JungYK, LeeSY. Efficient production of polylactic acid and its copolymers by metabolically engineered Escherichia coli. J Biotechnol, 2011; 151: 94–101.
2.
European Bioplastics. Press release: European Bioplastics: Fivefold growth of the bioplastics market by 2016. October10, 2012. Available at: http://en.european-bioplastics.org/blog/2012/10/10/pr-bioplastics-market-20121010/ (Last accessed November2013).
3.
nova-Institute. Bio-based polymers—production capacity will triple from 3.5 million tonnes in 2011 to nearly 12 million tonnes in 2020. Ind Biotechnol, 2013; 9(2): 81–84.
4.
The White House. National Bioeconomy Blueprint. (2012) Available at: www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/microsites/ostp/national_bioeconomy_blueprint_april_2012.pdf (Last accessed November2013).
5.
European Commission. Innovating for Sustainable Growth: A Bioeconomy for Europe. (2012) Available at: http://ec.europa.eu/research/bioeconomy/pdf/201202_innovating_sustainable_growth.pdf (Last accessed November2013).
6.
United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP). Assessing the Environmental Impacts of Consumption and Production: Priority Products and Materials. (2010) Available at: www.unep.org/resourcepanel/Portals/24102/PDFs/PriorityProductsAndMaterials_Report.pdf ISBN 978-92-807-3084-5 (Last accessed November2013).
7.
LemstraPJ. Petro- vs. bio-based polymers. Presented at: Second International Plastics Conference: Trends in Bioplastics, September 17–18, 2012, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
8.
ReganMJ, CreightonJL, DesvousgesWH. Sites for Our Solid Waste: a Guidebook for Effective Public Involvement. Washington, DC: Office of Solid Waste, US Environmental Protection Agency, 1990.
9.
US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). (2011), Municipal Solid Waste Generation, Recycling, and Disposal in the United States: Facts and Figures for 2010, EPA-530-F-11-005. Washington, DC: Solid Waste and Emergency Response (5306P).
10.
United National Environment Programme (UNEP). Converting Waste Plastics into a Resource. (2009) Assessment Guidelines, UNEP Division of Technology, Industry and Economics, International Environmental Technology Centre (IETC), Japan. Available at : www.unep.or.jp/Ietc/../spc/WastePlasticsEST_AssessmentGuidelines.pdf (Last accessed November2013).
11.
LawKL, Moret-FergusonL, MaximenkoS, et al.Plastic accumulation in the North Atlantic Subtropical Gyre. Science, 2010; 329(5996):1185–1188.
12.
RiosLM, JonesPR, MooreC, NarayanUV. Quantitation of persistent organic pollutants adsorbed on plastic debris from the Northern Pacific Gyre's “eastern garbage patch.”. J Environ Monitor, 2010; 12:2189–2312.
13.
CookJ, NuccitelliD, GreenSA, et al. (2013). Quantifying the consensus on anthropogenic global warming in the scientific literature. Environ Res Lett, 2013; 8:doi:10.1088/1748-9326/8/2/024024
14.
United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. Copenhagen Accord. (2009). Available at: http://unfccc.int/meetings/copenhagen_dec_2009/items/5262.php (Last accessed November2013).
15.
International Energy Agency (IEA). World Energy Outlook 2013. Paris: IEA Publications, 2013.
16.
WeissM, HaufeJ, CarusM, et al. (2012). A review of the environmental impacts of bio-based materials. J Ind Ecol, 2012; 16: S169–S181.
17.
European Association for the Co-ordination of Consumer Representation in Standardisation (ANEC). ANEC Position: Environmental Assessment Goes Astray. A Critique of Environmental Footprint Methodology and its Ingredients. 2012. Brussels: ANEC, ANEC-ENV-2012-G-008final.
