The Use of Simulated Altitude Techniques for Beneficial Cardiovascular Health Outcomes in Nonathletic,Sedentary,and Clinical Populations: A Literature Review

Abstract

Abstract

Lizamore, Catherine A., and Michael J. Hamlin. The use of simulated altitude techniques for beneficial cardiovascular health outcomes in nonathletic, sedentary, and clinical populations: A literature review. High Alt Med Biol 18:305–321, 2017.

Background:

The reportedly beneficial improvements in an athlete's physical performance following altitude training may have merit for individuals struggling to meet physical activity guidelines.

Aim:

To review the effectiveness of simulated altitude training methodologies at improving cardiovascular health in sedentary and clinical cohorts.

Methods:

Articles were selected from Science Direct, PubMed, and Google Scholar databases using a combination of the following search terms anywhere in the article: “intermittent hypoxia,” “intermittent hypoxic,” “normobaric hypoxia,” or “altitude,” and a participant descriptor including the following: “sedentary,” “untrained,” or “inactive.”

Results:

1015 articles were returned, of which 26 studies were accepted (4 clinical cohorts, 22 studies used sedentary participants). Simulated altitude methodologies included prolonged hypoxic exposure (PHE: continuous hypoxic interval), intermittent hypoxic exposure (IHE: 5–10 minutes hypoxic:normoxic intervals), and intermittent hypoxic training (IHT: exercising in hypoxia).

Conclusions:

In a clinical cohort, PHE for 3–4 hours at 2700–4200 m for 2–3 weeks may improve blood lipid profile, myocardial perfusion, and exercise capacity, while 3 weeks of IHE treatment may improve baroreflex sensitivity and heart rate variability. In the sedentary population, IHE was most likely to improve submaximal exercise tolerance, time to exhaustion, and heart rate variability. Hematological adaptations were unclear. Typically, a 4-week intervention of 1-hour-long PHE intervals 5 days a week, at a fraction of inspired oxygen (F_IO₂) of 0.15, was beneficial for pulmonary ventilation, submaximal exercise, and maximum oxygen consumption ( \documentclass{aastex}\usepackage{amsbsy}\usepackage{amsfonts}\usepackage{amssymb}\usepackage{bm}\usepackage{mathrsfs}\usepackage{pifont}\usepackage{stmaryrd}\usepackage{textcomp}\usepackage{portland, xspace}\usepackage{amsmath, amsxtra}\usepackage{upgreek}\pagestyle{empty}\DeclareMathSizes{10}{9}{7}{6}\begin{document} $${\dot {\rm V}}$$ \end{document} O_2max), but an F_IO₂ of 0.12 reduced hyperemic response and antioxidative capacity. While IHT may be beneficial for increased lipid metabolism in the short term, it is unlikely to confer any additional advantage over normoxic exercise over the long term. IHT may improve vascular health and autonomic balance.