DurrantMG, PerryNT, PaiJJ, et al.Bridge RNAs direct programmable recombination of target and donor DNA. Nature, 2024; 630(8018):984–993; doi: 10.1038/s41586-024-07552-4
2.
HerreraRJ, Garcia-BertrandR, SalzanoFM. Genomes, Evolution, and Culture: Past, Present, and Future of Humankind. Wiley; 2016.
3.
HsuPD, ScottDA, WeinsteinJA, et al.DNA targeting specificity of RNA-guided Cas9 nucleases. Nat Biotechnol, 2013; 31(9):827–832; doi: 10.1038/nbt.2647
4.
KonermannS, LotfyP, BrideauNJ, et al.Transcriptome engineering with RNA-targeting type VI-D CRISPR effectors. Cell, 2018; 173(3):665–676.e14; doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2018.02.033
5.
CapecchiMR. High efficiency transformation by direct microinjection of DNA into cultured mammalian cells. Cell, 1980; 22(2 Pt 2):479–488; doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(80)90358-X
6.
RobertsonE, BradleyA, KuehnM, et al.Germ-line transmission of genes introduced into cultured pluripotential cells by retroviral vector. Nature, 1986; 323(6087):445–448; doi: 10.1038/323445a0
7.
DoetschmanT, GreggRG, MaedaN, et al.Targetted correction of a mutant HPRT gene in mouse embryonic stem cells. Nature, 1987; 330(6148):576–578; doi: 10.1038/330576a0
8.
ThomasKR, CapecchiMR. Site-directed mutagenesis by gene targeting in mouse embryo-derived stem cells. Cell, 1987; 51(3):503–512; doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(87)90646-5
9.
YarnallMTN, IoannidiEI, Schmitt-UlmsC, et al.Drag-and-drop genome insertion of large sequences without double-strand DNA cleavage using CRISPR-directed integrases. Nat Biotechnol, 2023; 41(4):500–512; doi: 10.1038/s41587-022-01527-4
10.
McClintockB. The origin and behavior of mutable loci in maize. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 1950; 36(6):344–355; doi: 10.1073/pnas.36.6.344
11.
McClintockB. Induction of instability at selected loci in maize. Genetics, 1953; 38(6):579–599; doi: 10.1093/genetics/38.6.579
12.
McClintockB. Some parallels between gene control systems in maize and in bacteria. The American Naturalist, 1961; 95(884):265–277; doi: 10.1086/282188
13.
McClintockB. The significance of responses of the genome to challenge. Science, 1984; 226(4676):792–801.
14.
GrinsteinJD. Ahead of the curve: The Arc Institute Aims to reshape the biomedical research landscape. GEN Biotechnology, 2023; 1(2):115–119; doi: 10.1089/genbio.2022.29017.jgr
15.
HigginsBP, CarpenterCD, KarlsAC. Chromosomal context directs high-frequency precise excision of IS492 in Pseudoalteromonas atlantica. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 2007; 104(6):1901–1906; doi: 10.1073/pnas.0608633104
16.
PartridgeSR, HallRM. The IS1111 family members IS4321 and IS5075 have subterminal inverted repeats and target the terminal inverted repeats of Tn21 family transposons. J Bacteriol, 2003; 185(21):6371–6384; doi: 10.1128/jb.185.21.6371-6384.2003
17.
EkebergM, LövkvistC, LanY, et al.Improved contact prediction in proteins: Using pseudolikelihoods to infer Potts models. Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys, 2013; 87(1):e012707; doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.87.012707
