SimpsonBB, Conner-OgorzalyM. Economic Botany: Plants in OurWorld. New York: McGraw-Hill. 1986.
2.
HansenV. The Year 1000: When Explorers Connected the World—and GlobalizationBegan. New York: Scribner. 2020.
3.
MannCC. 1493: Uncovering the New World Created by Columbus. New York: Alfred A. Knope. 2011.
4.
HaleWJ. The Farm Chemurgic: Farmward the Star of Destiny Lights OurWay. University of California: TheStratford company. 1934.
5.
de BoerJ, AikingH. Pursuing a low meat diet to improve both health and sustainability: how can we use the frames that shape our meals?. Ecological Economics, 2017; 142:238–248.
6.
de BoerJ, SchoslerH, AikingH. “Meatless days” or “less but better”? Exploring strategies to adapt Western meat consumption to health and sustainability challenges. Appetite, 2014; 76:120–128.
7.
KearneyJ.Food consumption trends and drivers. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci, 2010; 365:2793–2807.
8.
SahaM, EckelmanMJ. Growing fresh fruits and vegetables in an urban landscape: A geospatial assessment of ground level and rooftop urban agriculture potential in Boston, USA. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2017; 165:130–141.
9.
TaylorAW, CoveneyJ, WardPR et al. Fruit and vegetable consumption—the influence of aspects associated with trust in food and safety and quality of food. Public Health Nutr, 2012; 15:208–217.
10.
UralaN, LähteenmäkiL. Consumers' changing attitudes towards functional foods. Food Quality and Preference, 2007; 18:1–12.
11.
van de KampME, van DoorenC, HollanderAet al.Healthy diets with reduced environmental impact? The greenhouse gas emissions of various diets adhering to the Dutch food based dietary guidelines. Food Res Int, 2018; 104:14–24.
12.
TopolE. TheA. I. Diet. In: New YorkTimes. (NewYork, New York). 2019.
13.
AllenaP, FitzSimmonsM, GoodmanMet al.Shifting plates in the agrifood landscape: the tectonics of alternative agrifood initiatives in California. J Rural Studies, 203; 19:61–75.
14.
BadamiMG, RamankuttyN. Urban agriculture and food security: A critique based on an assessment of urban land constraints. Global Food Security. 2015; 4:8–15.
15.
ColesR, CostaS. Food growing in the city: Exploring the productive urban landscape as a new paradigm for inclusive approaches to the design and planning of future urban open spaces. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2018; 170:1–5.
16.
La RosaD, BarbarossaL, PriviteraR, et al.Agriculture and the city: A method for sustainable planning of new forms of agriculture in urban contexts. Land Use Policy, 2014; 41:290–303.
17.
HopkinsPD, DaceyA. Vegetarian meat: Could technology save animals and satisfy meat eaters?. J Agric Environ Ethics, 2008; 21:579–596.
18.
BonnySPF, GardnerGE, PethickDW, et al.What is artificial meat and what does it mean for the future of the meat industry?. J Integrative Agri, 2015; 14:255–263.
19.
BonnySPF, GardnerGE, PethickDW, et al.Artificial meat and the future of the meat industry. Animal Production Sci, 2017; 57.
20.
National Academies of SciencesE, and Medicine. Preparing for Future Products of Biotechnology In: Preparing for Future Products of Biotechnology The National Academies, Washington (DC). 2017.
21.
StephensN, Di SilvioL, DunsfordI, et al.Bringing cultured meat to market: Technical, socio-political, and regulatory challenges in cellular agriculture. Trends Food Sci Technol, 2018; 78:155–166.
22.
HocquetteJF.Is in vitro meat the solution for the future?. Meat Sci, 2016; 120:167–176.
23.
BozemanJF, BozemanR, TheisTL. Overcoming climate change adaptation barriers: A study on food–energy–water impacts of the average American diet by demographic group. J Ind Ecol, 2019; 24:383–399.
24.
BlackstoneNT, El-AbbadiNH, McCabeMS, et al.Linking sustainability to the healthy eating patterns of the Dietary Guidelines for Americans: A modelling study. The Lancet Planetary Health. 2018; 2:e344–e352.
25.
CampbellBM, ThorntonP, ZougmoréR, et al.Sustainable intensification: What is its role in climate smart agriculture?. Curr Opin Environ Sustain, 2014; 8:39–43.
26.
MassetG, SolerLG, VieuxF, et al.Identifying sustainable foods: The relationship between environmental impact, nutritional quality, and prices of foods representative of the French diet. J Acad Nutr Diet, 2014; 114:862–869.
27.
RobertsonGP, SwintonSM. Reconciling agricultural productivity and environmental integrity: a grand challenge for agriculture. Front Ecology Environ, 2005; 3:38–46.
28.
BalmfordA, AmanoT, BartlettH, et al.The environmental costs and benefits of high-yield farming. Nature Sustain, 2018; 1:477–485.
29.
ChenB, HanMY, PengKet al.Global land-water nexus: Agricultural land and freshwater use embodied in worldwide supply chains. Sci Total Environ, 2018; 613–614:931–943.
30.
PostelSL, DailyGC, EhrlichPR. Human appropriation of renewable fresh water. Science, 1996; 271:785–788.
31.
Ibarrola-RivasMJ, Granados-RamírezR, NonhebelS. Is the available cropland and water enough for food demand? A global perspective of the Land-Water-Food nexus. Adv Water Res, 2017; 110:476–483.
32.
GoapA, SharmaD, ShuklaAK, et al.An IoT based smart irrigation management system using Machine learning and open source technologies. Comp Electr Agri, 2018; 155:41–49.
33.
KamienskiC, SoininenJP, TaumbergerM, et al.Smart water management platform: IoT-based precision irrigation for agriculture. Sensors (Basel), 2019; 19.
34.
TanL.Cloud-based decision support and automation for precision agriculture in orchards. IFAC-PapersOnLine, 2016; 49:330–335.
35.
VellidisG, TuckerM, PerryC, et al.A real-time wireless smart sensor array for scheduling irrigation. Computers Electronics Agriculture, 2008; 61:44–50.
CordellD, DrangertJ-O, WhiteS. The story of phosphorus: Global food security and food for thought. Global Environmental Change, 2009; 19:292–305.
38.
CordellD, NesetTSS. Phosphorus vulnerability: A qualitative framework for assessing the vulnerability of national and regional food systems to the multi-dimensional stressors of phosphorus scarcity. Global Environmental Change, 2014; 24:108–122.
39.
CordellD, WhiteS. Life's bottleneck: Sustaining the world's phosphorus for a food secure future. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 2014; 39:161–188.
40.
DasA, JusticD, InoueM, et al.Impacts of Mississippi River diversions on salinity gradients in a deltaic Louisiana estuary: Ecological and management implications. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, 2012; 111:17–26.
41.
StathamPJ.Nutrients in estuaries—An overview and the potential impacts of climate change. Sci Total Environ, 2012; 434:213–227.
42.
ZorbC, SenbayramM, PeiterE. Potassium in agriculture—Status and perspectives. J Plant Physiol, 2014; 171:656–669.
43.
JacobsB, CordellD, ChinJet al.Towards phosphorus sustainability in North America: A model for transformational change. Environmental Science & Policy, 2017; 77:151–159.
44.
ManningDAC.Mineral sources of potassium for plant nutrition. A review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 2010; 30:281–294.
45.
ChenM, GraedelTE. A half-century of global phosphorus flows, stocks, production, consumption, recycling, and environmental impacts. Global Environmental Change, 2016; 36:139–152.
46.
ChenowethJ, HadjikakouM, ZoumidesC. Quantifying the human impact on water resources: A critical review of the water footprint concept. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 2014; 18:2325–2342.
47.
MekonnenM, HoekstraAY. A global assessment of the water footprint of farm animal products. Ecosystems, 2012; 15:401–415.
48.
BassoB, ShuaiG, ZhangJ, et al.Yield stability analysis reveals sources of large-scale nitrogen loss from the US Midwest. Sci Rep, 2019; 9:5774.
49.
FischerG, ShahM, TubielloFN, et al.Socio-economic and climate change impacts on agriculture: An integrated assessment, 1990–2080. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci, 2005; 360:2067–2083.
50.
MaxmenA.Under attack: The threat of insects to agriculture is set to increase as the planet warms. What action can we take to safeguard our crops? Nature, 2013; 501:S15–S17.
51.
ZiskaLH, BlumenthalDM, RunionGB, et al.Invasive species and climate change: An agronomic perspective. Climatic Change, 2010; 105:13–42.
52.
DeroclesSAP, LuntDH, BertheSCF, et al.Climate warming alters the structure of farmland tritrophic ecological networks and reduces crop yield. Mol Ecol, 2018; 27:4931–4946.
53.
CalzadillaA, RehdanzK, BettsR, et al.Climate change impacts on global agriculture. Climatic Change, 2013; 120:357–374.
54.
SuweisS, RinaldoA, Van der ZeeSEATM, et al.Stochastic modeling of soil salinity. Geophysical Res Lett, 2010; 37.
55.
CastroHF, ClassenAT, AustinEE, et al.Soil microbial community responses to multiple experimental climate change drivers. Appl Environ Microbiol, 2010; 76:999–1007.
56.
BebberDP, HolmesT, GurrSJ. The global spread of crop pests and pathogens. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 2014; 23:1398–1407.
57.
FurlongMJ, ZaluckiMP. Climate change and biological control: The consequences of increasing temperatures on host-parasitoid interactions. Curr Opin Insect Sci, 2017; 20:39–44.
58.
GuS, HanP, YeZet al.Climate change favours a destructive agricultural pest in temperate regions: Late spring cold matters. Journal of Pest Science, 2018; 91:1191–1198.
59.
HulleM, Coeur d'AcierA, Bankhead-DronnetS, et al.Aphids in the face of global changes. C R Biol, 2010; 333:497–503.
60.
TrebickiP, DaderB, VassiliadisS, et al.Insect-plant-pathogen interactions as shaped by future climate: Effects on biology, distribution, and implications for agriculture. Insect Sci, 2017; 24:975–989.
61.
GagiuV, MateescuE, ArmeanuI, et al.Post-harvest contamination with mycotoxins in the context of the geographic and agroclimatic conditions in Romania. Toxins (Basel), 2018; 10.
62.
PiacentiniRD, MujumdarAS. Climate change and drying of agricultural products. Drying Technol, 2009; 27:629–635.
63.
HallA, MathewsAJ, HolzapfelBP. Potential effect of atmospheric warming on grapevine phenology and post-harvest heat accumulation across a range of climates. Int J Biometeorology, 2016; 60:1405–1422.
64.
Medina Á, González-JartínJM, SainzMJ. Impact of global warming on mycotoxins. Curr Opin Food Sci, 2017; 18:76–81.
65.
MorettiA, PascaleM, LogriecoAF. Mycotoxin risks under a climate change scenario in Europe. Trends Food Sci Technol, 2019; 84:38–40.
66.
ParfittJ, BarthelM, MacnaughtonS. Food waste within food supply chains: Quantification and potential for change to 2050. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci, 2010; 365:3065–3081.
67.
PatersonRRM, LimaN. How will climate change affect mycotoxins in food?. Food Res Int, 2010; 43:1902–1914.
68.
PatersonRRM, VenâncioA, LimaN, et al.Predominant mycotoxins, mycotoxigenic fungi and climate change related to wine. Food Res Int, 2018; 103:478–491.
69.
WigginsS, KirstenJ, LlambíL. The future of small farms. World Development, 2010; 38:1341–1348.
70.
RenC, LiuS, van GrinsvenH, et al.The impact of farm size on agricultural sustainability. J Cleaner Production, 2019; 220:357–367.
71.
DaleVH, KlineKL, KaffkaSR, et al.A landscape perspective on sustainability of agricultural systems. Landscape Ecol, 2012; 28:1111–1123.
72.
Van PasselS, MeulM. Multilevel and multi-user sustainability assessment of farming systems. Environ Impact Assess Rev, 2012; 32:170–180.
73.
GraymoreMLM, SipeNG, RicksonRE. Regional sustainability: How useful are current tools of sustainability assessment at the regional scale?. Ecological Economics, 2008; 67:362–372.
74.
KoundouriP, NaugesC, TzouvelekasV. The Future of Small Farms. World Development, 2006; 38:1341–1348.
75.
WoodhouseP.Beyond industrial agriculture? Some questions about farm size, productivity and sustainability. J Agrarian Change, 2010; 10:437–453.
76.
CoatesJF.Rural America: A future of decline and decay unless…. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 1993; 43:205–208.
77.
NolteK, OstermeierM. Labour market effects of large-scale agricultural investment: Conceptual considerations and estimated employment effects. World Development, 2017; 98:430–446.
78.
McManusP, WalmsleyJ, ArgentN, et al.Rural community and rural resilience: What is important to farmers in keeping their country towns alive?. J Rural Studies, 2012; 28:20–29.
79.
KainerD.Undergraduate research: A platform to enhance community college STEM education. Ind Biotechnol, 2013; 9:289–292.
80.
WalkerL.STEM Education: An important component of the industrial biotechnology innovation nexus. Ind Biotechnol, 2018; 14:235–235.
81.
HammRL, EvansSL, MarstonJ. An industry response to challenges in STEM and agricultural literacy. Ind Biotechnol, 2017; 13:35–37.
82.
ParkerJE, WagnerDJ. From the USDA: Educating the next generation: Funding opportunities in food, agricultural, natural resources, and social sciences education. CBE Life Sci Edu 15.
83.
WangH-H, KnoblochN. Levels of STEM integration through agriculture, food, and natural resources. J Agric Education, 2018; 59:258–277.
84.
SalzmanH, Lieff BenderlyB. STEM performance and supply: Assessing the evidence for education policy. J Sci Education Technol, 2018; 28:9–25.
85.
CamilliG, HiraR. Introduction to Special Issue—STEM Workforce: STEM Education and the Post-Scientific Society. J Sci Education Technol, 2018; 28:1–8.
86.
McKimAJ, Sorensen TJJ. VJ, et al. Underrepresented minority students find balance in STEM: Implications for colleges and teachers of agriculture. NACTA J, 2017; 61:317–323.
87.
ArthurWB. The nature of technology. FreePress, NewYork. 2009.
88.
FengY, ZhangY, YingC, et al.Nanopore-based fourth-generation DNA sequencing technology. Genomics Proteomics Bioinformatics, 2015; 13:4–16.
TresederKK, BalserTC, BradfordMA, et al.Integrating microbial ecology into ecosystem models: challenges and priorities. Biogeochemistry, 2019; 109:7–18.
98.
BangaJR.Optimization in computational systems biology. BMC Syst Biol, 2008; 2:47.
99.
Barreiro-GomezJ, QuijanoN, Ocampo-MartinezC. Constrained distributed optimization: A population dynamics approach. Automatica, 2016; 69:101–116.
100.
BershteinS, SerohijosAW, ShakhnovichEI. Bridging the physical scales in evolutionary biology: from protein sequence space to fitness of organisms and populations. Curr Opin Struct Biol, 2017; 42:31–40.
101.
ChaeTU, ChoiSY, KimJW, et al.Recent advances in systems metabolic engineering tools and strategies. Curr Opin Biotechnol, 2017; 47:67–82.
102.
HubnerK, SahleS, KummerU. Applications and trends in systems biology in biochemistry. FEBS J, 2011; 278:2767–2857.
103.
OuldridgeTE.The importance of thermodynamics for molecular systems, and the importance of molecular systems for thermodynamics. Nat Comput, 2018; 17:3–29.
104.
SerohijosAW, ShakhnovichEI. Merging molecular mechanism and evolution: Theory and computation at the interface of biophysics and evolutionary population genetics. Curr Opin Struct Biol, 2014; 26:84–91.
105.
VillaverdeAF, BangaJR. Reverse engineering and identification in systems biology: strategies, perspectives and challenges. J R Soc Interface, 2014; 11:20130505.
106.
NoraLC, WestmannCA, Martins-SantanaL, et al.The art of vector engineering: Towards the construction of next-generation genetic tools. Microb Biotechnol, 2019; 12:125–147.
107.
KozielMG, BelandGL, BowmanC, et al.Field performance of elite transgenic maize plants expressing an insecticidal protein derived from Bacillus thuringiensi. BIO/TECHNOLOGY, 1993; 11:194–200.
108.
TianP, WangJ, ShenX, et al.Fundamental CRISPR-Cas9 tools and current applications in microbial systems. Synth Syst Biotechnol, 2017; 2:219–225.
109.
BrinegarK, A KY, ChoiS, et al.The commercialization of genome-editing technologies. Crit Rev Biotechnol, 2017; 37:924–932.
110.
BartkowskiB, TheesfeldI, PirscherF, et al.Snipping around for food: Economic, ethical and policy implications of CRISPR/Cas genome editing. Geoforum, 2018; 96:172–180.
111.
ErikssonD, HarwoodW, HofvanderP, et al.A welcome proposal to amend the GMO legislation of the EU. Trends Biotechnol, 2018; 36:1100–1103.
112.
ErikssonS, JonasE, RydhmerL, et al.Invited review: Breeding and ethical perspectives on genetically modified and genome edited cattle. J Dairy Sci, 2018; 101:1–17.
113.
KarlsenE, SchulzC, AlmaasE. Automated generation of genome-scale metabolic draft reconstructions based on KEGG. BMC Bioinformatics, 2018; 19:467.
de Oliveira Dal'MolinCG, NielsenLK. Plant genome-scale metabolic reconstruction and modelling. Curr Opin Biotechnol, 2013; 24:271–277.
116.
SeaverSM, BradburyLM, FrelinO, et al.Improved evidence-based genome-scale metabolic models for maize leaf, embryo, and endosperm. Front Plant Sci, 2015; 6:142.
117.
ZhouJ, DengY, LuoF, et al.Phylogenetic molecular ecological network of soil microbial communities in response to elevated CO2. MBio, 2011; 2.
118.
MagnusdottirS, HeinkenA, KuttL, et al.Generation of genome-scale metabolic reconstructions for 773 members of the human gut microbiota. Nat Biotechnol, 2017; 35:81–89.
119.
KingZA, LloydCJ, FeistAM, et al.Next-generation genome-scale models for metabolic engineering. Curr Opin Biotechnol, 2015; 35:23–29.
120.
RaesJ, BorkP. Molecular eco-systems biology: Towards an understanding of community function. Nature Reviews: Microbiology, 2008; 6:693–699.
LangilleMGI, ZaneveldJ, CaporasoJG, et al.Predictive functional profiling of microbial communities using 16S rRNA marker gene sequences. Nat Biotechnol, 2015; 31:814–823.
123.
AuerL, MariadassouM, O'DonohueM, et al.Analysis of large 16S rRNA Illumina data sets: Impact of singleton read filtering on microbial community description. Mol Ecol Resour, 2017; 17:e122–e132.
124.
BirtelJ, WalserJC, PichonS, et al.Estimating bacterial diversity for ecological studies: Methods, metrics, and assumptions. PLoS One, 2015; 10:e0125356.
125.
CaporasoJG, LauberCL, WaltersWA, et al.Global patterns of 16S rRNA diversity at a depth of millions of sequences per sample. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2011; 108Suppl 1:4516–4522.
126.
GinigeMP, HugenholtzP, DaimsH, et al.Use of stable-isotope probing, full-cycle rRNA analysis, and fluorescence in situ hybridization-microautoradiography to study a methanol-fed denitrifying microbial community. Appl Environ Microbiol, 2004; 70:588–596.
127.
HungateBA, MauRL, SchwartzE, et al.Quantitative microbial ecology through stable isotope probing. Appl Environ Microbiol, 2015; 81:7570–7581.
128.
JamesonE, TaubertM, CoyotziS, et al.DNA-, RNA-, and protein-based stable-isotope probing for high-throughput biomarker analysis of active microorganisms. Methods Mol Biol, 2017; 1539:57–74.
129.
JuF, ZhangT. 16S rRNA gene high-throughput sequencing data mining of microbial diversity and interactions. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol, 2015; 99:4119–4129.
130.
KongY, HeM, McAlisterT, et al.Quantitative fluorescence in situ hybridization of microbial communities in the rumens of cattle fed different diets. Appl Environ Microbiol, 2010; 76:6933–6938.
131.
PoretskyR, RodriguezRL, LuoC, et al.Strengths and limitations of 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing in revealing temporal microbial community dynamics. PLoS One, 2014; 9:e93827.
132.
SinclairL, OsmanOA, BertilssonS, et al.Microbial community composition and diversity via 16S rRNA gene amplicons: Evaluating the illumina platform. PLoS One, 2015; 10:e0116955.
133.
WaggC, DudenhöfferJ-H, WidmerF, et al.Linking diversity, synchrony and stability in soil microbial communities. Functional Ecol, 2018; 32:1280–1292.
134.
KalyuzhnayaMG, LapidusA, IvanovaN, et al.High-resolution metagenomics targets specific functional types in complex microbial communities. Nat Biotechnol, 2008; 26:1029–1034.
WintermuteEH, SilverPA. Dynamics in the mixed microbial concourse. Genes Dev, 2010; 24:2603–2614.
137.
MaronPA, RanjardL, MougelC, et al.Metaproteomics: A new approach for studying functional microbial ecology. Microb Ecol, 2007; 53:486–493.
138.
XuJ.Microbial ecology in the age of genomics and metagenomics: concepts, tools, and recent advances. Mol Ecol, 2006; 15:1713–1731.
139.
AtamanM, Hernandez GardiolDF, FengosG, et al.redGEM: Systematic reduction and analysis of genome-scale metabolic reconstructions for development of consistent core metabolic models. PLoS Comput Biol, 2017; 13:e1005444.
140.
RavikrishnanA, NasreM, RamanK. Enumerating all possible biosynthetic pathways in metabolic networks. Sci Rep, 2018; 8:9932.
141.
RiesenfeldCS, SchlossPD, HandelsmanJ. Metagenomics: genomic analysis of microbial communities. Annu Rev Genet, 2004; 38:525–552.
142.
BinswangerH.Agricutural mechanization: A comparative historical perspective. The World Bank Research Observer, 1986; 1:27–56.
143.
LeeWS, AlchanatisV, YangC, et al.Sensing technologies for precision specialty crop production. Computers Electronics Agriculture, 2010; 74:2–33.
144.
HuntER, DaughtryCST. What good are unmanned aircraft systems for agricultural remote sensing and precision agriculture?. International J Remote Sensing, 2017; 39:5345–5376.
145.
WolfeML, RichardTL. 21st century engineering for on-farm food–energy–water systems. Curr Opin Chem Eng, 2017; 18:69–76.
146.
EsauT, ZamanQ, GroulxD, et al.Economic analysis for smart sprayer application in wild blueberry fields. Precision Agric, 2016; 17:753–765.
147.
BassoB, AntleJ. Digital agriculture to design sustainable agricultural systems. Nature Sustainability, 2020; 3:254–256.
148.
SchimmelpfennigD.Crop production costs, profits, and ecosystem stewardship with precision agriculture. J Agric Appl Economics, 2017; 50:81–103.
149.
ObertiR, MarchiM, TirelliP, et al.Selective spraying of grapevines for disease control using a modular agricultural robot. Biosy Eng, 2016; 146:203–215.
150.
UtstumoT, UrdalF, BrevikA, et al.Robotic in-row weed control in vegetables. Computers Electronics Agriculture, 2018; 154:36–45.
ZhaoY, GongL, HuangY, et al.A review of key techniques of vision-based control for harvesting robot. Computers Electronics Agric, 2016; 127:311–323.
153.
EmmiL, Gonzalez-de-SotoM, PajaresG, et al.New trends in robotics for agriculture: Integration and assessment of a real fleet of robots. ScientificWorldJournal, 2014; 2014:404059.
154.
EmmiL, Gonzalez-de-SantosP. Mobile robotics in arable lands: Current state and future trends. In: 2017 European Conference on Mobile Robots, ECMR 2017. (IEEE). 2017.
155.
BecharA, VigneaultC. Agricultural robots for field operations. Part 2: Operations and systems. Biosyst Eng, 2017; 153:110–128.
156.
SchorN, BecharA, IgnatT, et al.Robotic disease detection in greenhouses: Combined detection of powdery mildew and tomato spotted wilt virus. IEEE Robotics Automation Letters, 2016; 1:354–360.
157.
WalterA, FingerR, HuberR, et al.Opinion: Smart farming is key to developing sustainable agriculture. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2017; 114:6148–6150.
158.
ZhaoH, LiuZ, LiZ, et al. Modelling and dynamic tracking control of industrial vehicles with tractor-trailer structure. In: IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS). (IEEE Macau, Chinae). 1919.
159.
MahmudMSA, AbidinMSZ, EmmanuelAA, et al. Robotics and automation in agriculture: Present and future applications Application Modelling Simulation 2020;4:130–140.
160.
RouseJW, HassR, SchellJ, et al. Monitoring vegetation systems in the great plains with ERTS. 1974.
161.
AhamedT, TianL, ZhangYet al.A review of remote sensing methods for biomass feedstock production. Biomass Bioener, 2011; 35:2455–2469.
162.
KuhlgertS, AusticG, ZegaracR, et al.MultispeQ Beta: A tool for large-scale plant phenotyping connected to the open PhotosynQ network. R Soc Open Sci, 2016; 3:160592.
163.
RekhaBU, DesaiVV, AjawnPS, et al. Remote sensing technology and applications in agriculture In: International Conferenc on Computational Techniquws, Electronics and Mechanical Systems. (IEEE Belgaum, India). 2018; pp. 193–197.
164.
KhorramS, NelsonSAC, van der WieleCF, et al. Fundamentals of remote sensing imaging and preliminary analysis In: Handbook of Satellite Applications. 2017; pp. 981–1016.
165.
WanW, SuJ. Study of laser-induced plant fluorescence lifetime imaging technology for plant remote sensing monitor. Measurement, 2018; 125:564–571.
166.
MaesWH, SteppeK. Perspectives for remote sensing with unmanned aerial vehicles in precision agriculture. Trends Plant Sci, 2019; 24:152–164.
167.
NamasivayamV, LinR, JohnsonB, et al.Advances in on-chip photodetection for applications in miniaturized genetic analysis systems. J Micromechanics Microeng, 2004; 14:81–90.
168.
JabariS, FathollahiF, RoshanA, et al.Improving UAV imaging quality by optical sensor fusion: An initial study. Int J Remote Sensing, 2017; 38:4931–4953.
169.
CraigheadH.Future lab-on-a-chip technologies for interrogating individual molecules. Nature, 2006; 442:387–393.
170.
LafleurJP, JonssonA, SenkbeilS, et al.Recent advances in lab-on-a-chip for biosensing applications. Biosens Bioelectron, 2016; 76:213–233.
171.
LopezGA, EstevezMC, SolerM, et al.Recent advances in nanoplasmonic biosensors: Applications and lab-on-a-chip integration. Nanophotonics, 2017; 6:123–136.
172.
BehmannJ, AcebronK, EminD, et al.Specim IQ: Evaluation of a new, miniaturized handheld hyperspectral camera and its application for plant phenotyping and disease detection. Sensors (Basel), 2018; 18.
173.
WangL, DuanY, ZhangL, et al.LeafScope: A portable high-resolution multispectral imager for in vivo imaging soybean leaf. Sensors (Basel), 2020; 20.
174.
LussemU, BoltenA, MenneJ, et al.Ultra-high spatial resolution UAV-based imagery to predict biomass in temperate grasslands. ISPRS - International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, 2019; XLII-2/W13:443–447.
175.
ColominaI, MolinaP. Unmanned aerial systems for photogrammetry and remote sensing: A review. ISPRS J Photogrammetry Remote Sensing, 2014; 92:79–97.
176.
ZhangJ, WangC, YangC, et al.Assessing the effect of real spatial resolution of in situ UAV multispectral images on seedling rapeseed growth monitoring. Remote Sens, 2020; 12:1207–1234.
177.
DongX, ZhangZJ, YuR, et al.Extraction of information about individual trees from high-spatial-tesolution UAV-acquired images of an orchard. Remote Sens, 2020; 12.
178.
BurkartA, HechtVL, KraskaT, et al.Phenological analysis of unmanned aerial vehicle based time series of barley imagery with high temporal resolution. Precision Agric, 2017; 19:134–146.
179.
ChenJ, GuoB, YanR, et al.Rapid and automatic chemical identification of the medicinal flower buds of Lonicera plants by the benchtop and hand-held Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy. Spectrochim Acta A Mol Biomol Spectrosc, 2017; 182:81–86.
180.
YanH, XuYC, SieslerHW, et al.Hand-held near-infrared spectroscopy for authentication of fengdous and quantitative analysis of mulberry fruits. Front Plant Sci, 2019; 10:1548.
181.
StavisSM, CorgieSC, CiprianyBR, et al.Single molecule analysis of bacterial polymerase chain reaction products in submicrometer fluidic channels. Biomicrofluidics, 2007; 1:34105.
182.
GiraldoJP, WuH, NewkirkGM, et al.Nanobiotechnology approaches for engineering smart plant sensors. Nat Nanotechnol, 2019; 14:541–553
183.
LewTTS, KomanVB, SilmoreKS, et al.Real-time detection of wound-induced H2O2 signalling waves in plants with optical nanosensors. Nat Plants, 2020; 6:404–415.
184.
ShepherdM, TurnerJA, SmallB, et al. Priorities for science to overcome hurdles thwarting the full promise of the 'digital agriculture' revolution. J Sci Food Agric 2018.
185.
HuangY, ChenZ-x, YuT, et al.Agricultural remote sensing big data: Management and applications. J Integrative Agriculture, 2018; 17:1915–1931.
186.
PhamX, StackM. How data analytics is transforming agriculture. Business Horizons, 2018; 61:125–133.
187.
WolfertS, GeL, VerdouwC, et al.Big data in smart farming—A review. Agricultural Syst, 2017; 153:69–80.
188.
BrownME.Satellite remote sensing in agriculture and food security assessment. Procedia Environ Sci, 2015; 29.
189.
KamilarisA, KartakoullisA, Prenafeta-BoldúFX. A review on the practice of big data analysis in agriculture. Computers Electronics Agric, 2017; 143:23–37.
190.
KhanalS, FultonJ, ShearerS. An overview of current and potential applications of thermal remote sensing in precision agriculture. Computers Electronics Agric, 2017; 139:22–32.
191.
LobellDB.The use of satellite data for crop yield gap analysis. Field Crops Res, 2013; 143:56–64.
192.
SaxenaD, JoshiN. Digitally empowered village: Case of Akodara in Gujarat, India. South Asian J Business Manag Cases, 2018; 8:27–31.
193.
BankW. World Development Report 2016 :DigitalDividends. (WorldBank, WashingtonD.C.). 2016.
194.
DeichmannU, GoyalA, MishraD. Will digital technologies transform agriculture in developing countries?. Agricultural Economics, 2016; 47:21–33.
195.
MarxV.The big challenges of bid data. Nature, 2013; 498:255–260.
196.
da SilvaDSM, da SilvaWMC, ZheGR, et al. Big data trends in bioinformatics. In: IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine Bioinformatics and Biomedicine (BIBM). (San Diego). 2019; pp. 1862–1867.
197.
OliveiraAL.Biotechnology, big data and artificial intelligence. Biotechnol J, 2019; 14:e1800613.
198.
MaC, ZhangHH, WangX. Machine learning for Big Data analytics in plants. Trends Plant Sci, 2014; 19:798–808.
199.
TardieuF, Cabrera-BosquetL, PridmoreT et al. Plant phenomics, from sensors to knowledge. Curr Biol, 2017; 27:R770–R783.
200.
ArguesoCT, AssmannSM, BirnbaumKD, et al.Directions for research and training in plant omics: Big Questions and Big Data. Plant Direct, 2019; 3:e00133.
201.
SvensgaardJ, JensenSM, WestergaardJC, et al.Can reproducible comparisons of cereal genotypes be generated in field experiments based on UAV imagery using RGB cameras?. European J Agron, 2019; 106:49–57.
202.
RodríguezMA, CuencaL, Ortiz Á. Big data transformation in agriculture: From precision agriculture towards smart farming In: Collaborative Networks Digital Transformation, 2019:467–474.
203.
Bazán-VeraW, Bermeo-AlmeidaO, Cardenas-RodriguezM, et al. A Brief Review of Big Data in the Agriculture Domain In: Technologies and Innovation. 2019; pp. 66–77.
204.
PalssonBO. Systems biology: Properties of reconstructed networks. Cambridge UniversityPress. 2006.
205.
ChandrasekaranS.A protocol for the construction and curation of genome-scale integrated metabolic and regulatory network models. Methods Mol Biol, 2019; 1927:203–214.
206.
SuravajhalaP, BensoA, ValadiJK. Editorial: Annotation and curation of uncharacterized proteins: systems biology approaches. Front Genet, 2015; 6:224.
207.
WangM, CarverJJ, PhelanVV, et al.Sharing and community curation of mass spectrometry data with Global Natural Products Social Molecular Networking. Nat Biotechnol, 2016; 34:828–837.
208.
NgoVM, Le-KhacN-A, KechadiMT. Designing and implementing data warehouse for agricultural big data In: Big Data – BigData 2019. 2019; pp. 1–17.
209.
ClarkeAC. 2002: A Space Odyssey. New York: Signet. 1968.
210.
ByrumJ.AI Is a test for humanity. Will it pass? Ind Biotechnol, 2019; 15:280–281.
211.
ByrumJ.Worry about your average day, not smart AI. Ind Biotechnol, 2019; 15:334–335.
212.
ByrumJ.We need to speak up for AI, while we still can. Ind Biotechnol, 2020; 16:146–146.
213.
ErgenM.What is Artificial Intelligence? Technical considerations and future perception. Anatol J Cardiol, 2019; 22:5–7.
214.
ReeseB. The Fourth Age: SmartRobots, Conscious Computers and the Future ofHumanity. New York: AtriaBooks. 2018.
215.
DignumV. What Is Artificial Intelligence? In: Responsible Artificial Intelligence. 2019; pp. 9–34.
216.
SinghA, GanapathysubramanianB, SinghAK, et al.Machine learning for high-throughput stress phenotyping in plants. Trends Plant Sci, 2016; 21:110–124.
217.
MarçalTdS, RochaJRdASdC, SalvadorFV, et al.Estimation of variance for reciprocal general and specific combining ability effects by EM-AI algorithm. Crop Sci, 2019; 59:1494–1503.
218.
AlvesDP, TomazRS, LaurindoBS, et al.Artificial neural network for prediction of the area under the disease progress curve of tomato late blight. Scientia Agricola, 2017; 74:51–59.
219.
HeimRHJ, WrightIJ, ChangHC, et al.Detecting myrtle rust (Austropuccinia psidii) on lemon myrtle trees using spectral signatures and machine learning. Plant Pathol, 2018; 67:1114–1121.
220.
WheelerDL, ScottJ, DungJKS, et al.Evidence of a trans-kingdom plant disease complex between a fungus and plant-parasitic nematodes. PLoS One, 2019; 14:e0211508.
221.
WaleedM, UmT-W, KamalT, et al.Determining the precise work area of agriculture machinery using internet of things and artificial intelligence. Appl Sci, 2020; 10.
222.
LiakosKG, BusatoP, MoshouD, et al.Machine learning in agriculture: A review. Sensors (Basel), 2018; 18.
223.
PetersDPC, McVeyDS, EliasEH, et al.Big data–model integration and AI for vector-borne disease prediction. Ecosphere, 2020; 11:1–19.
224.
NeethirajanS.The role of sensors, big data and machine learning in modern animal farming. Sensing Bio-Sensing Res, 2020; 29.
225.
StokesJM, YangK, SwansonK, et al.A deep learning approach to antibiotic discovery. Cell. 2020; 180:688–702 e613.
226.
TranNH, ZhangX, LiM. Deep Omics. Proteomics, 2018; 18.
227.
VertesA, ArulA-B, AvarP, et al. Inferring Mechanism of Action of an Unknown Compound from Time Series Omics Data In: Computational Methods in Systems Biology. 2018; pp. 238–255.
228.
YamadaR, OkadaD, WangJ et al. Interpretation of omics data analyses. J Hum Genet 2020.
229.
TopcuogluBD, LesniakNA, RuffinMTt, et al.A framework for effective application of machine learning to microbiome-based classification problems. mBio. 2020; 11.
230.
NamkungJ.Machine learning methods for microbiome studies. J Microbiol. 2020; 58:206–216.
BestelmeyerBT, MarcilloG, McCordSE et al. Scaling up agricultural research with artificial intelligence. IT Professional, 2020; 22:33–38.
233.
PetersDPC, RiversA, HatfieldJL, et al.Harnessing AI to transform agriculture and inform agricultural research. IT Professional, 2020; 22:16–21.
234.
LiuSY.Artificial Intelligence (AI) in agriculture. IT Professional, 2020; 22:14–15.
235.
Saiz-RubioV, Rovira-MásF. From smart farming towards agriculture 5.0: A review on crop data management. Agronomy, 2020; 10.
236.
WienerN. Cybernetics: Or Control and Communication in the Animal and theMachine. New York: John Wiley & Sons. 1948.
237.
ForresterJW. IndustrialDynamics. Wiley, New York: M.I.T. Press. 1961.
238.
von BertalanffyL. General Systems Theory: FundamentalDevelopment, andApplications. New York: GeorgeBraziller. 1968.
239.
KendallA, SpangES. The role of industrial ecology in food and agriculture's adaptation to climate change. J Ind Ecol, 2019; 24:313–317.
240.
FroschRA.Industrial ecology: A philosophical introduction. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 1992; 89:800–803.
241.
LiuY, VillalbaG, AyresRU, et al.Global phosphorus flows and environmental impacts from a consumption perspective. J Ind Ecol, 2008; 12:229–247.
242.
KimS, DaleB. Cumulative energy and global warming impact from the production of biomass for biobased products. Ind Ecol 7:147–162.
243.
ChobtangJ, McLarenSJ, LedgardSF, et al.Consequential life cycle assessment of pasture-based milk production: A case study in the Waikato region, New Zealand. J Ind Ecol, 2017; 21:1139–1152.
244.
AlfaroJ, MillerS. Applying industrial symbiosis to smallholder farms. J Ind Ecol, 2014; 18:145–154.
245.
AlivisatosAP, BlaserMJ, BrodieEL, et al.A unified initiative to harness Earth's microbiomes: Transition from description to causality and engineering. Science, 2015; 350:507–508.
246.
DubilierN, McFall-NgaiMJ, ZhaoL. Create a global microbiome effort. Nature 2015;526 631–634.
247.
LawsonCE, HarcombeWR, HatzenpichlerR, et al.Common principles and best practices for engineering microbiomes. Nat Rev Microbiol, 2019; 17:725–741.
248.
VoorheesPJ, Cruz-TeranC, EdelsteinJ, et al.Challenges & opportunities for phage-based in situ microbiome engineering in the gut. J Control Release, 2020; 326:106–119.
RodriguezR, DuranP. Natural holobiome engineering by using native extreme microbiome to counteract the climate change effects. Front Bioeng Biotechnol, 2020; 8:568.
YinR, KardolP, ThakurMP, et al.Soil functional biodiversity and biological quality under threat: Intensive land use outweighs climate change. Soil Biol Biochem, 2020; 147.
253.
JanssonJK, HofmockelKS. The soil microbiome-from metagenomics to metaphenomics. Curr Opin Microbiol, 2018; 43:162–168.
254.
PachterL.Interpreting the unculturable majority. Nature Methods, 2006; 4:479–480.
255.
BachEM, WilliamsRJ, HargreavesSK, et al.Greatest soil microbial diversity found in micro-habitats. Soil Biol Biochem, 2018; 118:217–226.
256.
CompantS, SamadA, FaistH, et al.A review on the plant microbiome: Ecology, functions, and emerging trends in microbial application. J Adv Res, 2019; 19:29–37.
257.
HugginsDR, KarowRS, CollinsHP, et al.Introduction: Evaluating long-term impacts of harvesting crop residues on soil quality. Agron J, 2011; 103:230–233.
258.
GollanyHT, TitusBD, ScottDA, et al.Biogeochemical research priorities for sustainable biofuel and bioenergy feedstock production in the americas. Environ Manage, 2015; 56:1330–1355.
259.
McDanielMD, TiemannLK, GrandyAS. Does agricultural crop diversity enhance soil microbial biomass and organic matter dynamics? A meta-analysis. Ecol Appl, 2014; 24:560–570.
260.
TiemannLK, GrandyAS, AtkinsonEE, et al.Crop rotational diversity enhances belowground communities and functions in an agroecosystem. Ecol Lett, 2015; 18:761–771.
261.
TiemannLK, GrandyAS. Mechanisms of soil carbon accrual and storage in bioenergy cropping systems. GCB Bioenerg, 2015; 7:161–174.
262.
ShadeA, CaporasoJG, HandelsmanJ, et al.A meta-analysis of changes in bacterial and archaeal communities with time. ISME J, 2013; 7:1493–1506.
263.
GradyKL, SorensenJW, StopnisekN, et al.Assembly and seasonality of core phyllosphere microbiota on perennial biofuel crops. Nat Commun, 2019; 10:4135.
264.
ShadeA.Understanding microbiome stability in a changing world. mSystems, 2018; 3.
265.
BakkerMG, ManterDK, SheflinAM, et al.Harnessing the rhizosphere microbiome through plant breeding and agricultural management. Plant Soil, 2012; 360:1–13.
266.
GopalM, GuptaA. Microbiome selection could spur next-generation plant breeding strategies. Front Microbiol, 2016; 7:1971.
267.
HartmanK, van der HeijdenMGA, WittwerRA, et al.Cropping practices manipulate abundance patterns of root and soil microbiome members paving the way to smart farming. Microbiome, 2018; 6:14.
268.
GuanX, GaoX, AvellanA, et al. CuO nanoparticles alter the rhizospheric bacterial community and local nitrogen cycling for wheat grown in a Calcareous soil. Environ Sci Technol 2020.
269.
FagnanoM, AgrelliD, PascaleA, et al.Copper accumulation in agricultural soils: Risks for the food chain and soil microbial populations. Sci Total Environ, 2020; 734:139434.
270.
Kraut-CohenJ, ZoltiA, Shaltiel-HarpazL, et al.Effects of tillage practices on soil microbiome and agricultural parameters. Sci Total Environ, 2020; 705:135791.
271.
KimN, ZabaloyMC, GuanK, et al.Do cover crops benefit soil microbiome? A meta-analysis of current research. Soil Biol Biochem, 2020; 142.
272.
StryerL. Biochemistry. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman andCompany. 1981.
273.
HillJ. Early Pioneers of PhotosynthesisResearch. In: Eaton-RyeJ., TripathyB., SharkeyT. (eds) Eaton-RyeJ., TripathyB., Sharkey, vol 34. SpringerDordrecht. 2012.
274.
SahaR, SuthersPF, MaranasCD. Zea mays iRS1563: a comprehensive genome-scale metabolic reconstruction of maize metabolism. PLoS One, 2011; 6:e21784.
275.
MatsuokaT, TanakaS, EbinaK. Systems approach to excitation-energy and electron transfer reaction networks in photosystem II complex: model studies for chlorophyll a fluorescence induction kinetics. J Theor Biol, 2015; 380:220–237.
276.
BernsteinHC, CharaniaMA, McClureRS, et al.Multi-omic dynamics associate oxygenic photosynthesis with nitrogenase-mediated h2 production in Cyanothece sp. ATCC 51142. Sci Rep, 2015; 5:16004.
277.
ZargarSM, GuptaN, NazirM, et al.Impact of drought on photosynthesis: Molecular perspective. Plant Gene, 2017; 11:154–159.
278.
MaraisA, AdamsB, RingsmuthAK, et al.The future of quantum biology. J R Soc Interface, 2018; 15.
279.
MoralesA, YinX, HarbinsonJ, et al.In silico analysis of the regulation of the photosynthetic electron transport chain in C3 lants. Plant Physiol, 2018; 176:1247–1261.
280.
OakleyCG, SavageL, LotzS, et al.Genetic basis of photosynthetic responses to cold in two locally adapted populations of Arabidopsis thaliana. J Exp Bot, 2018; 69:699–709.
281.
ShawR, CheungCYM. A mass and charge balanced metabolic model of Setaria viridis revealed mechanisms of proton balancing in C4 plants. BMC Bioinformatics, 2019; 20:357.
282.
BaslamM, MitsuiT, HodgesM, et al.Photosynthesis in a changing global climate: Scaling up and scaling down in crops. Frontiers Plant Sci, 2020; 11.
283.
KinnersleyE. A course of experiments, in that curious and entertaining branch of natural philosophy, calll'd [sic] electricity; : Accompanied with lectures on the nature and properties of the electric fire. By WilliamJohnson. New York: H. Gaine, at the Bible andCrown, inHanover-Square. 1765.
284.
LemayJAL.Franklin and Kinnersley. Isis, 1961; 52:575–581.
285.
MurdochH. Illuminating Engineeering—From Edison's to laser New York: MacmillianPub. Comp. 1985.
286.
WheelerRM.A historical background of plant lighting: An introduction to the workshop. Hort Science, 2008; 43:1942–1943.
287.
PfeifferNE.Microchemical and morphological studies of effect of light on plants. Botanical Gazette, 1926; 81:173–195.
288.
PrilleuxE.De l'influence de la lumie ‘re artificiellesurlare’ductiondel'acidecarbonique par les plantes. Compt Rend Acad Sci Paris, 1869; 69:408–412.
289.
MangonH.Production de la matie ‘re verte des feuilles sous l'influence de la lumie‘re e ’lectrique. Compt Rend Acad Sci Paris, 1861; 53:243–244.
290.
WheelerR.A historical background of plant lighting: An introduction to the workshop. Hort Sci, 2008; 43:1942–1943.
291.
RehmanM, UllahS, BaoY, et al.Light-emitting diodes: Whether an efficient source of light for indoor plants?. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int, 2017; 24:24743–24752.
292.
GuptaSD, AgarwalA. Artificial lighting system for plant growth and development: Chronological advancement, working principles, and comparative assessment In: Light Emitting Diodes Agric 2017; pp. 1–25.
293.
RunkleES, MengQ, ParkY. LED applications in greenhouse and indoor production of horticultural crops. Acta Horticulturae, 2019:17–30.
294.
NazninMT, LefsrudM. An Overview of LED Lighting and Spectral Quality on Plant Photosynthesis In: Light Emitting Diodes for Agriculture. 2017; pp. 101–111.
295.
LiuH, FuY, YuJ, et al.Accumulation and primary metabolism of nitrate in lettuce (lactuca sativa l. var. youmaicai) grown under three different light sources. Communications Soil Sc Plant Analys, 2016; 47:1994–2002.
296.
ToldiD, GyugosM, DarkoE, et al.Light intensity and spectrum affect metabolism of glutathione and amino acids at transcriptional level. PLoS One, 2019; 14:e0227271.
297.
SolanoCJ, HernándezJA, SuardíazJ, et al.Impacts of LEDs in the Red spectrum on the germination, early seedling growth and antioxidant metabolism of pea (Pisum sativum L.) and melon (Cucumis melo L.). Agriculture, 2020; 10.
298.
SpalholzH, Perkins-VeazieP, HernándezR. Impact of sun-simulated white light and varied blue:red spectrums on the growth, morphology, development, and phytochemical content of green- and red-leaf lettuce at different growth stages. Scientia Horticulturae, 2020; 264.
299.
MengQ, RunkleES. Far-red radiation interacts with relative and absolute blue and red photon flux densities to regulate growth, morphology, and pigmentation of lettuce and basil seedlings. Scientia Horticulturae, 2019; 255:269–280.
300.
ZhangM, WhitmanCM, RunkleES. Manipulating growth, color, and taste attributes of fresh cut lettuce by greenhouse supplemental lighting. Scientia Horticulturae, 2019; 252:274–282.
301.
MengQ, KellyN, RunkleES. Substituting green or far-red radiation for blue radiation induces shade avoidance and promotes growth in lettuce and kale. Environ Experimental Botany, 2019; 162:383–391.
302.
BertoneR. Vertical Farming is Growing From the Ground Up. Available at: https://farmflavor.com/michigan/vertical-farming-growing-ground/ (Last accessed July2020).
303.
HigginsC. Current Status of Commercial Vertical Farms with LED Lighting Market in North America In: LED Lighting for Urban Agriculture. 2016; pp. 309–315.
304.
GómezC, Gennaro IzzoL. Increasing efficiency of crop production with LEDs. AIMS Agric Food, 2018; 3:135–153.
305.
DespommierD. The Vertical Farm: Feeding the World in the 21st Century. New York: St. Martin's Press. 2010.
306.
de AndaJ, ShearH. Potential of vertical hydroponic agriculture in Mexico. Sustainability, 2017; 9.
307.
ZhengJ, JiF, HeD, et al.Effect of light intensity on rooting and growth of hydroponic strawberry runner plants in a LED plant factory. Agronomy. 2019; 9.
308.
RuangrakE, KhummuengW. Effects of artificial light sources on accumulation of phytochemical contents in hydroponic lettuce. J Hort Sci Biotechnol, 2018; 94:378–388.
309.
MattsonNS, HarwoodED. Effect of light regimen on yield and flavonoid content of warehouse grown aeroponic Eruca sativa. Acta Horticulturae, 2012; 956:417–422.
310.
HeJ, QinL, AlahakoonPKDT, et al.LED-integrated vertical aeroponic farming system for vegetable production in Singapore. Acga Horticulturae, 2018; 1227:599–606.
311.
TomadoniB, CapelloC, ValenciaGA, et al.Self-assembled proteins for food applications: A review. Trends Food Sci Technol, 2020; 101:1–16.
312.
ShaL, XiongYL. Plant protein-based alternatives of reconstructed meat: Science, technology, and challenges. Trends Food Sci Technol, 2020; 102:51–61.
313.
RischerH, SzilvayGR, Oksman-CaldenteyKM. Cellular agriculture—Industrial biotechnology for food and materials. Curr Opin Biotechnol, 2020; 61:128–134.
314.
PostMJ, HocquetteJF. New Sources of Animal Proteins: Cultured Meat In: New Aspects of Meat Quality 2017;425–441.
315.
KadimIT, MahgoubO, BaqirS, et al.Cultured meat from muscle stem cells: A review of challenges and prospects. J Integrative Agric, 2015; 14:222–233.
316.
HeinleinRA. Farmer in theSky. New York: BallantineBooks. 1950.
317.
RobinsonKM. RedMars. New York: BantamBooks. 1993.
318.
RobinsonKM. GreenMars. New York: BantamBooks. 1994.
319.
RobinsonKM. BlueMars. New York: BantamBooks. 1996.
320.
SpoonerBS, DeBellL, HawkinsL, et al. Brine shrimp development in space: Ground-based data to shuttle flight results Transactions of the Kansas Academy of Science 1992;95:87–92.
321.
BenoitMR, LiW, StodieckLS, et al.Microbial antibiotic production aboard the International Space Station. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol, 2006; 70:403–411.
322.
FerlRJ, PaulA-L. Lunar plant biology—A review of the apollo era. Astrobiology, 2010; 10.
323.
PaulA-L, WheelerRM, LevineHG, et al. Fundamental plant biology enabled by the Space Shuttle American J Botany 2013;100:226–234.
324.
ZabelP, BamseyM, SchubertD, et al.Review and analysis of over 40 years of space plant growth systems. Life Sci Space Res (Amst), 2016; 10:1–16.
325.
HenningerDL, TriT, PakhamNJC. NASA'S advances life support systems hulas-rates test facility. A& Spacc Res, 1996; 18.
326.
WheelerRM.Plants for human life support in space: From Myers to Mars. Gravitiational and Space Biology. 2010; 23.
327.
MoldersK, QuinetM, DecatJ, et al.Selection and hydroponic growth of potato cultivars for bioregenerative life support systems. Adv Space Res, 2012; 50:156–165.
328.
KarouiaF, PeyvanK, PohorilleA. Toward biotechnology in space: High-throughput instruments for in situ biological research beyond Earth. Biotechnol Adv, 2017; 35:905–932.
329.
MazzucatoM. The Entrepreneurial State: DebunkingPublic vs. Private SectorMyths. New York: PublicAffairs. 2015.
330.
KoeningHE, CopperWE, FalveyJM. Engineering for ecological, sociological and economic compatibility. IEEE Transaction on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, 1972; SMC-2:319–331.