Abstract
Abstract
Waeber, Baptiste, Bengt Kayser, Lionel Dumont, Christopher Lysakowski, Martin R. Tramèr, and Nadia Elia. Impact of study design on reported incidences of acute mountain sickness: A systematic review. High Alt Med Biol 16:204–215, 2015.—
Results:
We extracted data from 53,603 subjects from 34 randomized controlled trials, 44 cohort studies, and 33 cross-sectional studies. In randomized trials, the median of AMS incidences without prophylaxis was 60% (range, 16%–100%); mode of ascent and population were significantly associated with AMS incidence. In cohort studies, the median of AMS incidences was 51% (0%–100%); geographical location was significantly associated with AMS incidence. In cross-sectional studies, the median of AMS incidences was 32% (0%–68%); mode of ascent and maximum altitude were significantly associated with AMS incidence. In a multivariate analysis, study design (p=0.012), mode of ascent (p=0.003), maximum altitude (p<0.001), population (p=0.002), and geographical location (p<0.001) were significantly associated with AMS incidence. Age, sex, speed of ascent, duration of exposure, or history of AMS were inconsistently reported and therefore not further analyzed.
Conclusions:
Reported incidences and identifiable predictive factors of AMS depend on study design.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
