Abstract
Background:
An automated method to accurately quantify facial function from videos has been a long-standing challenge in facial palsy (FP) management.
Objective:
To compare the accuracy of a Python open-source machine learning algorithm (Python-OS) to a standard image-based analysis tool (Emotrics) to track facial movement among patients with FP, as measured by error rates.
Methods:
Landmarks were generated on patient with FP images using Python-OS and Emotrics and on patient videos using Python-OS. Weighted error rates were calculated and compared between algorithms using analysis of variance tests.
Results:
Overall major error rates were 50.3%, 54.3%, and 9.2% for the Emotrics image, Python-OS image, and Python-OS video analyses (p < 0.001). Compared to image analyses, Python-OS video analysis had higher accuracy across all facial features (p = 0.03) and FP severities (p < 0.001). Video analysis allowed us to distinguish FP-specific temporal patterns; the linear relationship between right and left oral commissure movements in normal function (R = 0.99) became nonlinear in flaccid (R = 0.75) and synkinetic (R = 0.72) FP.
Conclusion:
We report high relative accuracy of dynamic FP quantification through Python-OS, improving the clinical utility of AI-aided FP assessment.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
