Pathways to Obtain Regulatory Approvals for the Use of Genetically Modified Algae in Biofuel or Biobased Chemical Production

US Department of Energy. National Algal Biofuels Technology Roadmap. Washington, DC, 2010.

Rosenberg JN , Oyler GA , Wilkinson L , Betenbaugh MJ . A green light for engineered algae: Redirecting metabolism to fuel a biotechnology revolution. Curr Opin Biotechnol, 2008; 19(5):430–436.

Larkum AW , Ross IL , Kruse O , Hankamer B . Selection, breeding and engineering of microalgae for bioenergy and biofuel production. Trends Biotechnol, 2012; 30(4):198–205.

Trentacoste EM , Martinez AM , Zenk T . The place of algae in agriculture: Policies for algal biomass production. Photosynth Res, 2014; doi:10.1007/s11120-014-9985-8

Radakovits R , Jinkerson RE , Darzins A , Posewitz MC . Genetic engineering of algae for enhanced biofuel production. Eukaryot Cell, 2010; 9(4):486–501.

Jones CS , Mayfield SP . Algae biofuels: Versatility for the future of bioenergy. Curr Opin Biotechnol, 2012; 23(3):346–351.

Rosgaard L , de Porcellinis AJ , Jacobsen JH , et al. Bioengineering of carbon fixation, biofuels, and biochemicals in cyanobacteria and plants. J Biotechnol, 2012; 162(1):134–147.

Work VH , D'Adamo S , Radakovits R , et al. Improving photosynthesis and metabolic networks for the competitive production of phototroph-derived biofuels. Curr Opin Biotechnol, 2012; 23(3):290–297.

Nozzi NE , Oliver JW , Atsumi S . Cyanobacteria as a platform for biofuel production. Frontiers Bioeng Biotechnol, 2013; 1:7.

Henley WJ , Litaker RW , Novoveská L , et al. Initial risk assessment of genetically modified (GM) microalgae for commodity-scale biofuel cultivation. Algal Research, 2013; 2(1):66–77.

Enzing CN , Nooijen A , Eggink G , et al. Algae and Genetic Modification. Research, Production and Risks. 2012. Available at: www.wageningenur.nl/en/Publication-details.htm?publicationId=publication-way-343238363239 (Last accessed February 2015 ).

Snow AA , Andow DA , Gepts P , et al. Genetically engineered organisms and the environment: Current status and recommendations. Ecol Appl, 2005; 15(2):377–404.

Tiedje JMC , Colwell RK , Grossman YL , et al. The planned introduction of genetically engineered organisms: Ecological considerations and recommendations. Ecology, 1989; 70(2):298–315.

Gressel J , van der Vlugt CJB , Bergmans HEN . Environmental risks of large scale cultivation of microalgae: Mitigation of spills. Algal Research. 2013; 2(3):286–298.

Glaser A , Glick P . Growing Risk: Addressing the Invasive Potential of Bioenergy Feedstocks. Washington, DC: National Wildlife Federation, 2012.

Ryan C . Cultivating Clean Energy: The Promise of Algae Biofuels. Washington, DC: National Resources Defense Council, 2009.

Menetrez MY . An overview of algae biofuel production and potential 3nvironmental impact. Environ Sci Technol, 2012; 46(13):7073–7085.

Snow AA , Smith VH . Genetically engineered algae for biofuels: A key role for ecologists. BioScience, 2012; 62(8):765–768.

Gressel J , van der Vlugt CJ , Bergmans HE . Cultivated microalgae spills: Hard to predict/easier to mitigate risks. Trends Biotechnol, 2014; 32(2):65–69.

Krimsky S . Genetic Alchemy: The Social History of the Recombinant DNA Controversy. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 1985.

Glass DJ . Impact of Government Regulation on Commercial Biotechnology (Chapter 10). In: Ono RD , ed. Business of Biotechnology. Boston: Newnes, 1991:169–198.

Glass DJ . Regulation of the Commercial Uses of Microorganisms. In: Encyclopedia of Environmental Microbiology. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2003.

Office of Science and Technology Policy. Coordinated Framework for Regulation of Biotechnology. Federal Register, 51; 1986:23302–23393.

Bergeson LL , Auer CM , Hernandez O . Creative adaptation: Enhancing oversight of synthetic biology under the Toxic Substances Control Act. Ind Biotechnol, 2014; 10(5):313–322.

US Environmental Protection Agency. Microbial Products of Biotechnology; Final Regulation Under the Toxic Substances Control Act. Federal Register, 62; 1997:17910–17958.

US Environmental Protection Agency. Regulatory Impact Analysis for the Regulation of Microbial Products of Biotechnology: The Regulated Community. Available at: www.epa.gov/oppt/biotech/pubs/ria/ria013.htm (Last accessed September 2014 ).

US Department of Agriculture. Introduction of Genetically Engineered Organisms. Federal Register, 52; 1987:22892–22915.

Organic Consumers Association. GE Algae Approved in Hawaii Despite Widespread Opposition. Available at: www.organicconsumers.org/ge/algae072005.cfm (Last accessed September 2014 ).

National Sea Grant Law Center. Pharmaceutical Research Delayed for Lack of Environmental Review. Available at: http://nsglc.olemiss.edu/SandBar/SandBar4/4.4pharmaceutical.htm (Last accessed September 2014 ).

Glass DJ . Regulating biotech: A case study. Forum Appl Res Public Policy, 1989; 4(3):92–95.

Food and Agriculture Organization. National Aquaculture Legislative Overview Fact Sheets. Available at: www.fao.org/fishery/nalo/search/en (Last accessed January 2015 ).

Eggers B , Mackenzie R . The Cartagena Protocol on biosafety. J Int Econ Law, 2000; 3(3):525–543.

European Union. Directive 2009/41/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 6 May 2009 on the contained use of genetically modified micro-organisms. Available at: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2009:125:0075:0097:EN:PDF (Last accessed September 2014 ).

European Union. Directive 2001/18/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 March 2001 on the deliberate release into the environment of genetically modified organisms. Available at: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:32001L0018 (Last accessed September 2014 ).

Yamanouchi K . Regulatory considerations in the development and application of biotechnology in Japan. Rev Sci Tech (International Office of Epizootics), 2005; 24(1):109–115.

Tribe D . Gene technology regulation in Australia: A decade of a federal implementation of a statutory legal code in a context of constituent states taking divergent positions. GM Crops Food, 2012; 3(1):21–29.

Darch H , Shahsavarani A . The Regulation of organisms used in agriculture under the Canadian Environmental Protection Act, 1999. In: Wozniak CA , McHughen A , eds. Regulation of Agricultural Biotechnology: The United States and Canada. The Netherlands: Springer, 2012:137–145.

US Environmental Protection Agency. TSCA Biotechnology Notifications, FY 1998 to Present. Available at: www.epa.gov/biotech_rule/pubs/submiss.htm (Last accessed September 2014 ).

US Department of Agriculture. Notification Procedures for the Introduction of Certain Regulated Articles. Federal Register, 58; 1993:17044–17059.

US Department of Agriculture. Simplification of Requirements and Procedures for Genetically Engineered Organisms. Federal Register, 62; 1997:23945–23958.

US Environmental Protection Agency. Points To Consider in The Preparation of TSCA Biotechnology Submissions for Microorganisms. Available at: www.epa.gov/oppt/biotech/pubs/pdf/ptcbio.pdf (Last accessed September 2014 ).

Algenol. Available at: www.algenol.com (Last accessed February 2015 ).

Strauss SH , Kershen DL , Bouton JH , et al. Far-reaching deleterious impacts of regulations on research and environmental studies of recombinant DNA-modified perennial biofuel crops in the United States. BioScience, 2010; 60(9):729–741.

US Food and Drug Administration. Generally Recognized as Safe (GRAS) Notification Program. Available at: www.fda.gov/AnimalVeterinary/Products/AnimalFoodFeeds/GenerallyRecognizedasSafeGRASNotifications/default.htm (Last accessed September 2014 ).

CTNBIO. Technical Report No. 3775/2013 - Commercial release for the production of triglycerides and bioproducts marketing, and any other related micro-organism Prototheca moriformis activities - Case No. 01200.001052 / 2013-32. Available at: www.ctnbio.gov.br/index.php/content/view/18732.html (Last accessed September 2014 ).