Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Objective:

This article describes the demographic distribution of, and association between, neighborhood disorganization and mental health diagnosis by race in a large cohort of urban children with chronic medical conditions.

Methods:

Data for this study were from Coordinated Healthcare for Complex Kids (CHECK), a health care demonstration project funded by the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Innovation. We conducted regression analyses to examine the relationship between neighborhood disorganization and mental health diagnosis among 6,458 children enrolled in CHECK.

Results:

The most common mental health diagnoses were mood disorders (8.6%), Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (7.4%), conduct disorders (6.1%), and anxiety disorders (4.8%). Black children had the highest neighborhood disorganization scores compared with other racial/ethnic categories. However, Black children had the lowest proportion of mental health diagnoses. Lower neighborhood disorganization was associated with having a mental health diagnosis; however, when adding race/ethnicity to the model, neighborhood disorganization no longer was significant.

Conclusions:

Level of neighborhood disorganization was highly correlated with racial/ethnic composition of the neighborhoods, and Black children disproportionately resided in highly disorganized neighborhoods compared with other groups. Neighborhood disorganization may not have sufficient variability within the racial/ethnic categories, which may explain the absence of an interaction between race/ethnicity and mental health diagnosis.

Introduction

Multiple interconnected mechanisms contribute to racial/ethnic disparities in the prevalence of mental health diagnosis as well as in access to and use of behavioral health care in children and adolescents. Socioeconomic status (SES), adverse childhood experiences, health system and policy factors, socioecological context, and race/ethnicity, all contribute to the disparities.^1,2 SES is vastly different for Blacks and Latinx compared with non-Latinx Whites in the United States; in 2017, the poverty rate among Black children was considerably higher at 33% compared with Latinx (26%) and White (11%) children.³

Although SES differences and social inequality contribute to mental health differences by race and ethnicity, adverse childhood experiences are also known determinants of mental health throughout the life course.⁴ Compared with White children, racial/ethnic minorities are disproportionately exposed to adverse factors (e.g., stress, trauma, pollution, maltreatment, poor housing, and violence).^1,5–7 Mental health disparities are also driven by health system- and provider-level differences in access to care, quality of care, and provider bias.⁸ Multiple studies have documented that White children have significantly higher psychopharmacological and psychotherapeutic treatment rates compared with their minority counterparts.⁹ For example, racial/ethnic minority children are less likely to take prescription medication for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) than are White children.¹⁰

Finally, social disorganization theory, referred to as neighborhood disorganization, asserts that neighborhood-level factors, including poverty, residential mobility and subsequent crime, and racial/ethnic heterogeneity of the population, are important predictors of behavioral problems and poor mental health outcomes in children.^11–15 One study found that children in more disorganized neighborhoods had 1.9 times higher odds of having behavioral problems than children who were living in more advantaged neighborhoods.¹⁵ Importantly, racial and ethnic minority children disproportionately reside in disorganized neighborhoods with concentrated disadvantage, high rates of residential mobility, and crime.^2,8 In Chicago, almost half (48%) of children live in low child opportunity areas, with staggering differences by race/ethnicity.^2,16 For example, one in two Black and Latinx children, compared with one in 509 White children, live in low child opportunity areas.¹⁶

Children with chronic medical conditions who reside in disorganized neighborhoods are particularly vulnerable to poor mental health outcomes because of their ongoing medical needs, neighborhood concentrated disadvantage, exposure to environmental contaminants, and structural inequities such as access to health care and adequate education.^2,8,15,17,18 Yet the mental health problems are often undetected and untreated despite harmful and lasting consequences that include poor educational, employment, and health outcomes and involvement in the criminal justice system.¹⁹

The influence of neighborhood disorganization on children's mental health diagnosis is mostly unknown, particularly if the children have chronic medical conditions and are living in poverty. Understanding how neighborhood disorganization impacts mental health diagnosis among such at-risk children can inform early identification strategies and lead to prevention and treatment. In this study, we examined the relationship between neighborhood disorganization and mental health disorder diagnosis among children and adolescents with chronic conditions who had public insurance and who were enrolled in the Coordinated Healthcare for Complex Kids (CHECK) program. The goal of this study was to examine the association between neighborhood disorganization and mental health diagnosis by race/ethnicity among children. This study presents new empirical findings about the relationships between neighborhood disorganization, race/ethnicity, and mental health.

The main aims of the CHECK project were to reduce health care costs, reduce school absenteeism, and increase patient/family engagement in health care. CHECK provided health care coordination, oral health, legal services, and behavioral health to enrolled participants. A full description of the CHECK intervention model is described elsewhere.^20–23 Data for this study were collected from December 1, 2014 through September 1, 2017. CHECK participants were identified for eligibility based on Medicaid claims data from the Illinois Medicaid agency, Medicaid managed care organizations, direct referrals from providers, or self-referrals. The analytic sample was made up of children 5–18 years of age with a chronic medical condition who were residing in Chicago and were enrolled in Medicaid. The CHECK program targeted asthma, diabetes mellitus, sickle cell disease, and neurological disorders because of the high prevalence of asthma and the high medical needs and costs associated with the other conditions. Many of the CHECK participants had more than one chronic condition and may also have had other conditions such as obesity, food allergies, and hypertension. For the purposes of this study, we analyzed the chronic conditions targeted by the CHECK program. While the CHECK program did not target children with mental health diagnoses for enrollment, this information was available from Medicaid claims records. For the purpose of this article, children and adolescents will be referred to as children. The University of Illinois at Chicago Institutional Review Board approved this study (protocol # 2018–1164).

Methods

Measures

The outcome variable was mental health diagnosis. We developed, a priori, a constructed list of all mental health diagnosis codes from the International Classification of Diseases, 9th and 10th Revisions, and then screened all enrolled CHECK participants' Medicaid claims data to identify these codes. We then selected the four most common diagnoses (mood disorders, ADHD, conduct disorders [included oppositional defiant disorder], and anxiety disorders) to code Mental health diagnosis as yes or no.

Addresses were geocoded and census tract level neighborhood variables were assigned to cases. Based on the concept of neighborhood disorganization (Shaw and McKay 1924), we computed a composite score that included mobility, population heterogeneity, and neighborhood poverty.¹⁴ The neighborhood disorganization composite score was calculated by conducting principal component analysis using the following variables: (1) % of vacant buildings, (2) % of residents who moved in the past 12 months, (3) % Blacks, (4) % Latinx, (5) % of residents below the federal poverty line, (6) % of female-headed household, (7) % of unemployed residents, (8) % of residents not in the labor force, and (9) neighborhood crime rates. All neighborhood variables were retrieved from the U.S. Census, except for census tract 2014–2017, where crime rates were extracted from publically available Chicago Police Department crime data.²⁴

A one-factor solution explaining 52.9% of the variance was explained with eigenvalue=4.77. The crime rate and % Blacks had the largest factor loadings, whereas % residents who moved in the past 12 months had the smallest loading. Percent Latinx was only the variable that had an inverse relation. The neighborhood disorganization factor score ranged from −2.001 (the least disorganized) to 3.190 (the most disorganized).

Age, sex, and chronic medical condition were extracted from Medicaid medical claims data. Age was categorized as 5–8, 9–13, and 14–18. Sex was dichotomized as female or male. Chronic medical condition was categorized as asthma, diabetes, sickle cell disease, neurological disorder, or other chronic medical condition. For those children with more than one chronic medical condition (e.g., sickle cell disease and neurological disorder), children were categorized into the chronic medical condition that is typically associated with higher health care utilization and cost. The ranking was sickle cell disease, neurological disorder, diabetes, asthma, and other chronic medical condition. For example, a child with a diagnosis of asthma and sickle cell disease was categorized into the sickle cell disease condition.

Race/ethnicity was extracted from CHECK intake assessments and Chicago Public Schools data. Race/ethnicity was categorized as Black, Latinx, or other. The race/ethnicity variable had missing data (10.9%), and to address this limitation we used the STATA multiple imputation procedure to impute patients' race/ethnicity. The multiple imputation approach creates multiple datasets that each have an imputed value. Missing values were predicted from the distribution of observed data iteratively²⁵ and improved degrees of freedom for multivariate significance tests were obtained from multiply imputed, small-sample data.^26,27 Seven hundred and five cases were imputed. We used the imputed datasets to estimate logistic regression models.

Analysis

First, descriptive statistics were used to explore the characteristics of the sample. Second, logistic regressions were performed to examine the effect of neighborhood disorganization on mental health diagnosis. Individual demographics, disease classification, and risk level were controlled for in all models. Stata 15, statistical software, was used for the analysis.

Results

A total of 6,458 children were included in the analytic sample (Table 1). Of the children, 32.2% were ages 5–8, 35.3% were ages 9–13, and 32.5% were ages 14–18. The sample included more males than females (57.1%). The majority of the children were Black (61.4%), followed by Latinx (33.9%), and other race groups (4.7%). The most common chronic medical condition was asthma (73.2%) followed by other chronic medical condition (16.5%), diabetes (5.2%), neurological disorders (3.4%), and sickle cell disease (1.7%). Overall, 18.1% of the children had a diagnosis of at least one of the four mental health diagnoses. The most common mental health diagnoses were mood disorders (8.6%), ADHD (7.4%), conduct disorders (6.1%), and anxiety disorders (4.8%). Figure 1 displays the proportion of mental health diagnosis by race/ethnicity. Children in the other race/ethnicity category had the highest proportion of mental health diagnosis and Black children had the lowest. Figure 2 displays the average neighborhood disorganization score by race/ethnicity. Black children had the highest neighborhood disorganization scores (most disorganized) and children in the other race/ethnicity category had the lowest.

FIG. 1.

Proportion of mental health diagnoses by race/ethnicity in children with chronic medical conditions enrolled in CHECK, 2014–2017 (n=6,458): Chicago, IL. CHECK, Coordinated Healthcare for Complex Kids.

FIG. 2.

Average neighborhood disorganization score by race/ethnicity in children with chronic medical conditions enrolled in CHECK, 2014–2017 (n=6,458): Chicago, IL.

Table 1.

Sample Demographics Health Characteristics Among Children with Chronic Medical Conditions Enrolled in Coordinated Healthcare for Complex Kids, 2014–2017: Chicago, IL

Variable	Total sample (n=6458) %
Age
5–8 years	32.2
9–13 years	35.3
14–18 years	32.5
Sex
Female	42.9
Male	57.1
Race/ethnicity^a
Black	61.4
Latinx	33.9
Other	4.7
Chronic condition
Asthma	73.2
Diabetes	5.2
Neurological	3.4
Sickle cell disease	1.7
Other	16.5
Mental health diagnosis
No	81.9
Yes	18.1
Mood disorders	8.6
Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder	7.4
Anxiety disorders	4.8
Conduct disorder	6.1

Imputed.

Logistic regression models are displayed in Table 2 and depict the relationship between neighborhood disorganization and mental health diagnosis. We introduced variables step-wise to examine changes in coefficients. Model 1 shows the effect of neighborhood disorganization on mental health diagnosis without taking in consideration children's chronic medical condition and race/ethnicity. Children older than age 13 were more likely, and children younger than age 9 were less likely, to have a mental health diagnosis. Lower neighborhood disorganization was associated with having a mental health diagnosis. In Model 2 we added the chronic disease variables. Having diabetes or a neurological disorder was associated with higher odds of having a mental health diagnosis compared with children in the other chronic disease category. When race/ethnicity was introduced in Model 3, neighborhood disorganization no longer was significant. Black children were less likely to have a mental health diagnosis compared with children in the other race/ethnicity category, whereas there was no statistical difference for Latinx children. When interaction terms between neighborhood disorganization and race/ethnicity were introduced into Model 4, the interaction terms were not statistically significant.

Table 2.

Logistic Regression Models Explaining Mental Health Diagnosis of Children with Chronic Medical Conditions Enrolled in Coordinated Healthcare for Complex Kids, 2014–2017 (n=6458): Chicago, IL

	OR
Variable	Model 1	Model 2	Model 3	Model 4
Age
5–8 years	0.5^**	0.5^**	0.5^**	0.5^**
9–13 years	—	—	—	—
14–18 years	1.2^**	1.2^**	1.2^**	1.2^**
Male	1.1	1.1	1.1	1.1
Neighborhood disorganization	0.9^**	0.9^**	1.0	1.0
Asthma	—	1.2	1.2	1.2
Diabetes	—	1.4^*	1.4^*	1.4^*
Neurological	—	2.6^**	2.6^**	2.6^**
Sickle cell disease	—	0.9	1.0	1.0
Other disease (Ref)	—	—	—	—
Latinx (Ref)	—	—	—	—
Other	—	—	1.2	1.1
Black	—	—	0.8^**	0.7^**
Neighborhood disorganization^*Latinx	—	—	—	0.9
Neighborhood disorganization^*Other	—	—	—	0.8

≤ 0.01.

≤0.001.

Discussion

The results of our study indicate that Black children had the highest average neighborhood disorganization score compared with any other racial/ethnic groups and the lowest rates of mental health diagnosis. Several individual-level and health care system-level factors may be contributing to the lower odds of Black children receiving a mental health diagnosis. Potential individual-level explanations include differences in parents' mental health literacy, competing priorities that prevent parents from addressing their children's mental health problems, and stigma around mental health problems.²⁸ Mental health literacy is the degree to which individuals have knowledge, beliefs, and understanding about mental health which can facilitate recognizing, managing, and preventing mental health issues.²⁸ This literacy is particularly crucial for parents because they typically spend most of their time with and have the most observations of their child's behavior, moreover they are responsible for their child's care and accessing treatment.²⁹

Parents' perceptions of their children's mental health needs are vital in determining if services are obtained and have been associated with racial disparities in access to mental health services.³⁰ For example, studies have found that Black parents are less likely to perceive their children as having a mental health service need compared with White parents.³⁰ Also, evidence suggests that parents with high stress levels are less likely to notice signs of mental health problems in their children than parents with lower levels of stress.³¹ The reasons for differences in parents' perceptions and ability to recognize potential mental health problems in their children requires further investigation. Parents, particularly single parents, living in poverty face significant stressors (e.g., housing insecurity, food insecurity, and unsafe living conditions) and often have urgent concerns (e.g., working, childcare, and dealing with their children's chronic health problems) that they may interfere with tending to their children's mental health needs.^32,33

Mental health stigma is another possible contributing factor in Black parents under recognition or pursuit of mental health diagnosis for their children. Several studies have found that Blacks associate higher levels of stigma with mental illness than Whites.^34–37 Parents who hold stigmatizing views of mental illness are less likely to acknowledge that their child has a mental health problem and also may attempt to protect their child from being labeled.³⁸ In addition, studies have documented that Black cultural values of personal strength and addressing problems within the family or through religious practices may view seeking professional help for mental health problems as a sign of weakness.^39–43

Several structural health system factors are known barriers to Blacks receiving behavioral health care. First, historical racism that is embedded in medical research and clinical treatment has contributed to mistrust of providers and the mental health system.^44,45 Second, discrimination within the health care and mental health settings, including from providers, has been associated with underutilization of services.⁴⁶ Third, underutilization of services occurs because of lack of access to behavioral health care services due to lack of providers, insurance, transportation to appointments, and long appointment wait times.^2,47 Studies consistently report a disparity in racial/ethnic minorities' access to mental health care.^2,47,48 Indeed, the lower rates of mental diagnosis among minorities in this cohort of children may reflect differential access to mental health care.^47,48

Neighborhood disorganization was negatively associated with mental health diagnosis. However it was no longer significant when race/ethnicity categories were added to the model. Race was significant for Black children compared with children in the other race/ethnicity category who were more than twice as likely as Black children to be diagnosed with a mental health diagnosis.

While previous studies have found that neighborhood disorganization has an effect on children's mental health,⁴⁹ one potential reason that it is not significant in this study is that the level of disorganization is highly correlated with racial/ethnic composition of the neighborhoods. Black children disproportionately resided in highly disorganized neighborhoods compared with other groups. Moreover, neighborhood disorganization may not have sufficient variability within the racial/ethnic categories, explaining its absence of interaction with race/ethnicity on mental health diagnosis. It is possible that because race/ethnicity composition was highly correlated with neighborhood disorganization, the race/ethnicity variable consumes most of the disorganization effect on mental health diagnosis. One way to tease out race/ethnicity and disorganization effects would be to compare racial/ethnic groups all living in areas with a same level of disorganization. However, realistically, it is very difficult to find such compatible areas, and certainly in Chicago, there are no White or other racial areas at the level of intense neighborhood disorganization that predominantly Black areas face. Furthermore, children residing in highly disorganized neighborhoods have differential exposure to heightened levels of stress, and logically would have higher rates of mental health diagnosis. Yet, Black children live in the most disorganized neighborhoods and have lower rates of mental health diagnosis. It is possible that the experience of being Black fundamentally determines where one lives and thus significantly contributes to the disparity in mental health diagnosis.

This study has some limitations. First, the 10.9% of missing race/ethnicity data may have affected study findings. When we analyzed the data using only cases with race/ethnicity data the results were essentially the same, suggesting the data were missing at random. In addition, Administrative data, such as Medicaid claims and Chicago Police data, may have coding errors. We assume that these errors are small and random.

Previous studies suggest that mental health diagnosis is underestimated in children,^2,50 and this is likely to be the case in our study population. As a result, many of the children who were not identified and diagnosed in our sample could still have mental health diagnoses. Finally, this study examined data from children in the CHECK program who have chronic medical conditions, are enrolled in Medicaid, and reside in Chicago. As such, the results may not be generalizable to all children or even just those enrolled in Medicaid.

Conclusion

Mental health problems in children that are not identified and addressed can intensify and worsen as the children age, and may have severe and lasting consequences.^2,51,52 Addressing behavioral health disparities among Black children residing in disorganized neighborhoods will require a multipronged intervention strategy that addresses individual- and system-level factors. At the individual level, increasing parents' mental health literacy is a promising intervention strategy that can increase recognition of mental health problems, decrease stigma around mental health, and lead to parents seeking mental health care for their children.⁵³ At a system level, expanding capacity and offering services in less traditional mental health environments may allow for improved early identification of mental needs by identifying them in less stigmatizing circumstances. One possibility is to expand access to care by offering mental health services in schools located in highly disorganized neighborhoods, including universal mental health screening. Another possibility is to expand access by integrating health, social, and mental health services in high-need communities. Future studies are needed that examine the mechanisms for the disparities at the health system and provider levels in mental health diagnoses. Furthermore, examining neighborhood level determinants that impact mental health outcomes can illuminate avenues for policy and health system changes that, in turn, can have a sweeping impact on communities. In fact, these upstream causes may be more amenable to interventions than individual-level approaches.⁵⁴

Footnotes

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank all of the staff, faculty, and administration who have supported the CHECK program. They also extend their thanks to the CHECK Executive Committee, CHECK Operations/Research Integration Group, Garret Munoz for his assistance with the data, Kenneth Rasinski for his critical editing, and leadership members who made this work possible. A special thanks to the Care Coordination and Behavioral Health Teams especially, Osei Bekoe, Ixtily Elizalde, Roszaine Gillespie, Tiffany Hartfield, Krystle Kellick, Whitney Montgomery, and Aaron Van Til for their valuable insights and experience with CHECK families and mental health.

Author Disclosure Statement

The authors have no potential conflicts of interest to disclose and no competing financial interests exist.

Funding Information

This publication was made possible by Grant Number 1C1CMS331342 from the Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. The contents of this publication are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official views of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services or any of its agencies. The research presented here was conducted by the awardee. Findings might or might not be consistent with or confirmed by the findings of the independent evaluation contractor. Research reported in this publication also was supported by the National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities of the National Institutes of Health under Award Number U54MD012523. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.

Abbreviations Used

References

Slopen

, Shonkoff

, Albert

, et al. Racial disparities in child adversity in the US: interactions with family immigration history and income. Am J Prev Med. 2016; 50:47–56.

Alegría

, Green

, McLaughlin

, et al. Disparities in Child and Adolescent Mental Health and Mental Health Services in the US. New York, NY: William T Grant Foundation, 2015.

Kids Count Data Center. Children in Poverty by Race and Ethnicity. Baltimore, MD: Annie E. Casey Foundation, 2014.

Felitti

, Anda

, Nordenberg

, et al. Relationship of childhood abuse and household dysfunction to many of the leading causes of death in adults: the Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACE) Study. Am J Prev Med. 1998; 14:245–258.

Turner

, Finkelhor

, Ormrod

. The effect of lifetime victimization on the mental health of children and adolescents. Soc Sci Med. 2006; 62:13–27.

Williams

, Collins

. US socioeconomic and racial differences in health: patterns and explanations. Annu Rev Sociol. 1995; 21:349–386.

Andrews

, Jobe-Shields

, López

, et al. Polyvictimization, income, and ethnic differences in trauma-related mental health during adolescence. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2015; 50:1223–1234.

Miranda

, McGuire

, Williams

, et al. Mental health in the context of health disparities. Am J Psychiatry. 2008; 165:1102–1108.

Cummings

, Druss

. Racial/ethnic differences in mental health service use among adolescents with major depression. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2011; 50:160–170.

10.

Morgan

, Staff

, Hillemeier

, et al. Racial and ethnic disparities in ADHD diagnosis from kindergarten to eighth grade. Pediatrics. 2013:peds. 2012–2390.

11.

Butcher

, Galanek

, Kretschmar

, et al. The impact of neighborhood disorganization on neighborhood exposure to violence, trauma symptoms, and social relationships among at-risk youth. Soc Sci Med. 2015; 146:300–306.

12.

Kawachi

, Kennedy

, Wilkinson

. Crime: social disorganization and relative deprivation. Soc Sci Med. 1999; 48:719–731.

13.

Sampson

, Groves

. Community structure and crime: testing social-disorganization theory. Am J Sociol. 1989; 94:774–802.

14.

Shaw

, McKay

. Juvenile Delinquency and Urban Areas. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1942.

15.

Singh

, Ghandour

. Impact of neighborhood social conditions and household socioeconomic status on behavioral problems among US children. Matern Child Health J. 2012; 16:158–169.

16.

Healthy Chicago 2.0. Partnering to Improve Health Equity 2016–2020. Chicago, IL: Chicago Department of Public Health, 2016.

17.

Berry

, Bloom

, Foley

, et al. Health inequity in children and youth with chronic health conditions. Pediatrics. 2010; 126(Suppl 3):S111–S119.

18.

Safran

, Mays

Jr , Huang

, et al. Mental health disparities. Am J Public Health. 2009; 99:1962–1966.

19.

Glassgow

, Van Voorhees

. Behavioral health disparities among children and youth with special health care needs. Pediatr Ann. 2017; 46:e382–e386.

20.

Glassgow

, Martin

, Caskey

, et al. An innovative health-care delivery model for children with medical complexity. J Child Health Care. 2017; 21:263–272.

21.

Glassgow

, Gerges

, Martin

, et al. Integration of mental health services into an innovative health care delivery model for children with chronic conditions. Child Youth Serv Rev. 2018; 95:144–151.

22.

Minier

, Hirshfield

, Ramahi

, et al. Schools and Health: an Essential Partnership for the Effective Care of Children with Chronic Conditions. J Sch Health. 2018; 88:699–703.

23.

Martin

, Collazo

, Frese

, et al. Oral health problems and solutions in high-risk children and young adults. J Dent Child. 2018; 85:125–132.

24.

Chicago Data Portal. Crimes 2001 to Present. Chicago, IL: City of Chicago, 2019.

25.

Royston

. Multiple imputation of missing values: further update of ice, with an emphasis on categorical variables. Stata J. 2009; 9:466.

26.

Sterne

, White

, Carlin

, et al. Multiple imputation for missing data in epidemiological and clinical research: potential and pitfalls. BMJ. 2009; 338:b2393.

27.

Marchenko

, Reiter

. Improved degrees of freedom for multivariate significance tests obtained from multiply imputed, small-sample data. Stata J. 2009; 9:388.

28.

Jorm

, Korten

, Jacomb

, et al. “Mental health literacy”: a survey of the public's ability to recognise mental disorders and their beliefs about the effectiveness of treatment. Med J Aust. 1997; 166:182–186.

29.

Mendenhall

. Predictors of service utilization among youth diagnosed with mood disorders. J Child Fam Stud. 2012; 21:603–611.

30.

Rose

, Parish

, Yoo

, et al. Suppression of racial disparities for children with special health care needs among families receiving Medicaid. Soc Sci Med. 2010; 70:1263–1270.

31.

Brannan

, Heflinger

, Bickman

LJJoE

, et al. The Caregiver Strain Questionnaire: measuring the impact on the family of living with a child with serious emotional disturbance. J Emotional Behav Disord, 1997; 5:212–222.

32.

Godoy

, Carter

. Identifying and addressing mental health risks and problems in primary care pediatric settings: a model to promote developmental and cultural competence. Am J Orthopsychiatry. 2013; 83:73–88.

33.

Ganz

, Curry

, Jones

, et al. Barriers to Mental Health Treatment Utilization in Wards 7 and 8 in Washington, DC: a Qualitative Pilot Study. Health Equity. 2018; 2:216–222.

34.

Alvidrez

, Snowden

, Kaiser

. The experience of stigma among Black mental health consumers. J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2008; 19:874–893.

35.

DeFreitas

, Crone

, DeLeon

, et al. Perceived and personal mental health stigma in Latino and African American college students. Front Public Health, 2018; 6:49.

36.

Cheng

H-L

, McDermott

, Lopez

. Mental health, self-stigma, and help-seeking intentions among emerging adults: an attachment perspective. Couns Psychol. 2015; 43:463–487.

37.

Dobalian

, Rivers

. Racial and ethnic disparities in the use of mental health services. J Behav Health Serv Res. 2008; 35:128–141.

38.

Villatoro

, DuPont-Reyes

, Phelan

, et al. Parental recognition of preadolescent mental health problems: does stigma matter?. Soc Sci Med. 2018; 216:88–96.

39.

Del Mauro

J.M

. Williams DJ. Children and adolescents' attitudes toward seeking help from professional mental health providers. Int J Adv Couns. 2013; 2013:120–138.

40.

Williams

, Domanico

, Marques

, et al. Barriers to treatment among African Americans with obsessive-compulsive disorder. J Anxiety Disord. 2012; 26:555–563.

41.

Belgrave

, Berry

. Community Approaches to Promoting Positive Mental Health and Psychosocial Well-Being. Handbook of Mental Health in African American Youth. Cham, Switzerland: Springer, 2016, pp. 121–140.

42.

Thurston

, Hardin

, Decker

, et al. Black and white parents' willingness to seek help for children's internalizing and externalizing symptoms. J Clin Psychol. 2018; 74:161–177.

43.

Blank

, Mahmood

, Fox

, et al. Alternative mental health services: the role of the Black church in the South. Am J Public Health. 2002; 92:1668–1672.

44.

Mays

, Jones

, Delany-Brumsey

, et al. Perceived discrimination in healthcare and mental health/substance abuse treatment among blacks, latinos, and whites. Med Care. 2017; 55:173.

45.

Suite

, La Bril

, Primm

, et al. Beyond misdiagnosis, misunderstanding and mistrust: relevance of the historical perspective in the medical and mental health treatment of people of color. J Natl Med Assoc. 2007; 99:879.

46.

Burgess

, Ding

, Hargreaves

, et al. The association between perceived discrimination and underutilization of needed medical and mental health care in a multi-ethnic community sample. J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2008; 19:894–911.

47.

Lê Cook

, Barry

, Busch

. Racial/ethnic disparity trends in children's mental health care access and expenditures from 2002 to 2007. Health Serv Res. 2013; 48:129–149.

48.

Chow

JC-C

, Jaffee

, Snowden

. Racial/ethnic disparities in the use of mental health services in poverty areas. Am J Public Health. 2003; 93:792–797.

49.

Xue

, Leventhal

, Brooks-Gunn

, et al. Neighborhood residence and mental health problems of 5-to 11-year-olds. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2005; 62:554–563.

50.

National Research Council. Preventing Mental, Emotional, and Behavioral Disorders Among Young People: Progress and Possibilities. Washington, DC: National Academies Press, 2009.

51.

Perou

, Bitsko

, Blumberg

, et al. Mental health surveillance among children—United States, 2005–2011. MMWR Surveill Summ. 2013; 62(Suppl 2):1–35.

52.

Thomas

. Universal mental health prevention for adolescents: real-world implications. Pediatrics. 2019; 144:e20190937.

53.

Lofthouse

, Fristad

. Psychosocial interventions for children with early-onset bipolar spectrum disorder. Clin Child Fam Psychol Rev. 2004; 7:71–88.

54.

Oakes

. The (mis) estimation of neighborhood effects: causal inference for a practicable social epidemiology. Soc Sci Med. 2004; 58:1929–1952.

Exploring Racial Disparities in Mental Health Diagnoses and Neighborhood Disorganization Among an Urban Cohort of Children and Adolescents with Chronic Medical Conditions

Abstract

Abstract

Objective:

Methods:

Results:

Conclusions:

Introduction

Methods

Measures

Analysis

Results

Discussion

Conclusion

Footnotes

Acknowledgments

Author Disclosure Statement

Funding Information

Abbreviations Used

References