Abstract
Background:
Preservation rhinoplasty is a re-emerging technique that lacks data on functional and aesthetic outcomes.
Objective:
To measure the change in patient-reported nasal aesthetic perception, nasal breathing, and sleep and compare outcomes between two different septal cartilage manipulation techniques among patients undergoing preservation rhinoplasty.
Methods:
Functional and aesthetic outcomes of a let down dorsal preservation rhinoplasty using either the modified subdorsal strip method (MSSM) or subdorsal Z-flap are assessed pre- and postoperatively using the validated assessment tools Nose Obstruction Symptom Evaluation (NOSE), Sinonasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22), Standardized Cosmesis and Health Nasal Outcomes Survey (SCHNOS), and Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS).
Results:
Fifty-two patients, 40 women and 12 men ages 15–69 years, underwent dorsal preservation rhinoplasty and the majority reported at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively significant improvement based on a paired t-test in NOSE, SNOT-22, SCHNOS, and ESS scores except for ESS scores at 6 and 12 months. No significant difference based on a two-sample t-test was observed between the MSSM and Z-flap techniques implemented.
Conclusion:
Let down dorsal preservation rhinoplasty with either the MSSM or Z-flap cartilage manipulation technique can achieve significant improvement in nasal aesthetics, nasal breathing, and sleep according to patient responses on validated assessment tools.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
