Salmonella Infantis and Enteritidis serovars have been reported as important causes of salmonellosis in humans worldwide. However, the virulence of these two serovars has yet to be compared. To evaluate the virulence of Salmonella Infantis (n = 23) and Salmonella Enteritidis (n = 7), we used two models: the Caco2 cells model (in vitro) and the Galleria mellonella model (in vivo). Additionally, the virulence genes of all tested strains were contrasted with phenotypic outcomes. Results showed that adhesion means were 18.2% for Salmonella Enteritidis and 38.2% for Salmonella Infantis strains. Invasion means were 77.1% for Salmonella Enteritidis and 56.2% for Salmonella Infantis strains. Significant differences were found between serovars in adherence and invasion assays. Mortality rates (58% for Salmonella Enteritidis and 62.6% for Salmonella Infantis) were not significantly different between serotypes. The distribution of virulence genes showed that genes fae (fimbrial adherence determinants) and shdA (nonfimbrial adherence determinants) were only found in Salmonella Infantis strains. On the other hand, the rck gene (invasion) and Plasmid-encoded fimbriae genes (pef A, B, C, D) were present in Salmonella Enteritidis exclusively. In conclusion, this study shows that Salmonella Enteritidis has a higher virulence potential under experimental conditions than Salmonella Infantis. However, more studies are needed to determine the risk that Salmonella Infantis could represent compared with Salmonella Enteritidis. Moreover, other in vivo models should be considered to assess the virulence of these serovars.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AballayA, AusubelFM. Caenorhabditis Elegans as a Host for the Study of Host-Pathogen Interactions. Curr Opin Microbiol, 2002; 5(1):97–101; doi: 10.1016/S1369-5274(02)00293-X
2.
AntunesP, MourãoJ, CamposJ, et al.Salmonellosis: The role of poultry meat. Clin Microbiol Infect, 2016; 22(2):110–121; doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2015.12.004
3.
AvivG, CorneliusA, DavidovichM, et al.Differences in the expression of SPI-1 genes pathogenicity and epidemiology between the emerging Salmonella enterica serovar Infantis and the model Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium. J Infect Dis, 2019; 220(6):1071–1081; doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiz235
4.
AvivG, ElpersL, MikhlinS, et al.The plasmid-encoded Ipf and Klf fimbriae display different expression and varying roles in the virulence of Salmonella enterica serovar Infantis in mouse vs. avian hosts. PLoS Pathog, 2017; 13(8):e1006559; doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1006559
5.
BalasubramanianR, ImJ, LeeJS, et al.The global burden and epidemiology of invasive non-typhoidal Salmonella infections. Hum Vaccin Immunother, 2019; 15(6):1421–1426; doi: 10.1080/21645515.2018.1504717
6.
BarrowPA. The paratyphoid salmonellae. Rev Sci Tech, 2000; 19(2):351–375.
7.
BaumlerAJ, TsolisRM, BoweFA, et al.The pef fimbrial operon of Salmonella typhimurium mediates adhesion to murine small intestine and is necessary for fluid accumulation in the infant mouse. Infect Immun, 1996; 64(1):61–68.
8.
BenderJK, WilleT, BlankK, et al.LPS structure and PhoQ activity are important for Salmonella Typhimurium virulence in the Galleria mellonella infection model. PLoS One, 2013; 8(8):1–12; doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0073287
9.
BerndtA, WilhelmA, JugertC, et al.Chicken cecum immune response to Salmonella enterica serovars of different levels of invasiveness. Infect Immun, 2007; 75(12):5993–6007; doi: 10.1128/IAI.00695-07
10.
BoyenF, PasmansF, Van ImmerseelF, et al.Salmonella Typhimurium SPI-1 genes promote intestinal but not tonsillar colonization in pigs. Microbes Infect, 2006; 8(14–15):2899–2907; doi: 10.1016/j.micinf.2006.09.008
11.
BraukmannM, MethnerU, BerndtA. Immune reaction and survivability of Salmonella Typhimurium and Salmonella Infantis after infection of primary avian macrophages. PLoS One, 2015; 10(3):e0122540; doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0122540
12.
BrownAC, ChenJC, WatkinsLKF, et al.CTX-M-65 extended-spectrum β-lactamase–producing Salmonella enterica serotype Infantis, United States. Emerg Infect Dis, 2018; 24(12):2284–2291; doi: 10.3201/eid2412.180500
13.
BurnettE, IshidaM, de JanonS, et al.Whole-genome sequencing reveals the presence of the blaCTX-M-65 gene in extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing and multi-drug-resistant clones of Salmonella serovar Infantis isolated from broiler chicken environments in the Galapagos Islands. Antibiotics (Basel), 2021; 10(3):1–13; doi: 10.3390/antibiotics10030267
14.
Calero-CáceresW, VillacísJ, IshidaM, et al.Whole-genome sequencing of Salmonella enterica serovar Infantis and Kentucky isolates obtained from layer poultry farms in Ecuador. Microbiol Resour Announc, 2020; 9(13):28–31; doi: 10.1128/mra.00091-20
15.
CampioniF, GomesCN, BergaminiAMM, et al.Comparison of cell invasion, macrophage survival and inflammatory cytokines profiles between Salmonella enterica serovars Enteritidis and Dublin from Brazil. J Appl Microbiol, 2021; 130(6):2123–2131; doi: 10.1111/jam.14924
16.
CardR, VaughanK, BagnallM, et al.Virulence characterisation of Salmonella enterica isolates of differing antimicrobial resistance recovered from UK livestock and imported meat samples. Front Microbiol, 2016; 7:1–11; doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2016.00640
17.
Cartelle GestalM, ZuritaJ, Paz Y MinoA, et al.Characterization of a small outbreak of Salmonella enterica serovar Infantis that harbour CTX-M-65 in Ecuador. Braz J Infect Dis, 2016; 20(4):406–407; doi: 10.1016/j.bjid.2016.03.007
18.
Cevallos-AlmeidaM, KerouantonA, DenisM. Salmonella In swine industry: Infection dynamics, colonizing power and virulence [in French]. These du Doctorat. Universite de Rennes 1: Rennes; 2018.
19.
ChuBX, LiYN, LiuN, et al.Salmonella Infantis delays the death of infected epithelial cells to aggravate bacterial load by intermittent phosphorylation of Akt with SopB. Front Immunol, 2021; 12:1–14; doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.757909
20.
European Food Safety Authority (EFSA). The European Union summary report on antimicrobial resistance in zoonotic and indicator bacteria from humans, animals and food in 2017/2018. EFSA J, 2020; 18(3):166; doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2020.6007
21.
FàbregaA, VilaJ. Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium skills to succeed in the host: Virulence and regulation. Clin Microbiol Rev, 2013; 26(2):308–341; doi: 10.1128/CMR.00066-12
22.
FerrariRG, RosarioDKA, Cunha-NetoA, et al.Worldwide epidemiology of Salmonella serovars in animal-based foods: A meta-analysis. Appl Environ Microbiol, 2019; 85(14):e00591-19; doi: 10.1128/AEM.00591-19
23.
FrancoA, LeekitcharoenphonP, FeltrinF, et al.Emergence of a clonal lineage of multidrug-resistant ESBL-producing Salmonella Infantis transmitted from broilers and broiler meat to humans in Italy between 2011 and 2014. PLoS One, 2015; 10(12):e0144802; doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0144802
24.
GagnonM, Zihler BernerA, ChervetN, et al.Comparison of the Caco-2, HT-29 and the mucus-secreting HT29-MTX intestinal cell models to investigate Salmonella adhesion and invasion. J Microbiol Methods, 2013; 94(3):274–279.
25.
GallichanS, Perez-SepulvedaBM, FeaseyNA, et al.Multiplex PCR assay for clade typing of Salmonella enterica serovar Enteritidis. Microbiol Spectr, 2022; 10(6):e0318222; doi: 10.1128/spectrum.03182-22
26.
GastRK, RegmiP, GurayaR, et al.Contamination of eggs by Salmonella Enteritidis in experimentally infected laying hens of four commercial genetic lines in conventional cages and enriched colony housing. Poult Sci, 2019; 98(10):5023–5027; doi: 10.3382/ps/pez222
27.
GiovagnoniG, RossiB, TugnoliB, et al.Thymol and carvacrol downregulate the expression of Salmonella Typhimurium virulence genes during an in vitro infection on Caco-2 cells. Microorganisms, 2020; 8(6):1–11; doi: 10.3390/microorganisms8060862
28.
GuerreroT, Bayas-ReaR, ErazoE, et al.Systematic review: Nontyphoidal Salmonella in food from Latin America. Foodborne Pathog Dis, 2022; 19(2):85–103; doi: 10.1089/fpd.2020.2925
29.
GuillénS, MarcénM, FauE, et al.Relationship between growth ability, virulence, and resistance to food-processing related stresses in non-typhoidal Salmonellae. Int J Food Microbiol, 2022; 361:109462; doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2021.109462
30.
HeffernanE, WuL, LouieJ, et al.Specificity of the complement resistance and cell association phenotypes encoded by the outer membrane protein genes Rck from Salmonella typhimurium and ail from Yersinia enterocolitica. Infect Immun, 1994; 62(11):5183–5186.
KavanaghK, FallonJP. Galleria mellonella larvae as models for studying fungal virulence. Fungal Biol Rev, 2010; 24(1–2):79–83; doi: 10.1016/j.fbr.2010.04.001
33.
KingsleyRA, HumphriesAD, WeeningEH, et al.Molecular and phenotypic analysis of the CS54 island of Salmonella enterica serotype Typhimurium: Identification of intestinal colonization and persistence determinants. Infect Immun, 2003; 71(2):629–640; doi: 10.1128/IAI.71.2.629-640.2003
34.
KingsleyRA, SantosRL, KeestraAM, et al.Salmonella enterica serotype Typhimurium ShdA is an outer membrane fibronectin-binding protein that is expressed in the intestine. Mol Microbiol, 2002; 43(4):895–905; doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.2002.02805.x
35.
KingsleyRA, Van AmsterdamK, KramerN, et al.The ShdA gene is restricted to serotypes of Salmonella enterica subspecies I and contributes to efficient and prolonged fecal shedding. Infect Immun, 2000; 68(5):2720–2727.
36.
KoczerkaM, DouarreP-E, KempfF, et al.The invasin and complement-resistance protein Rck of Salmonella is more widely distributed than previously expected. Microbiol Spectr, 2021; 9(2):e0145721; doi: 10.1128/spectrum.01457-21
37.
KoldeR. Package “Pheatmap”: Pretty Heatmaps. Version 1012, 2019; pp. 1–8. Available from: https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/pheatmap/pheatmap.pdf [Last accessed: April3, 2023].
38.
LedeboerNA, FryeJG, McClellandM, et al.Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium requires the Lpf, Pef, and Tafi fimbriae for biofilm formation on HEp-2 tissue culture cells and chicken intestinal epithelium. Infect Immun, 2006; 74(6):3156–3169; doi: 10.1128/IAI.01428-05
39.
LehtoEM, SalminenSJ. Inhibition of Salmonella Typhimurium adhesion to Caco-2 cell cultures by Lactobacillus strain GG spent culture supernate: Only a PH effect?. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol, 1997; 18(2):125–132; doi: 10.1111/j.1574-695x.1997.tb01037.x
40.
LiY, KangX, Ed-DraA, et al.Genome-based assessment of antimicrobial resistance and virulence potential of isolates of non-pullorum/gallinarum Salmonella serovars recovered from dead poultry in China. Microbiol Spectr, 2022; 10(4):e0096522; doi: 10.1128/spectrum.00965-22
41.
LiuB, ZhengD, ZhouS, et al.VFDB 2022: A general classification scheme for bacterial virulence factors. Nucleic Acids Res, 2022; 50(D1):D912–D917; doi: 10.1093/nar/gkab1107
42.
MajowiczSE, MustoJ, ScallanE, et al.The global burden of nontyphoidal Salmonella gastroenteritis. Clin Infect Dis, 2010; 50(6):882–889; doi: 10.1086/650733
43.
MalagoJJ, KoninkxJFJG, Ovelgö HH, et al. Expression levels of heat shock proteins in enterocyte-like Caco-2 cells after exposure to Salmonella Enteritidis. Cell Stress Chaperones, 2003; 8(2):194–203.
44.
McWhorterAR, DavosD, ChousalkarKK. Pathogenicity of Salmonella Strains Isolated from Egg Shells and the Layer Farm Environment in Australia. Appl Environ Microbiol, 2015; 81(1):405–414; doi: 10.1128/AEM.02931-14
45.
MejíaL, MedinaJL, BayasR, et al.Genomic epidemiology of Salmonella Infantis in Ecuador: From poultry farms to human infections. Front Vet Sci, 2020; 7:547891; doi: 10.3389/fvets.2020.547891
46.
MukherjeeK, AltincicekB, HainT, et al.Galleria Mellonella as a Model System for Studying Listeria Pathogenesis. Appl Environ Microbiol, 2010; 76(1):310–317; doi: 10.1128/AEM.01301-09
47.
OliveiraM, WijnandsL, AbadiasM, et al.Pathogenic potential of Salmonella Typhimurium DT104 following sequential passage through soil, packaged fresh-cut lettuce and a model gastrointestinal tract. Int J Food Microbiol, 2011; 148(3):149–155; doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2011.05.013
48.
Plym-ForshellL, WierupM. Salmonella contamination: A significant challenge to the global marketing of animal food products. Rev Sci Tech, 2006; 25(2):541–554; doi: 10.2050/6/rst.25.2.1683
ŠefcováMA, Ortega-ParedesD, Larrea-ÁlvarezCM, et al.Effects of Lactobacillus fermentum administration on intestinal morphometry and antibody serum levels in Salmonella-Infantis-challenged chickens. Microorganisms, 2023; 11(2):256; doi: 10.3390/microorganisms11020256
51.
SeribelliAA, CruzMF, VilelaFP, et al.Phenotypic and Genotypic Characterization of Salmonella Typhimurium Isolates from Humans and Foods in Brazil. PLoS One, 2020; 15(8 August); doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0237886
52.
ShahDH, ZhouX, KimHY, et al.Transposon mutagenesis of Salmonella enterica serovar Enteritidis identifies genes that contribute to invasiveness in human and chicken cells and survival in egg albumen. Infect Immun, 2012; 80(12):4203–4215; doi: 10.1128/IAI.00790-12
53.
StanawayJD, ParisiA, SarkarK, et al.The global burden of non-typhoidal Salmonella invasive disease: A systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Lancet Infect Dis, 2019; 19(12):1312–1324; doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(19)30418-9
54.
TateH, FolsterJP, HsuC-H, et al.Comparative analysis of extended-spectrum-β-lactamase CTX-M-65-producing Salmonella enterica serovar Infantis isolates from humans, food animals, and retail chickens in the United States. Antimicrob Agents Chemother, 2017; 61(7):e00488-17; doi: 10.1128/AAC.00488-17
55.
TysonGH, LiC, HarrisonLB, et al.A multidrug-resistant Salmonella Infantis clone is spreading and recombining in the United States. Microb Drug Resist, 2021; 27(6):792–799; doi: 10.1089/mdr.2020.0389
56.
ViegasSC, Mil-HomensD, FialhoAM, et al.The virulence of Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium in the insect model Galleria mellonella is impaired by mutations in RNase E and RNase III. Appl Environ Microbiol, 2013; 79(19):6124–6133; doi: 10.1128/AEM.02044-13
57.
Vinueza-BurgosC, CevallosM, Ron-GarridoL, et al.Prevalence and diversity of Salmonella serotypes in Ecuadorian broilers at slaughter age. PLoS One, 2016; 11(7):e0159567; doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0159567
58.
WeinbergerM, AndornN, AgmonV, et al.Blood invasiveness of Salmonella enterica as a function of age and serotype. Epidemiol Infect, 2004; 132(6):1023–1028; doi: 10.1017/S0950268803001109
59.
WoodwardMJ, Allen-VercoeE, RedstoneJS. Distribution, gene sequence and expression in vivo of the plasmid encoded fimbrial antigen of Salmonella serotype Enteritidis. Epidemiol Infect, 1996; 117:17–28.
60.
World Health Organization (WHO). WHO Estimates of the Global Burden of Foodborne Diseases. Foodborne Disease Burden Epidemiolgy Reference Group 2007-2015. World Health Organization: Geneva, 2015; 46(3); pp. 1–15.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
