AinsworthTA, SpiegelJH. Quality of life of individuals with and without facial feminization surgery or gender reassignment surgery. Qual Life Res. 2010; 19(7):1019–1024.
2.
OusterhoutDK. Feminization of the forehead: contour changing to improve female aesthetics. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1987; 79(5):70–13.
3.
ChoRS, LopezJ, MusaviL, et al.Computer-assisted design and manufacturing assists less experienced surgeons in achieving equivalent outcomes in cranial vault reconstruction. J Craniofac Surg. 2019; 30(7):2034–2038.
4.
HammoudehJA, HowellLK, BoutrosS, et al.Current status of surgical planning for orthognathic surgery: traditional methods versus 3D surgical planning. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2015; 3(2):e307.
5.
HanasonoMM, SkorackiRJ. Computer-assisted design and rapid prototype modeling in microvascular mandible reconstruction. Laryngoscope. 2013; 123(3):597–604.
6.
ResnickCM. Precise osteotomies for mandibular distraction in infants with Robin sequence using virtual surgical planning. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2018; 47(1):35–43.
7.
LubbersHT, MessmerP, GratzKW, et al.Misjudgments at the mandibular angle: freehand versus computer-assisted screw positioning. J Craniofac Surg. 2010; 21(4):1012–1017.
8.
ZavatteroE, BolzoniA, Dell'AversanaG, et al.Accuracy of fibula reconstruction using patient-specific CAD/CAM plates: a multicenter study on 47 patients. Laryngoscope. 2021; 131(7):E2169–E2175.
9.
AlnaifN, ZhouM, GalliR, et al.The role of preoperative computed tomography in nonsyndromic craniosynostosis. J Craniofac Surg. 2019; 30(2):424–428.
10.
GrayR, NguyenK, LeeJC, et al.Osseous transformation with facial feminization surgery: improved anatomical accuracy with virtual planning. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2019; 144(5):1159–1168.
11.
FolbeAJ, SviderPF, EloyJA. Anatomic considerations in frontal sinus surgery. Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 2016; 49(4):935–943.
12.
WolfKT, BrokawEJ, BellA, et al.Variant inferior alveolar nerves and implications for local anesthesia. Anesth Prog. 2016; 63(2):84–90.
13.
BaudouinJY, TiberghienG. Symmetry, averageness, and feature size in the facial attractiveness of women. Acta Psychol (Amst), 2004; 117(3):313–332.
14.
SpiegelJH. Facial determinants of female gender and feminizing forehead cranioplasty. Laryngoscope. 2011; 121(2):250–261.
15.
PenningtonN, RedmondA, StewartT, et al.The impact of surgeon handedness in total hip replacement. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2014; 96(6):437–441.
16.
AndrewTW, BaylvanJ, MittermillerPA, et al.Virtual surgical planning decreases operative time for isolated single suture and multi-suture craniosynostosis repair. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2018; 6(12):e2308.
MyersPL, NelsonJA, RosenEB, et al.Virtual surgical planning for oncologic mandibular and maxillary reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2021; 9(9):e3672.
19.
ChengH, ClymerJW, ChenBPH, et al.Prolonged operative duration is associated with complications: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Surg Res. 2018; 229:134–144.
20.
ChildersCP, Maggard-GibbonsM. Understanding costs of care in the operating room. JAMA Surg. 2018; 153(4):e176233.
