Abstract
Objective:
The aim of this study was to compare intraoperative and postoperative outcomes of two routes of salpingo-oophorectomy.
Materials and Methods:
Forty-two women undergoing vaginal hysterectomy were randomly assigned to 2 groups (1:1): group 1, laparoscopic oophorectomy with vaginal hysterectomy; or group 2, vaginal hysterectomy with vaginal oophorectomy. Outcome measures were operating time, blood loss, technical difficulty, intraoperative and postoperative complications, postoperative pain, and discharge time.
Results:
Vaginal oophorectomy was associated with a shorter operating time than laparoscopic oophorectomy at 37.06 ± 10.16 minutes (95% confidence interval [95% CI]: 32.36–41.75) and 20.75 ± 5.56 minutes (95% CI: 18.31–23.18), p = 0.001, in groups 1 and 2, respectively. The mean operating time for hysterectomy was similar in both groups at 48.06 ± 10.709 minutes for group 1 and 49.25 ± 11.318 minutes for group 2, p = 0.746. No statistically significant difference was noted for blood loss, level of technical difficulty, intraoperative or postoperative complications, postoperative pain, and discharge time.
Conclusions:
Vaginal and laparoscopic routes of oophorectomy can be used during vaginal hysterectomy. The vaginal route is a better option, with shorter operating time, feasibility with regional anesthesia, and a comparable surgical outcome to laparoscopy. When salpingo-oophorectomy cannot be completed vaginally, laparoscopic oophorectomy can be performed. (J GYNECOL SURG 32:220)