2290
11.
AmorimC, SilvérioSC, SilvaSP, et al.Single-step production of arabino-xylooligosaccharides by recombinant Bacillus subtilis 3610 cultivated in brewers’ spent grain. Carbohydr Polym, 2018; 199:546–554; doi: 10.1016/J.CARBPOL.2018.07.017
12.
SchmidtAR, DreschAP, Alves JuniorSL, et al.Applications of Brewer’s spent grain hemicelluloses in biorefineries: Extraction and value-added product obtention. Catalysts, 2023; 13(4):755; doi: 10.3390/catal13040755
13.
SwartLJ, PetersenAM, BedzoOKK, et al.Techno-economic analysis of the valorization of brewers spent grains: Production of xylitol and xylo-oligosaccharides. J of Chemical Tech & Biotech, 2021; 96(6):1632–1644; doi: 10.1002/JCTB.6683
14.
Minussi G doA, SantosAAd, ScapiniT, et al.Transforming orange waste with yeasts: Bioprocess prospects. Rev Bras Ciências Ambient, 2024; 59(1):1–17; doi: 10.5327/z2176-94781859
15.
MoreirinhaC, VilelaC, SilvaNHCS, et al.Antioxidant and antimicrobial films based on brewers spent grain arabinoxylans, nanocellulose and feruloylated compounds for active packaging. Food Hydrocoll, 2020; 108:105836; doi: 10.1016/J.FOODHYD.2020.105836
16.
Pérez-FloresJG, Contreras-LópezE, Castañeda-OvandoA, et al.Physicochemical characterization of an arabinoxylan-rich fraction from brewers’ spent grain and its application as a release matrix for caffeine. Food Res Int, 2019; 116:1020–1030; doi: 10.1016/J.FOODRES.2018.09.041
17.
FariaNT, MarquesS, FerreiraFC, et al.Production of xylanolytic enzymes by Moesziomyces spp. using xylose, xylan and brewery’s spent grain as substrates. N Biotechnol, 2019; 49:137–143; doi: 10.1016/J.NBT.2018.11.001
18.
CousinE, NamhaedK, PérèsY, et al.Towards efficient and greener processes for furfural production from biomass: A review of the recent trends. Sci Total Environ, 2022; 847:157599; doi: 10.1016/J.SCITOTENV.2022.157599
19.
TadiotoV, DeotiJR, MüllerC, et al.Prospecting and engineering yeasts for ethanol production under inhibitory conditions: An experimental design analysis. Bioprocess Biosyst Eng, 2023; 46(8):1133–1145; doi: 10.1007/S00449-022-02812-X
20.
JönssonLJ, MartínC. Pretreatment of lignocellulose: Formation of inhibitory by-products and strategies for minimizing their effects. Bioresour Technol, 2016; 199:103–112; doi: 10.1016/J.BIORTECH.2015.10.009
21.
KumarP, BarrettDM, DelwicheMJ, et al.Methods for pretreatment of lignocellulosic biomass for efficient hydrolysis and biofuel production. Ind Eng Chem Res, 2009; 48(8):3713–3729; doi: 10.1021/IE801542G
22.
Infante-NetaAA, de CarvalhoÁAO, D’AlmeidaAP, et al.Xylitol production from passion fruit peel hydrolysate: Optimization of hydrolysis and fermentation processes. Bioresour Technol, 2024; 414:131628; doi: 10.1016/J.BIORTECH.2024.131628
23.
MeralR, KoseYE, CeylanZ, et al.The potential use of agro-industrial by-products as sources of bioactive compounds: A nanotechnological approach. Stud Nat Prod Chem, 2022; 73:435–466; doi: 10.1016/B978-0-323-91097-2.00014-5
24.
DharmalingamB, TantayotaiP, PanakkalEJ, et al.Organic acid pretreatments and optimization techniques for mixed vegetable waste biomass conversion into biofuel production. Bioenerg Res, 2023; 16(3):1667–1682; doi: 10.1007/S12155-022-10517-Y
25.
GönenÇ, DeveciEÜ, Akter ÖnalN. Evaluation of biomass pretreatment to optimize process factors for different organic acids via Box-Behnken RSM method. J Mater Cycles Waste Manag, 2021; 23(5):2016–2027; doi: 10.1007/S10163-021-01276-7
26.
LiuB, LiuL, DengB, et al.Application and prospect of organic acid pretreatment in lignocellulosic biomass separation: A review. Int J Biol Macromol, 2022; 222(Pt A):1400–1413; doi: 10.1016/J.IJBIOMAC.2022.09.270
27.
NordinN, Md IlliasR, ManasNHA, et al.Highly sustainable cascade pretreatment of low-pressure steam heating and organic acid on pineapple waste biomass for efficient delignification. Fuel, 2022; 321:124061; doi: 10.1016/J.FUEL.2022.124061
28.
PalmieriF, EstoppeyA, HouseGL, et al.Oxalic Acid, a Molecule at the Crossroads of Bacterial-Fungal Interactions. 1st ed.. Elsevier Inc.; 2019.; doi: 10.1016/bs.aambs.2018.10.001
29.
JeongSY, KooB, LeeJW. Structural changes in biomass (yellow poplar and empty fruit bunch) during hydrothermal and oxalic acid pretreatments and their effects on enzymatic hydrolysis efficiency. Ind Crops Prod, 2022; 178(December 2021):114569; doi: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2022.114569
30.
BukhariNA, LohSK, LuthfiAAI, et al.Oil palm trunk biomass pretreatment with oxalic acid and its effect on enzymatic digestibility and fermentability. Mater Today Proc, 2021; 42:119–123; doi: 10.1016/j.matpr.2020.10.267
31.
LeeJW, HoutmanCJ, KimHY, et al.Scale-up study of oxalic acid pretreatment of agricultural lignocellulosic biomass for the production of bioethanol. Bioresour Technol, 2011; 102(16):7451–7456; doi: 10.1016/J.BIORTECH.2011.05.022
32.
ZhangT, KumarR, WymanCE. Sugar yields from dilute oxalic acid pretreatment of maple wood compared to those with other dilute acids and hot water. Carbohydr Polym, 2013; 92(1):334–344; doi: 10.1016/J.CARBPOL.2012.09.070
33.
YildirimO, TunayD, OzkayaB, et al.Optimization of oxalic and sulphuric acid pretreatment conditions to produce bio-hydrogen from olive tree biomass. Int J Hydrogen Energy, 2022; 47(62):26316–26325; doi: 10.1016/J.IJHYDENE.2021.11.017
34.
DreschAP, CavaliM, dos SantosDF, et al.Different treatments of pearl millet biomass for cellulose recovery: Effects on lignocellulosic composition. Cellulose Chem Technol, 2023; 57(3–4):227–236; doi: 10.3581/2/cellulosechemtechnol.2023.57.22
35.
VargasACG, DreschAP, SchmidtAR, et al.Batch fermentation of lignocellulosic elephant grass biomass for 2G ethanol and xylitol production. Bioenerg Res, 2023; 16(4):2219–2228; doi: 10.1007/s12155-022-10559-2(0123456789);
36.
RoqueLR, MorgadoGP, NascimentoVM, et al.Liquid-liquid extraction: A promising alternative for inhibitors removing of pentoses fermentation. Fuel, 2019; 242:775–787; doi: 10.1016/J.FUEL.2018.12.130
37.
KatarínaF, KatarínaM, KatarínaĎ, et al.Influence of yeast strain on aromatic profile of Gewürztraminer wine. LWT - Food Sci Technol, 2014; 59(1):256–262; doi: 10.1016/J.LWT.2014.05.057
38.
Di FrancescoA, UgoliniL, LazzeriL, et al.Production of volatile organic compounds by Aureobasidium pullulans as a potential mechanism of action against postharvest fruit pathogens. Biol Control, 2015; 81:8–14; doi: 10.1016/J.BIOCONTROL.2014.10.004
39.
SluiterA, HamesB, RuizR, et al.Determination of structural carbohydrates and lignin in Biomass - NREL/TP-510-42618. Lab Anal Proced. 2012;(April 2008):17.
40.
KoesterDL, GomesLM, DreschAP, et al.Biodegradable starch foams reinforced by food-chain side streams. Int J Biol Macromol, 2024; 275(Pt 1):133386; doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2024.133386
41.
LucaroniAC, DreschAP, FogolariO, et al.Effects of Temperature and pH on Salt-Stressed Yeast Cultures in Non-Detoxified Coconut Hydrolysate. Available from: https://home.liebertpub.com/ind2022; doi: 10.1089/IND.2021.0029
42.
Instituto Adolfo Lutz. 1a Edição Digital. 2008.
43.
Dos SantosDM, De Lacerda BukzemA, AscheriDPR, et al.Microwave-assisted carboxymethylation of cellulose extracted from brewer’s spent grain. Carbohydr Polym, 2015; 131:125–133; doi: 10.1016/J.CARBPOL.2015.05.051
44.
Camacho-NúñezL, Jurado-ContrerasS, La RubiaMD, et al.Cellulose-based upcycling of Breweŕs spent grains: Extraction and acetylation. J Polym Environ, 2024; 32(7):1–14; doi: 10.1007/S10924-023-03137-W
45.
SilvaA D, AlmeidaFS, SilvaMFd, et al.How do pH and temperature influence extraction yield, physicochemical, functional, and rheological characteristics of brewer spent grain protein concentrates? Food Bioprod Process, 2023; 139:34–45; doi: 10.1016/J.FBP.2023.03.001
46.
Ribeiro-SanchesMA, StochiVAL, Borges-MachadoAL, et al.Valorization of brewer’s spent grains (BSG) through alkaline hydrogen peroxide processing: Effect on composition, structure and rheological properties. Food Bioprod Process, 2024; 147:239–250; doi: 10.1016/J.FBP.2024.07.008
47.
MalinskáHA, VaněkM, NebeskáD, et al.Plant priming changes physiological properties and lignin content in Miscanthus x giganteus. Ind Crops Prod, 2021; 174:114185; doi: 10.1016/J.INDCROP.2021.114185
48.
EliopoulosC, ArapoglouD, ChorianopoulosN, et al.Conversion of brewers’ spent grain into proteinaceous animal feed using solid state fermentation. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int, 2022; 29(20):29562–29569; doi: 10.1007/S11356-021-15495-W
49.
IkramS, HuangLY, ZhangH, et al.Composition and nutrient value proposition of brewers spent grain. J Food Sci, 2017; 82(10):2232–2242; doi: 10.1111/1750-3841.13794
50.
JaegerA, SahinAW, NyhanL, et al.Functional properties of Brewer’s spent grain protein isolate: The missing piece in the plant protein portfolio. Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2023; 12(4):798; doi: 10.3390/FOODS12040798
51.
JunttilaMH. Extraction of brewers’ spent grain in near subcritical conditions: A method to obtain high protein contents extracts. J Agric Food Res, 2022; 10:100378; doi: 10.1016/J.JAFR.2022.100378
52.
WilkinsonS, SmartKA, CookDJ. A comparison of dilute acid- and alkali-catalyzed hydrothermal pretreatments for bioethanol production from Brewers’ spent grains. J Am Soc Brew Chem, 2014; 72(2):143–153; doi: 10.1094/ASBCJ-2014-0327-02
53.
SanchezB, BautistaJ. Effects of furfural and 5-hydroxymethylfurfural on the fermentation of Saccharomyces cerevisiae and biomass production from Candida guilliermondii. Enzyme Microb Technol, 1988; 10(5):315–318; doi: 10.1016/0141-0229(88)90135-4
54.
NievesLM, PanyonLA, WangX. Engineering sugar utilization and microbial tolerance toward lignocellulose conversion. Front Bioeng Biotechnol, 2015; 3(FEB):17; doi: 10.3389/FBIOE.2015.00017
55.
YangP, ChenJ, WuW, et al.Saccharomyces cerevisiae MET5DeltaSIZ1Delta enhancing organic acid tolerance with XYL1 and XYL2 integration for ethanol yield improvement in the presence of xylose and low pH value. Lwt, 2023; 180(April):114718; doi: 10.1016/j.lwt.2023.114718
ChangYH, ChangKS, ChenCY, et al.Enhancement of the efficiency of bioethanol production by saccharomyces cerevisiae via gradually batch-wise and fed-batch increasing the glucose concentration. Ferment, 2018; 4(2):45; doi: 10.3390/FERMENTATION4020045
58.
De NadalE, PosasF. The HOG pathway and the regulation of osmoadaptive responses in yeast. FEMS Yeast Res, 2022; 22(1); doi: 10.1093/FEMSYR/FOAC013
59.
MartinsJR, SchmatzAA, Salazar-BryanAM, et al.Effect of dilute acid pretreatment on the sugarcane leaf for fermentable sugars production. Sugar Tech, 2022; 24(5):1540–1550; doi: 10.1007/s12355-021-01106-y
60.
WuY, LiB, MiaoB, et al.Saccharomyces cerevisiae employs complex regulation strategies to tolerate low pH stress during ethanol production. Microb Cell Fact, 2022; 21(1):247; doi: 10.1186/s12934-022-01974-3
61.
VermeerschL, Perez-SamperG, CerulusB, et al.On the duration of the microbial lag phase. Curr Genet, 2019; 65(3):721–727; doi: 10.1007/S00294-019-00938-2
62.
HamillPG, StevensonA, McMullanPE, et al.Microbial lag phase can be indicative of, or independent from, cellular stress. Sci Rep, 2020; 10(1):5948; doi: 10.1038/S41598-020-62552-4
63.
LiuX, JiaB, SunX, et al.Effect of initial ph on growth characteristics and fermentation properties of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Food Sci, 2015; 80(4):M800–M808; doi: 10.1111/1750-3841.12813
64.
Salas-NavarretePC, de Oca MirandaAIM, MartínezA, et al.Evolutionary and reverse engineering to increase Saccharomyces cerevisiae tolerance to acetic acid, acidic pH, and high temperature. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol, 2022; 106(1):383–399; doi: 10.1007/S00253-021-11730-Z
65.
AriñoJ. Integrative responses to high pH Stress in S. cerevisiae. OMICS, 2010; 14(5):517–523; doi: 10.1089/OMI.2010.0044
66.
JungYH, KimIJ, KimHK, et al.Whole slurry fermentation of maleic acid-pretreated oil palm empty fruit bunches for ethanol production not necessitating a detoxification process. Bioprocess Biosyst Eng, 2014; 37(4):659–665; doi: 10.1007/s00449-013-1035-y
67.
ZhangB, KhushikFA, ZhanB, et al.Transformation of lignocellulose to starch-like carbohydrates by organic acid-catalyzed pretreatment and biological detoxification. Biotechnol Bioeng, 2021; 118(10):4105–4118; doi: 10.1002/BIT.27887
68.
DandekarR, FegadeB, BhaskarVH. GC-MS analysis of phytoconstituents in alcohol extract of Epiphyllum oxypetalum leaves. J Pharmacogn Phytochem, 2015; 4(1):148–154.
69.
MartinezSJ, BressaniAPP, DiasDR, et al.Effect of bacterial and yeast starters on the formation of volatile and organic acid compounds in coffee beans and selection of flavors markers precursors during wet fermentation. Front Microbiol, 2019; 10(JUN):1287; doi: 10.3389/FMICB.2019.01287
70.
YazawaH, IwahashiH, KamisakaY, et al.Production of polyunsaturated fatty acids in yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae and its relation to alkaline pH tolerance. Yeast, 2009; 26(3):167–184; doi: 10.1002/YEA.1659
71.
YouSK, JooYC, KangDH, et al.Enhancing fatty acid production of saccharomyces cerevisiae as an animal feed supplement. J Agric Food Chem, 2017; 65(50):11029–11035; doi: 10.1021/ACS.JAFC.7B04485
72.
ZeaL, MorenoJ, OrtegaJM, et al.Comparative study of the γ-butyrolactone and pantolactone contents in cells and musts during vinification by three Saccharomyces cerevisiae races. Biotechnol Lett, 1995; 17(12):1351–1356; doi: 10.1007/BF00189225
73.
ZhangQH, FangY, LuoWF, et al.Biocatalytic kinetic resolution of D,L-pantolactone by using a novel recombinant D-lactonase. RSC Adv, 2020; 11(2):721–725; doi: 10.1039/D0RA09053K
74.
BlanchardG, KerreS, WalkerA, et al.Allergic contact dermatitis from pantolactone and dexpanthenol in wound healing creams. Contact Dermatitis, 2022; 87(5):468–471; doi: 10.1111/COD.14198
75.
DrężekK, KozłowskaJ, DetmanA, et al.Development of a continuous system for 2-phenylethanol bioproduction by yeast on whey permeate-based medium. Molecules, 2021; 26(23):7388; doi: 10.3390/MOLECULES26237388
76.
MierzejewskaJ, DąbkowskaK, ChreptowiczK, et al.Hydrolyzed corn stover as a promising feedstock for 2-phenylethanol production by nonconventional yeast. J of Chemical Tech & Biotech, 2019; 94(3):777–784; doi: 10.1002/JCTB.5823
77.
MitriS, KoubaaM, MarounRG, et al.Bioproduction of 2-phenylethanol through yeast fermentation on synthetic media and on agro-industrial waste and by-products: A review. Foods, 2022; 11(1); doi: 10.3390/FOODS11010109
78.
NishimuraY, MatsuiT, IshiiJ, et al.Metabolic engineering of the 2-ketobutyrate biosynthetic pathway for 1-propanol production in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Microb Cell Fact, 2018; 17(1):38–11; doi: 10.1186/S12934-018-0883-1
79.
AvereschNJH, KrömerJO. Metabolic engineering of the shikimate pathway for production of aromatics and derived compounds-Present and future strain construction strategies. Front Bioeng Biotechnol, 2018; 6(MAR):32; doi: 10.3389/FBIOE.2018.00032
80.
DzialoMC, ParkR, SteenselsJ, et al.Physiology, ecology and industrial applications of aroma formation in yeast. FEMS Microbiol Rev, 2017; 41(Supp_1):S95–S128; doi: 10.1093/FEMSRE/FUX031
81.
ChenH, FinkGR. Feedback control of morphogenesis in fungi by aromatic alcohols. Genes Dev, 2006; 20(9):1150–1161; doi: 10.1101/GAD.1411806
82.
ChowJ, DionneHM, PrabhakarA, et al.Aggregate filamentous growth responses in yeast. mSphere, 2019; 4(2); doi: 10.1128/MSPHERE.00702-18
83.
Gómez-GilE, FrancoA, MadridM, et al.Quorum sensing and stress-activated MAPK signaling repress yeast to hypha transition in the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces japonicus. PLoS Genet, 2019; 15(5):e1008192; doi: 10.1371/JOURNAL.PGEN.1008192
