An Assessment of State Laws Providing Gubernatorial Authority to Remove Legal Barriers to Emergency Response

Abstract

Legal Perspectives

is aimed at informing healthcare providers, emergency planners, public health practitioners, and other decision makers about important legal issues related to public health and healthcare preparedness and response. The articles describe these potentially challenging topics and conclude with the authors' suggestions for further action. The articles do not provide legal advice. Therefore, those affected by the issues discussed in this column should seek further guidance from legal counsel. Readers may submit topics of interest to the column's editor, Lainie Rutkow, JD, PhD, MPH, at lrutkow@jhu.edu.

Governors play a fundamental role in emergency preparedness and can help facilitate rapid responses to emergencies. However, laws that operate successfully under normal circumstances can inadvertently create barriers during emergencies, delaying a timely response. State laws could thus limit, or even prohibit, necessary response efforts. To combat this risk, legislatures have passed emergency powers laws in each state granting governors the authority to declare a state of emergency and to exercise certain emergency powers to meet the needs of the emergency. Researchers conducted a 50-state legal assessment, which identified and examined state laws that give governors the discretion to modify existing laws or create new laws to respond effectively to any type of declared emergency. This article outlines the findings of that assessment, which identified 35 states that explicitly permit governors to suspend or amend both statutes and regulations; 7 states in which governors are permitted to amend regulations during a declared emergency but are not explicitly authorized to modify or remove statutes; and 8 states and the District of Columbia that provide no explicit authority to governors to change statutes or regulations during a declared emergency. The article also provides examples of how this power has been used in the past to demonstrate the utility and scope of this authority in a variety of public health threats.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Orenstein

. When law is not law: setting aside legal provisions during declared emergencies. J Law Med Ethics, 2013; 41(Suppl 1):73–76.

Hodge

, Anderson

. Principles and practice of legal triage during public health emergencies. New York University Annual Survey of American Law, 2008; 64:263–269.

Understanding the scope of authorities under state declarations of an emergency is a recognized competency in Minimum Competencies in Public Health Emergency Law, a model set of core competencies for public health professionals. US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. The public health emergency law competency model. March 17, 2014. https://www.cdc.gov/phlp/publications/topic/phel-competencies.html. Accessed March 20, 2018.

US Department of Health and Human Services. Pandemic Influenza Plan. 2017. https://www.cdc.gov/flu/pandemic-resources/pdf/pan-flu-report-2017v2.pdf. Accessed March 20, 2018.

Burris

, Ashe

, Levin

, Penn

, Larkin

. A transdisciplinary approach to public health law: the emerging practice of legal epidemiology. Annu Rev Public Health, 2016; 37:135–148.

Wagenaar

, Burris

(eds). Public Health Law Research: Theory and Methods. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 2013.

Thomson Reuters Westlaw. https://next.westlaw.com. Accessed June 21, 2017.

See, e.g., Mont. Stat. 10-3-104(2)(a).

LawAtlas. Emergency suspension powers. http://lawatlas.org/datasets/emergency-powers. Accessed May 23, 2018.

10.

See, e.g., Ark. Stat. § 12-75-114(e)(1).

11.

See, e.g., Idaho Stat. § 46-1008(5)(a).

12.

See, e.g., N.H. Rev. Stat. § 4:47 (“The governor … may exercise emergency management powers including … [t]he power to make, amend, suspend and rescind necessary orders, rules and regulations to carry out the provisions of this subdivision in the event of a disaster beyond local control”).

13.

Gov. Greg Abbott. A Proclamation Declaring a State of Disaster. August 23, 2017. https://gov.texas.gov/uploads/files/press/Governor_Abbott_Declares_State_of_Disaster_For_30_Texas_Counties.pdf. Accessed March 20, 2018.

14.

Gov. Andrew Cuomo. N.Y. Exec Or. 176. January 25, 2018. https://www.governor.ny.gov/sites/governor.ny.gov/files/atoms/files/EO_176.pdf. Accessed March 20, 2018.

15.

Gov. Andrew Cuomo. N.Y. Exec Or. 90. January 12, 2013. http://www.governor.ny.gov/news/no-90-declaring-disaster-emergency-state-new-york-and-temporarily-authorizing-pharmacists. Accessed March 20, 2018.

16.

Robison

. Impact of pharmacists providing immunizations on adolescent influenza immunization. J Am Pharm Assoc, 2016; 56(4):446–449.

17.

Rutkow

, Vernick

. Emergency legal authority and the opioid crisis. N Engl J Med, 2018; 377:26, 2512–2514.

18.

Gov. Tom Wolf. Proclamation of Disaster Emergency. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. January 10, 2018. http://www.pema.pa.gov/Proclamations/Documents/01.10.18%20-%20Disaster%20Proclamation.pdf. Accessed March 20, 2018.

19.

Courtney

, Morhard

, Bouri

, Cicero

. Expanding practitioner scopes of practice during public health emergencies: experiences from the 2009 H1N1 pandemic vaccination efforts. Biosecur Bioterror, 2010; 8(3):222–231.

20.

Haffajee

, Parmet

, Mello

. What is a public health “emergency”?. N Engl J Med, 2014; 371(11):986–988.