Abstract
Persistence of Listeria monocytogenes in retail deli environments is a serious food safety issue, potentially leading to cross-contamination of ready-to-eat foods such as deli meats, salads, and cheeses. We previously discovered strong evidence of L. monocytogenes persistence in delis across multiple states. We hypothesized that this was correlated with isolates' innate characteristics, such as biofilm-forming capacity or gene differences. To test this hypothesis, we sequenced the genomes of 21 L. monocytogenes isolates previously collected longitudinally from the retail deli environment. Isolates were chosen to represent varying attachment capacity and sanitizer tolerance as well as persistence or transience. We used single-nucleotide polymorphism analysis to characterize the isolates' genetic relationships and used BLAST to search the isolates' genomes for antibiotic resistance elements, quaternary ammonium tolerance genes, and stress survival islets. We further chose four isolates for RNA-sequencing analysis and compared their global biofilm transcriptome with their global planktonic transcriptome. We did not find genetic content that explained persistence. The presence of stress survival islet-1 correlated to increased attachment capacity (p < 0.05), but not persistence. Further, the presence of sanitizer tolerance elements was not significantly correlated with phenotypic sanitizer tolerance. Analysis of biofilm versus planktonic gene expression did not show the expected differences in gene expression patterns. Overall, L. monocytogenes persistence in the deli environment is likely a matter of poor sanitation and/or facility design, rather than isolates' biofilm-forming capacity, sanitizer tolerance, or genomic content.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
