Abstract
Purpose:
This study assessed the perspectives of pregnant and postpartum African immigrant women on mental illness.
Methods:
We conducted a focus group session (n=14) among pregnant and postpartum African immigrant women in June 2020. We used an inductive driven thematic analysis to identify themes related to mental health stigma.
Results:
Five core themes emerged: conceptualization of mental health, community stigmatizing attitudes, biopsychosocial stressors, management of mental health, and methods to reduce stigma.
Conclusion:
Understanding the perspectives of pregnant African immigrant women at the intersection of their race, ethnicity, gender, and migration are necessary to improve engagement with mental health services.
Introduction
The African immigrant population increased by nearly 90% since 2000, yet they remain underrepresented in health care research.1,2 The intersection of race, ethnicity, gender, and migrant status compounds discrimination and health inequities for African immigrants, and this may be further pronounced during the vulnerable period of pregnancy.3–5
Past systematic reviews and meta-analysis show 1.5 times higher likelihood of postpartum depression among immigrant women compared to nonimmigrant women. 6 However, majority of these studies on postpartum depression in immigrant women to high income countries have been conducted in Canada, Europe, and Asia, for example, in one meta-analysis, of the 22 studies included, only one was conducted in the United States. 6 One study focused on general health behaviors suggested that pregnant African immigrant women reported better overall health compared to native-born pregnant Black women. 7
Generalization on perspectives of mental health across geographical regions and ignoring the unique experience of mental health in the pregnancy and the postpartum period will lead to further public health gaps. Studies of African immigrants in the United States show reliance on religious support systems; acculturation (or stress of integration) and social exclusion have an impact on mental health service utilization.8,9 Dedicated studies are necessary to expand our understanding of the unique perspectives and needs of African immigrant mothers in the peripartum and postpartum period to improve engagement in mental health services.10–13 The aim of this study was to assess these unique perspectives that affect mental health service use.
Methods
Ethical consideration
The institutional review board at Northwestern University approved this study. Written and informed consent was completed.
Setting, participants, and study design
Setting
The study was completed in partnership with the United African Organization (UAO). UAO provided social services to African immigrants.
Participants
The focus group and survey participants (n=14) inclusion criteria were as follows: (1) identifying as an African immigrant, (2) pregnant or postpartum within the past 12 months, (3) English speaking, and (4) 18 years of age or older. Participants were recruited using convenience sampling. Participants completed one focus group and a brief survey.
Recruitment
Flyers and brochures were placed in UAO offices. Text messages and word of mouth were used, and community members were self-referred.
Interview procedure and protocol
The semistructured interview guide and survey components were developed by a multidisciplinary team, including academic and community partners, to ensure culturally acceptable language in discussing mental health. We developed the interview guide and survey based on the existing literature on mental illness related to religiosity and the influence of social stigma within the community. 14
The questionnaire was completed before the focus group, and all study activities lasted ∼75 min. Due to the COVID 19 pandemic, videoconferencing was used. Participants received $30 compensation for their time. Probes and member checking were used to verify meaning. 15 All participant information was deidentified.
Data analysis
The focus group questions are presented in Table 1. We used a grounded theory thematic approach to ensure that emerging themes were elicited given the limited data on this population.16,17 NVivo software, a qualitative analysis tool, was used. The focus group was audio recorded and transcribed. We used five iterative steps 16 : initial review, line coding, organization of meaning units, discussion, and final review of consistency between two experienced coders (a first generation African immigrant female psychiatrist and a white female postdoctoral psychology student). One coder also had lived experience as an African immigrant mother. Intercoder reliability (K>0.80) was reached. Coders applied the codebook to the full transcript.
Focus Group Questions
Assessments
We developed a sociodemographic questionnaire to assess age group, education, marital status, citizenship status, income, employment status, and insurance status. The Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ2) is a validated two-item depression screening measure. 18 This measure has a high positive predictive value. 18 We also developed a brief questionnaire to assess specific beliefs about mental illness such as religiosity and views on medications. 19
Results
Among the African immigrant women (n=14) in the study, 50.0% of respondents reported being pregnant (n=7; 5 in the first trimester) and 3 (21.4%) participants had a positive screen on the PHQ-2. Participants' characteristics are shown in Table 2.
Characteristics of Sample
Summary of focus group and brief questionnaire results
Five core themes related to mental health and mental health stigma emerged:
Theme 1. Conceptualization of mental health in the community. Some respondents described mental health as an emotional experience, possessing resilience and having good functional well-being. The word “mental” was seen as having negative connotations. Some respondents (n=4, 28.57%) believe that depression is not a medical illness, and some respondents (n=3, 21.4%) reported that people with depression are dangerous, while others (n=7, 50%) reported people with depression are unpredictable.
Theme 2. Community stigmatizing attitudes toward mental health challenges during pregnancy. Several respondents shared their experience of judgment. People with emotional struggles were seen as “crazy” or “mentally retarded.” There was majority consensus that pregnant women should not take medication while pregnant (n=10, 71.4%), despite acceptance of the biological models of illness (theme 3). Some respondents reported that feelings of sadness or depression are a moral failure (7 [50%]), a result of sin (6 [42.9%]), or caused by evil spirits (5 [35.6%]).
Theme 3. Biopsychosocial stressors and hormonal changes during the peripartum and postpartum period. There was general consensus that pregnancy was connected to changes in the emotional state of a person. Stressors included biological and psychosocial aspects of stress—hormones, lack of sleep, and the overwhelming nature of personal and professional responsibilities.
Theme 4. Management of mental health during the perinatal and postpartum period. Respondents offered several ways to manage mental health in the context of pregnancy, including self-motivation, religious resources, and talking to others (both in the community and professionally). While 50.0% of respondents reported that they would call 911 or seek immediate help if someone was having suicidal thoughts, 5 (35.7%) said that they would never or rarely seek immediate help.
Theme 5. Methods to reduce stigma. One respondent described mental health as invisible and difficult to “normalize.” Respondents suggested public health campaigns and awareness groups in the community, similar to the focus group forum. In particular, one respondent described the need to support pregnant women due to the added psychosocial stressors that come with pregnancy (Table 3).
Core Themes and Representative Quotes
Discussion
Our main finding was that stigma toward mental health was associated with the label of being “crazy” or being judged. In addition, medication was not viewed as acceptable, but there was openness to activities such as support from the community and psychotherapy. There was acceptance of the biopsychosocial aspects of pregnancy (including hormonal changes); despite this acknowledgment, most respondents had stigmatizing views of medications. And some respondents endorsed beliefs that sadness or depression is a moral failure, a sin, or caused by evil spirits. Past studies show that stigmatizing beliefs similar to these led to worse mental health outcomes related to higher morbidity and mortality.9,20
Previous studies have also shown that pregnant African immigrant women had better self-rated overall health compared to native-born pregnant Black women, 7 likely due to the healthy migrant effect.8,21 The healthy migrant effect refers to the concept that migrants tend to have better health status than people of similar backgrounds in the host country 22 ; however, over time, likely due to the effect of racism, gender, and migration, this apparent advantage is diminished.22,23 In our sample, the willingness to seek professional mental health services, especially pharmacotherapy, was particularly low.
There are higher somatization rates among African immigrants, compared to US born Black people; African immigrants tend to focus on physical health symptoms and prefer primary care health professionals.8,24 In our study, respondents endorsed anxiety and low mood symptoms, such as difficulty sleeping, elevated heart rate, tearfulness, irritability, and generally feeling overwhelmed. Due to somatization, pregnant African immigrant women are at elevated risk of health care professionals not recognizing their symptoms. Therefore, they may experience further delay in initiation and engagement in mental health services in pregnancy, where early intervention is critical.4,25
Study limitations
This was a brief report with a small sample size and the use of one focus group. As a result of the limited size, our recruitment was not representative of the population. In addition, while we used both open ended and closed ended questions, some closed ended questions such as whether people “looked down” on emotional wellness may have been leading. Additional larger studies are needed to further highlight themes and perspectives in the study population, and findings should not be generalized to the entire community.
Conclusion
This study suggests that more research needs to be done to understand the experiences of pregnant and postpartum African immigrant women. While we cannot generalize findings from this study, we found that in this focus group, pregnant and postpartum African immigrant women expressed the need for culturally sensitive providers who are not dismissive of religious and cultural approach to mental health.
While stigmatizing beliefs were evident, there was also a juxtaposition of beliefs in the spiritual causation of mental illness along with the biopsychosocial causation (hormonal changes in pregnancy) of mental illness. There is an opportunity here to improve engagement in mental health services by increasing cultural sensitivity training among health care professionals, and future studies with a larger sample size are needed to explore the specific and unique needs of pregnant and postpartum African immigrant women.
Footnotes
Author Disclosure Statement
No competing financial interests exist.
Funding Information
Funding for this study was provided by Northwestern's Asher Center for the Study and Treatment of Depressive Disorders.
