Genotype-based Screening for Hereditary Hemochromatosis: II. Attitudes Toward Genetic Testing and Psychosocial Impact—A Report from a German Pilot Study

Abstract

In collaboration with the German Sickness Fund (Kaufmännische Krankenkasse-KKH), we conducted a pilot study on DNA-based population screening of hereditary hemochromatosis (HH) in Germany. The health insurance organization KKH briefly informed their members about the possibility to participate voluntarily in this pilot project. A total of 5882 KKH members contacted us and received detailed information on the aim of the project and clinical and genetic aspects of HH. Of these individuals, 3961 requested HFE genotyping. After genotype results had been communicated to the participants' general practitioner, we sent a selfadministered questionnaire to all homozygous (n = 67) and heterozygous (n = 485) as well as 448 wild-type study participants (Σ = 1000) to assess the psychosocial impact of HFE genotyping. In addition, questionnaires were sent to 8000 randomly selected members of the KKH to investigate their attitude toward genetic testing. Six hundred thirty-one (63.1%) of the test participants and 2141 (26.8%) of the randomly chosen KKH members responded. A total of 59.1% of the members would generally accept predictive genetic testing and 3.7% objected to such tests in principle. Individuals with higher educational status accepted predictive testing significantly more often than individuals with less education. Of the tested individuals, 69.9% thought that participation in the pilot study was probably beneficial for them and 1% (5 heterozygotes and 1 wild-type) thought that it was probably harmful. Of the participants, 94.6% judged their decision to have participated in the pilot study as right and 0.3% (2 heterozygotes) as probably wrong. Only very few of the tested individuals underwent pretest (1 case) or posttest (11 cases) genetic counseling. We conclude that genotype- based screening for HH is generally accepted and was perceived as beneficial. Negative psychosocial consequences are rare and could presumably have been prevented by delivering appropriate pretest and posttest information.