Parkinson's disease is one of the most common neurodegenerative disorders characterized by cell death of dopaminergic neurons in the substantia nigra. Recent research has focused on cellular replacement through lineage reprogramming as a potential therapeutic strategy. This study sought to use genetics to define somatic cell types in vivo amenable to reprogramming. To stimulate in vivo reprogramming to dopaminergic neurons, we generated a Rosa26 knock-in mouse line conditionally overexpressing Mash1, Lmx1a, and Nurr1. These proteins are characterized by their role in neuronal commitment and development of midbrain dopaminergic neurons and have previously been shown to convert fibroblasts to dopaminergic neurons in vitro. We show that a tricistronic construct containing these transcription factors can reprogram astrocytes and fibroblasts in vitro. However, cassette overexpression triggered cell death in vivo, in part through endoplasmic reticulum stress, while we also detected “uncleaved” forms of the polyprotein, suggesting poor “cleavage” efficiency of the 2A peptides. Based on our results, the cassette overexpression induced apoptosis and precluded reprogramming in our mouse model. Therefore, we suggest that alternatives must be explored to balance construct design with efficacious reprogramming. It is evident that there are still biological obstacles to overcome for in vivo reprogramming to dopaminergic neurons.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AddisRC, et al.Efficient conversion of astrocytes to functional midbrain dopaminergic neurons using a single polycistronic vector. PLoS One, 2011; 6:e28719.
2.
KimJ, et al.Functional integration of dopaminergic neurons directly converted from mouse fibroblasts. Cell Stem Cell, 2011; 9:413–419.
3.
PfistererU, et al.Efficient induction of functional neurons from adult human fibroblasts. Cell Cycle, 2011; 10:3311–3316.
4.
LiuX, et al.Direct reprogramming of human fibroblasts into dopaminergic neuron-like cells. Cell Res, 2012; 22:321–332.
5.
ShengC, et al.Generation of dopaminergic neurons directly from mouse fibroblasts and fibroblast-derived neural progenitors. Cell Res, 2012; 22:769–772.
6.
KimH-S, KimJ, JoY, et al.Direct lineage reprogramming of mouse fibroblasts to functional midbrain dopaminergic neuronal progenitors. Stem Cell Res, 2014; 12:60–68.
7.
OhS, et al.Efficient reprogramming of mouse fibroblasts to neuronal cells including dopaminergic neurons. ScientificWorldJournal, 2014; 2014:957548.
8.
TakahashiK, YamanakaS. Induction of pluripotent stem cells from mouse embryonic and adult fibroblast cultures by defined factors. Cell, 2006; 126:663–676.
9.
Gutierrez-ArandaI, et al.Human induced pluripotent stem cells develop teratoma more efficiently and faster than human embryonic stem cells regardless the site of injection. Stem Cells, 2010; 28:1568–1570.
LiY, et al.Noninvasive detection of human-induced pluripotent stem cell (hiPSC)-derived teratoma with an integrin-targeting agent (99m)Tc-3PRGD2. Mol Imaging Biol, 2013; 15:58–67.
12.
IedaM, et al.Direct reprogramming of fibroblasts into functional cardiomyocytes by defined factors. Cell, 2010; 142:375–386.
13.
BuganimY, et al.Direct reprogramming of fibroblasts into embryonic Sertoli-like cells by defined factors. Cell Stem Cell, 2012; 11:373–386.
14.
NajmFJ, et al.Transcription factor-mediated reprogramming of fibroblasts to expandable, myelogenic oligodendrocyte progenitor cells. Nat Biotechnol, 2013; 31:426–433.
15.
HendryCE, et al.Direct transcriptional reprogramming of adult cells to embryonic nephron progenitors. J Am Soc Nephrol, 2013; 24:1424–1434.
16.
HuangP, et al.Direct reprogramming of human fibroblasts to functional and expandable hepatocytes. Cell Stem Cell, 2014; 14:370–384.
17.
CaiazzoM, et al.Direct generation of functional dopaminergic neurons from mouse and human fibroblasts. Nature, 2011; 476:224–227.
18.
DellavalleA, et al.Pericytes resident in postnatal skeletal muscle differentiate into muscle fibres and generate satellite cells. Nat Commun, 2011; 2:411–499.
19.
TroncheF, et al.Disruption of the glucocorticoid receptor gene in the nervous system results in reduced anxiety. Nat Genet, 1999; 23:99–103.
20.
TorperO, et al.Generation of induced neurons via direct conversion in vivo. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2013; 110:7038–7043.
21.
RouauxC, ArlottaP. Direct lineage reprogramming of post-mitotic callosal neurons into corticofugal neurons in vivo. Nat Cell Biol, 2013; 15:214–221.
22.
NiuW, et al.In vivo reprogramming of astrocytes to neuroblasts in the adult brain. Nat Cell Biol, 2013; 15:1164–1175.
23.
GuoZ, et al.In Vivo direct reprogramming of reactive glial cells into functional neurons after brain injury and in an Alzheimer's disease model. Cell Stem Cell, 2014; 14:188–202.
24.
RobelS, BerningerB, GötzM. The stem cell potential of glia: lessons from reactive gliosis. Nat Rev Neurosci, 2011; 12:88–104.
25.
MadisenL, et al.A robust and high-throughput Cre reporting and characterization system for the whole mouse brain. Nat Neurosci, 2010; 13:133–140.
26.
HeinrichC, et al.Directing astroglia from the cerebral cortex into subtype specific functional neurons. PLoS Biol, 2010; 8:e1000373.
27.
ZhaoS, et al.Generation of embryonic stem cells and transgenic mice expressing green fluorescence protein in midbrain dopaminergic neurons. Eur J Neurosci, 2004; 19:1133–1140.
28.
HitzC, WurstW, KühnR. Conditional brain-specific knockdown of MAPK using Cre/loxP regulated RNA interference. Nucleic Acids Res, 2007; 35:e90.
29.
SeilerA, et al.Glutathione peroxidase 4 senses and translates oxidative stress into 12/15-lipoxygenase dependent- and AIF-mediated cell death. Cell Metab, 2008; 8:237–248.
30.
VerrouC, ZhangY, ZürnC, et al.Comparison of the tamoxifen regulated chimeric Cre recombinases MerCreMer and CreMer. Biol Chem, 1999; 380:1435–1438.
31.
OakeleyE. DNA methylation analysis a review of current methodologies. Pharmacol Ther, 1999; 84:389–400.
32.
PfafflMW. A new mathematical model for relative quantification in real-time RT-PCR. Nucleic Acids Res, 2001; 29:45e.
33.
DonnellyML, et al.The ‘cleavage’ activities of foot-and-mouth disease virus 2A site-directed mutants and naturally occurring ‘2A-like’ sequences. J Gen Virol, 2001; 82:1027–1041.
34.
KimJH, et al.High cleavage efficiency of a 2A peptide derived from porcine teschovirus-1 in human cell lines, zebrafish and mice. PLoS One, 2011; 6:e18556.
35.
CareyBW, et al.Reprogramming of murine and human somatic cells using a single polycistronic vector. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2009; 106:11818.
36.
ShaoL, et al.Generation of iPS cells using defined factors linked via the self-cleaving 2A sequences in a single open reading frame. Cell Res, 2009; 19:296–306.
37.
LinY-J, HuangL-H, HuangC-T. Enhancement of heterologous gene expression in Flammulina velutipes using polycistronic vectors containing a viral 2A cleavage sequence. PLoS One, 2013; 8:e59099.
38.
DanielsRW, RossanoAJ, MacleodGT, GanetzkyB. Expression of multiple transgenes from a single construct using viral 2A peptides in Drosophila. PLoS One, 2014; 9:e100637.
39.
HottonD, MauroN, LezotF, et al.Differential expression and activity of tissue-nonspecific alkaline phosphatase (TNAP) in rat odontogenic cells in vivo. J Histochem Cytochem, 1999; 47:1541–1552.
40.
ZhouY, et al.Unstable expression of transgene is associated with the methylation of CAG promoter in the offspring from the same litter of homozygous transgenic mice. Mol Biol Rep, 2014; 41:5177–5186.
41.
TatePH, BirdAP. Effects of DNA methylation on DNA-binding proteins and gene expression. Curr Opin Genet Dev, 1993; 3:226–231.
42.
JaenischR, BirdA. Epigenetic regulation of gene expression: how the genome integrates intrinsic and environmental signals. Nat Genet, 2003; 33Suppl:245–254.
43.
ShilatifardA. Chromatin modifications by methylation and ubiquitination: implications in the regulation of gene expression. Annu Rev Biochem, 2006; 75:243–269.
44.
RheeJ-K, et al.Integrated analysis of genome-wide DNA methylation and gene expression profiles in molecular subtypes of breast cancer. Nucleic Acids Res, 2013; 41:8464–8474.
45.
ZetouneAB, et al.Comparison of nonsense-mediated mRNA decay efficiency in various murine tissues. BMC Genet, 2008; 9:83.
46.
TawaR, OnoT, KurishitaA, et al.Changes of DNA methylation level during pre-and postnatal periods in mice. Differentiation, 1990; 45:44–48.
47.
KarowM, et al.Reprogramming of pericyte-derived cells of the adult human brain into induced neuronal cells. Cell Stem Cell, 2012; 11:471–476.
48.
LewisM, HowdlePD. The neurology of liver failure. QJM, 2003; 96:623–633.
49.
CanbayA, FriedmanS, GoresGJ. Apoptosis: the nexus of liver injury and fibrosis. Hepatology, 2004; 39:273–278.
50.
GuicciardiME, GoresGJ. Apoptosis: a mechanism of acute and chronic liver injury. Gut, 2005; 54:1024–1033.
51.
WangK. Molecular mechanisms of hepatic apoptosis. Cell Death Dis, 2014; 5:e996.
52.
HamptonRY. ER stress response: getting the UPR hand on misfolded proteins. Curr Biol, 2000; 10:R518–R521.
53.
SchröderM, KaufmanRJ. ER stress and the unfolded protein response. Mutat Res, 2005; 569:29–63.
54.
XuC, Bailly-maitreB, ReedJC. Endoplasmic reticulum stress: cell life and death decisions. J Clin Invest, 2005; 115:2656–2664.
55.
WuJ, KaufmanRJ. From acute ER stress to physiological roles of the unfolded protein response. Cell Death Differ, 2006; 13:374–384.
SorianoP. Generalized lacZ expression with the ROSA26 Cre reporter strain. Nat Genet, 1999; 21:70–71.
58.
WörtgeS, et al.Tetracycline-controlled transgene activation using the ROSA26-iM2-GFP knock-in mouse strain permits GFP monitoring of DOX-regulated transgene-expression. BMC Dev Biol, 2010; 10:95.
59.
ImayoshiI, et al.A multifunctional teal-fluorescent Rosa26 reporter mouse line for Cre- and Flp-mediated recombination. Neurosci Res, 2012; 73:85–91.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
