Long-Term Survival Phase Cells of Salmonella Typhimurium ATCC 14028 Have Significantly Greater Resistance to Ultraviolet Radiation in 0.85% Saline and Apple Juice

Abstract

Nonendospore-forming pathogenic bacteria in the long-term survival (LTS) phase can remain viable for months or years and may show reduced susceptibility to various antimicrobial interventions. In the present study, we investigated the response of LTS phase Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium (ATCC 14028) to ultraviolet (UV) radiation in 0.85% (w/v) saline and apple juice and the extent of sublethal injury in LTS phase survivors. The LTS-phase Salmonella Typhimurium cells were cultured at 35°C for 14 days in tryptic soy broth with 0.6% (w/v) yeast extract (TSBYE). Exponential- and stationary-phase cells, cultured in TSBYE (35°C) for 2.5 and 18 h, respectively, served as control samples. Cells (10⁷ CFU [colony-forming unit]/mL) from each physiological state were exposed to UV light in saline (80 μW/cm²) and apple juice (1500 μW/cm²). The Salmonella Typhimurium survivors were plated for enumeration on either tryptic soy agar with 0.6% yeast extract or xylose-lysine-tergitol 4 (XLT4) agar and colonies counted after incubation (35°C, 24 h). Of all the growth phases tested, LTS phase cells were consistently impacted the least by UV treatment (p < 0.05). In saline, D-values of exponential, stationary, and LTS Salmonella Typhimurium were 0.35, 0.38, and 0.49 min, respectively. D-values in apple juice at pH 3.63 and pH 5.65 were 2.52, 3.19, and 3.57 min and 3.24, 3.50, and 4.18 min, respectively. UV radiation (80 μW/cm²) of Salmonella Typhimurium in saline for 2.5 min reduced the number of exponential- and stationary-phase cells by ∼7.19 and 6.30 log₁₀ CFU/mL, respectively. In contrast, LTS cells were only reduced by 5.08 log₁₀ CFU/mL. Among the three physiological states, LTS phase cells had the least sublethal injury in the surviving population (p < 0.05). These results indicate that the LTS state cross-protects Salmonella Typhimurium against UV radiation and should be considered in determination of the UV radiation D-value for this pathogen.