SchaubP, Al-BabiliS, DrakeR, BeyerP. Why is Golden Rice golden (yellow) instead of red?. Plant Physiol, 2005; 138(1):441–450.
2.
TaverneLD. Harmful greens [Letter to Editor]. The Economist, 2015; 414(8922):14.
3.
PotrykusI. Golden rice and beyond. Plant Physiol, 2001; 125(3):1157–1161.
4.
WesselerJ, ZilbermanD. The economic power of the Golden Rice opposition. Environ Dev Econ, 2014; 19(06):724–742.
5.
SpadyT. Pope blesses Golden Rice. ASPB News, 2014; 41(1):11.
6.
Greenpeace. All that glitters is not gold, the false hope of “Golden Rice.” Amsterdam: Greenpeace International, 2005. Available at www.greenpeace.org/international/Global/international/planet-2/report/2005/5/All%20That%20Glitters%20is%20Not%20Gold.pdf (Last accessed March2015).
7.
Greenpeace. Golden illusion: The broken promises of “Golden” Rice. Amsterdam: Greenpeace International. 2013. Available at: www.greenpeace.org/international/Global/international/publications/agriculture/2013/458%20-%20Golden%20Illusion-GE-goldenrice.pdf (Last accessed March2015).
8.
PotrykusI. “Golden Rice”, a GMO-product for public good, and the consequences of GE-regulation. J Plant Biochem Biotechnol, 2012; 21(1):68–75.
9.
WesselerJ, KaplanS, ZilbermanD. The cost of delaying approval of Golden Rice. ARE Update: University of California Giannini Foundation of Agricultural Economics. 2014; 17(3):1–3.
10.
WiddusR. Public–private partnerships: An overview. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg, 2005;(99S):S1–S8.
11.
HennesseyWO, GuptaA, KowalskiSP. Practice driving policy: Agbiotech transfer as capacity building. In: SmythSJ, PhillipsPWB, CastleD, eds. Handbook on Agriculture, Biotechnology and Development. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2014:314–342.
12.
KrattigerA, PotrykusI. Golden Rice: A product-development partnership in agricultural biotechnology and humanitarian licensing. In: KrattigerA, MahoneyRT, NelsenL, et al. eds. Executive Guide to Intellectual Property Management in Health and Agricultural Innovation: A Handbook of Best Practices. Oxford, UK: MIHR/PIPRA, 2007:CS11–CS14.
13.
Gently modified: The EU lifts its ban of GM crops. The Economist, 2015; 414(8921):52.
14.
MitchellL. Biotechnology and food security. USDA Economic Research Service Agriculture Information Bulletin. June2001, Number 765-11.
15.
GregoryP, KowalskiSP. Crop bioengineering: Enormous potential for catalyzing international development. Agriculture for Development, 2009;(6):26–30.
16.
KryderRD, KowalskiSP, KrattigerAF. The Intellectual and Technical Property Components of Pro-Vitamin A Rice (Golden Rice): A Preliminary Freedom-to-Operate Review. ISAAA Briefs no. 20. Ithaca, NY: ISAAA, 2000.
17.
KowalskiSP, KryderRD. Golden rice: A case study in intellectual property management and international capacity building. Risk Health Saf Environ, 2002; 13(1/2):47–67.
18.
HoustonR. Technical brief: Sustainability of vitamin A supplementation programs. US Agency for International Development's Health Infectious Disease and Nutrition Office (HIDN) USAID, March2007. Available at: http://pdf.usaid.gov/pdf_docs/PNADK392.pdf (Last accessed March2015).
19.
World Health Organization. Global prevalence of vitamin A deficiency in populations at risk 1995–2005. WHO Global Database on Vitamin A Deficiency. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2009.
20.
HallJ, BachorV, MatosS. Developing and diffusing new technologies: Strategies for legitimization. Calif Manage Rev, 2014; 56(3):98–117.
21.
PaineJA, ShiptonCA, ChaggarS, et al.Improving the nutritional value of Golden Rice through increased pro-vitamin A content. Nat Biotechnol, 2005; 23(4):482–487.
22.
JordaKF. Trade secrets and trade-secret licensing. In: KrattigerA, MahoneyRT, NelsenL, et al. eds. Intellectual Property Management in Health and Agricultural Innovation: A Handbook of Best Practices. Oxford, UK: MIHR/PIPRA, 2007:1043–1057.
23.
Golden Rice and Intellectual Property. Available at: www.goldenrice.org (Last accessed February2015).
24.
DattaSK, DattaK, ParkhiV, et al.Golden rice: Introgression, breeding, and field evaluation. Euphytica, 2007; 154(3):271–278.
25.
KhushGS. Biotechnology: Public–private partnerships and intellectual property rights in the context of developing countries. In: McManisCR, ed. Biodiversity and the Law. Sterling, VA: Earthscan, 2007:179–191.
26.
TangG, QinJ, DolnikowskiGG, et al.Golden Rice is an effective source of vitamin A. Am J Clin Nutr, 2009; 89(6):1776–1783.
27.
HoaTTC, Al-BabiliS, SchaubP, et al.Golden Indica and Japonica rice lines amenable to deregulation. Plant Physiol, 2003; 133(1):161–169.
28.
KowalskiSP, EboraRV, KryderRD, PotterRH. Transgenic crops, biotechnology and ownership rights: What scientists need to know. Plant J, 2002; 31(4):407–421.
29.
ClarkKL, KowalskiSP. Harnessing the power of patent information to accelerate innovation. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Data Min Knowl Discov, 2012; 2(5):427–435.
30.
ChesbroughH. Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press Books, 2003.
31.
ChesbroughH. Open innovation: Where we've been and where we're going. Res Manage, 2012; 55(4):20–27.
32.
BaldiaS. The transaction cost problem in international intellectual property exchange and innovation markets. Nw J Int'l L & Bus, 2013; 34(1):1–52.
33.
MayerJE. Delivering Golden Rice to developing countries. J AOAC Int, 2007; 90(5):1445–1449.
34.
HallBH. Open innovation & intellectual property rights: The two-edged sword. Economy, Culture and History Japan Spotlight Bimonthly, 2010; 29(1):18.
35.
GranstrandO, HolgerssonM. The challenge of closing open innovation: The intellectual property disassembly problem. Res Manage, 2014; 57(5):19–25.
36.
McCarthyJT, SchechterRE, FranklynDJ. McCarthy's Desk Encyclopedia of Intellectual Property. Washington, DC: Bureau of National Affairs, 2004.
37.
WatkinsA, MandellJ. Global Forum Action Plan: STI Capacity Building Partnerships for Sustainable Development. Washington, DC: The World Bank, 2010.
38.
YangCH, ShyuJZ. A symbiosis dynamic analysis for collaborative R&D in open innovation. Int J Comput Sci Eng, 2010; 5(1):74–84.
39.
LimH, ParkY. Identification of technological knowledge intermediaries. Scientometrics, 2010; 84(3):543–561.
40.
WolsonR. The role of technology transfer offices in building the South African biotechnology sector: An assessment of policies, practices and impact. J Technol Transf, 2007; 32(4):343–365.
41.
MarediaKM, ErbischFH, SampaioMJ. Technology transfer offices for developing countries. Biotechnol Dev Monit, 2000;(43):15–18.
42.
ShabdSA. Food security and Indian agriculture: Policies, production performance and marketing environment. Ag Econ Res Rev, 2009; 22(1):1–19.
43.
GiddingsLV, ChassyBM. Igniting agricultural innovation: Biotechnology policy prescriptions for a new administration. Sci Prog, 2009:1–11.
44.
The World Bank Institute. Developing Technology and Innovation in Africa: Focus on Agriculture and Food Industry. Research Agenda and Policy Forum Sponsored by the Government of Denmark and the World Bank Institute with Support from the Government of Ireland and Global Development Network. Dar-es-Salaam, Tanzania, May12–14, 2008.
45.
GrimesHD, PayumoJ, JonesK. Opinion: Food security needs sound IP. The Scientist. July20, 2011. Available at: www.the-scientist.com/?articles.view/articleNo/30934/title/Opinion–Food-Security-Needs-Sound-IP/ (Last accessed March2015).
46.
DubockA. Nutritional enhancement by biofortification of staple crops. In: BennettDJ, JenningsRC, eds. Successful Agricultural Innovation in Emerging Economies: New Genetic Technologies for Global Food Production. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2013:199–220.
47.
OvaskaT. The failure of development aid. Cato J, 2003; 23(2):175–188.
48.
BereanoP. Bill's excellent African adventure: A tale of technocratic agroindustrial philanthrocapitalism. Genewatch, 2013; 26(1):16–17.
49.
DoughtonS. After 10 years, few payoffs from Bill Gates' “Grand Challenges.”. The Seattle Times. December22, 2014. Available at: www.seattletimes.com/seattle-news/after-10-years-few-payoffs-from-gatesrsquo-lsquogrand-challengesrsquo/ (Last accessed March2015).