Abstract
Objective:
To assess the impact of a guided video-based coaching (VBC) session on resident satisfaction with surgical feedback.
Materials and Methods:
A guided VBC session was designed as a feedback tool and evaluated in this prospective randomized trial performed at a single academic institution. Residents were divided into junior and senior levels and randomized into three feedback groups: usual teaching (UT) with MyTip, VBC with a generalist ObGyn, and VBC with a fellowship-trained ObGyn. Residents received feedback on one level-specific laparoscopic surgery, bilateral salpingectomy or total hysterectomy. All residents completed pre- and post-intervention confidence surveys and post-intervention satisfaction surveys. The Wilcoxon signed-rank test was utilized to compare satisfaction and confidence between intervention groups and UT, and Kruskall–Wallis tests were used to compare all the three subgroups.
Results:
Twenty-six residents participated in the study. There was a significant difference in overall resident satisfaction with surgical feedback (p < 0.001) when comparing VBC to UT. Residents in VBC were more satisfied with the amount (p = 0.001), timeliness (p = 0.006), and quality (p = 0.002) of feedback (Table 2). In comparison to UT, residents reported VBC was more engaging (p < 0.001) and specific (p < 0.001) and contributed more to surgical skill development (p = 0.003) and overall education (p < 0.001). Subanalyses demonstrated that VBC had a larger impact on junior resident satisfaction. There was no difference between pre- and post-confidence scores among all the groups.
Conclusion(s):
Residents participating in VBC had higher satisfaction with surgical feedback compared to UT. There was no change in confidence scores among all participants.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
