FraserJ, RosenM. Patenting genes in a post-Myriad world. Ind Biotechnol, 2013; 9(4):163–164.
2.
ReiterT, FasseJP.Patent eligibility of biological methods and compositions. Ind Biotechnol, 2013; 9(3):90–92.
3.
Mayo Collaborative Servs. v. Prometheus Labs., Inc., 566 U.S. __, 132 S. Ct. 1289 (2012).
4.
Assoc. for Molecular Pathology v. Myriad Genetics, Inc., 569 U.S. __, 133 S. Ct. 2107, 2111 (2013).
5.
Guidance for Determining Subject Matter Eligibility of Claims Reciting Or Involving Laws of Nature, Natural Phenomena, & Natural Products. Citing Diamond v. Chakrabarty, 447 U.S. 303 (1980) and Myriad, 133 S. Ct. at 2116-17. Available at www.uspto.gov/patents/law/exam/myriad-mayo_guidance.pdf (Last accessed May2014).
6.
Guidance for Determining Subject Matter Eligibility of Claims Reciting Or Involving Laws of Nature, Natural Phenomena, & Natural Products at pg 3. Available at www.uspto.gov/patents/law/exam/myriad-mayo_guidance.pdf (Last accessed May2014).