We examined how competing with a software-generated partner (SGP) against another human/virtual partner team, in an exercise video game (exergame), affects individual motivation as measured by effort.
Materials and Methods:
Participants (n = 90; 49 female; Mage = 19.93 ± 1.48) were randomly assigned to one of three conditions: individual control (IC); conjunctive partner, no competition (PNC); or conjunctive partner, with competition (PWC). Participants performed the first series of exercises alone. After resting, those in the partnered conditions performed the remaining trials with a same-sex SGP. Those in the PWC condition were told that they and their virtual partner would be competing against another human–virtual partner team.
Results:
A significant motivation gain was observed in both partnered conditions compared to control (P < 0.001), but the partnered groups did not differ significantly. However, participants in the PWC condition enjoyed the task significantly (P < 0.05) more than those in the PNC and IC conditions and the PWC participants identified more with the SGP as a teammate than the PNC participants.
Conclusions:
Altogether, intergroup competition with an SGP may be an enjoyable way to enhance motivation and performance while exercising.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
HausenblasHA, CarronAV, MackDE. Application of the theories of reasoned action and planned behavior to exercise behavior: A meta-analysis. J Sport Exerc Psychol, 1997; 19:36–51.
2.
FeltzDL, ForlenzaST, WinnB, KerrNL. Cyber buddy is better than no buddy: A test of the Köhler motivation effect in exergames. Games Health J, 2014; 3:98–105.
3.
EdeA, ForlenzaST, FeltzDL. Buddy Up for Exergames: How Group Dynamics Principles Can Be Applied to Active Video Games (Handbook of Research on Holistic Perspectives in Gamification for Clinical Practice). Hershey, PA; IGI Global; 2015.
4.
Anderson-HanleyC, SnyderAL, NimonJP, ArcieroPJ. Social facilitation in virtual reality-enhanced exercise: Competitiveness moderates exercise effort of older adults. Clin Interv Aging, 2011; 6:275.
5.
PengW, HsiehG. The influence of competition, cooperation, and player relationship in a motor performance centered computer game. Comput Human Behav, 2012; 28:2100–2106.
6.
BornsteinG, GneezyU, NagelR. The effect of intergroup competition on group coordination: An experimental study. Games Econ Behav, 2002; 41:1–25.
7.
GockelC, KerrNL, SeokDH, HarrisDW. Indispensability and group identification as sources of task motivation. J Exp Soc Psychol, 2008; 44:1316–1321.
8.
DishmanRK. The problem of exercise adherence: Fighting sloth in nations with market economies. Quest, 2001; 53:310–317.
9.
FeltzDL, IrwinBC, KerrNL. Two-player partnered exergame for obesity prevention: Using discrepancy in players' ability as a strategy to motivate physical activity. J Diabetes Sci Technol, 2012; 6:820–827.
10.
IrwinBC, FeltzDL, KerrNL. Silence is golden: Effect of encouragement in motivating the weak link in an online exercise video game. J Med Internet Res, 2013; 15:e104.
11.
SamendingerS, BecklesJ, ForlenzaST, et al.Partner weight as a moderator of exercise motivation in an obese sample. Med Res Arch, 2015; 3:1–6.
12.
KohlerO. Kraftleistungen bei einzelund gruppenabeit [Physical performance in individual and group situations]. Industrielle Psychotechnik, 1926; 3:274–282.
13.
ReevesB, NassC. The Media Equation: How People Treat Computers, Televisions, and New Media Like Real People and Places. Cambridge, England; Cambridge University Press; 1996.
14.
NassC, MoonY, CarneyP. Are people polite to computers? Responses to computer-based interviewing systems. J Appl Soc Psychol, 1999; 29:1093–1110.
15.
CookeA, KavussanuM, McIntyreD, et al.The effects of individual and team competitions on performance, emotions, and effort. J Sport Exerc Psychol, 2013; 35:132–143.
16.
ErevI, BornsteinG, GaliliR. Constructive intergroup competition as a solution to the free rider problem: A field experiment. J Exp Soc Psychol, 1993; 29:463–478.
17.
WittchenM, KrimmelA, KohlerM, et al.The two sides of competition: Competition‐-induced effort and affect during intergroup versus interindividual competition. Br J Psychol, 2013; 104:320–338.
18.
LevineRA, CampbellDT. Ethnocentrism: Theories of Conflict, Ethnic Attitudes and Group Conflict (Social Identity: International Perspectives). New York: Wiley; 1972.
19.
TajfelH, TurnerJC. The Social Identity Theory of Intergroup Behavior (Psychology of Intergroup Relations). Chicago, IL: Nelson Hall; 2004.
20.
HaslamSA. Psychology in Organizations: The Social Identity Approach. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2004.
21.
JamesK, GreenbergJ. In-group salience, intergroup comparison, and individual performance and self-esteem. Pers Soc Psychol Bull, 1989; 15:604–616.
22.
FeltzDL, KerrNL, IrwinBC. Buddy up: The Köhler effect applied to health games. J Sport Exer Psychol, 2011; 33:506–526.
23.
ForlenzaST, KerrNL, IrwinBC, et al.Is my exercise partner similar enough? Partner characteristics as a moderator of the Köhler effect in exergames. Games Health J, 2012; 1:436–441.
24.
LountRBJr., MesséLA, KerrNL. Trying harder for different reasons: Conjunctivity and sex composition as bases for motivation gains in performing groups. Soc Psychol (Gott), 2000; 31:221–230.
25.
RaedekeTD. The relationship between enjoyment and affective responses to exercise. J Appl Sport Psychol, 1997; 19:105–115.
26.
BrownR, CondorS, MatthewsA, et al.Explaining intergroup differentiation in an industrial organization. J Occup Psychol, 1986; 59:273–286.
27.
EdeA, SullivanP, FeltzDL. Self-doubt: Uncertainty as a motivating factor on effort in an exercise endurance task. Psychol Sport Exerc, 2017; 28:31–36.
28.
OuwerkerkJW, de GilderD, de VriesNK. When the going gets tough, the tough get going: Social identification and individual effort in intergroup competition. Pers Soc Psychol Bull, 2000; 26:1550–1559.
29.
EmichKJ. A social cognitive investigation of intragroup motivation: Transpersonal efficacy, effort allocation, and helping. Group Dyn, 2011; 18:203–221.
30.
OsbornKA, IrwinBC, SkogsbergNJ, FeltzDL. The Köhler effect: Motivation gains and losses in real sports groups. Sport Exerc Perform Psychol, 2012; 1:242.
