The purpose of this pilot study was to investigate the feasibility of implementing a noncomputerized, game-based, community cognitive health intervention with minority and/or lower socioeconomic status (SES) older adults in order to improve cognitive performance and quality of life.
Materials and Methods:
Through partnerships with community organizations, we implemented an innovative pilot 10-week cognitive training intervention. Noncomputerized games were used to combine social interaction and cognitive training that challenged attentional and memory function for 1 hour each week over the span of 10 weeks. One game used in the intervention program was created by adapting a working memory training task into a fun and competitive card game; the other two games were commercially available.
Results:
The intervention and pre/post assessments were able to be delivered in a community setting. Overall retention was satisfactory, but it dropped in later weeks of the intervention. Older adult participants reported enjoying the games and being invested in their performance. They also reported playing the games with family and friends at home. Older adult participants complied with game rules but were reluctant to comply with instructions to rotate game partners and game types. They preferred their first partners, and they preferred the card game over the existing commercial games.
Conclusions:
This intervention has the potential to improve quality of life and reduce disparities in cognitive health in older adults because it is an accessible game-based intervention program that motivates older adult participants to engage cognitively and to continue this engagement beyond the formal training sessions. However, in order to carry this out on a larger scale, particular attention must be paid to recruitment, retention, and training procedures. This article discusses the critical need for cognitive training interventions in minority and lower SES older adults, the intended benefits, and the best approaches to conducting this type of intervention.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
GüntherVK, SchäferP, HolznerBJ, KemmlerGW. Long-term improvements in cognitive performance through computer-assisted cognitive training: A pilot study in a residential home for older people. Aging Ment Health, 2003; 7:200–206.
2.
MahnckeHW, ConnorBB, AppelmanJ, AhsanuddinOM. Memory enhancement in healthy older adults using a brain plasticity-based training program: A randomized, controlled study. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 2006; 103:12523–12528.
3.
SitzerDI, TwamleyEW, JesteDV. Cognitive training in Alzheimer's disease: A meta-analysis of the literature. Acta Psychiatr Scand, 2006; 114:75–90.
4.
BarnesDE, YaffeK, BelforN, et al.Computer-based cognitive training for mild cognitive impairment: Results from a pilot randomized, controlled trial. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord, 2009; 23:205–210.
5.
FisherM, HollandC, MerzenichMM, VinogradovS. Using neuroplasticity-based auditory training to improve verbal memory in schizophrenia. Am J Psychiatry, 2009; 166:805–811.
6.
ShatilE, MetzerA, HorvitzO, MillerA. Home-based personalized cognitive training in MS patients: A study of adherence and cognitive performance. Neurorehabilitation, 2010; 26:143–153.
7.
OvermanAA. Computer-based training and cognitive improvement after adult-onset malaria: A case report. NeuroRehabilitation, 2012; 30:101–107.
8.
Vallat-AzouviC, Pradat-DiehlP, AzouviP. Rehabilitation of the central executive of working memory after severe traumatic brain injury: Two single-case studies. Brain Inj, 2009; 23:585–594.
9.
AngueraJA, BoccanfusonJ, RintoulJL, et al.Video game training enhances cognitive control in older adults. Nature, 2013; 501:97–101.
10.
BasakC, BootWR, VossMW, KramerAF. Can training in a real-time strategy video game attenuate cognitive decline in older adults?. Psychol Aging, 2008; 23:765–777.
11.
VincentGK, VelkoffVA. The Next Four Decades: The Older Population in the United States: 2010 to 2050. Current Population Reports P25-1138.Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau; 2010;
12.
WernerP. Beliefs about memory problems and help seeking in elderly persons. Clin Gerontol, 2004; 27:19–30.
13.
BallK, BerchDB, HelmersKF, et al.Effects of cognitive training interventions with older adults: A randomized controlled trial. JAMA, 2002; 288:2271–2281.
14.
CarlsonMC, SaczynskiJS, RebokGW, et al.Exploring the effects of an “everyday” activity program on executive function and memory in older adults: Experience Corps®. Gerontologist, 2008; 48:793–801.
15.
HertzogC, KramerAF, WilsonRS, LindenbergerU. Enrichment effects on adult cognitive development: Can the functional capacity of older adults be preserved and enhanced?. Psychol Sci Public Interest, 2008; 9:1–65.
16.
SchmiedekF, LövdénM, LindenbergerU. Hundred days of cognitive training enhance broad cognitive abilities in adulthood: Findings from the COGITO study. Front Aging Neurosci, 2010; 2:27.
17.
SmithG, HousenP, YaffeK, et al.A cognitive training program based on principles of brain plasticity: Results from the Improvement in Memory with Plasticity-based Adaptive Cognitive Training (IMPACT) study. J Am Geriatr Soc, 2009; 57:594–603.
18.
WillisSL, TennstedtSL, MarsiskeM, et al.Long-term effects of cognitive training on everyday functional outcomes in older adults. JAMA, 2006; 296:2805–2814.
19.
LustigC, ShahP, SeidlerR, Reuter-LorenzPA. Aging, training, and the brain: A review and future directions. Neuropsychol Rev, 2009; 19:504–522.
20.
United States Census Bureau. Statistical Abstract of the United States: 2012. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office; 2012.
21.
Paasche-OrlowMK, ParkerRM, GazmararianJA, et al.The prevalence of limited health literacy. J Gen Intern Med, 2005; 20:175–184.
22.
TangM-X, CrossP, AndrewsH, et al.Incidence of AD in African-Americans, Caribbean Hispanics, and Caucasians in northern Manhattan. Neurology, 2001; 56:49–56.
23.
ZsembikBA, PeekMK. Race differences in cognitive functioning among older adults. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci, 2001; 56:S266–S274.
24.
Moody-AyersSY, MehtaKM, LindquistK, et al.Black–white disparities in functional decline in older persons: The role of cognitive function. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci, 2005; 60:933–939.
25.
KirbyJB, KanedaT. Neighborhood socioeconomic disadvantage and access to health care. J Health Soc Behav, 2005; 46:15–31.
26.
MutchlerJE, BurrJA. Racial differences in health and health care service utilization in later life: The effect of socioeconomic status. J Health Soc Behav, 1991; 32:342–356.
27.
KosterA, PenninxBW, BosmaH, et al.Socioeconomic differences in cognitive decline and the role of biomedical factors. Ann Epidemiol, 2005; 15:564–571.
28.
MehtaKM, SimonsickEM, RooksR, et al.Black and white differences in cognitive function test scores: What explains the difference?. J Am Geriatr Soc, 2004; 52:2120–2127.
29.
RabbittP, DonlanC, WatsonP, et al.Unique and interactive effects of depression, age, socioeconomic advantage, and gender on cognitive performance of normal healthy older people. Psychol Aging, 1995; 10:307–313.
McDougallGJ, BeckerH, PituchK, et al.Differential benefits of memory training for minority older adults in the SeniorWISE study. Gerontologist, 2010; 50:632–645.
32.
CharnessN, BootWR. Aging and information technology use potential and barriers. Curr Dir Psychol Sci, 2009; 18:253–258.
33.
JungY, PengW, MoranM, et al.Low-income minority seniors' enrollment in a cybercafé: Psychological barriers to crossing the digital divide. Educ Gerontol, 2010; 36:193–212.
34.
LogesWE, JungJY. Exploring the digital divide internet connectedness and age. Commun Res, 2001; 28:536–562.
35.
PeacockSE, KunemundH. Senior citizens and internet technology: Reasons and correlates of access versus non-access in a European comparative perspective. Eur J Ageing, 2007; 4:191–200.
36.
MeltzoffAN, KuhlPK, MovellanJ, SejnowskiTJ. Foundations for a new science of learning. Science, 2009; 325:284–288.
37.
JaeggiSM, BuschkuehlM, JonidesJ, PerrigWJ. Improving fluid intelligence with training on working memory. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 2008; 105:6829–6833.
38.
ReitanRM. The relation of the Trail Making Test to organic brain damage. J Consult Psychol, 1955; 19:393–394.
BrehmerY, WesterbergH, BäckmanL. Working-memory training in younger and older adults: Training gains, transfer, and maintenance. Front Hum Neurosci, 2012; 6:63.
41.
JaeggiSM, Studer-LuethiB, BuschkuehlM, et al.The relationship between n-back performance and matrix reasoning—Implications for training and transfer. Intelligence, 2010; 38:625–635.
42.
GerstorfD, LövdénM, RöckeC, et al.Well-being affects changes in perceptual speed in advanced old age: longitudinal evidence for a dynamic link. Dev Psychol, 2007; 43:705–718.
43.
GilhoolyML, GilhoolyKJ, JonesRB. Quality of life: Conceptual challenges in exploring the role of ICT in active ageing. In: CabreraM, MalanowskiN (eds.). Information and Communication Technologies for Active Ageing: Opportunities and Challenges for the European Union. Amsterdam: IOSS; 2009: 49–76.
44.
NewsomJT, SchulzR. Social support as a mediator in the relation between functional status and quality of life in older adults. Psychol Aging, 1996; 11:34–44.
45.
PinquartM, SörensenS. Influences of socioeconomic status, social network, and competence on subjective well-being in later life: A meta-analysis. Psychol Aging, 2000; 15:187–224.
46.
DienerE, EmmonsRA, LarsenRJ, GriffinS. The satisfaction with life scale. J Pers Assess, 1985; 49:71–75.
47.
MishraJ, BavelierD, GazzaleyA. How to assess gaming-induced benefits on attention and working memory. Games Health J, 2012; 1:192–198.
48.
CsikszentmihalyiM. Beyond Boredom and Anxiety. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 1975.
49.
BelchiorP, MarsiskeM, SiscoS, et al.Older adults' engagement with a video game training program. Act Adapt Aging, 2012; 36:269–279.
