Abstract
Purpose:
The prevalence of HIV among Black women is higher than the prevalence among other ethnic groups. Although antiretroviral therapy reduces HIV transmission and mortality, Black women still face health disparities when it comes to receiving health care. The purpose of this scoping review is to synthesize research regarding health disparities and health inequities faced by Black women living with HIV (BWLH).
Methods:
We searched three scholarly databases, PsychNet, MEDLINE, and CINAHL, and 18 peer-reviewed complete studies that met the inclusion criteria.
Results:
Several themes emerged from the literature, including discrimination, poverty, mental and physical health, health care, and social support. Each theme had a role in the progression of BWLH along the HIV care continuum.
Conclusion:
Black women continue to be disproportionately affected by HIV, which involves active engagement in HIV care to sustain viral suppression to prevent the spread of the virus. Factors continue to exist that contribute to health disparities and inequities, such as discrimination, internal and enacted HIV-related stigma, and poverty. Thematic findings in this review indicate that patient-centered care and support systems can positively impact BWLH experiences along the HIV continuum.
Introduction
In the United States, 1.2 million people had HIV at the end of 2021. 1 In total, 40% were Blacks/African Americans, representing 12% of the U.S. population. In contrast, Whites made up 61% of the U.S. population and 26% of HIV-positive people. Black women are disproportionately affected by HIV, with approximately 27% infected. 2 There were 10 times as many new HIV infections among Black women compared to White women and four times as many cases compared to Latina women between 2015 and 2019. 2 Most new HIV infections among females were caused by heterosexual contact. When transmitted, HIV-positive status increases the risk for new infections, which is a significant public health concern.3,4
Since its development in the 1980s, antiretroviral therapy (ART) has suppressed HIV viral loads, prevented HIV transmission, preserved health, and increased life expectancy. 5 PrEP, a preexposure prophylaxis, and PEP, postexposure prophylaxis, are both additional HIV care advancements for people at risk for HIV due to sex or injection drug use.6,7 As a result of racism, HIV-related stigma, homophobia, and poverty, there are still disparities in equitable health care, explaining why HIV affects specific populations more than others. 6 In terms of HIV-related stigma and discrimination, Black women with HIV face challenges impeding their chances to be linked to care or to maintain viral suppression, ultimately halting progression along the HIV care continuum.6,8 Access to HIV care and viral suppression are among the National Priorities to improve HIV-related health outcomes and diminish health disparities and health inequities. 4 Therefore, the purpose of conducting this literature review is to gain a deeper understanding of HIV-related health disparities and health equity issues that affect Black women living with HIV (BWLH). Due to the disproportionate prevalence for Black women compared to other populations, it remains critical to understand how these disparities hinder access to and retention in HIV care, thus preventing viral suppression and increasing the risk for HIV transmission.
Methods
The Arksey and O’Malley scoping review framework was used to identify empirical research articles published in peer-reviewed journals that explored the breadth of health disparities and health inequities experienced by BWLH. 9
Inclusion and exclusion criteria
The sample of articles collected for this scoping review included studies ranging from quantitative correlational research to qualitative studies that held several interviews with BWLH from local communities. All articles selected for this study qualified by (1) being written in English, (2) presenting original work, (3) being published in a peer-reviewed journal, (4) being published between January 2018 and July 2023, (5) containing samples of all female adult subjects, and (6) reporting data exclusively from subjects living in the United States. The aforementioned qualifications were applied across all databases; however, the ability to specify publication date ranges for articles within MEDLINE was limited to years.
Furthermore, articles satisfying the previous set of requirements were all individually reviewed to narrow down the sample of articles to only those that present information regarding health disparities and health inequities among BLWH. To be included, the articles in this phase had to satisfy the following criteria: (1) the studied sample must focus on HIV-infected or individuals living with HIV, (2) the sample should report at least 50% Black or African American women, and (3) health disparities or health inequities must be mentioned in the abstract. In addition, any articles remaining in the sample were excluded from the study if they included samples of individuals who were male, transgender, or not diagnosed or living with HIV.
Search strategy
An initial literature search on August 14, 2023, spanned three scholarly databases: PsychNet, MEDLINE, and CINAHL. From the initial search, results included 160 articles from APA PsychNet, 350 articles from MEDLINE, and 106 articles from CINAHL. Two authors reviewed each article’s title and abstract within 4 weeks.
Search terms
The authors used the same search terms to generate the initial number of articles across all three databases. First, to ensure articles highlighted BWLH populations, initial search terms included HIV, women, and health disparities. Furthermore, within each database, the “apply equivalent terms” setting was activated to identify articles with similar but different terms that were effectively equal to the input search terms. For example, an equivalent phrasing of “Black women living with HIV” would be “African American women diagnosed with HIV.”
Study selection
To end the initial search, all authors scanned the titles, abstracts, and keywords of the remaining articles to confirm whether each article fit the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Next, citations were input into a storage folder within the online reference software Zotero. Moreover, articles were organized into one of three subfolders corresponding to the database the article was selected from. Additionally, any duplicate articles found were removed from the sample during this process. Afterward, the complete assortment was divided and screened in full text before deciding whether the article would be included in the review.
Data extraction and organization
In addition to using Zotero, an Excel sheet was used to log the following information for each article: first author, year of publication, country of origin, keywords depicting main objectives of the study, type of research featured in the study, accessibility information including DOI numbers, sample percentages for BWLH, key findings, conclusions, and comments for how each article contributes to the research question for this literature review. When encoding the types of study, one of four labels was assigned to each article based on information provided in the study’s abstract and methods section. These labels included correlational, cross-sectional, longitudinal, and qualitative interviews. Additionally, information for each article was condensed and recorded in an Excel sheet (Table 1). The final information that was recorded included the first author, year of publication, type of research featured in the study, percentage of BWLH in the study sample, keywords, and key findings (Table 1). In addition, all data were thematically sorted into categories based on the disparities discussed.
Characteristics of Included Studies
BWLH, Black women living with HIV.
Results
From the screening process detailed in the proceeding section, 37 articles that fit the initial qualifications for inclusion were identified across the databases. The articles extracted from each database featured 11 from CINAHL, 3 from MEDLINE, and 23 from APA PsycNet. Upon further screening beyond the title and abstract, 20 articles were excluded from the final sample for not focusing on the target population of Black, cisgender, adult women living with HIV, failed to discuss health disparities in the abstract, or were found to be a duplicate of an article identified previously from another database. Specifically, from the 20 not included in this scoping review, 8 were from CINAHL, 2 were from MEDLINE, and 10 were from APAPsycNet. Of these 20 excluded studies, one article from MEDLINE and one from APA PsycNet were found to be a duplicate of another article already represented in the review. One article from APA PsycNet met all other qualifications but was excluded because Black women only comprised 32% of the sample. In the end, 18 articles comprised the final sample, including three from CINAHL, one from MEDLINE, and 14 from APA PsycNet (Fig. 1).

Graphic of the extraction method for generating the final sample of articles. The following figure, beginning with the total amount of articles that appeared in the search, demonstrates each step in the article screening process. The final sample of 18 articles that fit the screening criteria can be seen in the last row.
Within the final sample of 18 studies, 14 focused on quantitative studies, while only four featured findings from qualitative studies. The average percentage of Black women within study samples was 84%, where BWLH ranged from 61% to 100%. All studies were conducted in the United States per the inclusion requirements. Furthermore, most studies highlighted subject data collected in the Southeast United States. Exceptions to this included participant data gathered from cities including Brooklyn, NY; Bronx, NY; Chicago, IL; Boston, MA; and San Francisco, CA.
Five leading themes emerged from the literature: discrimination and stigma, poverty, mental and physical health, health care, and social support. Analyzing the findings within these five areas played influential roles, either positive or negative, in BWLH progression along the HIV care continuum.
Discrimination and stigma
BWLH are impacted by discrimination and stigma that affect their access and engagement in HIV care and management of other chronic health problems, according to several studies.10–17 BWLH’s inability to disclose their HIV status when seeking health care and not keeping their appointments are associated with perceived discrimination and stigma.12,13 According to one study, there is an association between intersectional discrimination and microaggression with both depression and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Intersectional discrimination refers to the presence of multiple oppressive factors (e.g., lack of access to health care, denial of housing, neighborhoods devoid of opportunity), resulting in systems of oppression impacting minority groups’ quality of life. In comparison, microaggressions are subtle forms of discrimination experienced every day (e.g., daily subtle insults, jokes). Existing theories, including Microaggression theory, relate discrimination, and microaggressions to negative health outcomes. 10 Among BWLH, internalized HIV stigma, internalization, and self-rejection are associated with their perceived chances of being diagnosed with breast cancer and whether they would participate in breast cancer or other health screening activities.18,19 Another study indicated that HIV-related stigma demonstrated in health care settings was associated with a lower level of trust in providers. 20 Providers can make a positive impact to help reduce internalized HIV-related stigma, through assessment of BWLH knowledge of the virus, demolishing any misconceptions of the disease that possibly result in BWLH disclosing HIV status to support systems. 17 One study did not observe an association between internalized and enacted HIV-related stigma and lower engagement in HIV care among BWLH. Enacted HIV stigma is defined as the experiences of discrimination, stereotyping, or prejudice from others because of one’s HIV status. 19 However, other factors related to consistent engagement in HIV care were advanced age, higher educational attainment, a strong social support system, and the type of HIV clinic setting where health care was received. 16
Poverty
Studies found a correlation between neighborhood poverty, the use of ART and HIV viral loads, and mortality.13,21,22 Neighborhood poverty plays a significant role in higher prevalences of unsuppressed viral loads, and a decrease in the proportion of BWLH receiving ART.13,21,22 Areas with a high level of neighborhood poverty can be associated with structural factors, such as the lack of HIV services at clinics that serve low-income individuals. 22 In addition to having an HIV-positive status, BWLH’s poor socioeconomic status contributed to the inability to afford stable housing or sustain employment. 13 Women 18–54 years of age living in counties with lower poverty levels and who were insured had lower mortality rates. 23 Few studies have examined U.S.-born Black women and non-U.S.-born women. In this review, one study assessed disparities linked with social and economic disadvantages to diagnosing HIV, and the results identified a relative disparity in HIV diagnosis rates for non-U.S. Caribbean and African-born women, an increase of 25%. 24 The second study using the Social Ecological Framework indicates that individual, community, and societal factors can contribute to a person’s overall health. Non-U.S.-born women were most likely to have a higher viral suppression rate in comparison to U.S.-born women when education or housing status were not contributing factors. 25
Mental and physical health
Having HIV, along with mental health and physical health problems, deterred some women from being actively involved in their HIV care and treatment.10,13 However, a study reported that some women became engaged in their HIV care when diagnosed with other comorbidities. 13 Another study found that mental health was impacted negatively by microaggressions associated with racism, sexism, heterosexism, and HIV-related stigma when experienced by BWLH. 10
Two studies looked at the association between HIV and breast health.18,19 There was an association between symptoms of depression and HIV-related stigma and perception of being diagnosed with breast cancer. 19 Findings of a study examining the association of internalized HIV-related stigma and beliefs about breast health found HIV-related stigma correlated with one’s inclination to have breast cancer and possible undesirable effects of breast cancer. 18 One study found high psychosocial stress positively related to increased neuroendocrine biomarker concentrations among BWLH, suggesting the association with cardiovascular disease. 26
Health care
Studies recognized several factors within health care affecting BWLHs linked to HIV care.12–14,20,22,27 Structural factors in high-poverty neighborhoods, such as insufficient health care providers or access to ART in underserved clinics, contribute to health disparity. 23 BWLH have avoided clinics in their community or where people they know would recognize them, which deterred them from receiving HIV care. 13 Their willingness to be engaged in HIV care occurred when they felt appreciated by health care providers who listened to their stories and knew they were at the center of their health care.12,14,20 BWLH, who had a high trust level in health care providers, correlated with higher odds of adherence to ART, and was likelier to trust the health care system.12,27
Social support
Studies found that social support helps with ART adherence, effectively coping with psychosocial issues, and building resilience.10,12–14,20 BWLH families and healthy intimate relationships are essential for building resiliency.12,13 Support from other women living with HIV was most helpful when first diagnosed in helping them learn how to adjust to their diagnosis.12,14 Support from peers helped BWLH when faced with enacted HIV-related stigma and discrimination in addition to race-related discrimination. 12 Having social support where they received their HIV care services helped them resist feeling ashamed of living with the disease and have self-compassion. 20 Support received from health care providers helped women cope with other health conditions not related to HIV diagnosis.12,20
Discussion
People with HIV-positive status can live longer with ART, but they still encounter barriers to achieving and maintaining viral suppression. 4 This article examines the disparities and inequities BWLH experience in HIV care and treatment management. Based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria, the review identified 18 U.S.-based studies with four main themes related to HIV care: discrimination, poverty, mental and physical health, health care, and social support. The findings increase understanding of factors that hinder HIV care continuum engagement among BWLH, contributing to suboptimal outcomes.
Studies have examined the disparities experienced by BWLH due to racial and HIV discrimination and stigma, as well as the role of gendered microaggressions and intersectional microaggressions. Inequities in health are rooted in stigma. 17 BWLH’s stigma may be internalized, anticipated, or enacted. Fear of developing a disease other than HIV is attributed to internalized HIV-related stigma. Other individuals’ discrimination or prejudice, such as HIV-related enacted stigma experiences, did not inhibit their participation in health promotion activities. Another study found no association between continuous engagement in HIV care and internalized or enacted stigma. However, BWLH have concerns of being stigmatized (i.e., misconceptions) for having an HIV diagnosis. This is associated with not disclosing their HIV status when seeking health care. If BWLH detects HIV-related stigma among their community members, it discourages participation in HIV care, increases the likelihood of missed visits, and reduces trust in health care providers.3,16,17,19,20
A BWLH may experience microaggressions such as daily subtle insults, jokes, or unintentional comments related to their HIV status that make them feel ashamed of their HIV status. In addition to gendered microaggressions, Black women also experience intersectional microaggressions as they are both women and Black. The implications of gendered racial microaggressions on barriers to care are greater than those of race-related or HIV-related discrimination.10,11,21 In microaggression theory, physical and mental health can be adversely affected by microaggression. 28 Several studies have linked microaggressions to mental health issues among BWLH. Moreover, HIV-related discrimination, racial discrimination, and gendered racial microaggressions are associated with structural and institutional oppression. BWLH are at risk of structural and institutional oppression when experiencing health care access limitations, inadequacies in transportation infrastructure, and medical providers deficient in HIV care knowledge. Social support helps BWLH enhance their coping mechanisms to avoid stress or unpleasant emotions when faced with stigma and discrimination.10,11,21
A robust social support system plays a crucial role in BWLH’s engagement in HIV care. In this review, several factors were identified that contributed to BWLH not seeking HIV care once diagnosed, not starting ART, not adhering to ART, not being retained in HIV care, and, ultimately, the inability to maintain viral suppression. A woman’s perception of discrimination or the internal stigma of feeling ashamed or anticipating stigma when entering the health care system are contributing reasons to deterring care. Moreover, a breach of patient confidentiality is another concern when entering the health care system. As a result, a strong social support system helps overcome potential barriers to HIV care. Furthermore, health care organizations should provide patient-centered and team-oriented services.
BWLH living in poverty may not understand the significance of physical and mental health and how to navigate the health care system when structural factors exist. BWLH may be uninformed about HIV disease progression, the benefits of being connected to HIV care, and how HIV can be managed like other chronic health conditions. In addition, BWLH may not be aware of the resources available to assist with the cost of services when they are first diagnosed with HIV. Low-income individuals may be able to retain care with the help of community services. Women may not have access to transportation services to obtain HIV care outside of their neighborhoods, where they may prefer to receive treatment to avoid being recognized. For BWLH, it is essential to receive care for non-HIV-related health conditions, to participate in health promotion, and to be screened for diseases before they develop. The mental health status of BWLH plays a crucial role in their commitment to engage in HIV care to decrease the health disparities that are associated with being Black and HIV-positive. Access to health care should be available to BWLH where HIV-related stigma is not prevalent, the ability to receive ART, and the availability of HIV care management services (e.g., case management, behavioral health, mental health, dental), regardless of income level.
This study’s limitations include limiting the search to three databases, which may have prevented studies from being considered in the review. Many of the studies consisted of states in the southeast without a representative sample of other regions in the United States. A limited number of interventions were considered in the study findings to increase BWLH participation in HIV care. Future studies should explore the impact of gender and racial microaggressions on BWLH’s initiation of HIV care when first diagnosed with HIV and throughout their health care management. Moreover, future research efforts could investigate the effectiveness of policies and procedures adopted by health care institutions to increase HIV retention rates and viral suppression rates among BWLH.
Conclusion
This literature review contributes to a deeper understanding of HIV-related health factors that impact Black women in the United States. Various challenges were posed by race and ethnicity, socioeconomic status, and individual situations. Compared to women of other races and ethnicities, Black women suffer from a higher rate of HIV diagnosis. The existence of these disparities may be influenced by socioeconomic factors such as poverty, social determinants of health, the lack of access to health care, stigma, and discrimination. A woman’s ability to protect herself can be impacted by individual circumstances such as gender inequality and power dynamics that affect relationships, neglect toward HIV prevention and treatment, and a lack of awareness and education that hinders early diagnosis and intervention. Adherence to medication and overall health can be affected by physical and mental health conditions, as well as substance use.
An integrated and multifaceted approach is needed to address the complex challenges that Black women with HIV face. The promotion of education and awareness is an effective preventative strategy for HIV that empowers individuals. Second, reducing stigma and discrimination related to HIV and creating a communicative environment is essential to encouraging testing and treatment. In addition, affordable medications and easy access to health care can make services more effective. To provide comprehensive services to Black women with HIV, health care professionals, and community organizations could collaborate holistically and culturally.
Footnotes
Acknowledgments
We would like to thank Allison Thomas for constructive review and feedback.
Authors’ Contributions
J.P.T.: conceptualization (lead); methodology (equal); formal analysis (equal); writing–original draft (equal); writing–review and editing (equal). W.B.: conceptualization (supporting); methodology (equal); formal analysis (equal); writing–original draft (equal); writing–review and editing (equal). K.M.: conceptualization (supporting); methodology (supporting) writing–original draft (supporting); writing–review and editing (supporting).
Author Disclosure Statement
Authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Funding Information
No funding was received by the authors for this article.
