Background: Prolapse of the neovagina is a rarely reported complication of male-to-female transgender surgery and is not commonly encountered by gynecologists. Documented management of such cases is scarce in the literature and includes a few case reports or abstracts. This article reports the current authors' experience treating complete eversion of the neovagina successfully with laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy. Case: A 55-year-old transgender female had complete eversion of her neovagina and symptoms of obstructive defecation syndrome (ODS). Use of a ring pessary was unsuccessful. A magnetic resonance imaging proctogram revealed anismus, and paradoxical contraction of the anal canal and puborectalis muscle. At a pelvic-floor multidisciplinary meeting, biofeedback treatment was recommended for her ODS symptoms as well as laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy. The procedure posed various technical difficulties for this patient, compared to an XX female, including lack of a distinct rectovaginal septum, a narrow and shortened vagina, and more-dense and vascular tissues of Denonvilliers' fascia. A higher risk of mesh erosion was identified because of the vaginal tissue being thinner keratinized squamous epithelium; thus, the surgical technique was adapted to reduce this risk. Results: At 18-month's follow-up, good anatomical results were noted, and the patient's satisfaction was reflected in her Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification and International Consultation on Incontinence Modular Questionnaire–Vaginal Symptoms vaginal symptom scores. Conclusions: To the current authors' knowledge, this is the first published description of laparoscopic mesh sacrocolpopexy in the literature. The procedure is safe, with low morbidity, faster recovery, and good medium-term anatomical and functional outcomes. The need for a multidisciplinary approach when managing such complex cases is emphasized. (J GYNECOL SURG 32:245)
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
SutcliffePA, DixonS, AkehurstRL, et al.Evaluation of surgical procedures for sex reassignment: A systematic review. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg, 2009; 62:294.
2.
BucciS, MazzonG, LiguoriG, et al.Neovaginal prolapse in male-to-female transsexuals: An 18-year-long experience. Biomed Res Int, 2014; 2014:240761.
3.
GoddardJC, VickeryRM, QureshiA, SummertonDJ, KhoosalD, TerryTR. Feminizing genitoplasty in adult transsexuals: Early and long-term surgical results. BJU Int, 2007; 100:607.
4.
StanojevicDS, DjordjevicML, MilosevicA, et al.; Belgrade Gender Dysphoria Team. Sacrospinous ligament fixation for neovaginal prolapse prevention in male-to-female surgery. Urology, 2007; 70:767.
5.
MaherCF, QatawnehAM, DwyerPL, CareyMP, CornishA, SchluterPJ. Abdominal sacral colpopexy or vaginal sacrospinous colpopexy for vaginal vault prolapse: A prospective randomized study. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2004; 190:20.
6.
MaherCM, FeinerB, BaesslerK, GlazenerCM. Surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse in women: The updated summary version Cochrane review. Int Urogynecol J, 2011; 22:1445.
7.
BensonJT, LucenteV, McClellanE. Vaginal versus abdominal reconstructive surgery for the treatment of pelvic support defects: A prospective randomized study with long-term outcome evaluation. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 1996; 175:1418.
8.
LoverroG, BettocchiC, BattagliaM, CormioG, SelvaggiG, Di TonnoP, SelvaggiFP. Repair of vaginal prolapse following penoscrotal flap vaginoplasty in a male-to-female transsexual. Gynecol Obstet Invest, 2002; 53:234.
9.
FrederickRW, LeachGE. Abdominal sacral colpopexy for repair of neovaginal prolapse in male-to-female transsexuals. Urology, 2004; 64:580.
10.
CondousG, JonesR, LamAM. Male-to-female transsexualism: Laparoscopic pelvic floor repair of prolapsed neovagina. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol, 2006; 46:254.
11.
PatelPS, LamA. Laparoscopic mesh sacrocolpopexy for recurrent neovaginal prolapse after male-to-female gender reassignment. J Minim Invasive Gynecol, 2012; 19:S178.
12.
MorcelK, CamborieuxL; Programme de Recherches sur les Aplasies Müllériennes, GuerrierD. Mayer–Rokitansky–Küster–Hauser (MRKH) syndrome. Orphanet J Rare Dis, 2007; 14:2:13.
13.
McQuillanSK, GroverSR. Dilation and surgical management in vaginal agenesis: A systematic review. Int Urogynecol J, 2014; 25:299.
14.
BorrutoF, CamoglioFS, ZampieriN, FedeleL. The laparoscopic Vecchietti technique for vaginal agenesis. Int J of Gynecol Obstet, 2007; 98:15.
15.
DeLanceyJO. Anatomic aspects of vaginal eversion after hysterectomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 1992; 166(6[pt1]):1717.
16.
SchafferJ, FabricantC, CarrBR. Vaginal vault prolapse after nonsurgical and surgical treatment of Müllerian agenesis. Obstet Gynecol, 2002; 99(5[pt2]):947.
17.
MatsuiH, SekiK, SekiyaS. Prolapse of the neovagina in Mayer–Rokitansky–Kuster–Hauser syndrome: A case report. J Reprod Med, 1999; 44:548.
18.
FreundtI, ToolenaarTA, JeekelH, DrogendijkAC, HuikeshovenFJ. Prolapse of the sigmoid neovagina: Report of three cases. Obstet Gynecol, 1994; 83(5[pt2]):876.
19.
CalcagnoM, PastoreM, BellatiF, PlottiF, MaffuciD, BoniT, Benedetti PaniciP. Early prolapse of a neovagina created with self-dilatation and treated with sacrospinous ligament suspension in a patient with Mayer–Rokitansky–Küster–Hauser syndrome: A case report. Fertil Steril, 2010; 93:267e1.
20.
KondoW, RibeiroR, TsumanumaFK, ZomerMT. Laparoscopic promontofixation for the treatment of recurrent sigmoid neovaginal prolapse: Case report and systematic review of the literature. J Minim Invasive Gynecol, 2012; 19:176.
21.
YokomizoR, MurakamiT, NaitouH, YamadaA. Treatment for prolapse of the sigmoid neovagina in Mayer–Rokitansky–Kuster–Hauser syndrome. Obstet Gynecol, 2002; 100(5[pt2]):1085.
22.
PopovA, GuminaD, MironenkoK, et al.Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy in a patient with vault prolapse of the sigmoid stump. Int Urogynecol J, 2016; 27:315.
23.
ChristopoulosP, CutnerA, VashishtA, CreightonSM. Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy to treat prolapse of the neovagina created by vaginal dilation in Rokitansky syndrome. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol, 2011; 24:e33.
