Consumers often engage in unsafe food handling behaviors at home. Previous studies have investigated the ability of behavior-change theories to explain and predict these behaviors. The purpose of this review was to determine which theories are most consistently associated with consumers' safe food handling behaviors across the published literature. A standardized systematic review methodology was used, consisting of the following steps: comprehensive search strategy; relevance screening of identified references; confirmation of relevance and characterization of relevant articles; risk-of-bias assessment; data extraction; and descriptive analysis of study results. A total of 20 relevant studies were identified; they were mostly conducted in Australia (40%) and the United States (35%) and used a cross-sectional design (65%). Most studies targeted young adults (65%), and none focused on high-risk consumer groups. The outcomes of 70% of studies received high overall risk-of-bias ratings, largely due to a lack of control for confounding variables. The most commonly applied theory was the Theory of Planned Behavior (45% of studies), which, along with other investigated theories of behavior change, was frequently associated with consumer safe food handling behavioral intentions and behaviors. However, overall, there was wide variation in the specific constructs found to be significantly associated and in the percentage of variance explained in each outcome across studies. The results suggest that multiple theories of behavior change can help to explain consumer safe food handling behaviors and could be adopted to guide the development of future behavior-change interventions. In these contexts, theories should be appropriately selected and adapted to meet the needs of the specific target population and context of interest.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AbbotJM, Byrd-BredbennerC, SchaffnerD, BruhnCM, BlalockL. Comparison of food safety cognitions and self-reported food-handling behaviors with observed food safety behaviors of young adults. Eur J Clin Nutr, 2009; 63:572–579.
2.
AjzenI.The Theory of Planned Behavior. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process, 1991; 50:179–211.
3.
AthearnPN, KendallPA, HillersVV, SchroederM, BergmannV, ChenG, MedeirosLC. Awareness and acceptance of current food safety recommendations during pregnancy. Matern Child Health J, 2004; 8:149–162.
4.
BaiL, TangJ, YangY, GongS. Hygienic food handling intention. An application of the Theory of Planned Behavior in the Chinese cultural context. Food Control, 2014; 42:172–180.
5.
BearthA, CousinM-E, SiegristM. Poultry consumers' behaviour, risk perception and knowledge related to campylobacteriosis and domestic food safety. Food Control, 2014; 44:166–176.
6.
Byrd-BredbennerC, AbbotJM, WheatleyV, SchaffnerD, BruhnC, BlalockL. Risky eating behaviors of young adults-implications for food safety education. J Am Diet Assoc, 2008; 108:549–552.
7.
CaneJ, O'ConnorD, MichieS. Validation of the Theoretical Domains Framework for use in behaviour change and implementation research. Implement Sci, 2012; 7:37.
ChenG, KendallPA, HillersVN, MedeirosLC. Qualitative studies of the food safety knowledge and perceptions of transplant patients. J Food Prot, 2010; 73:327–335.
10.
ChowS, MullanB. Predicting food hygiene. An investigation of social factors and past behaviour in an extended model of the Health Action Process Approach. Appetite, 2010; 54:126–133.
11.
DavisR, CampbellR, HildonZ, HobbsL, MichieS. Theories of behaviour and behaviour change across the social and behavioural sciences: A scoping review. Health Psychol Rev, 2015; 9:323–344.
12.
DickinsonA, WillsW, MeahA, ShortF. Food safety and older people: The kitchen life study. Br J Community Nurs, 2014; 19:226, 228–232.
13.
European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) and European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC). The European Union summary report on trends and sources of zoonoses, zoonotic agents and food-borne outbreaks in 2015. EFSA J, 2016; 14:4634.
14.
FeinSB, LandoAM, LevyAS, TeislMF, NobletC. Trends in U.S. consumers' safe handling and consumption of food and their risk perceptions, 1988 through 2010. J Food Prot, 2011; 74:1513–1523.
15.
FischerARH, FrewerLJ. Food-safety practices in the domestic kitchen: Demographic, personality, and experiential determinants. J Appl Soc Psychol, 2008; 38:2859–2884.
16.
FloydDL, Prentice-DunnS, RogersRW. A meta-analysis of research on Protection Motivation Theory. J Appl Soc Psychol, 2000; 30:407–429.
17.
FulhamE, MullanB. Hygienic food handling behaviors: Attempting to bridge the intention-behavior gap using aspects from temporal self-regulation theory. J Food Prot, 2011; 74:925–932.
18.
GlanzK, RimerBK, ViswanathK. Health Behavior: Theory, Research, and Practice, 5th edition. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, 2015.
19.
HansonJA, HughesSM, LiuP. Use of Health Belief Model variables to examine self-reported food handling behaviors in a sample of U.S. adults attending a tailgate event. J Food Prot, 2015; 78:2177–2183.
20.
HavelaarAH, KirkMD, TorgersonPR, GibbHJ, HaldT, LakeRJ, PraetN, BellingerDC, de SilvaNR, GargouriN, SpeybroeckN, CawthorneA, MathersC, SteinC, AnguloFJ, DevleesschauwerB. World Health Organization global estimates and regional comparisons of the burden of foodborne disease in 2010. PLoS Med, 2015; 12:e1001923.
21.
HigginsJPT, GreenS. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions: Version 5.1.0. The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. Available at: http://handbook.cochrane.org/, accessed April26, 2017.
22.
KennedyJ, GibneyS, NolanA, O'BrienS, McMahonMAS, McDowellD, FanningS, WallPG. Identification of critical points during domestic food preparation: An observational study. Br Food J, 2011; 113:766–783.
23.
LimT-P, ChyeFY, SulaimanMR, SukiNM, LeeJ-S. A structural modeling on food safety knowledge, attitude, and behaviour among Bum Bum Island community of Semporna, Sabah. Food Control, 2016; 60:241–246.
24.
LundBM, O'BrienSJ. The occurrence and prevention of foodborne disease in vulnerable people. Foodborne Pathog Dis, 2011; 8:961–973.
25.
MariS, TiozzoB, CapozzaD, RavarottoL. Are you cooking your meat enough? The efficacy of the Theory of Planned Behavior in predicting a best practice to prevent salmonellosis. Food Res Int, 2012; 45:1175–1183.
26.
MaysN, PopeC, PopayJ. Systematically reviewing qualitative and quantitative evidence to inform management and policy-making in the health field. J Health Serv Res Policy, 2005; 10:6–20.
27.
McArthurLH, HolbertD, ForsytheWA. Compliance with food safety recommendations among university undergraduates: Application of the Health Belief Model. Fam Consum Sci Res J, 2006; 35:160–170.
28.
McIntoshWA, ChristensenLB, AcuffGR. Perceptions of risks of eating undercooked meat and willingness to change cooking practices. Appetite, 1994; 22:83–96.
29.
McLindenT, SargeantJM, ThomasMK, PapadopoulosA, FazilA.Association between component costs, study methodologies, and foodborne illness-related factors with the cost of nontyphoidal Salmonella illness. Foodborne Pathog Dis, 2014a;11:718–726.
30.
McLindenT, SargeantJM, ThomasMK, PapadopoulosA, FazilA. Component costs of foodborne illness: A scoping review. BMC Public Health, 2014b;14:509.
31.
MedeirosLC, ChenG, HillersVN, KendallPA. Discovery and development of educational strategies to encourage safe food handling behaviors in cancer patients. J Food Prot, 2008; 71:1666–1672.
32.
MedeirosLC, HillersVN, KendallPA, MasonA. Food safety education: What should we be teaching to consumers?. J Nutr Educ, 2001; 33:108–113.
33.
MichieS, van StralenMM, WestR. The Behaviour Change Wheel: A new method for characterising and designing behaviour change interventions. Implement Sci, 2011; 6:42.
34.
MiltonAC, MullanBA. An application of the Theory of Planned Behavior—A randomized controlled food safety pilot intervention for young adults. Health Psychol, 2012; 31:250–259.
MullanB.Using social-cognition models to predict and design interventions to modify consumers' safe food handling behaviour. In: Food Supplies and Food Safety: Production, Conservation and Population Impact. WalschMB (ed.). New York: Nova Science Publishers, 2010, pp. 151–187.
37.
MullanBA.Knowledge, Beliefs and Attitudes, Concerning Food Hygiene, in Children and Young Adults in South Wales. PhD thesis. Cardiff Metropolitan University, United Kingdom, 1997.
38.
MullanBA, WongCL. Hygienic food handling behaviours. An application of the Theory of Planned Behaviour. Appetite, 2009; 52:757–761.
39.
MullanBA, WongCL, O'MooreK. Predicting hygienic food handling behaviour: Modelling the Health Action Process Approach. Br Food J, 2010; 112:1216–1229.
40.
MullanB, AllomV, SainsburyK, MondsLA. Determining motivation to engage in safe food handling behaviour. Food Control, 2016; 61:47–53.
41.
MullanB, AllomV, SainsburyK, MondsLA. Examining the predictive utility of an extended Theory of Planned Behaviour model in the context of specific individual safe food-handling. Appetite, 2015; 90:91–98.
42.
MullanB, WongC. Using the Theory of Planned Behaviour to design a food hygiene intervention. Food Control, 2010; 21:1524–1529.
43.
NesbittA, ThomasMK, MarshallB, SnedekerK, MeletaK, WatsonB, BienefeldM. Baseline for consumer food safety knowledge and behaviour in Canada. Food Control, 2014; 38:157–173.
44.
PatilSR, CatesS, MoralesR. Consumer food safety knowledge, practices, and demographic differences: Findings from a meta-analysis. J Food Prot, 2005; 68:1884–1894.
45.
PrestwichA, WebbTL, ConnerM. Using theory to develop and test interventions to promote changes in health behaviour: Evidence, issues, and recommendations. Curr Opin Psychol, 2015; 5:1–5.
46.
RedmondEC, GriffithCJ. Consumer food handling in the home: A review of food safety studies. J Food Prot, 2003; 66:130–161.
ScallanE, GriffinPM, AnguloFJ, TauxeRV, HoekstraRM. Foodborne illness acquired in the United States—Unspecified agents. Emerg Infect Dis, 2011a;17:16–22.
49.
ScallanE, HoekstraRM, AnguloFJ, TauxeRV, WiddowsonMA, RoySL, JonesJL, GriffinPM. Foodborne illness acquired in the United States—Major pathogens. Emerg Infect Dis, 2011b;17:7–15.
50.
SchaferRB, SchaferE, BultenaGL, HoibergEO. Food safety: An application of the Health Belief Model. J Nutr Educ, 1993; 25:17–24.
51.
SchwarzerR.Modeling health behavior change: How to predict and modify the adoption and maintenance of health behaviors. Appl Psychol, 2008; 57:1–29.
52.
ShapiroMA, PorticellaN, JiangLC, GravaniRB. Predicting intentions to adopt safe home food handling practices. Applying the Theory of Planned Behavior. Appetite, 2011; 56:96–103.
53.
SivaramalingamB, YoungI, PhamMT, WaddellL, GreigJ, MascarenhasM, PapadopoulosA. Scoping review of research on the effectiveness of food-safety education interventions directed at consumers. Foodborne Pathog Dis, 2015; 12:561–570.
ThomasBH, CiliskaD, DobbinsM, MicucciS. A process for systematically reviewing the literature: Providing the research evidence for public health nursing interventions. Worldviews Evid Based Nurs, 2004; 1:176–184.
56.
ThomasMK, MurrayR, FlockhartL, PintarK, FazilA, NesbittA, MarshallB, TatarynJ, PollariF. Estimates of foodborne illness-related hospitalizations and deaths in Canada for 30 specified pathogens and unspecified agents. Foodborne Pathog Dis, 2015; 12:820–827.
57.
ThomasMK, MurrayR, FlockhartL, PintarK, PollariF, FazilA, NesbittA, MarshallB. Estimates of the burden of foodborne illness in Canada for 30 specified pathogens and unspecified agents, circa 2006. Foodborne Pathog Dis, 2013; 10:639–648.
58.
ViswanathanM, BerkmanND, DrydenDM, HartlingL.Assessing risk of bias and confounding in observational studies of interventions or exposures: Further development of the RTI item bank. Methods Research Report. (Prepared by RTI–UNC Evidence-based Practice Center under Contract No. 290-2007-10056-I). AHRQ Publication No. 13-EHC106-EF. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; August2013. www.effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/reports/final.cfm Accessed July12, 2017.
59.
WebbJ, FosterJ, PoulterE. Increasing the frequency of physical activity very brief advice for cancer patients. Development of an intervention using the Behaviour Change Wheel. Public Health, 2016; 133:45–56.
60.
YoungI, WaddellL. Barriers and facilitators to safe food handling among consumers: A systematic review and thematic synthesis of qualitative research studies. PLoS One, 2016; 11:e0167695.
61.
YoungI, ReimerD, GriegJ, TurgeonP, MeldrumR, WaddellL. Psychosocial and health-status determinants of safe food handling among consumers: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Food Control, 2017; 78:401–411.
62.
YoungI, WaddellL, SanchezJ, WilhelmB, McEwenSA, RajićA. The application of knowledge synthesis methods in agri-food public health: Recent advancements, challenges and opportunities. Prev Vet Med, 2014; 113:339–355.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
