LocardE. The analysis of dust traces. Part I. Am J Police Sci, 1930; 1(3):276–298.
2.
WhitmoreL, McCauleyM, FarrellJA, et al.nadvertent human genomic bycatch and intentional capture raise beneficial applications and ethical concerns with environmental DNA. Nat Ecol Evol, 2023; In Press; doi: 10.1038/s41559-023-02056-2
3.
ThomsenPF, WillersleyE. Environmental DNA—An emerging tool in conservation for monitoring past and present biodiversity. Biol Conserv, 2015; 183:4–18.
4.
ToothmanMH, KesterKM, ChampagneJ, et al.Characterization of human DNA in environmental samples. Forensic Sci Int, 2008; 178(1):7–15.
5.
SibandaT, SelvarajanR, OgolaHJO, et al.Distribution and comparison of bacterial communities in HVAC systems of two university buildings: Implications for indoor air quality and public health. Environ Monitor Assess, 2021; 193:47; doi: 10.1007/s10661-020-08823-z
6.
BallantyneKN, PoyAL, van OorschotRAH. Environmental DNA monitoring: Beware of the transition to more sensitive typing methodologies. Aust J Forensic Sci, 2013; 45(3):323–340.
7.
DassMA, ShermanCDH, NaiYH, et al.Assessing the use of environmental DNA (eDNA) as a tool in the detection of human DNA in water. J Forensic Sci, 2022; 67(6):2299–2307.
8.
MeikeljohnKA, ScheibleMKR, BoggsLM, et al.Using FastID to analyze complex SNP mixtures from indoor dust. J Forensic Sci, 2023; 68(3):768–779.
