Objective: The objective of this study was to describe the use of a robotic surgical system for radical hysterectomy in a side-docking approach. Methods: We report a series of laparoscopic radical hysterectomies performed using the da Vinci Robotic Surgical System in a side-docking approach. The patient's record and operative findings were reviewed. Results: A series of eight laparoscopic radical hysterectomies using the da Vinci Robotic Surgical System in a side-docking approach were performed from July 2009 to November 2009. Vaginal access was readily available to surgeons. The working space for the first assistant was improved comparing to the central-docking approach. The median operative time was 257 minutes and median blood loss was 200 mL. There was no major complication from the operations. All patients recovered from the operation without significant sequelae. Conclusions: A series of laparoscopic radical hysterectomies using the da Vinci Robotic Surgical System in a side-docking approach was reported. This approach provides better vaginal access and improved the working spaces for the assistants. (J GYNECOL SURG 26:99)
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
NezhatCR, NezhatFR, BurrellMOet al.Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and laparoscopically assisted vaginal radical hysterectomy with pelvic and paraaortic node dissections. J Gynecol Surg, 1993; 9:105.
2.
SedlacekTV, CampionMJ, HutchinsRA, ReichH. Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy: A preliminary report. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc, 1994; 1,4, Part 2:S32.
3.
MalzoniM, TinelliR, CosentinoFet al.Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy in patients with early cervical cancer: Our instruments and technique. Surg Oncol, 2009; 18:289.
4.
SpirtosNM, EisenkopSM, SchlaerthJB, BallonSC. Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy (type III) with aortic and pelvic lymphadenectomy in patients with stage I cervical cancer: Surgical morbidity and intermediate follow-up. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2002; 187:340.
5.
SertBM, AbelerVM. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical hysterectomy (Piver type III) with pelvic node dissection: Case report. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol, 2006; 27:531.
6.
MagrinaJF, KhoRM, WeaverAL, MonteroRP, MagtibayPM. Robotic radical hysterectomy: Comparison with laparoscopy and laparotomy. Gynecol Oncol, 2008; 109:86.
7.
KimYT, KimSW, HyungWJ, LeeSJ, NamEJ, LeeWJ. Robotic radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy for cervical carcinoma: A pilot study. Gynecol Oncol, 2008; 108:312.
8.
BoggessJF, GehrigPA, CantrellLet al.A case–control study of robot-assisted type III radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymph node dissection compared with open radical hysterectomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2008; 199:e1.
9.
LoweMP, ChamberlainDH, KamelleSA, JohnsonPR, TillmannsTD. A multi-institutional experience with robotic-assisted radical hysterectomy for early stage cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol, 2009; 113:191.
10.
HollowayRW, AhmadS, DeNardisSAet al.Robotic-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy and lymphadenectomy for endometrial cancer: Analysis of surgical performance. Gynecol Oncol, 2009; 115:447.
