Facial palsy patients face significant challenges. Gracilis free flap transfer is a key procedure in facial reanimation.
Objective:
This study aims to analyze oral commissure excursion improvement after gracilis free flap transfer and the differences regarding donor nerve: cross-facial nerve graft (CFNG), hypoglossal or spinal accessory nerves, motor nerve to masseteric (MNTM), and most recently, double anastomosis using both the MNTM and CFNG.
Methods:
A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted of studies reporting oral commissure excursion improvement after free gracilis muscle transfer. Pooled proportions were calculated using a random-effects model.
Results:
Eighteen studies, 453 patients, and 488 free gracilis flaps were included. The mean change in perioperative oral commissure excursion was 7.0 mm, for CFNG 7.2 mm, for MNTM 7.7, and for double anastomoses 5.5 mm.
Conclusions:
There is a significant improvement in oral commissure excursion after gracilis muscle-free flap. Unfortunately, we could not make definitive conclusions regarding the optimal choice of donor nerve.
BianchiB, FerriA, PoddiV, et al.Facial animation with gracilis muscle transplant reinnervated via cross-face graft: does it change patients' quality of life?. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2016; 44(8):934–939.
3.
HariiK, OhmoriK, ToriiS. Free gracilis muscle transplantation, with microneurovascular anastomoses for the treatment of facial paralysis. a preliminary report. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1976; 57(2):133–143.
4.
O'BrienBM, FranklinJD, MorrisonWA. Cross-facial nerve grafts and microneurovascular free muscle transfer for long-established facial palsy. Br J Plast Surg. 1980; 33(2):202–215.
5.
TerzisJK, NoahEM. Dynamic restoration in Möbius and Möbius-like patients. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2003; 111(1):40–55.
BoglioliF, ColomboV, TarabbiaF, et al.Double innervation in free-flap surgery for long-standing facial paralysis. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2012; 65(10):1343–1349.
8.
DusseldorpJR, van VeenMM, MohanS, HadlockTA. Outcome tracking in facial palsy. Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 2018; 51(6):1033–1050.
9.
HadlockTA, UrbanLS. Toward a universal, automated facial measurement tool in facial reanimation. Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2012; 14(4):277–282.
10.
BrayD, HedstromDK, CheneyML, HadlockTA. Assessing outcomes in facial reanimation: evaluation and validation of the SMILE system for measuring lip excursion during smiling. Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2010; 12(5):352–354.
11.
MoherD, LiberatiA, TetzlaffJ, Altman DG; PRISMAGroup. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med. 2009; 6(7):e1000097.
12.
WellsGA, SheaB, O'ConnellD, et al.The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for assessing the quality of nonrandomized studies in meta-analyses. 2009. www.ohri.ca/programs/clinical_epidemiology/oxford.asp. Accessed February22, 2016.
13.
HigginsJP, ThompsonSG. Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis. Stat Med. 2002; 21(11):1539–1558.
DerSimonianR, KackerR. Random-effects model for meta-analysis of clinical trials: an update. Contemp Clin Trials. 2007; 28(2):105–114.
16.
LinL, ChuH. Quantifying publication bias in meta-analysis. Biometrics. 2018; 74(3):785–794.
17.
FreyM, MichaelidouM, TzouCJ, et al.Three-dimensional video analysis of the paralyzed face reanimated by cross-face nerve grafting and free gracilis muscle transplantation: quantification of the functional outcome. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008; 122(6):1709–1722.
18.
KrishnanKG, SchackertG, SeifertV. Outcomes of microneurovascular facial reanimation using masseteric innervation in patients with long-standing facial palsy resulting from cured brainstem lesions. Neurosurgery. 2010; 67(3):663–674; discussion 674.
19.
BianchiB, CopelliC, FerrariS, FerriA, SesennaE. Use of the masseter motor nerve in facial animation with free muscle transfer. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2012; 50(7):650–653.
20.
LeeLN, SusarlaSM, HedstromDK, et al.Surgical site infections after gracilis free flap reconstruction for facial paralysis. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2012; 147(2):245–248.
21.
VakhariaKT, HedstromD, PlotkinSR, CheneyM, HadlockTA. Facial reanimation of patients with neurofibromatosis type 2. Neurosurgery. 2012; 70(2Suppl Operative):237–243.
22.
BhamaPK, WeinbergJS, LindsayRW, et al.Objective outcomes analysis following microvascular gracilis transfer for facial reanimation: a review of 10 years experience. JAMA Facial Plast Surg. 2014; 16(2):85–92.
23.
LindsayRW, BhamaP, HadlockTA. Quality-of-life improvement after free gracilis muscle transfer for smile restoration in patients with facial paralysis. JAMA Facial Plast Surg. 2014; 16(6):419–424.
24.
LindsayRW, BhamaP, WeinbergJ, HadlockTA. The success of free gracilis muscle transfer to restore smile in patients with nonflaccid facial paralysis. Ann Plast Surg. 2014; 73(2):177–182.
25.
SforzaC, FrigerioA, MapelliA, et al.Double-powered free gracilis muscle transfer for smile reanimation: a longitudinal optoelectronic study. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2015; 68(7):930–939.
26.
DomantovskyI, CopelandJ, ClancyRM, ZukerRM, BorschelGH. Long-term outcomes of smile reconstruction in möbius syndrome. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2018; 141(6):868e–882e.
27.
FarisC, HeiserA, HadlockT, JowettN. Free gracilis muscle transfer for smile reanimation after treatment for advanced parotid malignancy. Head Neck. 2018; 40(3):561–568.
28.
GreeneJJ, TavaresJ, MohanS, JowettN, HadlockT. Long-term outcomes of free gracilis muscle transfer for smile reanimation in children. J Pediatr. 2018; 202:279–284.e2.
29.
van VeenMM, DijkstraPU, le CoultreS, MureauMAM, WerkerPMN. Gracilis transplantation and temporalis transposition in longstanding facial palsy in adults: patient-reported and aesthetic outcomes. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2018; 46(12):2144–2149.
30.
BianchiB, ZitoF, PerlangeliG, et al.Long-term results of facial animation surgery in patients with Moebius syndrome. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2020; 48(12):1132–1137.
31.
RoyM, KlarE, HoES, ZukerRM, BorschelGH. Segmental gracilis muscle transplantation for midfacial animation in möbius syndrome: a 29-year experience. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2019; 143(3):581e–591e.
32.
KimMJ, KimHB, JeongWS, ChoiJW, KimYK, OhTS. Comparative study of 2 different innervation techniques in facial reanimation: cross-face nerve graft-innervated versus double-innervated free gracilis muscle transfer. Ann Plast Surg. 2020; 84(2):188–195.
33.
WangCY, ChenJF, LiJ. [Masseter nerve-innervated free gracilis muscle transfer for smile reanimation in adults]. Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2021; 56(5):465–470. [Chinese].
34.
TzafettaK, Al-HassaniF, Pinto-LopesR, WadeRG, AhmadZ. Long-term outcomes of dual innervation in functional muscle transfers for facial palsy. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2021; 74(10):2664–2673.
35.
BianchiB, BergonzaniM, StellaE, et al.Supercharged masseteric-facial cross-graft for gracilis reinnervation in unilateral facial palsy treatment. Microsurgery. 2022; 42(3):231–238.
36.
RoyM, CorkumJP, ShahPS, et al.Effectiveness and safety of the use of gracilis muscle for dynamic smile restoration in facial paralysis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2019; 72(8):1254–1264.
37.
BaeYC, ZukerRM, ManktelowRT, WadeS. A comparison of commissure excursion following gracilis muscle transplantation for facial paralysis using a cross-face nerve graft versus the motor nerve to the masseter nerve. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006; 117:2407–2413.
38.
WatanabeY, AkizukiT, OzawaT, YoshimuraK, AgawaK, OtaT. Dual innervation method using one-stage reconstruction with free latissimus dorsi muscle transfer for re-animation of established facial paralysis: simultaneous reinnervation of the ipsilateral masseter motor nerve and the contralateral facial nerve to improve the quality of smile and emotional facial expressions. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2009; 62:1589–1597.
39.
VilaPM, KallogjeriD, YaegerLH, ChiJJ. Powering the gracilis for facial reanimation: a systematic review and meta-analysis of outcomes based on donor nerve. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2020; 146(5):429–436.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
