Abstract
Mutations in dysferlin and anoctamin 5 are the cause of muscular disorders, with the main presentations as limb-girdle muscular dystrophy or Miyoshi type of distal myopathy. Both these proteins have been implicated in sarcolemmal resealing. On the basis of similarities in associated phenotypes and protein functions, we tested the hypothesis that ANO5 protein could compensate for dysferlin absence. We first defined that the main transcript of ANO5 expressed in skeletal muscle is the 22-exon full-length isoform, and we demonstrated that dysferlin-deficient (Dysf prmd) mice have lower Ano5 expression levels, an observation that further enhanced the rational of the tested hypothesis. We then showed that AAV-mediated transfer of human ANO5 (hANO5) did not lead to apparent toxicity in wild-type mice. Finally, we demonstrated that AAV-hANO5 injection was not able to compensate for dysferlin deficiency in the Dysf prmd mouse model or improve the membrane repair defect seen in the absence of dysferlin. Consequently, overexpressing hANO5 does not seem to provide a valuable therapeutic strategy for dysferlin deficiency.
Monjaret and colleagues test the hypothesis that the muscular dystrophy phenotype caused by deficiency of the dysferlin protein can be rescued by overexpression of a similar protein, anoctamin 5, which is associated with a clinically similar muscular dystrophy. They demonstrate that AAV-mediated overexpression of anoctamin 5 is well tolerated in mice; however, this approach does not attenuate the characteristic pathological features of dysferlin-deficient mice.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
