Little is known about how to design serious videogames for children. The purpose of this article is to describe how behavior change techniques promoting self-regulation were incorporated into a serious videogame to help children consume more fruits and vegetables (FVs) and the extent to which these techniques were used by players. A secondary goal is to contribute to the body of scientific knowledge regarding how to design effective serious videogames for children.
Materials and Methods:
This research examines the gameplay data from an effective 10-episode online serious videogame promoting FV consumption to preadolescent children in the United States (roughly 9–11-year-olds).
Results:
Children participated in the self-regulation components. Modifications to reduce potential cognitive overload and inform future game design were identified.
Conclusion:
This research provided suggestive evidence that behavior change techniques promoting self-regulation can be successfully integrated into a serious videogame for children without detracting from game appeal. It also emphasizes the importance of formative research to the design of an appealing game where children understand and can successfully perform the behavior change procedures.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
GuentherPM, DoddKW, ReedyJ, et al.Most Americans eat much less than recommended amounts of fruits and vegetables. J Am Diet Assoc, 2006; 106:1371–1379.
2.
Krebs-SmithSM, GuentherPM, SubarAF, et al.Americans do not meet federal dietary recommendations. J Nutr, 2010; 140:1832–1838.
3.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, U.S. Department of Agriculture. Dietary Guidelines for Americans 2015–2020. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Publishing Office; 2015. http://health.gov/dietaryguidelines/2015/guidelines (accessed January31, 2017).
4.
BazzanoLA. The high cost of not consuming fruits and vegetables. J Am Diet Assoc, 2006; 106:1364–1368.
5.
BoeingH, BechtholdA, BubA, et al.Critical review: Vegetables and fruit in the prevention of chronic diseases. Eur J Nutr, 2012; 51:637–663.
6.
World Cancer Research Fund & American Institute for Cancer Research. Food, Nutrition, Physical Activity, and the Prevention of Cancer: A Global Perspective [Report]. Washington, DC: American Institute for Cancer Research; 2007. http://wcrf.org/sites/default/files/Second-Expert-Report.pdf (accessed January31, 2017).
7.
KnaiC, PomerleauJ, LockK, et al.Getting children to eat more fruit and vegetables: A systematic review. Prev Med, 2006; 42:85–95.
8.
AmmermanAS, LindquistCH, LohrKN, et al.The efficacy of behavioral interventions to modify dietary fat and fruit and vegetable intake: A review of the evidence. Prev Med, 2002; 35:25–41.
9.
ThompsonD, BaranowskiT, BudayR, et al.Serious video games for health: How behavioral science guided the development of a serious video game. Simul Gaming, 2010; 41:587–606.
10.
ThompsonD. What serious video games can offer child obesity prevention. JMIR Serious Games, 2014; 2:e8.
11.
BaranowskiT, BudayR, ThompsonDI, et al.Playing for real: Video games and stories for health-related behavior change. Am J Prev Med, 2008; 34:74–82.
12.
DeSmetA, Van RyckeghemD, CompernolleS, et al.A meta-analysis of serious digital games for healthy lifestyle promotion. Prev Med, 2014; 69:95–107.
13.
ThompsonD, BhattR, LazarusM, et al.A serious video game to increase fruit and vegetable consumption among elementary aged youth (Squire's Quest! II): Rationale, design, and methods. JMIR Res Protoc, 2012; 1:e19.
14.
ThompsonD, BaranowskiT, BudayR, et al.In pursuit of change: Youth response to intensive goal setting embedded in a serious videogame. J Diabetes Sci Technol, 2007; 1:907–917.
15.
MitgutschK, AlvaradoN. Purposeful by design?: A serious game design assessment framework. Proceedings of the International Conference on the Foundations of Digital Games. Raleigh NC: ACM; 2012, pp. 121–128.
16.
DeSmetA, PalmeiraA, BeltranA, et al.The yin and yang of formative research in designing serious (exer-)games. Games Health J, 2015; 4:63–66.
17.
ThompsonD. Talk to me, please! The importance of qualitative research to games for health. Games Health J, 2014; 3:117–118.
18.
LedouxT, GriffithM, ThompsonD, et al.An educational video game for nutrition of young people: Theory and design. Simul Gaming, 2016; 47:490–516.
19.
DeSmetA, ThompsonD, BaranowskiT, et al.Is participatory design associated with the effectiveness of serious digital games for healthy lifestyle promotion? A meta-analysis. J Med Internet Res, 2016; 18:e94.
20.
KarolyP. Mechanisms of self-regulation: A systems view. Annu Rev Psychol, 1993; 44:23–52.
21.
MaesS, KarolyP. Self-regulation assessment and intervention in physical health and illness: A review. Appl Psychol, 2005; 54:267–299.
22.
HarkinB, WebbTL, ChangBP, et al.Does monitoring goal progress promote goal attainment? A meta-analysis of the experimental evidence. Psychol Bull, 2016; 142:198–229.
23.
MichieS, AbrahamC, WhittingtonC, et al.Effective techniques in healthy eating and physical activity interventions: A meta-regression. Health Psychol, 2009; 28:690–701.
24.
GollwitzerPM. Implementation intentions: Strong effects of simple plans. Am Psychol, 1999; 54:493–503.
25.
DishmanRK, McIverKL, DowdaM, et al.Motivation and behavioral regulation of physical activity in middle school students. Med Sci Sports Exerc, 2015; 47:1913–1921.
26.
TeixeiraPJ, CarracaEV, MarquesMM, et al.Successful behavior change in obesity interventions in adults: A systematic review of self-regulation mediators. BMC Med, 2015; 13:84.
27.
BanduraA. Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall; 1986.
28.
RyanRM, DeciEL. Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well being. Am Psychol, 2000; 55:68–78.
29.
van StralenMM, YildirimM, te VeldeSJ, et al.What works in school-based energy balance behaviour interventions and what does not? A systematic review of mediating mechanisms. Int J Obes (Lond), 2011; 35:1251–1265.
30.
WindM, te VeldeSJ, BrugJ, et al.Direct and indirect association between environmental factors and fruit intake, mediation by psychosocial factors: The Pro Children study. Public Health Nutr, 2010; 13:1736–1745.
31.
CerinE, BarnettA, BaranowskiT. Testing theories of dietary behavior change in youth using the mediating variable model with intervention programs. J Nutr Educ Behav, 2009; 41:309–318.
32.
GrayHL, ContentoIR, KochPA, et al.Mediating mechanisms of theory-based psychosocial determinants on behavioral changes in a middle school obesity risk reduction curriculum intervention, Choice, Control, and Change. Child Obes, 2016; 12:348–359.
33.
DuncanMJ, EyreEL, BryantE, et al.Autonomous motivation mediates the relation between goals for physical activity and physical activity behavior in adolescents. J Health Psychol, 2015; doi: 10.1177/1359105315609089.
34.
ThompsonD, BhattR, VazquezI, et al.Creating action plans in a serious video game increases and maintains child fruit-vegetable intake: A randomized controlled trial. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act, 2015; 12:39.
35.
LockeEA, ShawKN, SaariLM, et al.Goal setting and task performance: 1969–1980. Psychol Bull, 1981; 90:125–152.
36.
LockeEA, LathamGP. Goal setting theory. In: O'NeilHFJr., DrillingsM, (eds). Motivation: Theory and Research. Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.; 1994, pp. 13–29.
37.
NoarSM, HarringtonNG, Van SteeSK, et al.Tailored health communication to change lifestyle behaviors. Am J Lifestyle Med, 2011; 5:112–122.
38.
GollwitzerPM, SheeranP. Implementation intentions and goal achievement: A meta-analysis of effects and processes. Adv Exp Soc Psychol, 2006; 38:69–119.
39.
AdriaanseMA, VinkersCD, De RidderDT, et al.Do implementation intentions help to eat a healthy diet? A systematic review and meta-analysis of the empirical evidence. Appetite, 2011; 56:183–193.
40.
Belanger-GravelA, GodinG, AmireaultS. A meta-analytic review of the effect of implementation intentions on physical activity. Health Psychol Rev, 2013; 7:23–54.
41.
CarraroN, GaudreauP. Spontaneous and experimentally induced action planning and coping planning for physical activity: A meta-analysis. Psychol Sport Exerc, 2013; 14:228–248.
42.
GrattonL, PoveyR, Clark-CarterD. Promoting children's fruit and vegetable consumption: Interventions using the Theory of Planned Behaviour as a framework. Br J Health Psychol, 2007; 12:639–650.
43.
MistryCD, SweetSN, Latimer-CheungAE, et al.Planfulness moderates intentions to plan and planning behaviour for physical activity. J Behav Health, 2015; 4:28–32.
44.
BanduraA. Social cognitive theory of self-regulation. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process, 1991; 50:248–287.
45.
SchunkDH. Effects of effort attributional feedback on children's perceived self-efficacy and achievement. J Educ Psychol, 1982; 74:548–556.
46.
MatlinMW. Chapter 7: Memory. In: Psychology, 2nd ed. Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt College Publishers; 1995, pp. 205–243.
47.
GeroJS. Design prototypes: A knowledge representation schema for design. AI Magazine, 1990; 11:26–36.
BraunV, ClarkeV. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol, 2006; 3:77–101.
50.
ThompsonD, FerryRJJr., CullenKW, et al.Improvement in fruit and vegetable consumption associated with more favorable energy density and nutrient and food group intake, but not kilocalories. J Acad Nutr Diet, 2016; 116:1443–1449.
51.
FranzwaC, TangY, JohnsonA, et al.Balancing fun and learning in a serious game design. In: Information Resources Management Association (ed). Gamification: Concepts, Methodologies, Tools, and Applications. Hershey PA: IGI Global; 2015, pp. 452–471.
52.
BudayR, BaranowskiT, ThompsonD. Fun and games and boredom. Games Health J, 2012; 1:257–261.
53.
PrenskyM. The motivation of gameplay: The real twenty-first century learning revolution. On the Horizon, 2002; 10:5–11.
54.
CullenKW, BaranowskiT, SmithSP. Using goal setting as a strategy for dietary behavior change. J Am Diet Assoc, 2001; 101:562–566.
55.
CullenKW, WatsonKB, ZakeriI, et al.Achieving fruit, juice, and vegetable recipe preparation goals influences consumption by 4th grade students. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act, 2007; 4:28.
56.
CullenKW, ZakeriI, PryorEW, et al.Goal setting is differentially related to change in fruit, juice, and vegetable consumption among fourth-grade children. Health Educ Behav, 2004; 31:258–269.
57.
LatifH, WatsonK, NguyenN, et al.Effects of goal setting on dietary and physical activity changes in the Boy Scout badge projects. Health Educ Behav, 2011; 38:521–529.
58.
SimonsM, BaranowskiJ, ThompsonD, et al.Child goal setting of dietary and physical activity in a serious videogame. Games Health J, 2013; 2:150–157.
59.
CullenKW, ThompsonD, LiuY. Meal specific dietary changes from Squires Quest II!: A serious video game intervention. J Nutr Ed Behav, 2016; 48:326–330.
60.
SchoellerDA, ThomasD, ArcherE, et al.Self-report-based estimates of energy intake offer an inadequate basis for scientific conclusions. Am J Clin Nutr, 2013; 97:1413–1415.
61.
BaxterSD. Cognitive processes in children's dietary recalls: Insight from methodological studies. Eur J Clin Nutr, 2009; 63Suppl 1:S19–S32.
62.
VenturaAK, LokenE, MitchellDC, et al.Understanding reporting bias in the dietary recall data of 11-year-old girls. Obesity (Silver Spring), 2006; 14:1073–1084.
63.
LivingstoneMB, RobsonPJ, WallaceJM. Issues in dietary intake assessment of children and adolescents. Br J Nutr, 2004; 92:S213–S222.
64.
BeltranA, DadabhoyH, ChenTA, et al.Adapting the eButton to the abilities of children for diet assessment. In: SpinkA, RiedelG, ZhouL, TeekensL, AlbatalR, GurrinC, (eds). Measuring Behavior 2016–10th International Conference on Methods and Techniques in Behavioral Research; Dublin, Ireland; 2016, pp. 72–81.
65.
BarghJA, GollwitzerPM, Lee-ChaiA, et al.The automated will: Nonconscious activation and pursuit of behavioral goals. J Pers Soc Psychol, 2001; 81:1014–1027.
