GymrekM, McGuireAL, GolanD, HalperinE, ErlichY. 2013. Identifying personal genomes by surname inference. Science, 339:321-324.
2.
HofmannB. 2009. Broadening consent—and diluting ethics?J Med Ethics, 35:125-129.
3.
KayeJ. 2012. Embedding biobanks as tools for personalised medicine. Norsk Epidemiol, 21,2.
4.
KayeJ, CurrenL, AndersonNet al.2012. From patients to partners: participant-centric initiatives in biomedical research. Nature Rev Genet, 13:371-376.
5.
KayeJ, WhitleyEA, KanellopoulouNet al.2011. Dynamic consent: a solution to a perennial problem?BMJ, 343:d6900-d6900.
6.
KuehnBM. 2013. Groups experiment with digital tools for patient consent. JAMA, 310:678-680.
7.
MalinB, SweeneyL. 2001. Re-identification of DNA through an automated linkage process. Proceedings of the AMIA Symposium. American Medical Informatics Association, 423.
8.
SteinsbekkKS, MyskjaBK, SolbergB. 2013. Broad consent versus dynamic consent in biobank research: is passive participation an ethical problem?Eur J Human Genet, 21:897-902.
9.
TerrySF, SheltonR, BiggersG, BakerD, EdwardsK. 2013. The haystack is made of needles. Genet Test Molec Biomarkers, 17:175-177.
10.
WeeR. 2013. Dynamic consent in the digital age of biology. J Prim Health Care, 5:259-261.
