Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2025-08
Effectiveness of Robot-Assisted Board Games on Cognitive Function and Mental Health for Older Adults with Mild Cognitive Impairment: A Cluster Randomized Trial
The effectiveness of robot-assisted board games targeting older adults with mild cognitive impairment was investigated to improve their cognitive function, general self-efficacy, and life satisfaction and reduce depression. A quasiexperimental research design was adopted with 109 older adults from 8 long-term care facilities and day-care centers assigned to the experimental (n = 52) and comparison groups (n = 57). The experimental group underwent a 12-week cognitive training program. Both groups completed before-and-after and 3-month follow-up measurements for outcome variables, including cognitive function (scores of mini-mental state examination [MMSE] and Alzheimer’s Disease Assessment Scale Cognitive Subscale [ADAS-Cog]), depression, general self-efficacy, and life satisfaction. The data were analyzed using the generalized estimating equation (GEE). The program’s usability was assessed using the system usability scale (SUS). The GEE analyses revealed significant postintervention improvements in the experimental group’s MMSE, ADAS-Cog, depression, general self-efficacy, and satisfaction with life scores. These effects persisted for the 3-month follow-up. The mean SUS score was 87.50, indicating the feasibility of robot-assisted interventions among older adults. These findings confirmed that interactive robot-assisted board games can improve cognitive function, general self-efficacy, and life satisfaction and reduce depression among older adults. The administration of long-term care facilities or day-care centers can adopt robot-assisted board games as a training tool to supplement health promotion activities to prevent cognitive deterioration and enhance mental health among older adults.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BradfieldNI, AmesD. Mild cognitive impairment: Narrative review of taxonomies and systematic review of their prediction of incident Alzheimer’s disease dementia. BJPsych Bull, 2020; 44(2):67–74; doi: 10.1192/bjb.2019.77
2.
JongsiriyanyongS, LimpawattanaP. Mild cognitive impairment in clinical practice: A review article. Am J Alzheimers Dis Other Demen, 2018; 33(8):500–507; doi: 10.1177/1533317518791401
3.
Sachs-EricssonN, BlazerDG. The new DSM-5 diagnosis of mild neurocognitive disorder and its relation to research in mild cognitive impairment. Aging Ment Health, 2015; 19(1):2–12; doi: 10.1080/13607863.2014.920303
4.
LiuX, WangG, CaoY. The prevalence of mild cognitive impairment and dementia among rural dwellers: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Geriatr Nurs, 2024; 56:74–82; doi: 10.1016/j.gerinurse.2024.01.003
5.
ManlyJJ, JonesRN, LangaKM, et al.Estimating the prevalence of dementia and mild cognitive impairment in the US: The 2016 health and retirement study harmonized cognitive assessment protocol project. JAMA Neurol, 2022; 79(12):1242–1249; doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2022.3543
6.
JiaL, DuY, ChuL, et al;COAST Group. Prevalence, risk factors, and management of dementia and mild cognitive impairment in adults aged 60 years or older in China: A cross-sectional study. Lancet Public Health, 2020; 5(12):e661–e671; doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(20)30185-7
7.
VuicB, KonjevodM, TudorL, et al.Tailoring the therapeutic interventions for behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia. Expert Rev Neurother, 2022; 22(8):707–720; doi: 10.1080/14737175.2022.2112668
8.
ZhangH, HuntleyJ, BhomeR, et al.Effect of computerised cognitive training on cognitive outcomes in mild cognitive impairment: A systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open, 2019; 9(8):e027062; doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-027062
9.
BasakC, QinS, O’ConnellMA. Differential effects of cognitive training modules in healthy aging and mild cognitive impairment: A comprehensive meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Psychol Aging, 2020; 35(2):220–249; doi: 10.1037/pag0000442
10.
NguyenL, MurphyK, AndrewsG. Cognitive and neural plasticity in old age: A systematic review of evidence from executive functions cognitive training. Ageing Res Rev, 2019; 53:100912; doi: 10.1016/j.arr.2019.100912
11.
NodaS, ShirotsukiK, NakaoM. The effectiveness of intervention with board games: A systematic review. Biopsychosoc Med, 2019; 13:22; doi: 10.1186/s13030-019-0164-1
12.
AndrewsJA, BrownLJ, HawleyMS, et al.Older adults’ perspectives on using digital technology to maintain good mental health: Interactive group study. J Med Internet Res, 2019; 21(2):e11694; doi: 10.2196/11694
13.
BookerKL, MitchellAW. From boring to board game: The effect of a serious game on key learning outcomes. JOTE, 2021; 5(4); doi: 10.26681/jote.2021.050407
14.
GatesNJ, VernooijRW, Di NisioM, et al.Computerised cognitive training for preventing dementia in people with mild cognitive impairment. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2019; 3(3):CD012279; doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012279
15.
MiltiadesHB, ThatcherWG. Individuals with Alzheimer’s learn to play a tile placement game: Results of a pilot study: Innovative practice. Dementia (London), 2019; 18(2):802–807; doi: 10.1177/1471301216675989
16.
MaB, YangJ, WongFKY, et al.Artificial intelligence in elderly healthcare: A scoping review. Ageing Res Rev, 2023; 83:101808; doi: 10.1016/j.arr.2022.101808
17.
WhelanS, MurphyK, BarrettE, et al.Factors affecting the acceptability of social robots by older adults including people with dementia or cognitive impairment: A literature review. Int J of Soc Robotics, 2018; 10(5):643–668; doi: 10.1007/s12369-018-0471-x
18.
BaurK, SchättinA, de BruinED, et al.Trends in robot-assisted and virtual reality-assisted neuromuscular therapy: A systematic review of health-related multiplayer games. J Neuroeng Rehabil, 2018; 15(1):107; doi: 10.1186/s12984-018-0449-9
19.
World Health Organization. Monitoring and evaluating digital health interventions: A practical guide to conducting research and assessment. 2016. Available from: https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/252183 [Last accessed: October22, 2024].
20.
LeeEH, KimBR, KimH, et al.Four-Week, home-based, robot cognitive intervention for patients with mild cognitive impairment: A pilot randomized controlled trial. Dement Neurocogn Disord, 2020; 19(3):96–107; doi: 10.12779/dnd.2020.19.3.96
21.
PinoO, PalestraG, TrevinoR, De CarolisB. The humanoid robot NAO as trainer in a memory program for elderly people with mild cognitive impairment. Int J of Soc Robotics, 2020; 12(1):21–33; doi: 10.1007/s12369-019-00533-y
22.
GamitoP, OliveiraJ, AlvesC, et al.Virtual reality-based cognitive stimulation to improve cognitive functioning in community elderly: A controlled study. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw, 2020; 23(3):150–156; doi: 10.1089/cyber.2019.0271
23.
WoolfC, LampitA, ShahnawazZ, et al.A systematic review and meta-analysis of cognitive training in adults with major depressive disorder. Neuropsychol Rev, 2022; 32(2):419–437; doi: 10.1007/s11065-021-09487-3
24.
PapiS, CheraghiM. Multiple factors associated with life satisfaction in older adults. Prz Menopauzalny, 2021; 20(2):65–71; doi: 10.5114/pm.2021.107025
25.
GuoY, PaiM, XueB, LuW. Bidirectional association between depressive symptoms and mild cognitive impairment over 20 years: Evidence from the health and retirement study in the United States. J Affect Disord, 2023; 338:449–458; doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2023.06.046
26.
LvR, YangL, LiJ, et al.Relationship between social participation and life satisfaction in community-dwelling older adults: Multiple mediating roles of depression and cognitive function. Arch Gerontol Geriatr, 2024; 117:105233; doi: 10.1016/j.archger.2023.105233
27.
LeeJ, ChoE, KimH, et al.The development and evaluation of a self-efficacy enhancement program for older adults with mild cognitive impairment. Appl Nurs Res, 2023; 73:151726; doi: 10.1016/j.apnr.2023.151726
28.
VlachogianniP, TseliosN. Perceived usability evaluation of educational technology using the System Usability Scale (SUS): A systematic review. J Res Technol Educ, 2022; 54(3):392–409; doi: 10.1080/15391523.2020.1867938
CockrellJR, FolsteinMF. Mini-Mental state examination. In: Principles and Practice of Geriatric Psychiatry. (Abou-SalehMT, KatonaCLE, AnandKA. eds.) John Wiley & Sons. Ltd.: UK; 2002; pp. 140–141.
31.
KueperJK, SpeechleyM, Montero-OdassoM. The Alzheimer’s Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive Subscale (ADAS-Cog): Modifications and responsiveness in pre-dementia populations. A narrative review. J Alzheimers Dis, 2018; 63(2):423–444; doi: 10.3233/JAD-170991
32.
ChengST, ChanA. A brief version of the geriatric depression scale for the Chinese. Psychol Assess, 2004; 16(2):182–186; doi: 10.1037/1040-3590.16.2.182
33.
LynessJM, NoelTK, CoxC, et al.Screening for depression in elderly primary care patients. A comparison of the center for epidemiologic studies-Depression scale and the geriatric depression scale. Arch Intern Med, 1997; 157(4):449–454.
34.
DienerED, EmmonsRA, LarsenRJ, et al.The satisfaction with life scale. J Pers Assess, 1985; 49(1):71–75; doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa4901_13
35.
ChenG, GullySM, EdenD. Validation of a new general self-efficacy scale. Organ Res Methods, 2001; 4(1):62–83; doi: 10.1177/109442810141004
36.
HyzyM, BondR, MulvennaM, et al.System usability scale benchmarking for digital health apps: Meta-analysis. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth, 2022; 10(8):e37290; doi: 10.2196/37290
37.
LiangKY, ZegerSL. Longitudinal data analysis using generalized linear models. Biometrika, 1986; 73(1):13–22; doi: 10.1093/biomet/73.1.13
38.
Vita-BarrullN, GuzmánN, Estrada-PlanaV, et al.Impact on executive dysfunctions of gamification and nongamification in playing board games in children at risk of social exclusion. Games Health J, 2022; 11(1):46–57; doi: 10.1089/g4h.2021.0034
39.
IizukaA, SuzukiH, OgawaS, et al.Does social interaction influence the effect of cognitive intervention program? A randomized controlled trial using Go game. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry, 2019; 34(2):324–332; doi: 10.1002/gps.5024
40.
IizukaA, SuzukiH, OgawaS, et al.Pilot randomized controlled trial of the GO game intervention on cognitive function. Am J Alzheimers Dis Other Demen, 2018; 33(3):192–198; doi: 10.1177/1533317517753362
41.
Estrada-PlanaV, MontaneraR, Ibarz-EstrugaA, et al.Cognitive training with modern board and card games in healthy older adults: Two randomized controlled trials. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry, 2021; 36(6):839–850; doi: 10.1002/gps.5484
42.
DartiguesJF, Foubert-SamierA, Le GoffM, et al.Playing board games, cognitive decline and dementia: A French population-based cohort study. BMJ Open, 2013; 3(8):e002998; doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-002998
43.
FanCC, ChoyCS, HuangCM, et al.The effects of a combination of 3D virtual reality and hands-on horticultural activities on mastery, achievement motives, self-esteem, isolation and depression: A quasi-experimental study. BMC Geriatr, 2022; 22(1):744; doi: 10.1186/s12877-022-03431-7
44.
ClairR, GordonM, KroonM, et al.The effects of social isolation on well-being and life satisfaction during pandemic. Humanit and Soc Sciences Commun, 2021; 8(1):1–6; doi: 10.1057/s41599-021-00710-3
45.
SakamotoA, UkawaS, OkadaE, et al.The association between social participation and cognitive function in community-dwelling older populations: Japan gerontological evaluation study at Taisetsu community Hokkaido. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry, 2017; 32(10):1131–1140; doi: 10.1002/gps.4576
46.
LevasseurM, DesrosiersJ, WhiteneckG. Accomplishment level and satisfaction with social participation of older adults: Association with quality of life and best correlates. Qual Life Res, 2010; 19(5):665–675; doi: 10.1007/s11136-010-9633-5
47.
HuangCM, ChangLC, WangMC, et al.Impact of two types of board games on drug-use prevention in adolescents at senior high schools. Games Health J, 2022; 11(4):242–251; doi: 10.1089/g4h.2021.0176
48.
FooJC, NagaseK, Naramura-OhnoS, et al.Rank among peers during game competition affects the tendency to make risky choices in adolescent males. Front Psychol, 2017; 8:16; doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00016
49.
BanduraA. Self-efficacy: the exercise of control. W.H. Freeman and Company: New York, NY; 1997.
50.
MohamadSNM, SazaliNSS, SallehMAM. Gamification approach in education to increase learning engagement. Int J Humanit Arts Soc Sci, 2018; 4(1):22–32; doi: 10.20469/ijhss.4.10003-1
51.
PuL, MoyleW, JonesC, et al.The effectiveness of social robots for older adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies. Gerontologist, 2019; 59(1):e37–e51; doi: 10.1093/geront/gny046
52.
LiangA, PirothI, RobinsonH, et al.A pilot randomized trial of a companion robot for people with dementia living in the community. J Am Med Dir Assoc, 2017; 18(10):871–878; doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2017.05.019
53.
MoyleW, CookeM, BeattieE, et al.Exploring the effect of companion robots on emotional expression in older adults with dementia: A pilot randomized controlled trial. J Gerontol Nurs, 2013; 39(5):46–53; doi: 10.3928/00989134-20130313-03
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
