Abstract
ABSTRACT
This study was conducted to determine the impact of the addition of the loop ligation (Endoloop) technique on choice of sterilization surgery in our residency teaching program and to investigate significant differences between this technique and other methods performed at our hospital. A retrospective study of all patients undergoing interval tubal sterilization at Tampa General Hospital in 1989 and 1991 was undertaken. Data were analyzed to determine the frequency of sterilization methods and differences between the loop ligation method and the other procedures performed; p values of less than 0.05 were considered significant. Sixty-one patients in 1989 and 75 in 1991 qualified for the study. Five methods of interval sterilization were performed: loop ligation, minilaparotomy, colpotomy, laparoscopic bipolar fulguration, and Silastic ring application. The frequency of the loop ligature technique increased from 0% in 1989 to 40% in 1991. There were no significant differences in operative time and complication rate among the loop method and other procedures. The loop ligature (Endoloop) method of laparoscopic sterilization does not significantly change the length of surgery, blood loss, or complication rate compared to the other laparoscopic techniques used in our residency program. This method provides a definitive tissue diagnosis, eliminates the risk of thermal injury, theoretically provides an opportunity of later tubal reanastomosis, and subjectively helps develop laparoscopic skills. (J GYNECOL SURG 10:15, 1994)
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.