Abstract
Objective:
Ureteroscopic lithotripsy (URSL) is the main method for treating ureteral calculi. The scholars used ureteroscopes with dual channels and access sheath to reduce the local temperature and flushing fluid pressure. This study compares the efficacy and safety of ureteral catheter-assisted URSL (UCA-URSL) and traditional URSL in treating ureteral calculi.
Patients and Methods:
A cross-regional retrospective case–control study in China, including 217 intention-to-treat patients from the First Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University and Tongji Hospital Affiliated to Tongji Medical College of Huazhong University of Science and Technology, from August 2023 to July 2024. The primary outcome was the temperature of the lithotripsy point. The secondary outcomes included stone-free rate (SFR), operation time, hospital stay, and postoperative complications.
Results:
Compared with the traditional URSL group, the catheter-assisted URSL group had a significantly lower lithotripsy point temperature (max, 37.9 ± 2.60°C vs 49.98 ± 5.04°C, p < 0.0001; mean, 32.3 ± 3.25°C vs 38.56 ± 2.70°C, p < 0.0001). In addition, the UCA-URSL group showed higher absolute SFR (immediately, 89.81% vs 53.21%, p < 0.0001; 3 months, 99.07% vs 72.48%, p < 0.0001), and reduced operation time (22.74 ± 7.08 minutes vs 26.40 ± 6.72 minutes, p = 0.0001), postoperative fever rate (1.85% vs 15.60%, p = 0.0003), and ureteral stricture rate (0% vs 3.67%, p = 0.04).
Conclusions:
In treating ureteral calculi, UCA lithotripsy shows better safety than traditional URSL. Catheter-assisted URSL can be used to improve traditional URSL.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
