Route of Hysterectomy for Benign Indications

Committee on Gynecologic Practice. Committee Opinion No 701: Choosing the Route of Hysterectomy for Benign Disease. Obstet Gynecol, 2017; 129:e155;reaffirmed in 2020.

Walters MD , Ferrando CU , Choosing a Route of Hysterectomy for Benign Uterine Disease . UpToDate,^® November 2020. Online document at: www.uptodate.com/contents/choosing-a-route-of-hysterectomy-for-benign-uterine-disease/print#! Accessed February 10, 2021.

Aarts JWM , Nieboer TE , Johnson N , Tavender E , Garry R , Mol BWJ , Kluivers KB . Surgical approach to hysterectomy for benign gynaecological disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2015; 8:CD003677.

Sandberg EM , Twijnstra AR , Driessen SR , Jansen FW . Total laparoscopic hysterectomy versus vaginal hysterectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2017:24:206.

Moen M , Walter A , Harmanli O , et al.; Society of Gynecologic Surgeons Education Committee. Considerations to improve the evidence-based use of vaginal hysterectomy in benign gynecology. Obstet Gynecol, 2014; 124:585.

Schmitt JJ , Baker MV , Occhino JA , et al. Prospective implementation and evaluation of a decision-tree algorithm for route of hysterectomy. Obstet Gynecol, 2020; 135:761.

Guntupalli SR . Hysterectomy in residency training. The new numbers game? Obstet Gynecol, 2020; 135:266.

Hoffman MS , Chi DS , Clarke-Pearson DL , Cliby W Creasman W , Underwood PB Jr . Surgical training in gynecologic oncology: Past, present, future. Gynecol Oncol, 2020; 158:188.

Whiteside JL , Kaeser CT , Ridgeway B . Achieving high value in the surgical approach to hysterectomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2019; 220:242.

Swenson CW , Kamdar NS , Harris JA , Uppal S , Campbell DA Jr , Morgan DM . Comparison of robotic and other minimally invasive routes of hysterectomy for benign indications. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2016; 215:650.e1.