Reporting of False Data During Ebola Virus Disease Active Monitoring—New York City,January 1,2015-December 29,2015

Abstract

The New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene (DOHMH) began to actively monitor people potentially exposed to Ebola virus on October 25, 2014. Active monitoring was critical to the Ebola virus disease (EVD) response and mitigated risk without restricting individual liberties. Noncompliance with active monitoring procedures has been reported. We conducted a survey of 4,075 eligible persons to evaluate (1) the frequency of reporting of false data during active monitoring, and (2) factors associated with reporting of false temperature data. A total of 393 persons (9.6%) responded to the survey. Fifty-five (14.0%) provided false temperature data, 5 (1.3%) did not report EVD-like symptoms that they had experienced, and 2 (0.5%) did not report a hospital or emergency room visit. Having visited Liberia (OR: 3.4, 95% CI: 1.4-7.9), Sierra Leone (OR: 3.4, 95% CI: 1.6-7.5), or multiple EVD-affected countries (OR: 12.9, 95% CI: 3.5-47.7); being aged <50 years (OR: 7.5, 95% CI: 1.7-33.1); and rating the importance of active monitoring as low (OR: 1.4, 95% CI: 1.1-1.8) were associated with increased odds of reporting false temperature data. Over 10% of respondents reported providing false data during EVD active monitoring. However, it remains unclear whether reporting of false data during active monitoring impedes the ability to rapidly identify EVD cases in settings with a low burden of EVD.

The New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene actively monitored people potentially exposed to Ebola virus, which was critical to the EVD response and mitigated risk without restricting individual liberties. Over 10% of respondents to a survey reported providing false data during EVD active monitoring, but it remains unclear whether this impeded the ability to rapidly identify EVD cases in settings with a low burden of EVD.