Restricted accessReview articleFirst published online 2011-09
The Effect of Hazard Analysis Critical Control Point Programs on Microbial Contamination of Carcasses in Abattoirs: A Systematic Review of Published Data
Hazard analysis critical control point (HACCP) programs have been endorsed and implemented globally to enhance food safety. Our objective was to identify, assess, and summarize or synthesize the published research investigating the effect of HACCP programs on microbial prevalence and concentration on food animal carcasses in abattoirs through primary processing. The results of microbial testing pre- and post-HACCP implementation were reported in only 19 studies, mostly investigating beef (n=13 studies) and pork (n=8 studies) carcasses. In 12 of 13 studies measuring aerobic bacterial counts, reductions were reported on beef (7/8 studies), pork (3/3), poultry (1/1), and sheep (1/1). Significant (p<0.05) reductions in prevalence of Salmonella spp. were reported in studies on pork (2/3 studies) and poultry carcasses (3/3); no significant reductions were reported on beef carcasses (0/8 studies). These trends were confirmed through meta-analysis of these data; however, powerful meta-analysis was precluded because of an overall scarcity of individual studies and significant heterogeneity across studies. Australia reported extensive national data spanning the period from 4 years prior to HACCP implementation to 4 years post-HACCP, indicating reduction in microbial prevalence and concentration on beef carcasses in abattoirs slaughtering beef for export; however, the effect of abattoir changes initiated independent of HACCP could not be excluded. More primary research and access to relevant proprietary data are needed to properly evaluate HACCP program effectiveness using modeling techniques capable of differentiating the effects of HACCP from other concurrent factors.
BorensteinM, HedgesL, HigginsJ, RothsteinH. Introduction to Meta-Analysis. West Sussex, UK: John Wiley and Sons, Ltd, 2009.
3.
BryantJ, BreretonD, GillC. Implementation of a validated HACCP system for the control of microbiological contamination of pig carcasses at a small abattoir. Can Vet J, 2003; 44:51–55.
4.
CasellaG. An introduction to Empirical Bayes data analysis. Am Stat, 1986; 39:83–87.
5.
CatesSC, AndersonDW, KarnsSA, BrownPA. Traditional versus hazard analysis and critical control point-based inspection: results from a poultry slaughter project. J Food Prot, 2001; 64:826–832.
6.
[CDC-DHHS] Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Department of Health and Human Services. FoodNet facts and figures—number of infections and incidence per 100,000 persons. 2010. www.cdc.gov/foodnet/factsandfigures/AllSites19962008_Incidence.pdf. 2011 January 20(Online.)
DormedyE. Implementation and microbial verification of HACCP (hazard analysis and critical control point) systems and HACCP intervention methods in meat processing establishments for the reduction of foodborne pathogens [dissertation]Lincoln: University of Nebraska, 1999; 99–118.
12.
DuvalS, TweedieR. Trim and fill: a simple funnel-plot-based method of testing and adjusting for publication bias in meta-analysis. Biometrics, 2000; 56:455–463.
13.
FearneA, GarciaM, HensonS, CollinsR, KhatriY, McEvoyJ, NganjeW, le RouxG. Global HACCP Implementation in Meat Producing Countries: Final Report. London, UK: Food Standards Agency, 2004MO1030pdf.www.food.gov.uk/science/research/foodborneillness/meathygieneresearch/m01prog/m01list/m01030/. 2011 January 20(Online.)
14.
GhafirY, ChinaB, KorsakN, DierickK, CollardJM, GodardC, de ZutterL, DaubeG. Belgian surveillance plans to assess changes in Salmonella prevalence in meat at different production stages. J Food Prot, 2005; 68:2269–2277.
15.
GillCO. HACCP by guesswork or by the numbers?Food Qual, 1999; 6:28–32.
16.
[GWADH] Government of Western Australia Department of Health. OzFoodNet (enteric infections) reports. 2010. www.public.health.wa.gov.au/3/605/3/ozfoodnet_enteric_infections_reports.pm. 2011 January 20(Online.)
17.
HigginsJP, ThompsonSG, DeeksJJ, AltmanDG. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. Br Med J, 2003; 327:557–560.
18.
IonnidisJPA, TrikalinosT. The appropriateness of asymmetry tests for publication bias in meta-analyses: a large survey. Can Med Assoc J, 2007; 176:1091–1096.
19.
JevsnikM, HlebecV, RasporP. Meta-analysis as a tool for barrier identification during HACCP implementation to improve food safety. Acta Aliment, 2006; 35:319–353.
LappiVR, ThimotheJ, WalkerJ, BellJ, GallK, MoodyMW, WiedmannM. Impact of intervention strategies on Listeria contamination patterns in crawfish processing plants: a longitudinal study. J Food Prot, 2004; 67:1163–1169.
22.
LupinH, ParinM, ZagarramurdiA. HACCP economics in fish processing plants. Food Control, 2010; 21:1143–1149.
23.
MullnerP, ShadboltT, Collins-EmersonJM, MidwinterAC, SpencerSEF, MarshallJ, CarterPE, CampbellDM, WilsonDJ, HathawayS, PirieR, FrenchNP. Molecular and spatial epidemiology of human campylobacteriosis: source association and genotype-related risk factors. Epidemiol Infect, 2010; 138:1372–1383.
24.
MullnerP, SpencerSEF, WilsonDJ, JonesG, NobleAD, MidwinterAC, Collins-EmersonJM, CarterP, HathawayS, FrenchNP. Assigning the source of human campylobacteriosis in New Zealand: a comparative genetic and epidemiological approach. Inf Gen Evol, 2009; 9:1311–1319.
25.
PatelNJ. Comparison of antibiotic sensitivity profiles, molecular typing patterns, and attribution of Salmonella enterica serotype Newport in the US, 2003–2006. [dissertation]Atlanta, GA: Georgia State University, 2007.
26.
PersaudB, LyonC. Empirical Bayes before-after safety studies: lessons learned from two decades of experience and future directions. Accid Anal Prev, 2007; 39:546–555.
27.
PhillipsD, JordanD, MorrisS, JensonI, SumnerJ. A national survey of the microbiological quality of beef carcasses and frozen boneless beef in Australia. J Food Prot, 2006; 69:1113–1117.
28.
PhillipsD, SumnerJ, AlexanderJF, DuttonKM. Microbiological quality of Australian beef. J Food Prot, 2001; 64:692–696.
29.
Public Health Agency of Canada. Canadian integrated surveillance report: Salmonella, Campylobacter, verotoxigenic E. coli and Shigella, from 2000 to 2004. 2009. www.phac-aspc.gc.ca/publicat/ccdr-rmtc/09vol35/35s3/human-humain-eng.php. 2011 January 20(Online.)
RomansJ, CostelloW, CarlsonCW, GreaserM, JonesK. The meat we eat. Danville, IL: Interstate Publishers, Inc, 1994; 187–211.
32.
RoseBE, HillWE, UmholtzR, RansomGM, JamesWO. Testing for Salmonella in raw meat and poultry products collected at federally inspected establishments in the United States, 1998 through 2000. J Food Prot, 2002; 65:937–947.
33.
SarwariAR, MagderS, LevineP, McNamaraAM, KnowerS, ArmstrongGL, EtzelR, HollingsworthJ, MorrisJG. Serovar distribution of Salmonella isolates from food animals after slaughter differs from that of isolates found in humans. J Infect Dis, 2001; 183:1295–1299.
34.
SchlosserW, HogueA, EbelE, RoseB, UmholtzR, FerrisK, JamesW. Analysis of Salmonella serovars from selected carcasses and raw ground product sampled prior to implementation of the pathogen reduction: Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Point Final Rule in the US. Int J Food Microbiol, 2000; 58:107–111.
35.
Scottish Food Standards Agency. The molecular epidemiology of Scottish Campylobacter isolates from human cases of infection using multilocus sequence Typing. 2009. www.food.gov.uk/multimedia/pdfs/publication/fullreportcamps.pdf. 2011 January 20(Online.)
36.
SumnerJ, PetrenasE, DeanP, DowsettP, WestG, WieringR, RavenG. Microbial contamination on beef and sheep carcasses in South Australia. Int J Food Microbiol, 2003; 81:255–260.
37.
SumnerJ, RavenG, GivneyR. Have changes to meat and poultry food safety regulation in Australia affected the prevalence of Salmonella or of salmonellosis?Int J Food Microbiol, 2004; 92:199–205.
38.
TamplinML, FederI, PalumboSA, OserA, YoderL, LuchanskyJB. Salmonella spp. and Escherichia coli biotype I on swine carcasses processed under the Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Point-based inspection models system. J Food Prot, 2001; 64:1305–1308.
39.
TergneyA, BoltonDJ. Validation studies on an online monitoring system for reducing faecal and microbial contamination on beef carcasses. Food Control, 2006; 17:378–382.
40.
TsolaE, DrosinosEH, ZoiopoulosP. Impact of poultry slaughter house modernisation and updating of food safety management systems on the microbiological quality and safety of products. Food Control, 2008; 19:423–431.
41.
[USDA-FSIS] United States Department of Agriculture, Food Safety and Inspection Service. Baseline data. 1998a. www.fsis.usda.gov/PDF/Baseline_Data_Cattle.pdf; www.fsis.usda.gov/OPHS/baseline/steer1.pdf. 2011 January 20(Online.)
42.
[USDA-FSIS] United States Department of Agriculture, Food Safety and Inspection Service. Baseline data. 1998b. www.fsis.usda.gov/OPHS/baseline/market_hog_1996.pdf; www.fsis.usda.gov/PDF/Baseline_Data_Swine.pdf. 2011 January 20(Online.)
43.
[USDA-FSIS] United States Department of Agriculture, Food Safety and Inspection Service. Baseline data. 2000. www.fsis.usda.gov/OPHS/baseline/broiler1.pdf; www.fsis.usda.gov/PDF/Baseline_Data_Young_Chicken.pdf. 2011 January 20(Online.)
44.
ValentineJ, PigottT, RothsteinH. How many studies do you need. A primer on statistical power for meta-analysis. J Ed Behav Stat, 2010; 35:215–247.
45.
VoetschAC, Van GilderTJ, AnguloFJ, FarleyMM, ShallowS, MarcusR, CieslakPR, DeneenVC, TauxeRV. Emerging Infections Program FoodNet Working Group. FoodNet estimate of the burden of illness caused by nontyphoidal Salmonella infections in the United States. Clin Inf Dis, 2004; 38,Suppl 3:S127–S134.
46.
WaddellL, RajićA, SargeantJ, ParkerS, DeckertA, McEwenS. The methodological soundness of literature reviews addressing three potential zoonotic public health issues. Zoonoses Public Health, 2009; 56:477–489.
47.
WagudeB. HACCP in a red meat abattoir. [dissertation]Praetoria, South Africa: University of Praetoria, 1999; 64–76.
48.
WheelerJG, SethiD, CowdenJM, WallPG, RodriguesLC, TompkinsDS, HudsonMJ, RoderickPJ. Study of infectious intestinal disease in England: rates in the community, presenting to general practice, and reported to national surveillance. The Infectious Intestinal Disease Study Executive. Br Med J, 1999; 318:1046–1050.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
