Antimicrobial resistance has become a major global public health concern, and agricultural operations are often implicated as a source of resistant bacteria. This study characterized the prevalence of antimicrobial-resistant Salmonella enterica and Escherichia coli from a total of 443 manure composite samples from preweaned calves, postweaned calves, dry cows, and lactating cows from 80 dairy operations in Pennsylvania. A total of 1095 S. enterica and 2370 E. coli isolates were screened and tested for resistance to 14 antimicrobials on the National Antimicrobial Resistance Monitoring System Gram-negative (NARMS GN) panel. Salmonellae were isolated from 67% of dairy operations, and 99% of the isolates were pan-susceptible. Salmonella were isolated more frequently from lactating and dry cow samples than from pre- and postweaned calf samples. Overall, the most prevalent serotypes were Cerro, Montevideo, Kentucky, and Newport. E. coli were isolated from all the manure composite samples, and isolates were commonly resistant to tetracyclines, sulfonamides, and aminoglycosides. Resistance was detected more frequently in the E. coli isolates from pre- and postweaned calf samples than in isolates from dry and lactating cow samples (p < 0.05). Multidrug-resistant E. coli (i.e., resistant to >3 antimicrobial classes) were isolated from 66 farms (83%) with significantly greater prevalence in preweaned calves (p < 0.05) than in the older age groups. The blaCTX-M and blaCMY genes were detected in the cephalosporin-resistant E. coli from 4% and 35% of the farms, respectively. These findings indicate that dairy animals, especially the calf population, serve as significant reservoirs for antimicrobial-resistant bacteria. Additional research on the colonization and persistence of resistant E. coli in calves is warranted to identify potential avenues for mitigation.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AfemaJA, MatherAE, SischoWM. Antimicrobial resistance profiles diversity in Salmonella from humans cattle. Zoonoses Public Health, 2015; 62:506–517.
2.
[APHIS] Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service. Antibiotic Use on U.S. Dairy Operations, 2002 and 2007. APHIS Info Sheet, USDA. October 2008. Available at: www.aphis.usda.gov/animal_health/nahms/dairy/downloads/dairy07/Dairy07_is_AntibioticUse.pdf, accessed December10, 2018.
3.
[APHIS] Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service. Salmonella, Listeria and Campylobactor on U.S. Dairy Operations, 1996–2007. USDA. March 2011. Available at: https://permanent.access.gpo.gov/gpo60588/Dairy07_ir_Food_safety.pdf, accessed December10, 2018.
4.
[APHIS] Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service. Dairy Cattle Management Practices in the United States. USDA. February 2016a. Available at: www.aphis.usda.gov/animal_health/nahms/dairy/downloads/dairy14/Dairy14_dr_PartI.pdf, accessed December10, 2018.
5.
[APHIS] Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service. Milk Quality, Milking Procedures, and Mastitis on U.S. Dairies, 2014. USDA. September 2016b. Available at: www.aphis.usda.gov/animal_health/nahms/dairy/downloads/dairy14/Dairy14_dr_Mastitis.pdf, accessed December10, 2018.
6.
ArthurTM, Brichta-HarhayDM, BosilevacJM, GueriniMN, KalchayanandN, WellsJE, ShackelfordSD, WheelerTL, KoohmaraieM. Prevalence and characterization of Salmonella in bovine lymph nodes potentially destined for use in ground beef. J Food Prot, 2008; 71:1685–1688.
7.
AustV, KnappsteinK, KunzHJ, KasparH, WallmannJ, KaskeM. Feeding untreated and pasteurized waste milk and bulk milk to calves: Effects on calf performance, health status and antibiotic resistance of faecal bacteria. J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr, 2013; 97:1091–1103.
8.
BarlowJ. Mastitis therapy and antimicrobial susceptibility: A multispecies review with a focus on antibiotic treatment of mastitis in dairy cattle. J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia, 2011; 16:383–407.
9.
BlauDM, McCluskeyBJ, LadelySR, DargatzDA, Fedorka-CrayPJ, FerrisKE, HeadrickML. Salmonella in dairy operations in the United States: Prevalence and antimicrobial drug susceptibility. J Food Prot, 2005; 68:696–702.
10.
CallawayTR, KeenJE, EdringtonTS, BaumgardLH, SpicerL, FondaES, GriswoldKE, OvertonTR, VanAmburghME, AndersonRC, GenoveseKJ. Fecal prevalence and diversity of Salmonella species in lactating dairy cattle in four states. J Dairy Sci, 2005; 88:3603–3608.
11.
CatryB, LaevensH, DevrieseLA, OpsomerG, De KruifA. Antimicrobial resistance in livestock. J Vet Pharmacol Ther, 2003; 26:81–93.
12.
[CDC] The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National Salmonella Surveillance Overview. Atlanta, GA: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, CDC, July 2011. Available at: https://www.cdc.gov/nationalsurveillance/pdfs/nationalsalmsurveilloverview_508.pdf, accessed December10, 2018.
13.
[CLSI] Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. Methods for Dilution Antimicrobial Susceptibility Tests for Bacteria That Grow Aerobically, approved standard—9th ed. CLSI document M07-A9. Wayne, PA: Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, 2012.
14.
CummingsKJ, ApreaVA, AltierC. Antimicrobial resistance trends among Escherichia coli isolates obtained from dairy cattle in the northeastern United States, 2004–2011. Foodborne Pathog Dis, 2014; 11:61–67.
15.
CummingsKJ, PerkinsGA, KhatibzadehSM, WarnickLD, AltierC. Antimicrobial resistance trends among Salmonella isolates obtained from dairy cattle in the northeastern United States, 2004–2011. Foodborne Pathog Dis, 2013; 10:353–361.
16.
CummingsKJ, WarnickLD, EltonM, Rodriguez-RiveraLD, SilerJD, WrightEM, GröhnYT, WiedmannM. Salmonella enterica serotype Cerro among dairy cattle in New York: An emerging pathogen?. Foodborne Pathog Dis, 2010; 7:659–665.
17.
DavisMA, SischoWM, JonesLP, MooreDA, AhmedS, ShortDM, BesserTE. Recent emergence of Escherichia coli with cephalosporin resistance conferred by blaCTX-M on Washington State dairy farms. Appl Environ Microbiol, 2015; 81:4403–4410.
18.
DuseA, WallerKP, EmanuelsonU, UnnerstadHE, PerssonY, BengtssonB. Risk factors for antimicrobial resistance in fecal Escherichia coli from preweaned dairy calves. J Dairy Sci, 2015; 98:500–516.
19.
EdringtonTS, FarrowRL, CarterBH, IslasA, HagevoortGR, CallawayTR, AndersonRC, NisbetDJ. Age and diet effects on fecal populations and antibiotic resistance of a multi-drug resistant Escherichia coli in dairy calves. Agric Food Anal Bacteriol, 2012; 2:162–174.
20.
EdringtonTS, HumeME, LooperML, SchultzCL, FitzgeraldAC, CallawayTR, GenoveseKJ, BischoffKM, McReynoldsJL, AndersonRC, NisbetDJ. Variation in the faecal shedding of Salmonella and E. coli O157:H7 in lactating dairy cattle and examination of Salmonella genotypes using pulsed-field gel electrophoresis. Lett Appl Microbiol, 2004a;38:366–372.
21.
EdringtonTS, SchultzCL, GenoveseKJ, CallawayTR, LooperML, BischoffKM, McReynoldsJL, AndersonRC, NisbetDJ. Examination of heat stress and stage of lactation (early versus late) on fecal shedding of E. coli O157: H7 and Salmonella in dairy cattle. Foodborne Pathog Dis, 2004b;1:114–119.
22.
ErskineRJ. Antimicrobial drug use in bovine mastitis. In Antimicrobial Therapy in Veterinary Medicine. PrescottJF, BaggotJD, WalkerRD, eds. Ames, IA: Iowa State University Press, 2000:712–734.
23.
FDA. National Antimicrobial Resistance Monitoring System-Enteric Bacteria (NARMS): 2011 Executive Report. Rockville, MD: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Food and Drug Administration, 2013. Available at: www.fda.gov/downloads/AnimalVeterinary/SafetyHealth/AntimicrobialResistance/NationalAntimicrobialResistanceMonitoringSystem/UCM407962.pdf, accessed December10, 2018.
FDA. NARMS 2015 Integrated Report. Laurel, MD: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, FDA, 2017. Available at: www.fda.gov/downloads/AnimalVeterinary/SafetyHealth/AntimicrobialResistance/NationalAntimicrobialResistanceMonitoringSystem/UCM581468.pdf, accessed December10, 2018.
26.
FosslerCP, WellsSJ, KaneeneJB, RueggPL, WarnickLD, BenderJB, EberlyLE, GoddenSM, HalbertLW. Herd-level factors associated with isolation of Salmonella in a multi-state study of conventional and organic dairy farms I. Salmonella shedding in cows. Prev Vet Med, 2005; 70:257–277.
27.
GraggSE, LoneraganGH, BrashearsMM, ArthurTM, BosilevacJM, KalchayanandN, WangR, SchmidtJW, BrooksJC, ShackelfordSD, WheelerTL. Cross-sectional study examining Salmonella enterica carriage in subiliac lymph nodes of cull and feedlot cattle at harvest. Foodborne Pathog Dis, 2013; 10:368–374.
28.
HoyleDV, ShawDJ, KnightHI, DavisonHC, PearceMC, LowJC, GunnGJ, WoolhouseME. Age-related decline in carriage of ampicillin-resistant Escherichia coli in young calves. Appl Environ Microbiol, 2004b;70:6927–6930.
KarnsJS, HaleyBJ, Van KesselJS. Improvements to a PCR-based serogrouping scheme for Salmonella enterica from dairy farm samples. J Food Prot, 2015; 78:1182–1185.
31.
KhachatryanAR, HancockDD, BesserTE, CallDR. Role of calf-adapted escherichia coli in maintenance of antimicrobial drug resistance in dairy calves role of calf-adapted Escherichia coli in maintenance of antimicrobial drug resistance in dairy calves. Appl Environ Microbiol, 2004; 70:752–757.
32.
LangfordFM, WearyDM, FisherL. Antibiotic resistance in gut bacteria from dairy calves: A dose response to the level of antibiotics fed in milk. J Dairy Sci, 2003; 86:3963–3966.
33.
Marrero-OrtizR, HanJ, LynneAM, DavidDE, StemperME, FarmerD, BurkhardtWIII, NayakR, FoleySL. Genetic characterization of antimicrobial resistance in Salmonella enterica serovars isolated from dairy cattle in Wisconsin. Food Res Int, 2012; 45:962–967.
34.
NewcombeRG. Interval estimation for the difference between independent proportions: Comparison of eleven methods. Stat Med, 1995; 17:857–872.
35.
NewcombeRG. Two-sided confidence intervals for the single proportion: Comparison of seven methods. Stat Med, 1998; 17:873–890.
36.
OliverSP, MurindaSE, JayaraoBM. Impact of antibiotic use in adult dairy cows on antimicrobial resistance of veterinary and human pathogens: A comprehensive review. Foodborne Pathog Dis, 2011; 8:337–355.
37.
PereiraRVV, SilerJD, BicalhoRC, WarnickLD. In vivo selection of resistant E. coli after ingestion of milk with added drug residues. PLoS One, 2014; 9:e115223.
38.
QuigleyJD, DrewryJJ, MurrayLM, IveySJ. Body weight gain, feed efficiency, and fecal scores of dairy calves in response to galactosyl-lactose or antibiotics in milk replacers. J Dairy Sci, 1997; 80:1751–1754.
39.
RahnK, De GrandisSA, ClarkeRC, McEwenSA, GalanJE, GinocchioC, CurtissRIII, GylesCL. Amplification of an invA gene sequence of Salmonella typhimurium by polymerase chain reaction as a specific method of detection of Salmonella. Mol Cell Probes, 1992; 6:271–279.
40.
RayKA, WarnickLD, MitchellRM, KaneeneJB, RueggPL, WellsSJ, FosslerCP, HalbertLW, MayK. Antimicrobial susceptibility of Salmonella from organic and conventional dairy farms. J Dairy Sci, 2006; 89:2038–2050.
41.
RayKA, WarnickLD, MitchellRM, KaneeneJB, RueggPL, WellsSJ, FosslerCP, HalbertLW, MayK. Prevalence of antimicrobial resistance among Salmonella on midwest and northeast USA dairy farms. Prev Vet Med, 2007; 79:204–223.
42.
Rodriguez-RiveraLD, CummingsKJ, LoneraganGH, RankinSC, HansonDL, LeoneWM, EdringtonTS. Salmonella prevalence and antimicrobial susceptibility among dairy farm environmental samples collected in Texas. Foodborne Pathog Dis, 2016; 13:205–211.
43.
SatoK, BartlettPC, SaeedMA. Antimicrobial susceptibility of Escherichia coli isolates from dairy farms using organic versus conventional production methods. J Am Vet Med Assoc, 2005; 226:589–594.
44.
SidakZ. Rectangular confidence regions for the means of multivariate normal distributions. J Am Stat Assoc, 1967; 62:626–633.
45.
SonnierJL, KarnsJS, LombardJE, KopralCA, HaleyBJ, KimS, Van KesselJS. Prevalence of Salmonella enterica, Listeria monocytogenes, and pathogenic Escherichia coli in bulk tank milk and milk filters from US dairy operations in the National Animal Health Monitoring System Dairy 2014 study. J Dairy Sci, 2018; 101:1943–1956.
46.
Van KesselJS, KarnsJS, GorskiL, McCluskeyBJ, PerdueML. Prevalence of Salmonellae, Listeria monocytogenes, and fecal coliforms in bulk tank milk on US dairies. J Dairy Sci, 2004; 87:2822–2830.
47.
Van KesselJS, KarnsJS, LombardJE, KopralCA. Prevalence of Salmonella enterica, Listeria monocytogenes, and Escherichia coli virulence factors in bulk tank milk and in-line filters from U.S. dairies. J Food Prot, 2011; 74:759–768.
48.
Van KesselJS, KarnsJS, WolfgangDR, HovinghE, JayaraoBM, Van TassellCP, SchukkenYH. Environmental sampling to predict fecal prevalence of Salmonella in an intensively monitored dairy herd. J Food Prot, 2008; 71:1967–1973.
49.
Van KesselJS, KarnsJS, WolfgangDR, HovinghE, SchukkenYH. Serotype shifts in an endemically infected dairy herd. Foodborne Pathog Dis, 2012; 9:319–324.
50.
Van KesselJS, KarnsJS, WolfgangDR, HovinghE, SchukkenYH. Longitudinal study of a clonal, subclinical outbreak of Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica serovar Cerro in a U.S. dairy herd. Foodborne Pathog Dis, 2007; 4:449–461.
51.
Van KesselJS, SonnierJ, ZhaoS, KarnsJS. Antimicrobial resistance of Salmonella enterica isolates from bulk tank milk and milk filters in the United States. J Food Prot, 2013; 76:18–25.
52.
WhiteDG, ZhaoS, SudlerR, AyersS, FriedmanS, ChenS, McDermottPF, McDermottS, WagnerDD, MengJ. The isolation of antibiotic-resistant salmonella from retail ground meats. N Engl J Med, 2001; 345:1147–1154.
53.
WittumTE, MollenkopfDF, DanielsJB, ParkinsonAE, MathewsJL, FryPR, AbleyMJ, GebreyesWA. CTX-M-type extended-spectrum β-lactamases present in Escherichia coli from the feces of cattle in Ohio, United States. Foodborne Pathog Dis, 2010; 7:1575–1579.
54.
WoodfordN, FaganEJ, EllingtonMJ. Multiplex PCR for rapid detection of genes encoding CTX-M extended-spectrum β-lactamases. J Antimicrob Chemother, 2006; 57:154–155.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
