Effectiveness of Game-Based Self-Management Interventions for Individuals with Diabetes: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online December, 2021
Effectiveness of Game-Based Self-Management Interventions for Individuals with Diabetes: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
Self-management is essential for individuals with diabetes. However, traditional self-management interventions may be hard to follow for other patients. Although games can stimulate extrinsic motivations, its application on self-management remains unclear. This review aims to evaluate the effects of game-based self-management interventions on health outcomes.
Materials and Methods:
We utilize PubMed, CINAHL, Cochrane Central, EMBASE, ProQuest Dissertation and Theses, PsycINFO, and Scopus from their inception until January 20, 2020. Meta-analyses are performed using Comprehensive Meta-analysis 3.0 software. The overall effect is measured using Hedges' g and determined using Z-statistics at significance level of P < 0.05. Heterogeneity is assessed using χ2 and I2 statistics. The risk of bias tool and the grades of recommendation, assessment, development, and evaluation system are used to assess individual and overall quality of evidence, respectively.
Results:
A total of 2150 records are identified, and 13 randomized controlled trials are selected. Meta-analyses revealed that game-based self-management interventions significantly improved patients' change in glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) level (g = 0.18, P = 0.02), adherence to physical activities (g = 0.59, P < 0.001), balance (g = 0.94–1.14, P < 0.001), and fall efficacy (g = 1.01, P < 0.001). Significant results were only found for the three-trial meta-analysis for HbA1c changes, but not for the two other HbA1c meta-analyses that included more trials. Furthermore, negligible improvements were observed in glycated hemoglobin at postintervention and follow-up assessments, diabetes knowledge, and self-efficacy.
Conclusion:
Game-based self-management can consider a supplementary intervention. Overall evidence is ranging from very low to low. Future studies can consider a large sample size with high-quality design according to the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials statement criteria.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Ba-EssaEM, AbdulrhmanS, KarkarM, et al.Closing gaps in diabetes care: From evidence to practice. Saudi J Med Med Sci, 2018; 6:68–76.
American Diabetes Association. 1. Improving care and promoting health in populations: Standards of medical care in diabetes. Diabetes Care, 2020; 43(Suppl 1):S7–S13.
4.
American Diabetes Association. 7. Diabetes technology: Standards of medical care in diabetes. Diabetes Care, 2021; 44(Suppl 1):S85–S99.
5.
BommerC, HeesemannE, SagalovaV, et al.The global economic burden of diabetes in adults aged 20–79 years: A cost-of-illness study. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol, 2017; 5:423–430.
6.
KingP, PeacockI, DonnellyR. The UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS): Clinical and therapeutic implications for type 2 diabetes. Br J Clin Pharmacol, 1999; 48:643–648.
7.
WanEYF, FungCSC, JiaoFF, et al.Five-year effectiveness of the multidisciplinary risk assessment and management programme–diabetes mellitus (RAMP-DM) on diabetes-related complications and health service uses: A population based and propensity-matched cohort study. Diabetes Care, 2018; 41:49.
8.
AfkarianM, ZelnickLR, HallYN, et al.Clinical manifestations of kidney disease among US adults with diabetes, 1988–2014. JAMA, 2016; 316:602–610.
9.
World Health Organization. Global Report on Diabetes; 2016. World Health Organization: Geneve, Switzerland.
10.
American Diabetes Association. Summary of revisions: Standards of medical care in diabetes—2020. Diabetes Care, 2020; 43(Suppl 1):S4–S6.
11.
NorrisSL, EngelgauMM, Venkat NarayanKM. Effectiveness of self-management training in type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care, 2001; 24:561.
12.
GlasgowRE, AndersonRM. In diabetes care, moving from compliance to adherence is not enough. Diabetes Care, 1999; 22:2090–2092.
13.
ThengY-L, LeeJWY, PatinadanPV, FooSSB. The use of videogames, gamification, and virtual environments in the self-management of diabetes: A systematic review of evidence. Games Health J, 2015; 4:352–361.
14.
AnsariRM, HosseinzadehH, HarrisM, ZwarN. Self-management experiences among middle-aged population of rural area of Pakistan with type 2 diabetes: A qualitative analysis. Clin Epidemiol Glob Health, 2019; 7:177–183.
15.
HermannsN, EhrmannD, Finke-GroeneK, KulzerB. Trends in diabetes self-management education: Where are we coming from and where are we going? A narrative review. Diabet Med, 2020; 37:436–447.
16.
WongS, SmithH, ChuaJ, et al.Effectiveness of self-management interventions in young adults with type 1 and 2 diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Diabet Med, 2020; 37:229–241.
17.
ChristensenJ, ValentinerLS, PetersenRJ, LangbergH. The effect of game-based interventions in rehabilitation of diabetics: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Telemed J E Health, 2016; 22:789–797.
18.
JacobS, Serrano-GilM. Engaging and empowering patients to manage their type 2 diabetes, Part II: Initiatives for success. Adv Ther, 2010; 27:665–680.
19.
Martos-CabreraMB, Membrive-JiménezMJ, Suleiman-MartosN, et al.Games and health education for diabetes control: A systematic review with meta-analysis. Healthcare (Basel), 2020; 8:399.
20.
SparapaniVdC, FelsS, KamalN, NascimentoLC. Conceptual framework for designing video games for children with type 1 diabetes. Rev Lat Am Enfermagem, 2019; 27:e3090.
21.
LarsenLH, SchouL, LundHH, LangbergH. The physical effect of exergames in healthy elderly: A systematic review. Games Health J, 2013; 2:205–212.
22.
BleumersL, AllA, MariënI, et al.State of Play of Digital Games for Empowerment and Inclusion: A Review of the Literature and Empirical Cases. Joint Research Center of the European Commission. Technical Reports Institute for Prospective Technological Studies, Luxembourg, 2012.
23.
KharraziH.Improving healthy behaviors in type 1 diabetic patients by interactive frameworks. AMIA Annu Symp Proc, 2009; 2009:322–326.
24.
MeklerED, BrühlmannF, TuchAN, OpwisK. Towards understanding the effects of individual gamification elements on intrinsic motivation and performance. Comput Hum Behav, 2017; 71:525–534.
25.
KaholK.Integrative gaming: A framework for sustainable game-based diabetes management. J Diabetes Sci Technol, 2011; 5:293–300.
26.
DeciEL, RyanRM. The “What” and “Why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychol Inq, 2000; 11:227–268.
27.
HungES-W, ChenS-C, ChangF-C, et al.Effects of interactive video game-based exercise on balance in diabetic patients with peripheral neuropathy: An open-level, crossover pilot study. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med, 2019; 2019:4540709.
28.
WangT-Y, ChenS-C, PengC-W, et al.Relevance of nerve conduction velocity in the assessment of balance performance in older adults with diabetes mellitus. Disabil Rehabil, 2017; 39:419–427.
29.
ZhouX, DengH, ShenX, LeiQ. Effect of balance training on falls in patients with osteoporosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Rehabil Med, 2018; 50:577–581.
30.
KuehYC, MorrisT, BorkolesE, SheeH. Modelling of diabetes knowledge, attitudes, self-management, and quality of life: A cross-sectional study with an Australian sample. Health Qual Life Outcomes, 2015; 13:129.
31.
AmerFA, MohamedMS, ElburAI, et al.Influence of self-efficacy management on adherence to self-care activities and treatment outcome among diabetes mellitus type 2. Pharm Pract (Granada), 2018; 16.
32.
Van AllenJ, NoserAE, LittlefieldAK, et al.Measuring self-efficacy in the context of pediatric diabetes management: Psychometric properties of the Self-Efficacy for Diabetes Scale. J Pediatr Psychol, 2018; 43:143–151.
33.
CharlierN, ZupancicN, FieuwsS, et al.Serious games for improving knowledge and self-management in young people with chronic conditions: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Med Inform Assoc, 2015; 23:230–239.
34.
HoltzBE, MurrayK, ParkT. Serious games for children with chronic diseases: A systematic review. Games Health J, 2018; 7:291–301.
35.
HigginsJPT, AltmanDG, GøtzschePC, et al.The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ, 2011; 343:d5928.
36.
MoherD, LiberatiA, TetzlaffJ, et al.Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. PLoS Med, 2009; 6:e1000097.
37.
HigginsJPT, ThomasJ, ChandlerJ, et al. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions version 6.2 (updated February 2021). Cochrane, 2021. Available from www.training.cochrane.org/handbook.
38.
SchünemannH, BrożekJ, OxmanA, GRADE Handbook for Grading Quality of Evidence and Strength of Recommendation. [updated October 2013]. The GRADE Working Group, 2013. Available from https://gdt.gradepro.org/app/handbook/handbook.html
39.
GuyattG, OxmanAD, AklEA, et al.GRADE guidelines: 1. Introduction—GRADE evidence profiles and summary of findings tables. J Clin Epidemiol, 2011; 64:383–394.
40.
GuyattGH, OxmanAD, KunzR, et al.What is “quality of evidence” and why is it important to clinicians?. BMJ, 2008; 336:995–998.
41.
GuyattGH, OxmanAD, VistGE, et al.GRADE: An emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ, 2008; 336:924–926.
42.
EggerM, SmithGD, SchneiderM, MinderC. Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ, 1997; 315:629–634.
43.
Comprehensive Meta-Analysis [computer program]. Version 3. Englewood, NJ: Biostat; 2013.
44.
BorensteinM, HedgesL, HigginsJ, RothsteinH. A basic introduction to fixed-effect and random-effects models for meta-analysis. Res Synth Methods, 2010; 1:97–111.
45.
RosenthalR, CooperH, HedgesL. Parametric measures of effect size. In Cooper H, Hedges LV, Valentine JC, (Eds.). The Handbook of Research Synthesis; 1994, Vol. 621, Russell Sage Foundation, New York, pp. 231–244.
BrownSJ, LiebermanDA, GemenyBA, et al.Educational video game for juvenile diabetes: Results of a controlled trial. Med Inform, 1997; 22:77–89.
48.
RafeezadehE, GhaemiN, Heidarian MiriH, RezaeianA. Effect of an educational video game for diabetes self-management on adherence to a self-care regimen in children with type 1 diabetes. Evid Based Care, 2019; 9:74–83.
49.
DugasM, CrowleyK, GaoGG, et al.Individual differences in regulatory mode moderate the effectiveness of a pilot mHealth trial for diabetes management among older veterans. PLoS One, 2018; 13:e0192807.
50.
JoshiR, JoshiD, CheriyathP. Improving adherence and outcomes in diabetic patients. Patient Prefer Adherence, 2017; 11:271–275.
51.
KerfootBP, GagnonDR, McMahonGT, et al.A team-based online game improves blood glucose control in Veterans with type 2 diabetes: A randomized controlled trial. Diabetes Care, 2017; 40:1218.
52.
FuchslocherA, NiesenhausJ, KrämerN. Serious games for health: An empirical study of the game “Balance” for teenagers with diabetes mellitus. Entertain Comput, 2011; 2:97–101.
53.
KempfK, MartinS. Autonomous exercise game use improves metabolic control and quality of life in type 2 diabetes patients—A randomized controlled trial. BMC Endocr Disord, 2013; 13:57.
54.
GoyalS, NunnCA, RotondiM, et al.A mobile app for the self-management of type 1 diabetes among adolescents: A randomized controlled trial. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth, 2017; 5:e82.
55.
Blanson HenkemansOA, BiermanBPB, JanssenJ, et al.Design and evaluation of a personal robot playing a self-management education game with children with diabetes type 1. Int J Hum Comput Stud, 2017; 106:63–76.
56.
HöchsmannC, MüllerO, AmbühlM, et al.Novel smartphone game improves physical activity behavior in type 2 diabetes. Am J Prev Med, 2019; 57:41–50.
57.
KumarVS, WentzellKJ, MikkelsenT, et al.The DAILY (Daily Automated Intensive Log for Youth) Trial: A wireless, portable system to improve adherence and glycemic control in youth with diabetes. Diabetes Technol Ther, 2004; 6:445–453.
58.
LeeS, ShinS. Effectiveness of virtual reality using video gaming technology in elderly adults with diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Technol Ther, 2013; 15:489–496.
59.
SchulzKF, AltmanDG, MoherD, GroupC. CONSORT 2010 Statement: Updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. BMC Med, 2010; 8:18.
60.
KolahiJ, BangH, ParkJ. Towards a proposal for assessment of blinding success in clinical trials: Up-to-date review. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol, 2009; 37:477–484.
61.
AbrahaI, CherubiniA, CozzolinoF, et al.Deviation from intention to treat analysis in randomised trials and treatment effect estimates: Meta-epidemiological study. BMJ, 2015; 350:h2445.
62.
PalK, EastwoodSV, MichieS, et al.Computer-based interventions to improve self-management in adults with type 2 diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Diabetes Care, 2014; 37:1759–2095.
63.
WardJEF. Self-regulation theory and self-monitoring of blood glucose behavior in type 2 diabetes mellitus. Electronic Theses and Dissertations 2014; Paper 1732.
64.
KalraS, SridharGR, BalharaYPS, et al.National recommendations: Psychosocial management of diabetes in India. Indian J Endocrinol Metab, 2013; 17:376–395.
65.
LewisMT, LujanHL, TonsonA, et al.Obesity and inactivity, not hyperglycemia, cause exercise intolerance in individuals with type 2 diabetes: Solving the obesity and inactivity versus hyperglycemia causality dilemma. Med Hypotheses, 2019; 123:110–114.
66.
XuW, LiangH-N, ZhangZ, BaghaeiN. Studying the effect of display type and viewing perspective on user experience in Virtual Reality Exergames. Games Health J, 2020; 9:405–414.
67.
de RidderM, KimJ, JingY, et al.A systematic review on incentive-driven mobile health technology: As used in diabetes management. J Telemed Telecare, 2017; 23:26–35.
68.
TateDF, LyonsEJ, ValleCG. High-tech tools for exercise motivation: Use and role of technologies such as the internet, mobile applications, social media, and video games. Diabetes Spectr, 2015; 28:45–54.
69.
VázquezFL, OteroP, García-CasalJA, et al.Efficacy of video game-based interventions for active aging. A systematic literature review and meta-analysis. PLoS One, 2018; 13:e0208192.
70.
NeriSGR, CardosoJR, CruzL, et al.Do virtual reality games improve mobility skills and balance measurements in community-dwelling older adults? Systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Rehabil, 2017; 31:1292–1304.
71.
VieiraER, PalmerRC, ChavesPHM. Prevention of falls in older people living in the community. BMJ, 2016; 353:i1419.
72.
MeekesW, StanmoreEK. Motivational determinants of Exergame Participation for older people in assisted living facilities: Mixed-methods study. J Med Internet Res, 2017; 19:e238.
73.
AminuddinHB, JiaoN, JiangY, et al.Effectiveness of smartphone-based self-management interventions on self-efficacy, self-care activities, health-related quality of life and clinical outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Nurs Stud. 2019; 116:103286.
74.
TiptonE, HallbergK, HedgesLV, ChanW. Implications of small samples for generalization: Adjustments and rules of thumb. Eval Rev, 2017; 41:472–505.
75.
ChanA-W, HróbjartssonA, HaahrMT, et al.Empirical evidence for selective reporting of outcomes in randomized trials comparison of protocols to published articles. JAMA, 2004; 291:2457–2465.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
