Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2026-1
Assessment of Antimicrobial Exposure on Generic Escherichia coli and Enterococcus spp. Concentration,Prevalence,and Resistance to Antimicrobials in Beef Cattle Raised with or Without Antimicrobials
The aim was to longitudinally evaluate the association between antimicrobial exposure and resistance occurrence within generic Escherichia coli and Enterococcus spp. populations in feedlot beef cattle raised conventionally or raised without antimicrobials. Angus steers (n = 180) were sorted into 1 of 2 treatments over 2 consecutive years (108 in yr 1 and 72 in yr 2): steers raised without antimicrobials (NAT) and conventionally raised steers exposed to antimicrobials (CONV). Pens within treatment were adjacent and separated by five empty pens from the other treatment. Monensin and tylosin were included in CONV steer diets. On d 123, CONV steers received a metaphylactic antimicrobial. Longitudinal diet (n = 6/year) and fecal (n = 5/year) sampling timepoints were collected to determine E. coli and Enterococcus spp. concentration, prevalence, and resistance patterns. Dietary Enterococcus spp. concentrations, and erythromycin (8ERYR; 128ERYR), tetracycline (TETR), trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (COTR), and cefotaxime (CTXR) resistant E. coli concentrations and prevalence were greater in NAT diets than CONV diets (p < 0.02). Fecal E. coli concentrations tended to be greater in NAT steers than CON steers (p = 0.07). Fecal TETRE. coli concentrations were greater in CONV steers than NAT steers (p = 0.03). Fecal COTR and CTXRE. coli prevalence was greater for CONV steers at the beginning of the finishing phase while greater for NAT steers at the end of the finishing phase (p < 0.01). Fecal Enterococcus spp. concentrations did not differ between treatments (p = 0.11). Concentrations of 8ERYR and 128ERYREnterococcus spp. were greater in CONV steers on d 64, 130, and 168 than NAT steers (p < 0.05). Overall, antimicrobial resistant Enterococcus spp. and E. coli were detected regardless of antimicrobial exposure.
AggaGE, GallowayHO. Dynamics of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing, third-generation cephalosporin-resistant and tetracycline-resistant Escerichia coli in feedlot cattle with or without tylosin administration. J Food Prot, 2023; 86(10):100144; doi: 10.1016/j.jfp.2023.100144
2.
AggaGE, SchmidtJW, ArthurTM. Antimicrobial-resistant fecal bacteria from ceftiofur-treated and nonantimicrobial-treated comingled beef cows at a cow–calf operation. Microb Drug Resist, 2016; 22(7):598–608; doi: 10.1089/mdr.2015.0259
3.
AlexanderTW, ReuterT, SharmaR, et al.Longitudinal characterization of resistant Escherichia coli in fecal deposits from cattle fed sub therapeutic levels of antimicrobials. Appl Environ Microbiol, 2009; 75(22):7125–7134; doi: 10.1128/AEM.00944-09
4.
ApleyMD, SchragNFD, AmrineDE, et al.Antimicrobial use in 20 U.S. beef feedyards: 2018-2019. Front Vet Sci, 2023; 10:1056362; doi: 10.3389/fvets.2023.1056362
5.
BachSJ, McAllisterTA, VeiraDM, et al.Effect of monensin on survival and growth of Escherichia coli O157:H7 in vitro. Can Vet J, 2002; 43(9):718–719.
6.
BerryED, WellsJE. Escherichia coli O157:H7: Recent advances in research on occurrence, transmission and control in cattle and the production environment. Adv Food Nutr Res, 2010; 60:67–117; doi: 10.1016/S1043-4526(10)60004-6
7.
BeukersAG, ZaheerR, CookSR, et al.Effect of in-feed administration and withdrawal of tylosin phosphate on antibiotic resistance in enterococci isolated from feedlot steers. Front Microbiol, 2015; 6:483; doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2015.00483
8.
CallawayTR, CarrMA, EdringtonTS, et al.Diet, Escherichia coli O157:H7, and cattle: A review after 10 years. Curr Issues Mol Biol, 2009; 11(2):67–79; doi: 10.21775/cimb.011.067
9.
CantónR, Ruiz-GarbajosaP. Co-resistance: An opportunity for the bacteria and resistance genes. Curr Opin Pharmacol, 2011; 11(5):477–485; doi: 10.1016/j.coph.2011.07.007
10.
CazerCL, EldermireERB, LhermieG, et al.The effect of tylosin on antimicrobial resistance in beef cattle enteric bacteria: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Prev Vet Med, 2020; 176:104934; doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2020.104934
11.
DargatzDA, StrohmeyerRA, MorleyPS, et al.Characterization of Escherichia coli and Salmonella enterica from cattle feed ingredients. Foodborne Pathog Dis, 2005; 2(4):341–347; doi: 10.1089/fpd.2005.2.341
GeB, LaFonPC, CarterPJ, et al.Retrospective analysis of Salmonella, Campylobacter, Escherichia coli, and Enterococcus in animal feed ingredients. Foodborne Pathog Dis, 2013; 10(8):684–691; doi: 10.1089/fpd.2012.1470
14.
GwenziW, ChaukuraN, Muisa-ZikaliN, et al.Insects, rodents, and pets as reservoirs, vectors, and sentinels of antimicrobial resistance. Antibiotics (Basel), 2021; 10(1):68; doi: 10.3390/antibiotics10010068
15.
HancockDD, RiceDH, HerriottDE, et al.Effects of farm manure-handling practices on Escherichia coli O157 prevalence in cattle. J Food Prot, 1997; 60(4):363–366; doi: 10.4315/0362-028X-60.4.363
16.
JacksonCR, Fedorka-CrayPJ, BarrettJB. Use of a genus-and species-specific multiplex PCR for identification of Enterococci. J Clin Microbiol, 2004; 42(8):3558–3565; doi: 10.1128/JCM.42.8.3558-3565.2004
17.
JacobME, FoxJT, NarayananSK, et al.Effects of feeding wet corn distillers grains with solubles with or without monensin and tylosin on the prevalence and antimicrobial susceptibilities of fecal foodborne pathogenic and commensal bacteria in feedlot cattle. J Anim Sci, 2008; 86(5):1182–1190; doi: 10.2527/jas.2007-0091
18.
JensenLB, BirkT, Borck HøgB, et al.Cross and co resistance among Danish porcine E. coli isolates. Res Vet Sci, 2018; 119:247–249; doi: 10.1016/j.rvsc.2018.07.002
19.
JensenLB, Frimodt-MøllerN, AarestrupFM. (Presence of erm gene classes in gram-positive bacteria of animal and human origin in Denmark. FEMS Microbiol Lett, 1999; 170(1):151–158; doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.1999.tb13368.x
20.
KühnI, IversenA, BurmanLG, et al.Comparison of enterococcal populations in animals, humans, and the environment–a European study. Int J Food Microbiol, 2003; 88(2–3):133–145; doi: 10.1016/s0168-1605(03)00176-4
21.
LeclercqR, CourvalinP. Intrinsic and unusual resistance to macrolide, lincosamide, and streptogramin antibiotics in bacteria. Antimicrob Agents Chemother, 1991; 35(7):1273–1276; doi: 1128/AAC.35.7.1273
22.
LewyK, CernicchiaroN, DixonAL, et al.Association between tulathromycin treatment for bovine respiratory disease and antimicrobial resistance profiles among gut commensals and foodborne bacterial pathogens isolated from feces of beef steers. J Food Prot, 2022; 85(8):1221–1231; doi: 10.4315/JFP-22-078
23.
LongNS, WellsJE, BerryED, et al.Metaphylactic antimicrobial effects on occurrences of antimicrobial resistance in Salmonella enterica, Escherichia coli and Enterococcus spp. measured longitudinally from feedlot arrival to harvest in high-risk beef cattle. J Appl Microbiol, 2022; 133(3):1940–1955; doi: 10.1111/jam.15691
24.
LynnTV, HancockDD, BesserTE, et al.The occurrence and replication of Escherichia coli in cattle feeds. J Dairy Sci, 1998; 81(4):1102–1108; doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(98)75672-3
25.
McAllisterTA, BachSJ, StanfordK, et al.Shedding of Escherichia coli O157:H7 by cattle fed diets containing monensin or tylosin. J Food Prot, 2006; 69(9):2075–2083; doi: 10.4315/0362-028x-69.9.2075
26.
McAuleyCM, BritzML, GobiusKS, et al.Prevalence, seasonality, and growth of enterococci in raw and pasteurized milk in Victoria, Australia. J Dairy Sci, 2015; 98(12):8348–8358; doi: 10.3168/jds.2015-9335
27.
MirzaaghaP, LouieM, SharmaR, et al.Distribution and characterization of ampicillin- and tetracycline-resistant Escherichia coli from feedlot cattle fed subtherapeutic antimicrobials. BMC Microbiol, 2011; 11:78; doi: 10.1186/1471-2180-11-78
28.
MurraySA, HolbertAC, NormanKN, et al.Effects of tylosin, a direct-fed microbial and feedlot pen environment on phenotypic resistance among Enterococci isolated from beef cattle feces. Antibiotics (Basel), 2022; 11(1):106; doi: 10.3390/antibiotics11010106
29.
NagarajaTG, ChengappaMM. Liver abscesses in feedlot cattle: A review. J Anim Sci, 1998; 76(1):287–298; doi: 10.2527/1998.761287x
30.
PetzelJP, HartmanPA. Monensin-based medium for the determination of total Gram-negative bacteria and Escherichia coli. Appl Environ Microbiol, 1985; 49(4):925–933; doi: 10.1128/aem.49.4.925-933.1985
31.
RobertsMC, SutcliffeJ, CourvalinP, et al.Nomenclature for macrolide and macrolide-lincosamide-streptogramin B resistance determinants. Antimicrob Agents Chemother, 1999; 43(12):2823–2830; doi: 10.1128/AAC.43.12.2823
32.
San MillanA, MacLeanRC. Fitness costs of plasmids: A limit to plasmid transmission. Microbiol Spectr, 2017; 5(5):1–12; doi: 10.1128/microbiolspec.mtbp-0016-2017
33.
SchmidtJW, AggaGE, BosilevacJM, et al.Occurrence of antimicrobial-resistant Escherichia coli and Salmonella enterica in the beef cattle production and processing continuum. Appl Environ Microbiol, 2015; 81(2):713–725; doi: 10.1128/AEM.03079-14
34.
SchmidtJW, GriffinD, KuehnLA, et al.Influence of therapeutic ceftiofur treatments of feedlot cattle on fecal and hide prevalences of commensal Escherichia coli resistant to expanded-spectrum cephalosporins, and molecular characterization of resistant isolates. Appl Environ Microbiol, 2013; 79(7):2273–2283; doi: 10.1128/AEM.03592-12
35.
SchmidtJW, VikramA, DosterE, et al.Antimicrobial resistance in U.S. retail ground beef with and without label claims regarding antibiotic use. J Food Prot, 2021; 84(5):827–842; doi: 10.4315/JFP-20-376
SimjeeS, HeffronAL, PridmoreA, et al.Reversible monensin adaptation in Enterococcus faecium, Enterococcus faecalis and Clostridium perfringens of cattle origin: Potential impact on human food safety. J Antimicrob Chemother, 2012; 67(10):2388–2395; doi: 10.1093/jac/dks236
38.
SintonLW, BraithwaiteRR, HallCH, et al.Survival of indicator and pathogenic bacteria in bovine feces on pasture. Appl Environ Microbiol, 2007; 73(24):7917–7925; doi: 10.1128/AEM.01620-07
39.
StockRA, LaudertSB, StroupWW, et al.Effect of monensin and monensin and tylosin combination on feed intake variation of feedlot steers. J Anim Sci, 1995; 73(1):39–44; doi: 10.2527/1995.73139x
40.
TadesseDA, LiC, MukherjeeS, et al.Whole genome sequence analysis of Ctx-M containing Escherichia coli isolates from retail meats and cattle in the United States. Microb Drug Resist, 2018; 24(7):939–948; doi: 10.1089/mdr.2018.0206
41.
TaubmanSB, JonesNR, YoungFE, et al.Sensitivity and resistance to erythromycin in Bacillus subtilis 168: The ribosomal binding of erythromycin and chloramphenicol. Biochim Biophys Acta, 1966; 123(2):438–440; doi: 10.1016/0005-2787(66)90301-7
USDA. [USDA] US Department of Agriculture-Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service: Veterinary Services-National Animal Health Monitoring System. “National antimicrobial resistance monitoring system integrated report, 2015.” Fort Collins, CO: USDA–APHIS–VS–CEAH–NAHMS. “Feedlot 2011: Part IV: Health and Health Management on U.S. Feedlots with a Capacity of 1,000 or More Head.” Fort Collins, CO: USDA–APHIS–VS–CEAH–NAHMS. 2013. Available from: https://www.aphis.usda.gov/sites/default/files/feed11_dr_partiv.pdf [Last accessed: February4, 2024].
44.
VikramA, RoviraP, AggaGE, et al.Impact of “raised without antibiotics” beef cattle production practices on occurrences of antimicrobial resistance. Appl Environ Microbiol, 2017; 83(22):e01682-17; doi: 10.1128/AEM.01682-17
