Stroke is the main cause of disability in adulthood. Recent advances in virtual reality (VR) technologies have led to its increased use in the rehabilitation of stroke patients. A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was conducted to determine the effectiveness of game-based reality on upper limb (UL) motor function and quality of life after stroke. In March 2018, a search of the following databases was performed: PubMed, PEDro, Web of Science, Scopus, The Cochrane Library, and Medline at EBSCO. The selection criteria were all RCTs published in English or Spanish during the past 10 years. The PEDro scale was used to evaluate the methodological quality of the studies. A total of 20 clinical trials were included in the systemic review, of which 15 contributed information to the meta-analysis. Favorable results were found for VR interventions on UL motor function (Fugl-Meyer Assessment for upper extremity, standardized mean difference [SMD] = 1.53, 95% CI [0.51–2.54]) and quality of life (functional independence measure, SMD = 0.77, 95% CI [0.05–1.49]). The results demonstrate the potential benefits of VR interventions on the recovery of UL motor function and on quality of life after stroke.
LohseKR, HildermanCGE, CheungKL, et al.Virtual reality therapy for adults post-stroke: A systematic review and meta-analysis exploring virtual environments and commercial games in therapy. PLoS One, 2014; 9:e93318.
4.
KiperPB, AgostiniM, Luque-MorenoC, et al.Reinforced feedback in virtual environment for rehabilitation of upper extremity dysfunction after stroke: Preliminary data from a randomized controlled trial. Biomed Res Int, 2014; 2014:1–8.
5.
BroerenJ, ClaessonL, GoudeD, et al.Virtual rehabilitation in an activity centre for community-dwelling persons with stroke. Cerebrovasc Dis, 2008; 26:289–296.
6.
MerchantZ, GoetzET, CifuentesL, et al.Effectiveness of virtual reality-based instruction on students' learning outcomes in K-12 and higher education: A meta-analysis. Comput Educ, 2014; 70:29–40.
AdamovichS V, FluetGG, TunikE, MeriansAS. Sensoriomotor training in virtual reality: A review. NeuroRehabilitation, 2009; 25:29–44.
9.
KwonJ-S, ParkM-J, YoonI-J, ParkS-H. Effects of virtual reality on upper extremity function and activities of daily living performance in acute stroke: A double-blind randomized clinical trial. NeuroRehabilitation, 2012; 31:379–385.
10.
PourmandA, DavisS, LeeD, et al.Emerging utility of virtual reality as a multidisciplinary tool in clinical medicine. Games Health J, 2017; 6:263–270.
11.
ParkY-H, LeeC, LeeB-H. Clinical usefulness of the virtual reality-based postural control training on the gait ability in patients with stroke. J Exerc Rehabil, 2013; 9:489–494.
12.
KimW, ChoS, BaekD, et al.Upper Extremity functional evaluation by Fugl-Meyer assessment scoring using depth- sensing camera in hemiplegic stroke patients. PLoS One, 2016; 11:e0158640.
13.
HendersonA, Korner-bitenskyN, LevinM. Virtual reality in stroke rehabilitation: A systematic review of its effectiveness for upper limb motor recovery. Top Stroke Rehabil, 2007; 14:52–61.
14.
BrienM, SveistrupH. An intensive virtual reality program improves functional balance and mobility of adolescents with cerebral palsy. Pediatr Phys Ther, 2011; 23:258–266.
15.
BissonE, ContantB, SveistrupH, LajoieY. Functional balance and dual-task reaction times in older adults are improved by virtual reality and biofeedback training. Cyberpsychol Behav, 2007; 10:16–23.
16.
PietrzakE, PullmanS, McGuireA. Using virtual reality and videogames for traumatic brain injury rehabilitation: A structured literature review. Games Health J, 2014; 3:202–214.
17.
de RooijIJM, van de PortIGL, MeijerJ-WG. Effect of virtual reality training on balance and gait ability in patients with stroke: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Phys Ther, 2016; 96:1905–1918.
18.
LaverKE, LangeB, GeorgeS, et al.Virtual reality for stroke rehabilitation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2017; 11:CD008349.
19.
HuttonB, Catalá-lópezF, MoherD. The PRISMA statement extension for systematic reviews incorporating network meta-analysis: PRISMA-NMA. Med Clin (Barc), 2016; 147:262–266.
20.
BhogalSK, TeasellRW, FoleyNC, SpeechleyMR. The PEDro scale provides a more comprehensive measure of methodological quality than the Jadad Scale in stroke rehabilitation literature. J Clin Epidemiol, 2005; 58:668–673.
21.
VerhagenAP, Vet HCWDe, Bie RADe, et al.The Delphi List: A criteria list for quality assessment of randomized clinical trials for conducting systematic reviews developed by Delphi Consensus. J Clin Epidemiol, 1998; 51:1235–1241.
SinH, LeeG. Additional virtual reality training using Xbox Kinect in stroke survivors with hemiplegia. Am J Phys Med Rehabil, 2013; 92:871–880.
24.
TaveggiaG, BorboniA, SalviL, et al.Efficacy of robot-assisted rehabilitation for the functional recovery of the upper limb in post-stroke patients: A randomized controlled study. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med, 2016; 52:767–773.
25.
ShinJ-H, ParkSB, JangSH. Effects of game-based virtual reality on health-related quality of life in chronic stroke patients: A randomized, controlled study. Comput Biol Med, 2015; 63:92–98.
26.
SaposnikG, CohenLG, MamdaniM, et al.Efficacy and safety of non-immersive virtual reality exercising in stroke rehabilitation (EVREST): A randomised, milticentre, single-blind, controlled trial. Lancet Neurol, 2016; 15:1019–1027.
27.
ZhengC, LiaoW, XiaW. Effect of combined low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation and virtual reality training on upper limb function in subacute stroke: A double-blind randomized controlled trail. J Huazhong Univ Sci Technol Med Sci, 2015; 35:248–254.
28.
BrunnerI, SkouenJS, HofstadH, et al.Virtual Reality Training for Upper Extremity in Subacute Stroke (VIRTUES): A multicenter RCT. Neurology, 2017; 89:2413–2421.
29.
ThielbarKO, LordTJ, FischerHC, et al.Training finger individuation with a mechatronic-virtual reality system leads to improved fine motor control post-stroke. J Neuroeng Rehabil, 2014; 11:171.
30.
KongK, LohY, ThiaE, et al.Efficacy of a virtual reality commercial gaming device in upper limb recovery after stroke: A randomized, controlled study. Top Stroke Rehabil, 2016; 23:333–340.
31.
Fugl-MeyerAR, JaaskoL, LeymanI, et al.The post-stroke hemiplegic patient. 1. A method for evaluation of physical performance. Scand J Rehabil Med, 1975; 7:13–31.
32.
BürgeE, KupperD, FinckhA, et al.Neutral functional realignment orthosis prevents hand pain in patients with subacute stroke: A randomized trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 2008; 89:1857–1862.
33.
RabadiMH, RabadiFM. Comparison of the action research arm test and the Fugl-Meyer assessment as measures of upper-extremity motor weakness after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 2006; 87:962–966.
34.
MathiowetzV, VollandG, KashmanN, WeberK. Adult norms for the box and block test of manual dexterity. Am J Occup Ther, 1985; 39:386–391.
35.
CollinC, WadeD, DaviesS, HorneV. The Barthel ADL Index: A reliability study. Int Disabil Stud, 1987; 10:61–63.
36.
LinacreJM, HeinemannAW, WrightBD, et al.The structure and stability of the functional independence measure. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 1994; 75:127–132.
37.
Ruiz-GonzálezL, Lucena-AntónD, SalazarA, et al.Physical therapy in Down syndrome: Systematic review and meta-analysis. J Intellect Disabil Res, 2019; 68(3):1041–1067.
38.
LinJ, KelleherCL, EngsbergJR. Developing home-based virtual reality therapy interventions. Games Health J, 2013; 2:34–38.
39.
HousmanSJ, ScottKM, ReinkensmeyerDJ. A randomized controlled trial of gravity-supported, computer-enhanced arm exercise for individuals with severe hemiparesis. Neurorehabil Neural Repair, 2009; 23:1505–1514.
40.
PironL, TurollaA, AgostiniM, et al.Exercises for paretic upper limb after stroke: a combined virtual-reality and telemedicine approach. J Rehabil Med, 2009; 41:1016–1020.
41.
BallesterBR, MaierM, MaríaR, et al.Counteracting learned non-use in chronic stroke patients with reinforcement-induced movement therapy. J Neuroeng Rehabil, 2016; 13:1–15.
42.
ShinJ-H, KimM-Y, LeeJ-Y, et al.Effects of virtual reality-based rehabilitation on distal upper extremity function and health-related quality of life: A single- blinded, randomized controlled trial. J Neuroeng Rehabil, 2016; 13:17.
43.
LeeS, KimY, LeeB-H. Effect of virtual reality-based bilateral upper extremity training on upper extremity function after stroke: A randomized controlled clinical trial. Occup Ther Int, 2016; 23:357–368.
44.
HochstenbachJ, MulderT, Limbeek JVan, et al.Cognitive decline following stroke: A comprehensive study of cognitive decline following stroke. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol, 1998; 20:503–517.
45.
HoldenMK. Virtual environments for motor rehabilitation: Review. Cyberpsychol Behav, 2005; 8:187–211.
SullivanKJ, CenSY. Model of disablement and recovery: Knowledge translation in rehabilitation research and practice. Phys Ther, 2011; 91:1892–1904.
48.
SubramanianSK, LourençoCB, ChilingaryanG, et al.Arm motor recovery using a virtual reality intervention in chronic stroke: Randomized control trial. Neurorehabil Neural Repair, 2013; 27:13–23.
49.
RandD, GivonN, WeingardenH, ert al. Eliciting upper extremity purposeful movements using video games: A comparison with traditional therapy for stroke rehabilitation. Neurorehabil Neural Repair, 2014; 28:733–739.
50.
JoK, YuJ, JungJ. Effects of Virtual Reality-Based Rehabilitation on Upper Extremity Function and Visual Perception in Stroke Patients: a Randomized Control Trial. J Phys Ther Sci. 2012; 24:1205–8.
51.
ChoiY, KuJ, LimH, Hyung KimY, PaikN. Mobile game-based virtual reality rehabilitation program for upper limb dysfunction after ischemic stroke. Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2016; 34:455–63.
