The Effects of a Serious Game on Depressive Symptoms and Anxiety in Breast Cancer Patients with Depression: A Pilot Study Using Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online December, 2018
The Effects of a Serious Game on Depressive Symptoms and Anxiety in Breast Cancer Patients with Depression: A Pilot Study Using Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Depression is common in cancer patients. We investigated the effects of playing a serious game in breast cancer patients with mild to moderate depression using functional neuroimaging.
Materials and Methods:
Thirty-five participants were randomly assigned to the Game group and the Nongame group, and fifteen participants in each group completed the study protocol. Participants in the Game group were asked to play a serious game, “Hit the Cancer” (RAW HAND, Seoul, Korea), for at least 30 minutes/day, 5 days/week, for 3 weeks. Participants in the Nongame group received usual care. At baseline and follow-up, all participants were assessed with the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), Beck Anxiety Inventory, Stress Response Inventory (SRI), and 3-Tesla resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging. Changes in functional connectivity (FC) between the brain regions in the default mode network (DMN) and salience network (SN) were analyzed.
Results:
After the intervention, BDI and SRI scores in the Game group greatly decreased compared with those in the Nongame group. In addition, compared with the Nongame group, the Game group showed decreased postintervention FC between the right posterior cingulate cortex (PCC) of the DMN and right insula of the SN. The improvement in BDI and SRI scores correlated with the decrease in FC between the right PCC and right insula.
Conclusion:
Selective attention training and repetitive stimulation of the insula by serious game play might cause normalization of the FC between the SN and DMN, thus improving depressive mood.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
SmithHR. Depression in cancer patients: Pathogenesis, implications and treatment (Review). Oncol Lett, 2015; 9:1509–1514.
2.
DauchyS, DolbeaultS, ReichM. Depression in cancer patients. EJC Suppl, 2013; 11:205–215.
3.
CarusoR, NanniMG, RibaM, et al.Depressive spectrum disorders in cancer: Prevalence, risk factors and screening for depression: A critical review. Acta Oncol, 2017; 56:146–155.
4.
MehnertA, BrahlerE, FallerH, et al.Four-week prevalence of mental disorders in patients with cancer across major tumor entities. J Clin Oncol, 2014; 32:3540–3546.
5.
BurgessC, CorneliusV, LoveS, et al.Depression and anxiety in women with early breast cancer: Five year observational cohort study. BMJ, 2005; 330:702.
6.
SuppliNP, JohansenC, ChristensenJ, et al.Increased risk for depression after breast cancer: A nationwide population-based cohort study of associated factors in Denmark, 1998–2011. J Clin Oncol, 2014; 32:3831–3839.
7.
BaucomDH, PorterLS, KirbyJS, et al.Psychosocial issues confronting young women with breast cancer. Breast Dis, 2005; 23:103–113.
8.
GrassiL, BerardiMA, RuffilliF, et al.Role of psychosocial variables on chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting and health-related quality of life among cancer patients: A European study. Psychother Psychosom, 2015; 84:339–347.
9.
SoteloJL, MusselmanD, NemeroffC. The biology of depression in cancer and the relationship between depression and cancer progression. Int Rev Psychiatry, 2014; 26:16–30.
10.
PrimackBA, CarrollMV, McNamaraM, et al.Role of video games in improving health-related outcomes: A systematic review. Am J Prev Med, 2012; 42:630–638.
11.
BealeIL, KatoPM, Marin-BowlingVM, et al.Improvement in cancer-related knowledge following use of a psychoeducational video game for adolescents and young adults with cancer. J Adolesc Health, 2007; 41:263–270.
12.
KatoPM, ColeSW, BradlynAS, PollockBH. A video game improves behavioral outcomes in adolescents and young adults with cancer: A randomized trial. Pediatrics, 2008; 122:e305–e317.
13.
ReichlinL, ManiN, McArthurK, et al.Assessing the acceptability and usability of an interactive serious game in aiding treatment decisions for patients with localized prostate cancer. J Med Internet Res, 2011; 13:e4.
14.
BeltranA, LiR, AterJ, et al.Adapting a videogame to the needs of pediatric cancer patients and survivors. Games Health J, 2013; 2:213–221.
15.
LiJ, ThengYL, FooS. Game-based digital interventions for depression therapy: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw, 2014; 17:519–527.
16.
FlemingT, DixonR, FramptonC, MerryS. A pragmatic randomized controlled trial of computerized CBT (SPARX) for symptoms of depression among adolescents excluded from mainstream education. Behav Cogn Psychother, 2012; 40:529–541.
17.
MerrySN, StasiakK, ShepherdM, et al.The effectiveness of SPARX, a computerised self help intervention for adolescents seeking help for depression: Randomised controlled non-inferiority trial. BMJ, 2012; 344:e2598.
18.
EmmelkampPM, KrijnM, HulsboschAM, et al.Virtual reality treatment versus exposure in vivo: A comparative evaluation in acrophobia. Behav Res Ther, 2002; 40:509–516.
19.
WalsheDG, LewisEJ, KimSI, et al.Exploring the use of computer games and virtual reality in exposure therapy for fear of driving following a motor vehicle accident. Cyberpsychol Behav, 2003; 6:329–334.
20.
LiWH, ChungJO, HoEK. The effectiveness of therapeutic play, using virtual reality computer games, in promoting the psychological well-being of children hospitalised with cancer. J Clin Nurs, 2011; 20:2135–2143.
21.
RosenbergD, DeppCA, VahiaIV, et al.Exergames for subsyndromal depression in older adults: A pilot study of a novel intervention. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry, 2010; 18:221–226.
22.
RussonielloCV, O'BrienK, ParksJM. EEG, HRV and psychological correlates while playing Bejeweled II: A randomized controlled study. Stud Health Technol Inform, 2009; 144:189–192.
23.
RaichleME, MacLeodAM, SnyderAZ, et al.A default mode of brain function. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 2001; 98:676–682.
24.
BluhmRL, OsuchEA, LaniusRA, et al.Default mode network connectivity: Effects of age, sex, and analytic approach. Neuroreport, 2008; 19:887–891.
25.
PetersK, KayaliF, ReithoferA, et al.Serious game scores as health condition indicator for cancer patients. Stud Health Technol Inform, 2015; 210:892–896.
26.
MuldersPC, van EijndhovenPF, ScheneAH, et al.Resting-state functional connectivity in major depressive disorder: A review. Neurosci Biobehav Rev, 2015; 56:330–344.
27.
FirstM, WilliamsJ, KargR, SpitzerR. Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-5 Disorders—Clinician Version (SCID-5-CV). Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Association; 2015.
28.
BeckAT, WardCH, MendelsonM, et al.An inventory for measuring depression. Arch Gen Psychiatry, 1961; 4:561–571.
29.
BeckAT, EpsteinN, BrownG, SteerRA. An inventory for measuring clinical anxiety: Psychometric properties. J Consult Clin Psychol, 1988; 56:893–897.
30.
KohKB, ParkJK, KimCH, ChoS. Development of the stress response inventory and its application in clinical practice. Psychosom Med, 2001; 63:668–678.
31.
ChoiSM, KangTY, WooJM. Development and validation of a modified form of the stress response inventory for workers. J Korean Neuropsychiatr Assoc, 2006; 45:541–553.
32.
AndersonJS, NielsenJA, FroehlichAL, et al.Functional connectivity magnetic resonance imaging classification of autism. Brain, 2011; 134:3742–3754.
33.
AndersonJS, NielsenJA, FergusonMA, et al.Abnormal brain synchrony in Down Syndrome. Neuroimage Clin, 2013; 2:703–715.
34.
LeuchterAF, CookIA, HunterAM, et al.Resting-state quantitative electroencephalography reveals increased neurophysiologic connectivity in depression. PLoS One, 2012; 7:e32508.
35.
Van DijkKR, SabuncuMR, BucknerRL. The influence of head motion on intrinsic functional connectivity MRI. Neuroimage, 2012; 59:431–438.
36.
MurphyK, BirnRM, HandwerkerDA, et al.The impact of global signal regression on resting state correlations: Are anti-correlated networks introduced?. Neuroimage, 2009; 44:893–905.
37.
SaadZS, GottsSJ, MurphyK, et al.Trouble at rest: How correlation patterns and group differences become distorted after global signal regression. Brain Connect, 2012; 2:25–32.
38.
MaldjianJA, LaurientiPJ, KraftRA, BurdetteJH. An automated method for neuroanatomic and cytoarchitectonic atlas-based interrogation of fMRI data sets. Neuroimage, 2003; 19:1233–1239.
39.
Tzourio-MazoyerN, LandeauB, PapathanassiouD, et al.Automated anatomical labeling of activations in SPM using a macroscopic anatomical parcellation of the MNI MRI single-subject brain. Neuroimage, 2002; 15:273–289.
40.
KimSM, ParkSY, KimYI, et al.Affective network and default mode network in depressive adolescents with disruptive behaviors. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat, 2016; 12:49–56.
41.
McCarthyH, SkokauskasN, MulliganA, et al.Attention network hypoconnectivity with default and affective network hyperconnectivity in adults diagnosed with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in childhood. JAMA Psychiatry, 2013; 70:1329–1337.
42.
ShelineYI, PriceJL, YanZ, MintunMA. Resting-state functional MRI in depression unmasks increased connectivity between networks via the dorsal nexus. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 2010; 107:11020–11025.
43.
MenonV, UddinLQ. Saliency, switching, attention and control: A network model of insula function. Brain Struct Funct, 2010; 214:655–667.
44.
CraigAD. How do you feel—now? The anterior insula and human awareness. Nat Rev Neurosci, 2009; 10:59–70.
45.
ManoliuA, MengC, BrandlF, et al.Insular dysfunction within the salience network is associated with severity of symptoms and aberrant inter-network connectivity in major depressive disorder. Front Hum Neurosci, 2013; 7:930.
46.
SridharanD, LevitinDJ, MenonV. A critical role for the right fronto-insular cortex in switching between central-executive and default-mode networks. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 2008; 105:12569–12574.
47.
LiB, LiuL, FristonKJ, et al.A treatment-resistant default mode subnetwork in major depression. Biol Psychiatry, 2013; 74:48–54.
48.
PosnerJ, HellersteinDJ, GatI, et al.Antidepressants normalize the default mode network in patients with dysthymia. JAMA Psychiatry, 2013; 70:373–382.
49.
ComelloML, FrancisDB, MarshallLH, PugliaDR. Cancer survivors who play recreational computer games: Motivations for playing and associations with beneficial psychological outcomes. Games Health J, 2016; 5:286–292.
50.
ButowP, KellyS, ThewesB, et al.Attentional bias and metacognitions in cancer survivors with high fear of cancer recurrence. Psycho-Oncology, 2015; 24:416–423.
51.
AndryszakP, WilkoscM, IzdebskiP, ZurawskiB. A systemic literature review of neuroimaging studies in women with breast cancer treated with adjuvant chemotherapy. Contemp Oncol (Pozn), 2017; 21:6–15.
