Spherical nanoparticles are attracting increasing interest for diverse commercial uses due to their many useful attributes such as applicability as controlled-release systems and their super-hydrophobicity. In this review, methods of particle formation for cellulose, its derivatives, and related species are discussed with reference to numerous specific examples. Techniques for characterization of particle size, size-distribution, and related properties under both dispersed and solid particle conditions are summarized and contrasted. Finally, we note potential applications for these surprisingly reproducible nanospheres.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
FeynmanRP. There's plenty of room at the bottom. Eng Sci, 1960; 23(5):22–36.
2.
MoghimiSM, HunterAC, MurrayJC. Nanomedicine: Current status and future prospects. FASEB J, 2005; 19(3):311–330.
3.
MarinE, BriceñoMI, Caballero-GeorgeC. Critical evaluation of biodegradable polymers used in nanodrugs. Int J Nanomed, 2013; 8(1):3071–3091.
4.
PelazB, JaberS, de AberasturiDJ, et al.The state of nanoparticle-based nanoscience and biotechnology: Progress, promises, and challenges. ACS Nano, 2012; 6(10):8468–8483.
5.
LidénG. The European commission tries to define nanomaterials. Ann Occup Hyg, 2011; 55(1):1–5.
6.
BuzeaCI, PachecoI, RobbieK. Nanomaterials and nanoparticles: Sources and toxicity. Biointerphases, 2007; 2(4):MR17–MR71.
7.
ChenL, GeisslerA, BonaccursoE, ZhangK. Transparent slippery surfaces made with sustainable porous cellulose lauroyl ester films. ACS Appl Mater Interf, 2014; 6:6969–6976.
8.
NiemeyerCM. Nanoparticles, proteins, and nucleic acids: Biotechnology meets materials science. Angew Chem Int Ed, 2001; 40(22):4128–4158.
9.
BruceIJ, SenT. Surface modification of magnetic nanoparticles with alkoxysilanes and their application in magnetic bioseparations. Langmuir, 2005; 21(15):7029–7035.
10.
TolaymatTM, El BadawyAM, GenaidyA, et al.An evidence-based environmental perspective of manufactured silver nanoparticle in syntheses and applications: A systematic review and critical appraisal of peer-reviewed scientific papers. Sci Tot Environ, 2010; 408(5):999–1006.
11.
PanB, XingB. Applications and implications of manufactured nanoparticles in soils: A review. Eur J Soil Sci, 2012; 63(4):437–456.
12.
MoonRJ, MartiniA, NairnJ, et al.Cellulose nanomaterials review: Structure, properties and nanocomposites. Chem Soc Rev, 2011; 40(7):3941–3994.
13.
DufresneA. Nanocellulose: From Nature to High Performance Tailored Materials. Berlin, Germany: de Gruyter, 2012.
14.
HeleniusG, BäckdahlH, BodinA, et al.In vivo biocompatibility of bacterial cellulose. J Biomed Mater Res A, 2006; 76(2):431–438.
15.
HeinzeT, Petzold-WelckeK. Recent advances in cellulose chemistry. In: HabibiY, LuciaLA, eds. Polysaccharide Building Blocks: A Sustainable Approach to the Development of Renewable Biomaterials. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, 2012:1–50.
16.
SongQ, WinterWT, BujanovicBJ, AmidonTE. Nanofibrillated cellulose (NFC): A high-value co-product that improves the economics of cellulosic ethanol. Energies, 2014; 7:607–618.
17.
LiXF, DingEY, LiGK. A method of preparing spherical nano-crystal cellulose with mixed crystalline forms of cellulose I and II. Chin J Polym Sci, 2001; 19(3):291–296.
18.
ZhangJ, ElderTJ, PuY, RagauskasAJ. Facile synthesis of spherical cellulose nanoparticles. Carbohydr Polym, 2007; 69(3):607–611.
19.
WondraczekH, Petzold-WelckeK, FardimP, HeinzeT. Nanoparticles from conventional cellulose esters: Evaluation of preparation methods. Cellulose, 2013; 20(2):751–760.
GunduzO, AhmadZ, StrideE, EdirisingheM. Continuous generation of ethyl cellulose drug delivery nanocarriers from microbubbles. Pharm Res, 2013; 30(1):225–237.
22.
BielskaD, KarewiczA, KamińskiK, et al.Self-organized thermo-responsive hydroxypropyl cellulose nanoparticles for curcumin delivery. Eur Polym J, 2013; 49(9):2485–2494.
23.
DesgouillesS, VauthierC, BazileD, et al.The design of nanoparticles obtained by solvent evaporation: A comprehensive study. Langmuir, 2003; 19(22):9504–9510.
24.
UbrichN, BouillotP, PellerinC, et al.Preparation and characterization of propranolol hydrochloride nanoparticles: A comparative study. J Control Release, 2004; 97(2):291–300.
25.
LokhandeAB, MishraS, KulkarniRD, NaikJB. Preparation and characterization of repaglinide loaded ethylcellulose nanoparticles by solvent diffusion technique using high pressure homogenizer. J Pharm Res, 2013; 7(5):421–426.
26.
BagheriM, PourmirzaeiL. Synthesis and characterization of cholesteryl-modified graft copolymer from hydroxypropyl cellulose and its application as nanocarrier. Macromol Res, 2013; 21(7):801–808.
27.
LokhandeAB, MishraS, KulkarniRD, NaikJB. Influence of different viscosity grade ethylcellulose polymers on encapsulation and in vitro release study of drug loaded nanoparticles. J Pharm Res, 2013; 7(5):414–420.
28.
PeruginiP, SimeoniS, ScaliaS, et al.Effect of nanoparticle encapsulation on the photostability of the sunscreen agent, 2-ethylhexyl-p-methoxycinnamate. Int J Pharm, 2002; 246(1-2):37–45.
29.
SpernarthL, MagdassiS. Preparation of ethyl cellulose nanoparticles from nano-emulsion obtained by inversion at constant temperature. Micro Nano Lett, 2007; 2(4):90–95.
30.
GeneralovaAN, SizovaSV, OleinikovVA, et al.Highly fluorescent ethyl cellulose nanoparticles containing embedded semiconductor nanocrystals. Colloid Surf A, 2009; 342(1–3):59–64.
31.
CalderóG, García-CelmaMJ, SolansC. Formation of polymeric nano-emulsions by a low-energy method and their use for nanoparticle preparation. J Colloid Inter Sci, 2011; 353(2):406–411.
32.
HornigS, HeinzeT. Efficient approach to design stable water-dispersible nanoparticles of hydrophobic cellulose esters. Biomacromolecules, 2008; 9(5):1487–1492.
33.
KultererMR, ReischlM, ReichelVE, et al.Nanoprecipitation of cellulose acetate using solvent/nonsolvent mixtures as dispersive media. Colloid Surf A, 2011; 375(1-3):23–29.
34.
WaichK, MayrT, KlimantI. Fluorescence sensors for trace monitoring of dissolved ammonia. Talanta, 2008; 77(1):66–72.
35.
RavikumaraNR, MadhusudhanB, NagarajTS, et al.Preparation and evaluation of nimesulide-loaded ethylcellulose and methylcellulose nanoparticles and microparticles for oral delivery. J Biomater Appl, 2009; 24(1):47–64.
36.
Pan-InP, BanlunaraW, ChaichanawongsarojN, WanichwecharungruangS. Ethyl cellulose nanoparticles: Clarithomycin encapsulation and eradication of H. pylori. Carbohydr Polym, 2014; 109(1): 22–27.
37.
KostagM, KöhlerS, LiebertT, HeinzeT. Pure cellulose nanoparticles from trimethylsilyl cellulose. Macromol Symp, 2010; 294(2):96–106.
38.
HettrichK, PinnowM, VolkertB, et al.Novel aspects of nanocellulose. Cellulose, 2014; 21(4):2479–2488.
39.
AdsulM, SoniSK, BhargavaSK, BansalV. Facile approach for the dispersion of regenerated cellulose in aqueous system in the form of nanoparticles. Biomacromolecules, 2912; 13(9):2890–2895.
40.
JinHY, XiaF, ZhaoYP. Preparation of hydroxypropyl methyl cellulose phthalate nanoparticles with mixed solvent using supercritical antisolvent process and its application in co-precipitation of insulin. Adv Powder Technol, 2012; 23(2):157–163.
41.
MajediFS, Hasani-SadrabadiMM, EmamiSH, et al.Microfluidic synthesis of chitosan-based nanoparticles for fuel cell applications. Chem Commun, 2012; 48(62):7744–7746.
42.
MajediFS, Hasani-SadrabadiMM, HojjatiS, et al.Microfluidic assisted self-assembly of chitosan based nanoparticles as drug delivery agents. Lab Chip, 2013; 13(2):204–207.
43.
TressetG, MarculescuC, SalonenA, et al.Fine control over the size of surfactant–polyelectrolyte nanoparticles by hydrodynamic flow focusing. Anal Chem 2013l;85(12):5850–5856.
44.
GaoJ, HaidarG, LuX, HuZ. Self-association of hydroxypropylcellulose in water. Macromolecules, 2001; 34(7):2242–2247.
45.
XiaX, TangS, LuX, HuZ. Formation and volume phase transition of hydroxypropyl cellulose microgels in salt solution. Macromolecules, 2003; 36(10):3695–3698.
46.
CaiT, HuZ, MarquezM. Synthesis and self-assembly of nearly monodisperse nanoparticles of a naturally occurring polymer. Langmuir, 2004; 20(18):7355–7359.
47.
DouH, SunK, YangW. The self-assembly of hydroxypropylcellulose and carboxyl-ended surfactants to multi-morphological nanoparticles. Macromol Chem Phys, 2006; 207(20):1899–1904.
48.
DouH, TangM, YangW, SunK. One-pot synthesis, characterization, and drug loading of polysaccharide-based nanoparticles with carboxyl functional groups. Colloid Polym Sci, 2007; 285(9):1043–1047.
49.
TanJ, KangH, LiuR, et al.Dual-stimuli sensitive nanogels fabricated by self-association of thiolated hydroxypropyl cellulose. Polym Chem, 2011; 2(3):672–678.
50.
YaoR, XuJ, LuX, DengS. Phase transition behavior of HPMC-AA and preparation of HPMC-PAA nanogels. J Nanomater, 2011; doi.org/10.1155/2011/507542
51.
IbrahimMM, El-ZawawyWK, NassarMA. Synthesis and characterization of polyvinyl alcohol/nanospherical cellulose particle films. Carbohdr Polym, 2010; 79(3):694–699.
52.
ThakoreS. Nanosized cellulose derivatives as green reinforcing agents at higher loadings in natural rubber. J Appl Polym Sci, 2014; 131(16):doi: 10.1002/APP.40632
53.
XiongR, ZhangX, TianD, et al.Comparing microcrystalline with spherical nanocrystalline cellulose from waste cotton fabrics. Cellulose, 2012; 19(4):1189–1198.
54.
VoskoboinikovIV, KonstantinovaSA, KorotkovAN, GalbraikhLS. Preparation and properties of aqueous dispersions of cellulose nanospheres. Russ J Bioorg Chem, 2013; 39(7):694–698.
55.
BlancoMD, AlonsoMJ. Development and characterization of protein-loaded poly(lactide-co-glycolide) nanospheres. Eur J Pharm Biopharm, 1997; 43(3):287–294.
56.
LeeWk, ParkJy, JungS, et al.Preparation and characterization of biodegradable nanoparticles entrapping immunodominant peptide conjugated with PEG for oral tolerance induction. J Control Release, 2005; 105(1-2):77–88.
57.
FeczkóT, VargaO, KovácsM, et al.Preparation and characterization of photochromic poly(methyl methacrylate) and ethyl cellulose nanocapsules containing a spirooxazine dye. J Photochem Photobiol A: Chem, 2011; 222(1):293–298.
58.
GanachaudF, KatzJL. Nanoparticles and nanocapsules created using the Ouzo effect: Spontaneous emulsification as an alternative to ultrasonic and high-shear devices. Chem Phys Chem, 2005; 6(2):209–216.
59.
SchubertS, DelaneyJTJr, SchubertUS. Nanoprecipitation and nanoformulation of polymers: From history to powerful possibilities beyond poly(lactic acid). Soft Matter, 2011; 7:1581–1588.
60.
AubryJ, GanachaudF, Cohen AddadJ-P, CabaneB. Nanoprecipitation of poly(methyl methacrylate) by solvent shifting: 1. Boundaries. Langmuir, 2009; 25:1970–1979.
61.
Mora-HuertasC, FessiH, ElaissariA. Influence of process and formulation parameters on the formation of submicron particles by solvent displacement and emulsification-diffusion methods. Adv Colloid Interface Sci, 2011; 163(2):90–122.
62.
KultererMR, ReichelVE, KarglR, et al.Functional polysaccharide composite nanoparticles from cellulose acetate and potential applications. Adv Funct Mater, 2012; 22(8):1749–1758.
63.
NelsonK, DengY. Encapsulation of inorganic particles with nanostructured cellulose. Macromol Mater Eng, 2007; 292(10-11):1158–1163.
64.
KarnikR, GuF, BastoP, et al.Microfluidic platform for controlled synthesis of polymeric nanoparticles. Nano Lett, 2008; 8(9):2906–2912.
65.
KnightJB, VishwanathA, BrodyJP, AustRH. Hydrodynamic focusing on a silicon chip: Mixing nanoliters in microseconds. Phys Rev Let, 1998; 80:3863–3866.
66.
TrabelsiS, GuillotS, RitaccoH, et al.Nanostructures of colloidal complexes formed in oppositely charged polyelectrolyte/surfactant dilute aqueous solutions. Eur Phys J E Soft Matter, 2007; 23(3):305–311.
67.
LuX, HuZ, GaoJ. Synthesis and light scattering study of hydroxypropyl cellulose microgels. Macromolecules, 2000; 33(23):8698–8702.
68.
Bourgeat-LamiE, LangJ. Encapsulation of inorganic particles by dispersion polymerization in polar media. 1. Silica nanoparticles encapsulated by polystyrene. J Colloid Interface Sci, 1998; 197(2):293–308.
AriasJL, Lopez-ViotaM, DelgadoAV, RuizMA. Iron/ethylcellulose (core/shell) nanoplatform loaded with 5-fluorouracil for cancer targeting. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces, 2010; 77(1):111–116.
71.
SuwannateepN, BanlunaraW, WanichwecharungruangSP, et al.Mucoadhesive curcumin nanospheres: Biological activity, adhesion to stomach mucosa and release of curcumin into the circulation. J Control Release, 2011; 151(2):176–182.
