Abstract
Purpose:
Black pregnant individuals in Alabama are disproportionately affected by severe maternal morbidity and mortality (SMM). To understand why racial disparities in maternal health outcomes persist and identify potential strategies to reduce these inequities, we sought perspectives from obstetric health care providers, health administrators, and members of local organizations who provide pregnancy, delivery, and postpartum care services in Alabama.
Methods:
We conducted qualitative in-depth interviews with stakeholders (n=20), purposively recruited from community-based organizations, clinical settings, government organizations, and academic institutions. Interview guides were based on Howell's conceptual model of pathways to racial disparities in maternal mortality. Data were coded using a modified framework theory approach and analyzed thematically.
Results:
Racism, unjust laws and policies, and poverty/lack of infrastructure in communities emerged as major themes contributing to racial disparities in maternal health at the community and systems levels. Inadequate health insurance coverage was described as a strong driver of the disparities. Service providers suggested strategies for Alabama should be community focused, evidence based, and culturally sensitive. These should include Medicaid expansion, expanded parental leave, and removal of laws restricting choice. Community- and systems-level interventions should include community infrastructure improvements, choice in maternity services, and provision of digital communication options.
Conclusions:
Providers shared perspectives on community and structural areas of intervention to reduce racial inequities in SMM. These results can inform discussions with health system and community partners about Alabama and other Deep South initiatives to improve maternal health outcomes in black communities.
Introduction
Black pregnant individuals in the United States are disproportionately affected by severe maternal morbidity and mortality (SMM).1–4 Alabama has the third worst maternal mortality ratio in the United States, with similar differences by race/ethnicity. 5 The causes for these disparities are complex and incompletely understood, with multiple contributing factors at the individual, community, provider, health care organization, and system levels.6–8 To understand the drivers of disparities, it is essential to acknowledge race as a social construct and examine the many specific barriers to health care utilization for pregnant individuals driven by social and economic inequities rooted in historical and ongoing racism.9–11 There are calls to understand better the effects of income inequality and structural racism on health at a state level and noted research gaps (e.g., engagement and inclusion of community perspectives and social determinants).12,13
Ongoing efforts at state and local levels to improve maternal health in Alabama include the establishment of a maternal mortality review committee, the Alabama Perinatal Quality Collaborative, and the initiation of state reporting on maternal death data by race/ethnicity.5,14 Racial disparities persist despite current evidence and ongoing efforts to reduce this inequity. 15
We used a framework approach to conduct and analyze in-depth interviews to identify community and systems factors contributing to these disparities in Alabama and, importantly, strategies to overcome them. 16 We sought the perspectives of stakeholders, including traditional and alternative/complementary providers, who provide a wide range of supportive and clinical services to racially and ethnically diverse pregnant people in Alabama across the continuum of maternal care.
Methods
Overview
This study's methods and results are organized according to the Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research (COREQ) checklist. 17 This study was approved by the University of Alabama at Birmingham's Institutional Review Board (IRB-3006402).
Research team positionality and reflexivity
Two interviewers with previous experience conducting qualitative research were trained in interview techniques by qualitative expert investigators. One is a doctoral student (MD, MPH) who identifies as black, while the other is a health disparities researcher (PhD, MPH) who identifies as white. Both identify as cisgender women and shared their interest in reducing maternal health inequities with participants. The researchers acknowledge the possibility that their own racial backgrounds could have influenced the interpretation of the data and made efforts to disclose and discuss their potential biases. They piloted the interview guide, took notes during interviews, drafted postinterview memos, and held regular team discussions throughout piloting, data collection, and analysis to reflect on emerging themes and adjust the guide and interpretations as needed.
Study design and theoretical framework
Howell's conceptual framework underpins the study and was utilized to develop the semistructured interview guide (Supplementary Data S1).16,18 Topics included perspectives on why disparities in SMM persist, contributing multilevel factors, and strategies to overcome the barriers to reduce SMM in Alabama.
Participant selection
Participants were purposively selected as relevant interested parties through recommendations by study investigators who were not directly involved with conducting or analyzing the interviews. In some cases, participants had a previous professional relationship with one or more investigators (e.g., membership in maternal health workgroups). Eligible participants were (1) those who provided clinical maternity care or nonclinical maternal health services (i.e., lactation counseling, doula services), (2) representatives of maternal health roundtable and review panels, and (3) staff of community-based organizations and government agencies. Recruitment was not restricted by race, ethnicity, gender, or institutional affiliation. Study participants were also asked to recommend additional service providers for consideration.
The interviewers called or emailed potential participants (n=37) as part of recruitment but had no other previous relationship with them. Seventeen individuals did not respond or were unavailable to participate. Participants were informed about the purpose of the study during recruitment and provided informed consent at the start of the interview.
Setting and data collection
The interviewers conducted pilot interviews with two volunteers from relevant fields (an obstetrician gynecologist [OBGYN] and a doula from a community-based organization). Both pilot interviewees identified as black, had experience with interviews, and provided feedback on interviewing skills and the content in the guide.
Participants completed a brief oral demographic survey and an in-depth interview lasting up to 90 min via Zoom at their homes or workplace. Participants were compensated with a $20 gift card. The survey asked for relevant demographic characteristics, including educational experience, current professional role, years of experience, workplace setting, and type of maternity services provided. They were also asked how they identified regarding gender, race, and ethnicity. No notetaker was present, but the interviewer took informal field notes and drafted postinterview memos to aid the team discussions. Study personnel frequently met to discuss main themes, areas to follow-up in future interviews, and to determine saturation, defined as no new themes emerging (n=20 interviews).
Data analysis
Audio files were transcribed using an automated transcription option or a professional transcription company. The interviewers/analysts utilized the postinterview memos, themes from the transcripts, and the interview guide to develop the initial coding framework. Themes from transcripts related to participants' perceptions were organized by level following the overall study conceptual framework.16,18 Major themes were identified as broad codes and were refined into fine codes. Using NVivo 12, study team members double-coded six transcripts. 19 Areas of disagreement were discussed with both coders and a third member of the study team before a revised coding framework was agreed upon to address issues of inter-rater reliability. The remaining transcripts were coded independently, with study team discussions to clarify coding and interpretation as needed. As new fine codes were identified, all transcripts were revisited and coded using the complete coding guide.
The final themes and subthemes relevant to community and systems factors are described in the results, with findings at provider and health care organization levels presented elsewhere. 20 Participants were not asked to provide feedback on the study findings.
Results
Participant characteristics
All enrolled participants completed the interview (n=20) from January to March 2021 (Table 1). 20 Participants identified as obstetric providers, community-based organization staff, or others (public health, researcher, etc.). Most participants identified as female, held graduate-level or professional degrees, and primarily worked in urban or mixed urban and rural settings serving diverse populations across the state. Most reported providing clinical and/or supportive maternity care services with services stretching across the continuum of care as defined as pregnancy, delivery, and postpartum. Some participants reported active membership in local maternal health workgroups.
Characteristics of Study Participants
The demographic characteristics in Table 1 are included in part from Toluhi et al. (in press), a complementary paper.
Many participants held multiple roles.
Physician, nurse, nurse practitioner.
Doula, certified lactation counselor, birth educator.
Public health agency staff, not-for-profit representative.
Director, co-/founder, educator, researcher, public health agency staff.
Some participants have dual roles with different lengths of time on their current roles.
Doula services are not covered by Medicaid in Alabama. Clients paid out-of-pocket or their services were covered by grants according to participants.
Some participants shared the race of their patients/clients when asked about the population they served.
Self-reported race was collected due to the focus on racial disparities to put comments in the context of the participant's race. Race and ethnicity were based on responses to the open-ended questions about how the participants identified their race and ethnicity. Due to the small sample size, individuals who did not fit into the two main groups, black and white, were grouped into the “other” category (Table 1). 20
Themes around community and systems factors contributing to racial disparities in maternal mortality
Racism, unjust laws and policies, and poverty and lack of community infrastructure emerged as themes at the community and systems levels as contributing to disparities in maternal health. Participants also suggested strategies at these levels to reduce inequities. Illustrative quotations for major themes and select subthemes are presented in Tables 2 and 3. Many sub/themes overlapped.
Factors Contributing to Inequities in Maternal Mortality and Severe Maternal Morbidities in AL
CBO, Community-Based Organization.
Participant-Proposed Strategies to Reduce Inequities in Maternal Mortality and Severe Maternal Morbidities in Alabama
ACOG, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists; ASAM, American Society of Addiction Medicine; FMLA, Family and Medical Leave Act; NFP, not-for-profit; OBGYN, obstetrician gynecologist; WIC, Women, Infants, & Children.
Racism
Systemic racism present in Alabama was discussed as a driving factor behind racial disparities in maternal health by many of the service providers. Some participants described the health insurance system as a part of institutionalized racism (Table 2, Quote 1). They noted that the legacy of racism included the lack of racial diversity in many communities, issues of environmental justice that contribute to overall poor health of people who are black, cultural disempowerment of black voices (Table 2, Quote 2), the racism of policymakers and lack of diverse interested parties involved in policymaking (Table 2, Quote 3–4), as well as gerrymandering as preventing active participation of communities of color in policy change.
Unjust Laws and Policies
Participants described several laws and policies as unjust and contributing to racial disparities in maternal health in Alabama. Many identified specific laws and policies (i.e., health insurance and paid parental leave) as contributing to the issue. Some providers suggested that these unjust laws and policies were related to the lack of inclusion of diverse participants in influencing organizations such as the maternal mortality review programs (Table 2, Quote 5).
Health insurance policies
Many participants spoke about their experiences working with black pregnant/postpartum individuals as well as their experiences with people with inadequate health coverage. They noted that in Alabama harmful policies included lack of insurance coverage during the postpartum period, restrictions on choice for provider, restrictions on changes to provider or facility, lack of coverage for complementary and alternative services, lack of insurance for undocumented people, and distance to providers covered by health insurance as contributing factors (Table 2, Quotes 6–7).
Other restrictive laws and policies
Participants noted laws restrict women's access to abortion in Alabama, with some unable to travel across state lines for services (Table 2, Quote 8). These inflexible policies limit pregnant individuals' autonomy and contribute to undesired pregnancies (Table 2, Quote 9). Participants also described using chemical endangerment laws to criminalize pregnant people (Table 2, Quote 10), as well as prosecuting pregnant patients with substance use disorder and sending them to jail without rehabilitation services or medicated assisted therapy as unjust. They discussed the lack of standardized paid parental leave as putting the health of pregnant individuals at increased risk when they return to work mere days after delivery to meet their families' financial needs (Table 2, Quote 11).
Some participants noted that Medicaid reimbursement policies led to doctors being underpaid and overworked (Table 2, Quote 12). In sum, participants shared their belief that these policies disproportionately affect low-income black women in the Deep South.
Poverty and Lack of Infrastructure in Black Communities
Participants discussed poverty and resource insecurity (housing, nutrition, transportation, etc.), which disproportionately impact certain communities in Alabama. They explained that these issues might lead to the inability to comply with provider recommendations and interfere with the continuity of care, which sometimes results in negative judgments, stigma from members of the health care community, delays in care, and an increased need for emergency services. They noted issues around the lack of safe environments in some communities due to crime and lack of sidewalks and lights. They felt these contribute to stressful environments, mental health concerns, and the inability to be active.
Some service providers elaborated that the lack of grocery stores creates food deserts and contributes to obesity and comorbidities, which can contribute to poor maternal health (Table 2, Quote 13). Participants also noted that these issues are exacerbated by the lack of transportation or medical facilities within neighborhoods of lower income (Table 2, Quote 14).
Suggested Strategies to Overcome Community- and Systems-Level Barriers
Incorporate care into communities
Participants emphasized strategies to increase access of black pregnant individuals to maternity care. They suggested including members of black communities in the provision of maternity care, which would require systems-level interventions. Some advocated for a pyramid model of care, which would include community health workers, a care team including complementary and alternative providers (certified nurse midwives, doulas) to support low-risk births, and OBGYNs and maternal–fetal medicine specialists to see high-risk patients (Table 3, Quotes 1–2). Others mentioned the need to advocate for a stronger role for nurse practitioners. To reach rural areas or areas lacking specialty facilities, participants suggested telemedicine and changing laws to support the use of certified nurse midwives (Table 3, Quote 3–4).
Participants noted the importance of bringing care to where pregnant individuals live. This can be done by locating health facilities within communities and preventing hospital closures, giving the option for home visits, and improving transportation with options such as group transportation shown to be effective in other settings (Table 3, Quote 5). Other suggestions included resourced medical buses, transport provided by hospital networks, and improvements in the timeliness, reliability, and pregnant individuals' awareness of existing transportation services. They noted that working with trusted sources of information within communities, both informal and formal (i.e., faith-based leaders), would be essential to increase dialogue between communities and medical care providers and systems. Engagement should establish specific needs and ensure that strategies, resources, and communication are culturally appropriate and relevant (Table 3, Quote 6).
Emphasize social services
Participants noted that social services should be emphasized during prenatal care to support the whole family with childcare, health coverage, and programs impacting one's overall health (i.e., mental health, substance use disorders, nutrition, and housing insecurity) as those can affect one's ability to utilize maternal health services (Table 2, Quotes 7–9).
Expand health insurance coverage
Participants all agreed about the need for Medicaid expansion in Alabama and similar states. Participants recommended extending coverage beyond 6 weeks during the postpartum period, allowing for free use of specialty services, and providing coverage of services by nontraditional providers in low-risk and medically underserved settings (Table 3, Quote 10).
Enact equity-centered policies to support health and reduce racial disparities
Participants advocated for antiracism in health policy as a critical strategy to reduce egregious disparities. They called for more diverse voices in policymaking at all levels. Participants noted the need to standardize paid parental leave policies (Table 3, Quote 11), remove policies that criminalize pregnant people (Table 3, Quote 12), and remove policies that restrict provider and facility choice.
Discussion
Participants provided nuanced, descriptive data on community and systems contributors to the persistent inequity in maternal health in Alabama and other Deep South states. Specifically, this study identifies the heightened impact of racism in the Deep South context and how it is reflected in systems, laws, policies, and communities. These findings highlight the complexity of the issues and point to potential strategies to reduce them. All emphasized the need for approaches to be evidence-based and modeled from other states and countries. Our study participants identified the issue of structural racism to be a driving force in inequities in maternal health in Alabama, which has been documented in other parts of the country.21–25 However, systemic racism is particularly salient in the Deep South, with inadequate desegregation leading to reduced care access and quality. 26
More recently, many states in the U.S. South did not expand Medicaid, which according to Nolen et al. accounts for 92% of adults in the coverage gap; these states are also disproportionately impacted due to the more significant number of black people, with black populations more likely to be underinsured compared with other populations.27–29 The concerns around systemic racism and neighborhood-level segregation align with evidence of SMM being associated with racialized economic segregation, which requires policy initiatives to overcome.30,31
The consensus for care in communities dominated many stakeholder interviews and aligns with existing literature advocating for equity-centered approaches to care.32,33 The community-informed care models described by participants, which provide team-based care and have home visiting options, support human rights from the reproductive justice perspective. 34 In-home visiting programs with community health workers or nurses have effectively improved prenatal care utilization and birth outcomes such as preterm birth among economically disadvantaged and ethnically diverse women.35–37 The need for policy changes to increase access and affordability of maternity care was highlighted by our participants and has been emphasized by others.25,38 Additional strategies to reduce inequities from the literature include prioritizing implementation research and promoting opportunities for providers to have meaningful discussions with patients outside of the clinical setting.38,39
The findings of this study should be interpreted considering its limitations. Participants focused discussion on issues within Alabama, which has a unique context related to health access and infrastructure needs. 40 Participants were purposively recruited through their active participation in professional roles related to maternal health care. Many participants worked with populations of lower income pregnant women in urban or mixed urban and rural settings and described barriers and strategies related to economic disadvantage. Yet, many black families have a high socioeconomic status yet still experience inequities in SMM, which further supports the need for systems-level solutions and strategies to reduce systemic racism.15,41
Despite efforts to increase comfort in the discussion of sensitive topics, including racial concordance in half of the interviews, participants may have been hesitant to disclose factors that could be perceived as contributing to the issue themselves, considering the heightened social discord around issues of racism in the United States at the time of interviews.42,43 Despite efforts to recruit racially and ethnically diverse participants across genders, the participants primarily identified as women and black or white.44,45 Interviews focused on black cis-gender women, but maternal health inequities are possible across the spectrum of gender identities; more research is needed to understand their unique challenges.
Interview data reflect the situation at the time of data collection. Although most remain relevant, encouraging efforts include establishing the Alabama Maternal Health Task Force and Medicaid extension.14,46 The extension includes dental coverage for pregnant individuals, postpartum coverage up to 1 year after delivery, and reimbursement rate increases for maternity health care professionals.47–50 These experts' calls to expand Medicaid eligibility are promising, but would be insufficient with other systems-level interventions needed to improve pregnancy and birth outcomes and reduce racial disparities.51–54 In addition, Alabama residents face greater challenges to reproductive rights, including further restriction on abortion access in the state enforcing a total abortion ban with anticipated consequences, including increased maternal and infant mortality and reduced access to early and continuous prenatal care and birthing services.55–57
Health equity implications
These stakeholder perspectives provided contextual, community, and systemic factors often unavailable in other maternal health surveillance systems. Contributors identified include systemic racism, barriers to access to care such as a lack of transportation and insurance coverage, and policies restricting pregnant individuals' choices. Our informants described actionable strategies and emphasized that these should be evidence based, community focused, and culturally appropriate. Strategies should focus on improving pregnant individuals' overall health across the life span and include broad and multisectoral policies to address issues of systemic racism, expand Medicaid, and incorporate choice for services for pregnant individuals.
Lastly, these locally informed findings can guide discussions with health system and community partners about Alabama and other Deep South local and statewide initiatives to reduce racial disparities in maternal health.
Footnotes
Acknowledgments
We thank the maternal health service providers who gave their time and shared their perspectives.
Authors' Contributions
The study was conceptualized by M.B.R., H.B., Z.I.J., C.C.K., R.S., J.M.S., A.T.N.T., M.S.W., and J.M.T. Data curation, formal analysis, and writing the original draft were carried out by M.B.R. and A.A.T. under the supervision of J.M.T. Reviewing and editing were taken care of by M.B.R., H.B., Z.I.J., C.C.K., R.S., J.M.S., A.T.N.T., and M.S.W.
Disclaimer
The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institution of Health (NIH).
Author Disclosure Statement
No competing financial interests exist.
Funding Information
The U.S. National Institutes of Health funded this study through an administrative supplement to the UAB Center for Clinical and Translational Science to study disparities in maternal mortality and severe maternal morbidity (3UL1TR003096-02S [PI: Kimberly]). The second author also acknowledges the support of the American Association of University Women (AAUW) through the 2020–2021 International Fellowship awarded to support her doctoral studies.
Abbreviations Used
References
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
